Theoretical investigation of DFSI with immunity to both Doppler effect and frequency-sweep nonlinearity

Feiteng Zheng, Bin Shao, Shufeng Sun, Wu Zhang, Qinggui Tan, Wei Zhang

Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (11) : 662-667.

Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (11) : 662-667. DOI: 10.1007/s11801-022-2090-x
Article

Theoretical investigation of DFSI with immunity to both Doppler effect and frequency-sweep nonlinearity

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Frequency-swept interferometry (FSI) is a well-known ranging technique, but it suffers from three problems, namely, the Doppler effect, the frequency-sweep nonlinearity, as well as the slow frequency-sweep rate. The first two problems hinder the measurement accuracy, while the third problem limits the measurement rate. In this paper, we present a dynamic FSI (DFSI) that solves these three fundamental problems simultaneously. The DFSI consists of two auxiliary interferometers (AU1 and AU2) and two measurement interferometers (FSI and frequency-fixed interferometry (FFI)). We use FSI to obtain the Doppler and nonlinearity affected ranging signal, AU1 to monitor the frequency-tuning nonlinearity in the frequency-swept laser (FSL), and FFI and AU2 to constitute a laser vibrometer for monitoring the target motion-induced Doppler effect. Then, a novel signal fusion processing technique is applied to reconstruct the real dynamic distance from the above-measured signals. The dynamic ranging error caused by the Doppler effect and frequency-sweep nonlinearity in FSI can be eliminated and the dynamic distance at each sampling point can be obtained. The validity of this method is demonstrated by numerical experiments.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Feiteng Zheng, Bin Shao, Shufeng Sun, Wu Zhang, Qinggui Tan, Wei Zhang. Theoretical investigation of DFSI with immunity to both Doppler effect and frequency-sweep nonlinearity. Optoelectronics Letters, 2022, 18(11): 662‒667 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-022-2090-x

References

[1]
ShangY, LinJ R, YangL H, et al.. Precision improvement in frequency scanning interferometry based on suppression of the magnification effect[J]. Optics express, 2020, 28(4):5822-5834
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
LiuH, ZhangW, ShaoB, et al.. Algorithm of Doppler error suppression in frequency-swept interferometry for the dynamic axial clearance measurement of high-speed rotating machinery[J]. Optics express, 2021, 29(26):42471-42484
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
ShaoB, ZhangW, ZhangP, et al.. Multi-parameter measurement of rotors using the Doppler effect of frequency-swept interferometry[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(24):7178
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
ChenX L, WangX C, PanS L. Accuracy enhanced distance measurement system using double-sideband modulated frequency scanning interferometry[J]. Optical engineering, 2017, 56(3): 036114-036117
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
ChenY, LeiX, XiaoL, et al.. Dynamic distance measurement based on a fast frequency-swept interferometry[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(13):4771
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
DengZ, LiuZ, LiB, et al.. Precision improvement in frequency-scanning interferometry based on suppressing nonlinear optical frequency sweeping[J]. Optical review, 2015, 22(5): 724-730
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
ZhuY, LiuZ G, DengW, et al.. Input signal shaping based on harmonic frequency response function for suppressing nonlinear optical frequency in frequency-scanning interferometry[J]. Review of scientific instruments, 2018, 89(5):053109
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
DengW, LiuZ, DengZ, et al.. Extraction of interference phase in frequency-scanning interferometry based on empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert transform[J]. Applied optics, 2018, 57: 2299-2305
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
JiangS, LiuB, WangH, et al.. Absolute distance measurement using frequency-scanning interferometry based on Hilbert phase subdivision[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(23):5132
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
ZhuY, WangZ, TianK, et al.. Phase-generated carrier combined with the Hilbert transform for phase demodulation in frequency-scanning interferometry[J]. Optics and lasers in engineering, 2022, 153: 106988
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
JiaX Y, LiuZ G, DengZ W, et al.. Dynamic absolute distance measurement by frequency sweeping interferometry based Doppler beat frequency tracking model[J]. Optics communications, 2019, 430: 163-169
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
JiaX, LiuZ, TaoL, et al.. Frequency-scanning interferometry using a time-varying Kalman filter for dynamic tracking measurements[J]. Optics express, 2017, 25(21):25782-25796
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
DengZ, LiuZ, JiaX, et al.. Dynamic cascade-model-based frequency-scanning interferometry for real-time and rapid absolute optical ranging[J]. Optics express, 2019, 27(15):21929-21945
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
LuC, XiangY, GanY, et al.. FSI-based non-cooperative target absolute distance measurement method using PLL correction for the influence of a nonlinear clock[J]. Optics letters, 2018, 43(9):2098-2101
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
ZhangF, YiL, QuX. Simultaneous measurements of velocity and distance via a dual-path FMCW lidar system[J]. Optics communications, 2020, 474: 126066
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
ShaoB, ZhangW, ZhangP, et al.. Dynamic clearance measurement using fiber-optic frequency-swept and frequency-fixed interferometry[J]. IEEE photonics technology letters, 2020, 32(20):1331-1334
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/