A dynamic photoresponse model for a pinned photodiode in CMOS image sensors

Abstract

A novel dynamic photoresponse model for complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) image sensors with pinned photodiode (PPD) structures is proposed. The PPD is regarded as the bonding structure of the two p-n junctions. The transient current equation of the two junctions is calculated by the current-voltage formula of the p-n junction, and the photoresponse curve of the PPD is calculated and drawn by the numerical solution. Simulation results show that the dynamic model successfully restores the entire process of the electron accumulation in the PPD. The difference between the full well capacity (FWC) values which were calculated by the proposed model and the simulation results is less than 5%, which is much smaller than the error of 40% for the traditional model.

References

[1] MarcelotO, GoiffonV, NalletF, et al.. Pinned photodiode CMOS image sensor TCAD simulation: in-depth analysis of in-pixel pinning voltage measurement for a diagnostic tool[J]. IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2017, 64(2):455-462

[2] PriyadarshiniN, SarkarM. A 2erms-temporal noise CMOS image sensor with in-pixel 1/f noise reduction and conversion gain modulation for low light imaging[J]. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems I: regular papers, 2021, 68(1):185-195

[3] RizzoloS, GoiffonV, EstribeauM, et al.. Influence of pixel design on charge transfer performances in CMOS image sensors[J]. IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2018, 65(3):1048-1055

[4] PelamattiA, BelloirJ-M, MessienC, et al.. Temperature dependence and dynamic behavior of full well capacity in pinned photodiode CMOS image sensors[J]. IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2015, 62(4):1200-1207

[5] AlaibakhshH, KaramiM A. A general compact pinned photodiode model capable of miniature PPD modeling[J]. IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2021, 68(6):2785-2790

[6] GaoZ, XuJ, ZhouY, et al.. Analysis and modeling of the light-dependent full well capacity of the 4-T pixel in CMOS image sensors[J]. IEEE sensors journal, 2016, 16(8):2367-2373

[7] KhanU, SarkarM. Dynamic capacitance model of a pinned photodiode in CMOS image sensors[J]. IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2018, 65(7):2892-2898

[8] AlaibakhshH, KaramiM A. Analytical modeling of pinning process in pinned photodiodes[J]. IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2018, 65(10):4362-4368

[9] XiaC, ZhangY, LuX, et al.. Dynamic model of FWC dependent on the energy-level distribution of interface-state traps in pinned photodiodes[J]. IEEE transactions on electron devices, 2021, 68(4):1682-1687

[10] AkshayK, PillaiP R, BhuvanB. Analytical modeling of response time and full well capacity of a pinned photo diode[C], 2018, New York, IEEE: 17805936

[11] ForcinaA, CarboneP. Modelling dark current and hot pixels in imaging sensors[J]. Statistical modelling, 2020, 20(1):30-41

[12] PelamattiA, GoiffonV, EstribeauM, et al.. Estimation and modeling of the full well capacity in pinned photodiode CMOS image sensors[J]. IEEE electron device letters, 2013, 34(7):900-902

[13] BoukhaymaA. Ultra low noise CMOS image sensors[R], 2018, Cham, Switzerland, Springer: 15

[14] ChenC, BenlanS, BingZ, et al.. An improved model for the full well capacity in pinned photodiode CMOS image sensors[J]. IEEE journal of the electron devices society, 2015, 3(4):306-310

[15] EnK, LiuB S, ZhuJ S, et al.. The physics of semicon ductors[M], 2008, 7th ed.Beijing, Publishing House of Electronics Industry: 158-187

[16] NeamenD A. Semiconductor physics and devices basic principles[M], 2010, 3rd ed.Beijing, Publishing House of Electronics Industry: 170-225ZHAO Y Q, YAO S Y, XIE X D, et al, Transl.