Blind restoration of turbulence degraded images based on two-channel alternating minimization algorithm

Huizhen Yang, Songheng Li, Xin Li, Zhiguang Zhang, Haibo Yang, Jinlong Liu

Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 122-128.

Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (2) : 122-128. DOI: 10.1007/s11801-022-1128-4
Article

Blind restoration of turbulence degraded images based on two-channel alternating minimization algorithm

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Due to the atmospheric turbulence and the system noise, images are blurred in the astronomical or space object detection. Wavefront aberrations and system noise make the capability of detecting objects decrease greatly. A two-channel image restoration method based on alternating minimization is proposed to restore the turbulence degraded images. The images at different times are regarded as separate channels, then the object and the point spread function (PSF) are reconstructed in an alternative way. There are two optimization parameters in the algorithm: the object and the PSF. Each optimization step is transformed into a constraint problem by variable splitting and processed by the augmented Lagrangian method. The results of simulation and actual experiment verify that the two-channel image restoration method can always converge rapidly within five iterations, and values of normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) remain below 3% after five iterations. Standard deviation data show that optimized alternating minimization (OAM) has strong stability and adaptability to different turbulent levels and noise levels. Restored images are approximate to the ideal imaging by visual assessment, even though atmospheric turbulence and systemnoise have a strong impact on imaging. Additionally, the method can remove noise effectively during the process of image restoration.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Huizhen Yang, Songheng Li, Xin Li, Zhiguang Zhang, Haibo Yang, Jinlong Liu. Blind restoration of turbulence degraded images based on two-channel alternating minimization algorithm. Optoelectronics Letters, 2022, 18(2): 122‒128 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-022-1128-4

References

[1]
RaoC H, TianY, BaoH. TysonR K. AO-based high resolution image post-processing[M]. Topics in adaptive optics, IntechOpen, 2011, Croatia, Intech: 69-94
[2]
ParkJ, ChoeY, YeomD I. A study on spatial filtering of a speckle image reflected from a scattering medium in a coherent beam combining system[J]. Journal of the Korean physical society, 2021, 78(8):657-661
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
MACKAY C, RAFAEL R L, BRUNO F C, et al. AOLI—adaptive optics lucky imager: diffraction limited imaging in the visible on large ground-based telescopes[EB/OL]. (2012-07-17)[2021-06-30]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4065/.
[4]
KeX Z, CuiN M. Experimental research on phase diversity method for correcting vortex beam distortion wavefront[J]. Applied physics B, 2020, 126(4):1-11
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
MinardiS, HarrisR J, LabadieL. Astrophotonics: astronomy and modern optics[J]. Astronomy and astrophysics review, 2021, 29(1):1-84
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
XiangY Y, LiuZ, JinzY. High resolution solar image reconstruction method[J]. Progress in astronomy, 2016, 34(1):94-110(in Chinese)
[7]
LiuT, YinT T, GuoY N. Research on single-channel blind deconvolution algorithm of single mixed image[C], 2021, Cham, Springer International Publishing: 860-8702
[8]
AyersG R, DaintyJ C. Iterative blind deconvolution method and its applications[J]. Optics letters, 1988, 13(7):547
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
ChenL, YapK H, HeY. Efficient recursive multichannel blind image restoration[J]. EURASIP journal on advances in signal processing, 2007, 2007(1): 1-10
[10]
HajmohammadiS, NooshabadiS, ArcherG E, et al.. Parallel hybrid bispectrum-multi-frame blind deconvolution image reconstruction technique[J]. Journal of realtime image processing, 2019, 16(7):919-929
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
HirschM, HarmelingS, SraS, et al.. Online-multi-frame blind deconvolution with super-resolution and saturation correction[J]. Astronomy and astrophysics, 2011, 531(Pt.2):A9
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
KanaevA, MillerC W. Confidence measures of optical flow for multi-frame image reconstruction[C], 2012, Washington, SPIE: 23-348399
[13]
SroubekF, MilanfarP. Robust multichannel blind deconvolution via fast alternating minimization[J]. IEEE transactions on image processing, 2012, 21(4):1687-1700
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
LiuJ L, YangH Z, LiX, et al.. Error analysis and threshold selection in model-based wavefront sensorless adaptive optics system[J]. Optoelectronics letters, 2020, 16(5):0327-0332
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
LiW, HeY, WangJ, et al.. Quality improvement of adaptive optics retinal images using conditional adversarial networks[J]. Biomedical optics express, 2020, 11(2):831-849
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
RoddierN A. Atmospheric wavefront simulation using Zernike polynomials[J]. Optical engineering, 1990, 29(10):1174-1180
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
YAN J, LI J, FU X. No-reference quality assessment of contrast-distorted images using contrast enhancement[EB/OL]. (2019-04-18)[2021-06-30]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08879/.

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/