Study on photocatalytic activity of MoS2/ZnO composite in visible light

Chun-mei Tang, Hong-yan Zhang, Jun Zhang

Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 446-450.

Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 446-450. DOI: 10.1007/s11801-020-9227-6
Article

Study on photocatalytic activity of MoS2/ZnO composite in visible light

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A series of MoS2/ZnO compound photocatalysts with different mass ratios were successfully prepared by hydrothermal method. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and UV-vis absorption were used to characterize the prepared MoS2/ZnO photocatalysts. It was proved that the combination of MoS2 and ZnO can increase the content of oxygen vacancies on surface of ZnO, thus improving the light absorption capacity in visible light region and reducing the band gap of ZnO. And the photocatalytic performance of ZnO was improved. Experimental results show that the MoS2/ZnO (3 wt%) compound has the highest degradation rate for methylene blue (MB) under visible light, which means that it has the best photocatalytic activity among all the prepared samples.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chun-mei Tang, Hong-yan Zhang, Jun Zhang. Study on photocatalytic activity of MoS2/ZnO composite in visible light. Optoelectronics Letters, 2020, 16(6): 446‒450 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11801-020-9227-6

References

[1]
QiK-z, ChengB, YuJ-g, WingkeiH. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 727: 792
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ganesh PrasadA, Surya PrasadA, SungwonK, Han JooK, Chan HeeP, Cheol SangK. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 682: 208
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
RajeswariR, ManikandanS, ViswanathanA. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2018, 85: 59
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
RajkumarS, Kavi RasuK, VijayarangamuthuK. Materials Letters, 2019, 243: 183
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Suganya JosephineGA, RamachandranS, SivasamyA. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 2015, 19: 549
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
HoW, Yu JimmyC, LinJ, YuJ-g, LiP. Langmuir, 2004, 20: 5865
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
FengW-p, JingA-h, LiJ-h, LiangG-f. Optoelectronics Letters, 2016, 12: 195
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
HuL-w, HuC-h, TianH, ZhangY-x, JingA-h. Optoelectronics Letters, 2014, 10: 81
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
ZhangH-y, YuS-g, BianM-j. Optoelectronics Letters, 2018, 14: 241
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
MeiW, ChenC-s, ChenX, LiuX-y, YangZ, DingF, ChaoZ-s, LiuT-g. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2018, 530: 714
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
SuneelK, VenkatachalamM, JaninaD, VenkataK. Vacuum, 2019, 163: 88
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
KouroshR, MehranehM, RoghayehD, AhmadY. Materials Letters, 2019, 234: 134
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
ShaoL-n, WuZ-f, DuanH-m, ShaymuratT. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2018, 258: 937
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Zhan Shi-baog, TangF-m, LiuJ-k, CheW, SuH, LiuW, HuangY-y, JiangY, YaoT, LiuQ-h, WeiS-q. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2017, 137: 104
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
KrishnanU, KaurM, KaurG, SinghK, Dogra AnkitR, KumarM, KumarA. Materials Research Bulletin, 2019, 111: 212
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
LamouchiA, Ben AssakerI, ChtourouR. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 478: 937
CrossRef Google scholar

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/