Experimental investigation of the CHSH-class inequality and its robustness in noisy environments

Jia-qiang Zhao , Lian-zhen Cao , Yang Yang , Ying-de Li , Huai-xin Lu

Optoelectronics Letters ›› : 318 -320.

PDF
Optoelectronics Letters ›› : 318 -320. DOI: 10.1007/s11801-017-7041-6
Article

Experimental investigation of the CHSH-class inequality and its robustness in noisy environments

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Using the entangled two-photon systems, we experimentally demonstrate the predictions of the analog Clauser-Horne- Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality and investigate the robustness of the CHSH-class inequality in the bit-flip noisy environment. We obtain the experimental results of CHSH inequality and analog CHSH inequality as SCHSH=2.64±0.02 and SanalogCHSH=2.76±0.02, respectively, and prove that the analog CHSH inequality is more robust against bit-flip noise than the CHSH inequality. It provides better advantages for the experimental study and application.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jia-qiang Zhao, Lian-zhen Cao, Yang Yang, Ying-de Li, Huai-xin Lu. Experimental investigation of the CHSH-class inequality and its robustness in noisy environments. Optoelectronics Letters 318-320 DOI:10.1007/s11801-017-7041-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

WisemanH. M., JonesS. J., DohertyA. C.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98: 140402

[2]

CavalcantiE. G., JonesS. J., WisemanH. M., ReidM. D.. Phys. Rev. A, 2009, 80: 032112

[3]

EinsteinA., PodolskyB., RosenN.. Phys. Rev., 1935, 47: 777

[4]

BellJ. S.. Physics, 1964, 1: 195

[5]

AcinA., BrunnerN., GisinN.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98: 230501

[6]

BuhrmanH., CleveR., MassarS., WolfR. D.. Rev. Modern Phys., 2010, 82: 665

[7]

RossetD., BranciardC., BarneaT. J., PutzG., BrunnerN., GisinN.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2016, 116: 010403

[8]

ChuanT. K.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2012, 109: 070501

[9]

ClauserJ. F., HorneM. A., ShimonyA., HoltR. A.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1969, 23: 880

[10]

LuH. X., CaoL. Z., ZhaoJ. Q., LiY. D., WangX. Q.. Sci. Rep., 2014, 4: 4476

[11]

KaniewskiJ.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2016, 117: 070402

[12]

ChavesR., AcínA., AolitaL., CavalcantiD.. Phys. Rev. A, 2014, 89: 042106

[13]

E. G. Cavalcanti, C. J. Foster, M. Fuwa and H. M. Wiseman, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 32, A74 (2015).

[14]

GirdharP., CavalcantiE. G.. Phys. Rev. A, 2016, 94: 032317

[15]

TameM. S., PrevedelR., PaternostroM., BöhiP., KimM. S., ZeilingerA.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98: 140501

[16]

MoehringD. L., MadsenM. J., BlinovB. B., MonroeC.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 93: 090410

[17]

TanjiH., SimonJ., GhoshS., VuleticV.. Physics, 2008,

[18]

AlmeidaM. L., BarrettS. J., TothG., AcinA.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 99: 040403

[19]

ZhaoJ. Q., CaoL. Z., LuH. X., WangX. Q.. Journal of Optoelectronics·Laser, 2014, 25: 1018

[20]

LuH. X., ZhaoJ. Q., CaoL. Z., WangX. Q.. Phys. Rev. A, 2011, 84: 044101

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

63

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/