Experimental investigation of the CHSH-class inequality and its robustness in noisy environments

Jia-qiang Zhao , Lian-zhen Cao , Yang Yang , Ying-de Li , Huai-xin Lu

Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 318 -320.

PDF
Optoelectronics Letters ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) :318 -320. DOI: 10.1007/s11801-017-7041-6
Article
research-article
Experimental investigation of the CHSH-class inequality and its robustness in noisy environments
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Using the entangled two-photon systems, we experimentally demonstrate the predictions of the analog Clauser-Horne- Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality and investigate the robustness of the CHSH-class inequality in the bit-flip noisy environment. We obtain the experimental results of CHSH inequality and analog CHSH inequality as SCHSH=2.64±0.02 and SanalogCHSH=2.76±0.02, respectively, and prove that the analog CHSH inequality is more robust against bit-flip noise than the CHSH inequality. It provides better advantages for the experimental study and application.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jia-qiang Zhao, Lian-zhen Cao, Yang Yang, Ying-de Li, Huai-xin Lu. Experimental investigation of the CHSH-class inequality and its robustness in noisy environments. Optoelectronics Letters, 2017, 13(4): 318-320 DOI:10.1007/s11801-017-7041-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Wiseman H. M., Jones S. J., Doherty A. C.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2007, 98: 140402

[2]

Cavalcanti E. G., Jones S. J., Wiseman H. M., Reid M. D.. Phys. Rev. A. 2009, 80: 032112

[3]

Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N.. Phys. Rev.. 1935, 47: 777

[4]

Bell J. S.. Physics. 1964, 1: 195

[5]

Acin A., Brunner N., Gisin N.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2007, 98: 230501

[6]

Buhrman H., Cleve R., Massar S., Wolf R. D.. Rev. Modern Phys.. 2010, 82: 665

[7]

Rosset D., Branciard C., Barnea T. J., Putz G., Brunner N., Gisin N.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2016, 116: 010403

[8]

Chuan T. K.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2012, 109: 070501

[9]

Clauser J. F., Horne M. A., Shimony A., Holt R. A.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 1969, 23: 880

[10]

Lu H. X., Cao L. Z., Zhao J. Q., Li Y. D., Wang X. Q.. Sci. Rep.. 2014, 4: 4476

[11]

Kaniewski J.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2016, 117: 070402

[12]

Chaves R., Acín A., Aolita L., Cavalcanti D.. Phys. Rev. A. 2014, 89: 042106

[13]

E. G. Cavalcanti, C. J. Foster, M. Fuwa and H. M. Wiseman, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 32, A74 (2015).

[14]

Girdhar P., Cavalcanti E. G.. Phys. Rev. A. 2016, 94: 032317

[15]

Tame M. S., Prevedel R., Paternostro M., Böhi P., Kim M. S., Zeilinger A.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2007, 98: 140501

[16]

Moehring D. L., Madsen M. J., Blinov B. B., Monroe C.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2004, 93: 090410

[17]

Tanji H., Simon J., Ghosh S., Vuletic V.. Physics. 2008

[18]

Almeida M. L., Barrett S. J., Toth G., Acin A.. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2007, 99: 040403

[19]

Zhao J. Q., Cao L. Z., Lu H. X., Wang X. Q.. Journal of Optoelectronics·Laser. 2014, 25: 1018

[20]

Lu H. X., Zhao J. Q., Cao L. Z., Wang X. Q.. Phys. Rev. A. 2011, 84: 044101

PDF

116

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/