A mid-infrared methane detection device based on dual-channel lock-in amplifier

Abstract

A portable dual-channel digital/analogue hybrid lock-in amplifier (LIA) is developed, and its amplitude detection error is less than 10% when the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is larger than −12 dB. Then, a differential mid-infrared methane (CH₄) detection device is experimentally demonstrated based on a wideband incandescence wire-source and a multi-pass spherical reflector. The experiments are carried out to obtain the sensing performance of the device. With the absorption length of only ∼4.8 cm, the limit of detection (LoD) is about 71.43 mg/m³, and the detection range is from 0 mg/m³ to 5.00×10⁴ mg/m³. As the concentration gets larger than 714.30 mg/m³, the relative detection error falls into the range of −5%–+5%. Two seven-hour-measurements are done on the CH₄ samples with concentrations of 1.43×10³ mg/m³ and 4.29×10³ mg/m³, respectively, and the results show that the maximum relative error is less than 5%. Because of the cost effective incandescence wire-source, the small-size and inexpensive dual-channel LIA, and the small-size absorption pool and reflector, the developed device shows potential applications of CH₄ detection in coal mine production and environmental protection.

Keywords

Maximum Relative Error / Detection Device / Absorption Length / Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy / High Concentration Range

References

[1] HuangJ, ZhaiB, YeW, ZhengC, WangY. Journal of Optoelectronics·Laser, 2014, 25: 947

[2] LvR, SongN, SongF, YeW, ZhengC, WangY. Journal of Optoelectronics·Laser, 2013, 24: 1350

[3] ZhangG J, WuX L. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2004, 42: 219

[4] GrosselA, ZéninariV, ParvitteB, JolyL, CourtoisD. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics, 2007, 88: 483

[5] KamatP C, RollerC B, NamjouK, JeffersJ D, FaramarzalianA, SalasR, McCannP J. Applied Optics, 2007, 46: 3969

[6] KanR F, DengF Z, ZhangY J, LiuJ G, LiuC, WangM, GaoS H, ChenJ. Chinese Physics B, 2005, 14: 1904

[7] XiaH, LiuW, ZhangY, KanR, WangM, HeY, CuiY, RuanJ, GengH. Chinese Optics Letters, 2008, 6: 437

[8] LiuJ, TanQ, ZhangW, XueC, GuoT, XiongJ. Measurement, 2011, 44: 823

[9] YeW L, ZhengC T, YuX, ZhaoC X, SongZ W, WangY D. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2011, 155: 37

[10] ZhengC T, YeW L, LiG L, YuX, ZhaoC X, SongZ W, WangY D. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2011, 160: 389

[11] YuX, LvR H, SongF, ZhengC T, WangY D. Spectroscopy Letters, 2014, 47: 30

[12] ZhengC T, YeW L, HuangJ Q, CaoT S, LvM, DangJ M, WangY D. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2014, 190: 249

[13] SonnaillonM O, BonettoF J. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, 76: 024703

[14] FerriG, De LaurentiisP, DiNataleC, D’AmicoA. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2001, 92: 263

[15] MarschnerU, GrtzH, JettkantB, RuwischD, WoldtG, FischerW J, ClasbrummelB. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2009, 156: 145

[16] De MarcellisA, FerriG, Di NataleC, MartinelliE, D’AmicoA. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2012, 12: 1377

[17] D’AmicoA, De MarcellisA, Di CarloC, Di NataleC, FerriG, MartinelliE, PaolesseR, StornelliV. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2010, 144: 400

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.