One Health risk perception among the urban vulnerable dwellers of Gujarat, India: A cross-sectional assessment

Pratiksha Ganasva , Sandul Yasobant , Krupali Patel , Deepak Saxena

One Health Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 181 -188.

PDF (1029KB)
One Health Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) :181 -188. DOI: 10.4103/ohbl.ohbl_7_24
Original Article
research-article
One Health risk perception among the urban vulnerable dwellers of Gujarat, India: A cross-sectional assessment
Author information +
History +
PDF (1029KB)

Abstract

Objective: To assess One Health risk perception and local knowledge concerning threats arising from the interaction of humans, animals, and the environment at the community level with a particular emphasis on zoonotic disease transmission at Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar City, Gujarat, India, where the majority are vegetarians.
Methods: A cross-sectional design with cluster sampling was employed with 387 participants participated in a quantitative survey, comprising 192 livestock handlers and 195 non-livestock handlers. Additionally, 20 in-depth interviews explored qualitative insights. Data were processed using MS Excel and analysed using Stata version 14.
Results: In our study, we observed varied risk perceptions among predominantly female participants. Among livestock handlers, 23.4% acknowledged the potential for zoonotic transmission, while this awareness increased to 41.0% among non-livestock handlers. Although handwashing after animal contact and work was common among livestock handlers, only 20.3% recognized the pivotal role of hygiene in preventing zoonotic diseases. Similarly, 37.0% of livestock handlers and 47.2% of non-livestock handlers understood the risks associated with consuming raw milk and meat, which reveals a statistical difference between these two groups (P=0.000). Another significant difference was observed in the perception on animal waste disposal sites with 58.9% of livestock keepers and 80.0% of non-livestock keepers considering such sites as risky factors (P=0.000). Furthermore, vaccination awareness was high, with 85.4% of livestock handlers and 88.7% of non-livestock handlers being aware of vaccination as a preventive measure against zoonotic diseases. Interestingly, non-livestock individuals demonstrated a higher level of awareness regarding zoonotic diseases compared to their livestock counterparts.
Conclusions: This study emphasizes the urgent need for collaborative One Health interventions to address zoonotic disease risks among livestock handlers in India. By bridging knowledge gaps and promoting proactive measures, we can effectively safeguard public health and well-being in the face of emerging zoonotic threats.

Keywords

Risk perception / Livestock and non-livestock / Awareness / Knowledge / Behaviour

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pratiksha Ganasva, Sandul Yasobant, Krupali Patel, Deepak Saxena. One Health risk perception among the urban vulnerable dwellers of Gujarat, India: A cross-sectional assessment. One Health Bulletin, 2024, 4 (4) : 181-188 DOI:10.4103/ohbl.ohbl_7_24

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Conflict of interest statement

The authors claim there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study receives no extramural funding.

Data availability statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to conception and designing of the manuscript. Crital revision of the manuscript along with supplementing materials for preparing the manuscript throughly was done by Pratiksha G and Sandual Y. The data collection was done by Pratiksha G. The work of completing the manuscript was equally contributed by Pratiksha G along with Sandul Y, Krupali P and Deepak S. All authors agree with the content of the manuscript.

References

[1]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One Health Basics [Online]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/basics/index.html [Accessed on 20 December 2022].

[2]

The Global Governance of Emerging Zoonotic Diseases [Online]. Available from: https://www.cfr.org/report/global-governance-emerging-zoonotic-diseases. [Accessed on 30 May 2023].

[3]

Kumar S, Swain S, Preetha G, Singh B, Aggarwal D. Zoonotic Diseases in India. Indian J Community Med 2020; 45(Suppl 1): S1.

[4]

WHO. One health [Online]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/one-health. [Acceessed on 17 June 2023]

[5]

Aggarwal D, Swain S, Singh BS, Kumar S. Overview of zoonotic diseases in peri-urban areas and introduction to the special issue. Indian J Community Med 2020; 45(Suppl 1): S3-S5.

[6]

Wright A, Thrusfield M. Perceptions of zoonotic and animal diseases in the Van Gujjar community of North India. Prev Vet Med 2016; 123: 143-53.

[7]

Singh BB, Kaur R, Gill GS, Gill JPS, Soni RK, Aulakh RS. Knowledge, attitude and practices relating to zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab, India. Acta Trop 2019; 189: 15-21.

[8]

Prabhakar N, Prabhakar Zn, Sai Es. Awareness regarding zoonotic diseases among the butchers of proddatur. Iranian J Health, Safety Environ 2016; 4(2): 729-737.

[9]

Times of India. Anand: Vigil for zoonoses to start from Ahmedabad, Anand [Online]. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/vigil-for-zoonoses-to-start-from-ahmedabad-anand/articleshow/98718531.cms. [Accessed on 13 June 2023].

[10]

ISO 31000:2018(en). Risk management - Guidelines [Online]. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:31000:ed-2:v1:en. [Accessed on 17 June 2023].

[11]

Slovic P. Perception of Risk. Science 1987; 236(4799): 280-285.

[12]

Ferrer RA, Klein WMP. Risk perceptions and health behavior. Curr Opin Psychol 2015; 5: 85-89.

[13]

Häsler B, Cornelsen L, Bennani H, Rushton J. A review of the metrics for One Health benefits. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique 2014; 33(2): 453-464.

[14]

Population U. Gujarat Population 2024 [Online]. Available from: https://www.populationu.com/in/gujarat-population. [Accessed on April 8 2024].

[15]

Yasobant S, Bruchhausen W, Saxena D, Memon FZ, Falkenberg T. Health system contact and awareness of zoonotic diseases: Can it serve as one health entry point in the urban community of Ahmedabad, India? Yale J Biol Med 2021; 94(2): 259-269.

[16]

Patel K, Saxena D. Self-reported selected zoonotic diseases among animal handlers in Urban Ahmedabad, India. Vet World 2019; 12(1): 176.

[17]

Hundal JS, Sodhi SS, Gupta A, Singh J, Chahal US. Awareness, knowledge, and risks of zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab. Vet World 2016; 9(2): 186.

[18]

Bissong MEA, Lyombe JCN, Asongalem E, Ngamsha RB, Tendongfor N. Zoonotic diseases risk perception and infection prevention and control practices among poultry farmers in the Buea Health District, Cameroon: A one health perspective. Vet World 2022; 15(11): 2744.

[19]

Islam SS, Rumi TB, Kabir SML, Rahman AKMA, Faisal MMH, Islam R, et al. Zoonotic tuberculosis knowledge and practices among cattle handlers in selected districts of Bangladesh. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15(4): e0009394.

[20]

Tsegaye D, Gutema FD, Terefe Y. Zoonotic diseases risk perceptions and protective behaviors of consumers associated with consumption of meat and milk in and around Bishoftu, Ethiopia. Heliyon 2022; 8(8): e10351

[21]

Berge AC, Baars T. Raw milk producers with high levels of hygiene and safety. Epidemiol Infect 2020; 148: e14.

[22]

Hopker A, Pandey N, Dhamorikar A, Hopker S, Gautam P, Pandey S, et al. Delivery and evaluation of participatory education for animal keepers led by veterinarians and para-veterinarians around the Kanha Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. PLoS One 2018; 13(8): e0200999.

[23]

Hopker A, Pandey N, Bartholomew R, Blanton A, Hopker S, Dhamorikar A, et al. Livestock vaccination programme participation among smallholder farmers on the outskirts of National Parks and Tiger Reserves in the Indian states of Madhya Pradesh and Assam. PLoS One 2021; 16(8): e0256684.

PDF (1029KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/