Fecal shedding and transmission of vaccine-derived poliovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gangerdiwala Mariya Yunus , Kanchwala Aliasgar Taher , Khan Adnan Akram , Dudhane Suraj Anil , Haji Sana Anis , Abusufiyan Shaikh

One Health Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 13 -20.

PDF (840KB)
One Health Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :13 -20. DOI: 10.4103/ohbl.ohbl_29_24
Meta-analysis
research-article
Fecal shedding and transmission of vaccine-derived poliovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF (840KB)

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to summarize the emergence and transmission of vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) across various geographies, its impacts, and the developments of immunization techniques and vaccines.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed Prioritization of Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) criteria and was registered with Prospective Systematic Reviews (CRD42023389248). We included clinical studies such as randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case reports and cross-sectional studies accessing the fecal excretion of VDPV. Five independent reviewers selected appropriate and relevant studies from PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar published before January 2023. Statistical analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a random effects model to address heterogeneity (I2), with publication bias evaluated via funnel plots and statistical tests.
Results: Out of the 83 initially identified studies, 9 were included in meta-analysis. Participants who received the first dose of monovalent oral polio vaccine (mOPV) did not show statistically significant fecal shedding compared to those treated with the second dose (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.51-2.03, P=0.47). Individuals who received the novel oral polio vaccine (nOPV) significantly reduce virus fecal shedding after the second dose compared to the first dose (OR: 2.95. 95% CI: 1.39-6.25, P=0.00). Sero-conversion rates do not differ significantly between two doses in participants received mOPV (OR:1.10, 95% CI: 0.60-2.01, P=0.35), meanwhile nOPV exhibit a higher seroconversion rate (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.67, P=0.01).
Conclusions: This study provides the evidence supporting the clinical efficacy and safety of nOPV compared to mOPV.

Keywords

Oral polio vaccine / Fecal shedding / Vaccine derived polio virus / Novel oral polio vaccine (nOPV) / Monovalent oral polio vaccine (mOPV)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Gangerdiwala Mariya Yunus, Kanchwala Aliasgar Taher, Khan Adnan Akram, Dudhane Suraj Anil, Haji Sana Anis, Abusufiyan Shaikh. Fecal shedding and transmission of vaccine-derived poliovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. One Health Bulletin, 2025, 5 (1) : 13-20 DOI:10.4103/ohbl.ohbl_29_24

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study received no extramural funding.

Data availability statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Authors’ contributions

Yunus GM conducted the literature search, collected and analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. Taher KA, Anil DS, and Akarm KA contributed to the study design and provided feedback. Anis HS created the tables and figures and helped draft the manuscript. Shaikh A proposed the research problem, supervised the research process, including tool development and data analysis, and reviewed and approved the final manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

[1]

Saleem AF, Mach O, Yousafzai MT, Khan A, Weldon WC, Oberste MS, et al. Immunogenicity of different routine poliovirus vaccination schedules: A randomized, controlled trial in Karachi, Pakistan. J Infect Dis 2018; 217(3): 443-450.

[2]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vaccine-associated paralytic polio. 2022. [Online] Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/polio/hcp/vaccine-associated-paralytic-polio-faq.html. [Accessed on 10 January 2023].

[3]

Burns CC, Diop OM, Sutter RW, Kew OM. Vaccine-derived polioviruses. J Infect Dis 2014; 210(1): S283-S293.

[4]

Jarvis CI, Altamirano J, Sarnquist C, Edmunds WJ, Maldonado Y. Spatial analyses of oral polio vaccine transmission in an community vaccinated with inactivated polio vaccine. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67(1): S18-S25.

[5]

World Health Organization . Poliomyelitis. 2023. [Online] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/poliomyelitis. [Accessed on 4 November 2023].

[6]

Bigouette JP, Henderson E, Traore MA, Wassilak SGF, Jorba J, Mahoney F, et al. Update on vaccine-derived poliovirus outbreaks - worldwide, January 2020-June 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 70: 1691-1699.

[7]

Aziz AB, Verma H, Jeyaseelan V, Yunus M, Nowrin S, Moore DD, et al. One full or two fractional doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine for catch-up vaccination in older infants: A randomized clinical trial in Bangladesh. J Infect Dis 2022; 226(8): 1319-1326.

[8]

Chu K, Ying Z, Wang L, Hu Y, Xia J, Chen L, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated poliovirus vaccine made from Sabin strains: A phase II, randomized, dose-finding trial. Vaccine 2018; 36(45): 6782-6789.

[9]

Estívariz CF, Watkins MA, Handoko D, Rusipah R, Deshpande J, Rana BJ, et al. A large vaccine-derived poliovirus outbreak on Madura Island-Indonesia, 2005. J Infect Dis 2008; 197(3): 347-354.

[10]

Van Damme P, De Coster I, Bandyopadhyay AS, Revets H, Withanage K, De Smedt P, et al. The safety and immunogenicity of two novel live attenuated monovalent (serotype 2) oral poliovirus vaccines in healthy adults: A double-blind, single-centre phase 1 study. Lancet 2019; 394(10193): 148-158.

[11]

World Health Organization . Poliomyelitis. 2022. [Online] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/poliomyelitis. [Accessed on 10 November 2023].

[12]

Sarnquist C, Holubar M, García-García L, Ferreyra-Reyes L, Delgado-Sánchez G, Cruz-Hervert LP, et al. Protocol paper: Oral poliovirus vaccine transmissibility in communities after cessation of routine oral poliovirus vaccine immunization. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67(1): S120.

[13]

Global Polio Eradication Initiative . Annual Report 2013. [Online] Available from: https://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/GPEI_AR2013_A4_EN.pdf. [Accessed on 11 December 2022].

[14]

Zaman K, Bandyopadhyay AS, Hoque M, Gast C, Yunus M, Jamil KM, et al. Evaluation of the safety, immunogenicity, and faecal shedding of novel oral polio vaccine type 2 in healthy newborn infants in Bangladesh: A randomised, controlled, phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet 2023; 401(10371): 2168-2177.

[15]

De Coster I, Leroux-Roels I, Bandyopadhyay AS, Gast C, Withanage K, Steenackers K, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two novel type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine candidates compared with a monovalent type 2 oral poliovirus vaccine in healthy adults: Two clinical trials. Lancet 2021; 397(10268): 39-50.

[16]

Liang X, Zhang Y, Xu W, Wen N, Zuo S, Lee LA, et al. An Outbreak of poliomyelitis caused by type 1 vaccine-derived poliovirus in China. J Infect Dis 2006; 194(5): 545-551.

[17]

Saleem AF, Mach O, Quadri F, Khan A, Weldon WC, Oberste MS, et al. Immunogenicity of poliovirus vaccines in chronically malnourished infants: A randomized controlled trial in Pakistan. Vaccine 2015; 33(24): 2757-2763.

[18]

Aronson JK. Meyler’s side effects of drugs: The international encyclopedia of adverse drug reactions and interactions. 15th ed. Elsevier: Amsterdam; 2006, p. 2881-2887.

[19]

Capeding MR, Gomez-Go GD, Oberdorfer P, Borja-Tabora C, Bravo L, Carlos J, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a new inactivated polio vaccine made from sabin strains: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2/3 seamless study. J Infect Dis 2022; 226(2): 308-318.

[20]

Kim SH, Lee KY, Jang YS. Mucosal immune system and M cell-targeting strategies for oral mucosal vaccination. Immune Netw 2012; 12(5): 165-175.

[21]

Orenstein W, Offit P, Edwards KM, Plotkin S. Plotkin’s vaccines. 8th ed. Elsevier: Amsterdam; 2023, p. 1397-1431.

[22]

Flaherty DK. Immunology for pharmacy. Mosby: St. Louis, 2012, p. 197-213.

[23]

Taniuchi M, Famulare M, Zaman K, Uddin MJ, Upfill-Brown AM, Ahmed T, et al. Community transmission of type 2 poliovirus after cessation of trivalent oral polio vaccine in Bangladesh: An open-label cluster-randomised trial and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17(10): 1069-1079.

[24]

Macklin GR, Peak C, Eisenhawer M, Kurji F, Mach O, Konz J, et al. Enabling accelerated vaccine roll-out for Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs): Novel oral polio vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) experience. Vaccine 2023; 41(1): A122-A127.

[25]

Global Polio Eradication Initiative . nOPV2 clinical development summary. 2023. [Online] Available from: https://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/EN_nOPV2-Clinical-Development-Summary_Apr-2023.pdf. [Accessed on 12 May 2023].

[26]

Suurmond R, van Rhee H, Hak T. Introduction, comparison and validation of meta-essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2017; 8(4): 537-553.

[27]

Brickley EB, Wieland-Alter W, Connor RI, Ackerman ME, Boesch AW, Arita M, et al. Intestinal immunity to poliovirus following sequential trivalent inactivated polio vaccine/bivalent oral polio vaccine and trivalent inactivated polio vaccine-only immunization schedules: Analysis of an open-label, randomized, controlled trial in chilean infants. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67(1): S42-S50.

[28]

Ferreyra-Reyes L, Cruz-Hervert LP, Troy SB, Huang CH, Sarnquist C, Delgado-Sánchez G, et al. Assessing the individual risk of fecal poliovirus shedding among vaccinated and non-vaccinated subjects following national health weeks in Mexico. PLOS ONE 2017; 12(10): 1-16.

[29]

Gast C, Bandyopadhyay AS, Sáez-Llorens X, De Leon T, DeAntonio R, Jimeno J, et al. Fecal shedding of 2 novel live attenuated oral poliovirus type 2 vaccine candidates by healthy infants administered bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine/inactivated poliovirus vaccine: 2 randomized clinical trials. J Infect Dis 2022; 226(5): 852-861.

[30]

Laassri M, Lottenbach K, Belshe R, Wolff M, Rennels M, Plotkin S, et al. Effect of different vaccination schedules on excretion of oral poliovirus vaccine strains. J Infect Dis 2005; 192(12): 2092-2098.

[31]

Saleem AF, Mach O, Yousafzai MT, Khan A, Weldon WC, Oberste MS, et al. Immunogenicity of different routine poliovirus vaccination schedules: A randomized, controlled trial in Karachi, Pakistan. J Infect Dis 2018; 217(3): 443-450.

[32]

Mirzoev A, Macklin GR, Zhang Y, Mainou BA, Sadykova U, Olsavszky VS, et al. Assessment of serological responses following vaccination campaigns with type 2 novel oral polio vaccine: A population-based study in Tajikistan in 2021. Lancet Glob Health 2022; 10(12): e1807-e1814.

[33]

Platt LR, Estívariz CF, Sutter RW. Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis: A review of the epidemiology and estimation of the global burden. J Infect Dis 2014; 210(1): S380-S389.

[34]

Ochoge M, Futa AC, Umesi A, Affleck L, Kotei L, Daffeh B, et al. Safety of the novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) in infants and young children aged 1 to <5 years and lot-to-lot consistency of the immune response to nOPV2 in infants in The Gambia: A phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2024; 403(10432): 1164-1175.

PDF (840KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/