A genome-integrated CRISPR/Cas12a system enables efficient genetic engineering in Xenorhabdus budapestensis XBD8

Wenfeng Gan , Jiaqi Duan , Changyan Yin , Liwen Zhang , Guangyue Li

New Plant Protection ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : e70044

PDF (1259KB)
New Plant Protection ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) :e70044 DOI: 10.1002/npp2.70044
ORIGINAL PAPER
A genome-integrated CRISPR/Cas12a system enables efficient genetic engineering in Xenorhabdus budapestensis XBD8
Author information +
History +
PDF (1259KB)

Abstract

Xenorhabdus budapestensis strain XBD8, isolated from soil in northeastern China, produces a diverse array of natural products with promising agricultural applications, including fabclavines and GameXPeptides. However, the development and application of this strain have been significantly constrained because conventional genome-editing methods rely on homologous recombination technology, which is inefficient and time-consuming. The CRISPR/Cas technology, derived from the adaptive immune system of prokaryotes, provides a powerful and groundbreaking tool for microbial genome editing. In this study, we developed a CRISPR/Cas12a-based genome-editing approach for XBD8 that enables precise and seamless deletion or replacement of DNA fragments ranging from 379 to 45,168 base pairs, with a success rate exceeding 90%. Using this system, the quorum-sensing regulatory module LuxR/LuxI was introduced into XBD8 to enable dynamic regulation of key biosynthetic genes involved in fabclavines biosynthesis. As a result, the production of fabclavine-8 reached 140.10 mg/L, representing a 1.90-fold increase compared with the wild-type strain.

Keywords

CRISPR/Cas12a / fabclavines / genome editing / LuxR/LuxI / Xenorhabdus budapestensis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wenfeng Gan, Jiaqi Duan, Changyan Yin, Liwen Zhang, Guangyue Li. A genome-integrated CRISPR/Cas12a system enables efficient genetic engineering in Xenorhabdus budapestensis XBD8. New Plant Protection, 2026, 3 (2) : e70044 DOI:10.1002/npp2.70044

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Sicard, M., Ferdy, J. B., Pagès, S., Le Brun, N., Godelle, B., Boemare, N., & Moulia, C. (2004). When mutualists are pathogens: An experimental study of the symbioses between Steinernema (entomopathogenic nematodes) and Xenorhabdus (bacteria). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17(5), 985–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00748.x

[2]

Suzuki, T., Yabusaki, H., & Nishimura, Y. (1996). Phylogenetic relationships of entomopathogenic nematophilic bacteria: Xenorhabdus spp. and Photorhabdus sp. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 36(5), 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.3620360509

[3]

Sicard, M., Brugirard-Ricaud, K., Pagès, S., Lanois, A., Boemare, N. E., Brehélin, M., & Givaudan, A. (2004). Stages of infection during the tripartite interaction between Xenorhabdus nematophila, its nematode vector, and insect hosts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70(11), 6473–6480. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.11.6473-6480.2004

[4]

Chaston, J. M., Murfin, K. E., Heath-Heckman, E. A., & Goodrich-Blair, H. (2013). Previously unrecognized stages of species-specific colonization in the mutualism between Xenorhabdus bacteria and Steinernema nematodes. Cellular Microbiology, 15(9), 1545–1559. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12134

[5]

Bozhüyük, K. A. J., Zhou, Q., Engel, Y., Heinrich, A., Pérez, A., & Bode, H. B. (2017). Natural products from Photorhabdus and other entomopathogenic bacteria. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, 402, 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2016_24

[6]

Dal Peraro, M., & van der Goot, F. G. (2016). Pore-forming toxins: Ancient, but never really out of fashion. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 14(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2015.3

[7]

Lang, G., Kalvelage, T., Peters, A., Wiese, J., & Imhoff, J. F. (2008). Linear and cyclic peptides from the entomopathogenic bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophilus. Journal of Natural Products, 71(6), 1074–1077. https://doi.org/10.1021/np800053n

[8]

Abebew, D., Sayedain, F. S., Bode, E., & Bode, H. B. (2022). Uncovering nematicidal natural products from Xenorhabdus bacteria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 70(2), 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c05454

[9]

Shi, Y. M., Hirschmann, M., Shi, Y. N., Ahmed, S., Abebew, D., Tobias, N. J., Grün, P., Crames, J. J., Pöschel, L., Kuttenlochner, W., Richter, C., Herrmann, J., Müller, R., Thanwisai, A., Pidot, S. J., Stinear, T. P., Groll, M., Kim, Y., & Bode, H. B. (2022). Global analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters reveals conserved and unique natural products in entomopathogenic nematode-symbiotic bacteria. Nature Chemistry, 14(6), 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-00923-2

[10]

Fuchs, S. W., Grundmann, F., Kurz, M., Kaiser, M., & Bode, H. B. (2014). Fabclavines: Bioactive peptide-polyketide-polyamino hybrids from Xenorhabdus. Chembiochem: A European Journal of Chemical Biology, 15(4), 512–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201300802

[11]

Yuan, B., Li, B., Shen, H., Duan, J., Jia, F., Maimaiti, Y., Li, Y., & Li, G. (2023). Identification of fabclavine derivatives, Fcl-7 and Fcl-8, from Xenorhabdus budapestensis as major antifungal natural products against Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 134(9), lxad190. https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxad190

[12]

Duan, J., Yuan, B., Jia, F., Li, X., Chen, C., & Li, G. (2024). Development of an efficient and seamless genetic manipulation method for Xenorhabdus and its application for enhancing the production of fabclavines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 72(1), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c04136

[13]

Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P., & Siksnys, V. (2012). Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(39), E2579–E2586. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208507109

[14]

Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012). A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337(6096), 816–821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829

[15]

Zhang, H., Cheng, Q. X., Liu, A. M., Zhao, G. P., & Wang, J. (2017). A novel and efficient method for bacteria genome editing employing both CRISPR/Cas9 and an antibiotic resistance cassette. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00812

[16]

Fonfara, I., Richter, H., Bratovič, M., Le Rhun, A., & Charpentier, E. (2016). The CRISPR-associated DNA-Cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature, 532(7600), 517–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17945

[17]

Safari, F., Zare, K., Negahdaripour, M., Barekati-Mowahed, M., & Ghasemi, Y. (2019). CRISPR Cpf1 proteins: Structure, function and implications for genome editing. Cell & Bioscience, 9(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-019-0298-7

[18]

Zetsche, B., Gootenberg, J. S., Abudayyeh, O. O., Slaymaker, I. M., Makarova, K. S., Essletzbichler, P., Volz, S. E., Joung, J., van der Oost, J., Regev, A., Koonin, E. V., & Zhang, F. (2015). Cpf1 is a single RNA-Guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell, 163(3), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038

[19]

Ao, X., Yao, Y., Li, T., Yang, T. T., Dong, X., Zheng, Z. T., Chen, G. Q., Wu, Q., & Guo, Y. (2018). A multiplex genome editing method for Escherichia coli based on CRISPR-Cas12a. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 2307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02307

[20]

Abbasi, M. N., Fu, J., Bian, X., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, A. (2020). Recombineering for genetic engineering of natural product biosynthetic pathways. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(7), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.018

[21]

Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Pi, Y., Gu, T., Song, L., Wang, Y., & Ji, Q. (2018). CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and cytidine deaminase-mediated base editing in Pseudomonas species. iScience, 6, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.024

[22]

Li, Z., Karakousis, G., Chiu, S. K., Reddy, G., & Radding, C. M. (1998). The beta protein of phage lambda promotes strand exchange. Journal of Molecular Biology, 276(4), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1572

[23]

Murphy, K. C. (1991). Lambda Gam protein inhibits the helicase and chi-stimulated recombination activities of Escherichia coli RecBCD enzyme. Journal of Bacteriology, 173(18), 5808–5821. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.18.5808-5821.1991

[24]

Li, Y., Lin, Z., Huang, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Tang, Y. J., Chen, T., & Zhao, X. (2015). Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli using CRISPR-Cas9 meditated genome editing. Metabolic Engineering, 31, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.06.006

[25]

Zhao, D., Yuan, S., Xiong, B., Sun, H., Ye, L., Li, J., Zhang, X., & Bi, C. (2016). Development of a fast and easy method for Escherichia coli genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9. Microbial Cell Factories, 15(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0605-5

[26]

Yan, M. Y., Yan, H. Q., Ren, G. X., Zhao, J. P., Guo, X. P., & Sun, Y. C. (2017). CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted recombineering in bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 83(17), e00947. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00947-17

[27]

Li, L., Wei, K., Zheng, G., Liu, X., Chen, S., Jiang, W., & Lu, Y. (2018). CRISPR-Cpf1-assisted multiplex genome editing and transcriptional repression in Streptomyces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 84(18), e00827. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00827-18

[28]

Jiang, Y., Qian, F., Yang, J., Liu, Y., Dong, F., Xu, C., Sun, B., Chen, B., Xu, X., Li, Y., Wang, R., & Yang, S. (2017). CRISPR-Cpf1 assisted genome editing of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Nature Communications, 8(1), 15179. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15179

[29]

Hao, W., Suo, F., Lin, Q., Chen, Q., Zhou, L., Liu, Z., Cui, W., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Design and construction of portable CRISPR-Cpf1-mediated genome editing in Bacillus subtilis 168 oriented toward multiple utilities. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 524676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.524676

[30]

Ungerer, J., & Pakrasi, H. B. (2016). Cpf1 is a versatile tool for CRISPR genome editing across diverse species of cyanobacteria. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 39681. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39681

[31]

Haeusser, D. P., Hoashi, M., Weaver, A., Brown, N., Pan, J., Sawitzke, J. A., Thomason, L. C., Court, D. L., & Margolin, W. (2014). The Kil peptide of bacteriophage λ blocks Escherichia coli cytokinesis via ZipA-dependent inhibition of FtsZ assembly. PLoS Genetics, 10(3), e1004217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004217

[32]

Qin, Y., Jia, F., Zheng, X., Li, X., Duan, J., Li, B., Shen, H., Yang, X., Ren, J., & Li, G. (2023). Enhancing the production of xenocoumacin 1 in Xenorhabdus nematophila CB6 by a combinatorial engineering strategy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 71(23), 8959–8968. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c01793

[33]

Yan, F., Wang, J., Zhang, S., Lu, Z., Li, S., Ji, Z., Song, C., Chen, G., Xu, J., Feng, J., Zhou, X., & Zhou, H. (2023). CRISPR/FnCas12a-mediated efficient multiplex and iterative genome editing in bacterial plant pathogens without donor DNA templates. PLoS Pathogens, 19(1), e1010961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010961

[34]

Xue, C., & Greene, E. C. (2021). DNA repair pathway choices in CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing. Trends in Genetics, 37(7), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.008

[35]

Sharan, S. K., Thomason, L. C., Kuznetsov, S. G., & Court, D. L. (2009). Recombineering: A homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering. Nature Protocols, 4(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.227

[36]

Zhou, Y., Liu, X., Wu, J., Zhao, G., & Wang, J. (2020). CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted genome editing in Amycolatopsis mediterranei. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00698

[37]

Ge, C., Yu, Z., Sheng, H., Shen, X., Sun, X., Zhang, Y., Yan, Y., Wang, J., & Yuan, Q. (2022). Redesigning regulatory components of quorum-sensing system for diverse metabolic control. Nature Communications, 13(1), 2182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29933-x

[38]

Ge, C., Sheng, H., Chen, X., Shen, X., Sun, X., Yan, Y., Wang, J., & Yuan, Q. (2020). Quorum sensing system used as a tool in metabolic engineering. Biotechnology Journal, 15(6), e1900360. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201900360

[39]

Wenski, S. L., Cimen, H., Berghaus, N., Fuchs, S. W., Hazir, S., & Bode, H. B. (2020). Fabclavine diversity in Xenorhabdus bacteria. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 16, 956–965. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.84

[40]

Rill, A., Zhao, L., & Bode, H. B. (2024). Genetic toolbox for Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus: pSEVA based heterologous expression systems and CRISPR/Cpf1 based genome editing for rapid natural product profiling. Microbial Cell Factories, 23(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02363-8

[41]

Westbrook, A. W., Moo-Young, M., & Chou, C. P. (2016). Development of a CRISPR-Cas9 tool kit for comprehensive engineering of Bacillus subtilis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82(16), 4876–4895. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01159-16

[42]

Zetsche, B., Heidenreich, M., Mohanraju, P., Fedorova, I., Kneppers, J., DeGennaro, E. M., Winblad, N., Choudhury, S. R., Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Wu, W. Y., Scott, D. A., Severinov, K., van der Oost, J., & Zhang, F. (2017). Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using a single crRNA array. Nature Biotechnology, 35(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3737

[43]

Choi, S. Y., & Woo, H. M. (2020). CRISPRi-dCas12a: A dCas12a-mediated CRISPR interference for repression of multiple genes and metabolic engineering in cyanobacteria. ACS Synthetic Biology, 9(9), 2351–2361. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00091

[44]

Fleck, N., & Grundner, C. (2021). A Cas12a-based CRISPR interference system for multigene regulation in mycobacteria. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 297(2), 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100990

[45]

Shen, X., Wang, J., Li, C., Yuan, Q., & Yan, Y. (2019). Dynamic gene expression engineering as a tool in pathway engineering. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 59, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.03.019

[46]

Cao, Z., Liu, Z., & Mao, X. (2023). Application of quorum sensing in metabolic engineering. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 71(13), 5062–5074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00176

[47]

Doong, S. J., Gupta, A., & Prather, K. L. J. (2018). Layered dynamic regulation for improving metabolic pathway productivity in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(12), 2964–2969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716920115

[48]

Abisado, R. G., Benomar, S., Klaus, J. R., Dandekar, A. A., & Chandler, J. R. (2018). Bacterial quorum sensing and microbial community interactions. mBio, 9(3), e02331. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02331-17

[49]

Kim, E. M., Woo, H. M., Tian, T., Yilmaz, S., Javidpour, P., Keasling, J. D., & Lee, T. S. (2017). Autonomous control of metabolic state by a quorum sensing (QS)-mediated regulator for bisabolene production in engineered E. coli. Metabolic Engineering, 44, 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.11.004

[50]

Song, J., Zhuang, M., Fang, Y., Hu, X., & Wang, X. (2024). Self-regulated efficient production of L-threonine via an artificial quorum sensing system in engineered Escherichia coli. Microbiological Research, 284, 127720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2024.127720

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). New Plant Protection published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

PDF (1259KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉