Defense heterosis as a novel plant protection strategy: From theory to breeding practice

Kaiqi Xu , Xue Li , Fangfang Li

New Plant Protection ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : e70035

PDF (1651KB)
New Plant Protection ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :e70035 DOI: 10.1002/npp2.70035
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
Defense heterosis as a novel plant protection strategy: From theory to breeding practice
Author information +
History +
PDF (1651KB)

Abstract

Plant diseases cause severe yield losses annually, threatening global food security. Traditional resistance breeding faces challenges such as rapid pathogen evolution and yield-defense trade-offs. Defense heterosis—the phenomenon where F1 hybrids derived from crosses between genetically distinct parental lines exhibit superior disease resistance compared to parents—provides a promising solution. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding defense heterosis, from its conceptual evolution to modern genomic insights. Here, we outline three classical genetic hypotheses (dominance, overdominance, and epistasis) and introduce molecular mechanisms, including differentially expressed genes, epigenetic regulation (DNA methylation, histone modifications), and salicylic acid-mediated coordination of immunity. Case studies across rice, maize, wheat, and potato demonstrate the prevalence and variability of defense heterosis. We highlight that future efforts should utilize multiomics data, genome editing, and microbiome manipulation to predict and deploy defense heterosis. This integrated perspective bridges fundamental research and agricultural applications, offering a roadmap to enhance crop resilience and food security.

Keywords

crop breeding / defense heterosis / disease resistance / genetic mechanisms / hybrid vigor / molecular regulation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kaiqi Xu, Xue Li, Fangfang Li. Defense heterosis as a novel plant protection strategy: From theory to breeding practice. New Plant Protection, 2026, 3 (1) : e70035 DOI:10.1002/npp2.70035

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Zhao, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, X., & Zhou, J. M. (2022). From plant immunity to crop disease resistance. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 49(8), 693-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2022.06.003

[2]

Zang, J., Dong, S., Wang, W., Zhao, J., Chen, X., Guo, H., He, G., He, Z., Kang, Z., Li, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, G., Zhou, X., Wang, Y., & Zhou, J. M. (2019). Plant immunity and sustainable control of pests in China: Advances, opportunities and challenges. SCIENTIA SINICA Vitae, 49(11), 1479-1507. https://doi.org/10.1360/SSV-2019-0176

[3]

Ristaino, J. B., Anderson, P. K., Bebber, D. P., Brauman, K. A., Cunniffe, N. J., Fedoroff, N. V., Finegold, C., Garrett, K. A., Gilligan, C. A., Jones, C. M., Martin, M. D., MacDonald, G. K., Neenan, P., Records, A., Schmale, D. G., Tateosian, L., & Wei, Q. (2021). The persistent threat of emerging plant disease pandemics to global food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(23), e2022239118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022239118

[4]

Yang, L., Liu, P., Wang, X., Jia, A., Ren, D., Tang, Y., Tang, Y., Deng, X. W., & He, G. (2021). A central circadian oscillator confers defense heterosis in hybrids without growth vigor costs. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2317-2331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22268-z

[5]

Cui, L., Song, Y., Zhao, Y., Gao, R., Wang, Y., Lin, Q., Jiang, J., Xie, H., Cai, Q., Zhu, Y., Xie, H., & Zhang, J. (2024). Nei 6 You 7075, a hybrid rice cultivar, exhibits enhanced disease resistance and drought tolerance traits. BMC Plant Biology, 24(1), 1252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05998-2

[6]

Horgan, F. G., Bernal, C. C., Ramal, A. F., Almazan, M. L. P., Mundaca, E. A., & Crisol-Martínez, E. (2024). Heterosis for interactions between insect herbivores and 3-line hybrid rice under low and high soil nitrogen conditions. Insects, 15(6), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15060416

[7]

Hung, H. Y., & Holland, J. B. (2012). Diallel analysis of resistance to fusarium ear rot and fumonisin contamination in maize. Crop Science, 52(5), 2173-2181. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0154

[8]

Lim, S. M. (1975). Heterotic effects of resistance in maize to Helminthosporium maydis race O. Phytopathology, 65(10), 1117-1120. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-65-1117

[9]

Lim, S. M., & White, D. G. (1978). Estimates of heterosis and combining ability for resistance of maize to Colletotrichum graminicola. Phytopathology, 68(1), 1336-1342. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-68-1336

[10]

Sibiya, J., Tongoona, P., & Derera, J. (2012). Combining ability and GGE biplot analyses for resistance to northern leaf blight in tropical and subtropical elite maize inbred lines. Euphytica, 191(2), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0806-x

[11]

Li, A., Liu, D., Wu, J., Zhao, X., Hao, M., Geng, S., Yan, J., Jiang, X., Zhang, L., Wu, J., Yin, L., Zhang, R., Wu, L., Zheng, Y., & Mao, L. (2014). mRNA and small RNA transcriptomes reveal insights into dynamic homoeolog regulation of allopolyploid heterosis in nascent hexaploid wheat. The Plant Cell, 26(5), 1878-1900. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.124388

[12]

Nilsson-Ehle, H. (1909). Kreuzungsuntersuchungen an Hafer und Weizen [Crossing studies on oats and wheat]. H. Ohlssons Buchdr. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/101651738

[13]

Gopal, J. (1998). Heterosis and combining ability analysis for resistance to early blight (Alternaria solani) in potato. Potato Research, 41(4), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358963

[14]

Wang, J., Tian, L., Lee, H.-S., Wei, N. E., Jiang, H., Watson, B., Madlung, A., Osborn, T. C., Doerge, R. W., Comai, L., & Chen, Z. J. (2006). Genomewide nonadditive gene regulation in Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Genetics, 172(1), 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047894

[15]

Sinha, P., Singh, V. K., Saxena, R. K., Kale, S. M., Li, Y., Garg, V., Meifang, T., Khan, A. W., Kim, K. D., Chitikineni, A., Saxena, K. B., Sameer Kumar, C. V., Liu, X., Xu, X., Jackson, S., Powell, W., Nevo, E., Searle, I. R., Lodha, M., & Varshney, R. K. (2020). Genome-wide analysis of epigenetic and transcriptional changes associated with heterosis in pigeonpea. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 18(8), 1697-1710. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13333

[16]

Ma, X., Xing, F., Jia, Q., Zhang, Q., Hu, T., Wu, B., Shao, L., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Q., & Zhou, D. X. (2021). Parental variation in CHG methylation is associated with allelic-specific expression in elite hybrid rice. Plant Physiology, 186(2), 1025-1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab088

[17]

Yang, L., Li, B., Zheng, X. Y., Li, J., Yang, M., Dong, X., He, G., An, C., & Deng, X. W. (2015). Salicylic acid biosynthesis is enhanced and contributes to increased biotrophic pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis hybrids. Nature Communications, 6(1), 7309-7320. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8309

[18]

Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Xu, T., Srivastava, A. K., Wang, D., Zeng, L., Yang, L., He, L., Zhang, H., Zheng, Z., Yang, D. L., Zhao, C., Dong, J., Gong, Z., Liu, R., & Zhu, J. K. (2016). The chromatin remodeler DDM1 promotes hybrid vigor by regulating salicylic acid metabolism. Cell Discovery, 2(1), 16027. https://doi.org/10.1038/celldisc.2016.27

[19]

Tuntasuvan, D., Jarabrum, W., Viseshakul, N., Mohkaew, K., Borisutsuwan, S., Theeraphan, A., & Kongkanjana, N. (2003). Chemotherapy of surra in horses and mules with diminazene aceturate. Veterinary Parasitology, 110(3), 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00304-7

[20]

Kölreuter, J. G. (1761). Prior report on new experiments and observations from plant genera. In der Gleditschischen Handlung. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/123976

[21]

Abbott, S., & Fairbanks, D. J. (2016). Experiments on plant hybrids by Gregor Mendel. Genetics, 204(2), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.195198

[22]

Darwin, C. (1877). The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511694202

[23]

Shull, G. H. (1914). Duplicate genes for capsule-form in Bursa bursa-pastoris. Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre, 12(1), 97-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01837282

[24]

Shull, G. H. (1948). What is “heterosis”. Genetics, 33(5), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/33.5.439

[25]

Gowen, J. W., & Shull, G. H. (1952). Beginnings of the heterosis concept. In Heterosis: A record of researches directed toward explaining and utilizing the vigor of hybrids (pp. 14-48). Iowa State College Press. https://doi.org/10.31274/isudp.1952.35

[26]

Hogg, R. (1880). The Magnum Bonum potato and its raiser. In The journal of horticulture (pp. 484-486). Published for the proprietor. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/55255245

[27]

Vijeth, S., Sreelathakumary, I., Rafeekher, M., & Kaushik, P. (2019). Appraisal of genetics and heterosis of important traits in chilli pepper cultivated under the influence of chilli leaf curl virus disease. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201912.0415.v1

[28]

Qu, X., Wang, X., Liu, B., Chen, M., Ning, J., Liu, H., Liu, G., Xu, X., Zhang, X., Yu, K., Xu, H., Lu, X., & Wang, C. (2023). Potential roles of IFI44 genes in high resistance to Vibrio in hybrids of Argopecten scallops. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 135, 108702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2023.108702

[29]

Lippman, Z. B., & Zamir, D. (2007). Heterosis: Revisiting the magic. Trends in Genetics, 23(2), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2006.12.006

[30]

Bruce, A. B. (1910). The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science, 32(827), 627-628. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.32.827.627.b

[31]

Jones, D. F. (1917). Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 3(4), 310-312. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.3.4.310

[32]

Keeble, F., & Pellew, C. (1910). The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). Journal of Genetics, 1(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981568

[33]

Huang, X., Yang, S., Gong, J., Zhao, Q., Feng, Q., Zhan, Q., Zhao, Y., Li, W., Cheng, B., Xia, J., Chen, N., Huang, T., Zhang, L., Fan, D., Chen, J., Zhou, C., Lu, Y., Weng, Q., & Han, B. (2016). Genomic architecture of heterosis for yield traits in rice. Nature, 537(7622), 629-633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19760

[34]

Wang, B., Hou, M., Shi, J., Ku, L., Song, W., Li, C., Ning, Q., Li, X., Li, C., Zhao, B., Zhang, R., Xu, H., Bai, Z., Xia, Z., Wang, H., Kong, D., Wei, H., Jing, Y., Dai, Z., … Wang, H. (2023). De novo genome assembly and analyses of 12 founder inbred lines provide insights into maize heterosis. Nature Genetics, 55(2), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01283-w

[35]

Hashimoto, S., Wake, T., Nakamura, H., Minamiyama, M., Araki-Nakamura, S., Ohmae-Shinohara, K., Koketsu, E., Okamura, S., Miura, K., Kawaguchi, H., Kasuga, S., & Sazuka, T. (2021). The dominance model for heterosis explains culm length genetics in a hybrid sorghum variety. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 4532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84020-3

[36]

Shull, G. H. (1908). The composition of a field of maize. Journal of Heredity, os-4(1), 296-301. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/os-4.1.296

[37]

East, E. M. (1936). Heterosis. Genetics, 21(4), 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/21.4.375

[38]

Gu, Z., Gong, J., Zhu, Z., Li, Z., Feng, Q., Wang, C., Zhao, Y., Zhan, Q., Zhou, C., Wang, A., Huang, T., Zhang, L., Tian, Q., Fan, D., Lu, Y., Zhao, Q., Huang, X., Yang, S., & Han, B. (2023). Structure and function of rice hybrid genomes reveal genetic basis and optimal performance of heterosis. Nature Genetics, 55(10), 1745-1756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-023-01495-8

[39]

Liu, H., Wang, Q., Chen, M., Ding, Y., Yang, X., Liu, J., Li, X., Zhou, C., Tian, Q., Lu, Y., Fan, D., Shi, J., Zhang, L., Kang, C., Sun, M., Li, F., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, B., … Huang, X. (2020). Genome-wide identification and analysis of heterotic loci in three maize hybrids. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 18(1), 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13186

[40]

LaFountain, A. M., Chen, W., Sun, W., Chen, S., Frank, H. A., Ding, B., & Yuan, Y.-W. (2017). Molecular basis of overdominance at a flower color locus. G3 (Bethesda), 7(12), 3947-3954. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.300336

[41]

Krieger, U., Lippman, Z. B., & Zamir, D. (2010). The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nature Genetics, 42(5), 459-463. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.550

[42]

Singh, R., Low, E.-T. L., Ooi, L. C.-L., Ong-Abdullah, M., Ting, N.-C., Nagappan, J., Nookiah, R., Amiruddin, M. D., Rosli, R., Manaf, M. A. A., Chan, K.-L., Halim, M. A., Azizi, N., Lakey, N., Smith, S. W., Budiman, M. A., Hogan, M., Bacher, B., Van Brunt, A., … Martienssen, R. A. (2013). The oil palm SHELL gene controls oil yield and encodes a homologue of SEEDSTICK. Nature, 500(7462), 340-344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12356

[43]

Xiao, Y., Jiang, S., Cheng, Q., Wang, X., Yan, J., Zhang, R., Qiao, F., Ma, C., Luo, J., Li, W., Liu, H., Yang, W., Song, W., Meng, Y., Warburton, M. L., Zhao, J., Wang, X., & Yan, J. (2021). The genetic mechanism of heterosis utilization in maize improvement. Genome Biology, 22(1), 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02370-7

[44]

Graham, G. I., Wolff, D. W., & Stuber, C. W. (1997). Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Science, 37(5), 1601-1610. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700050033x

[45]

Li, X., Li, X., Fridman, E., Tesso, T. T., & Yu, J. (2015). Dissecting repulsion linkage in the dwarfing gene Dw3 region for sorghum plant height provides insights into heterosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(38), 11823-11828. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509229112

[46]

Zong, Y., Wang, Y., Li, C., Zhang, R., Chen, K., Ran, Y., Qiu, J. L., Wang, D., & Gao, C. (2017). Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion. Nature Biotechnology, 35(5), 438-440. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3811

[47]

Bateson, W. (1907). Facts limiting the theory of heredity. Science, 26(672), 649-660. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.26.672.649

[48]

Minvielle, F. (1987). Dominance is not necessary for heterosis: A two-locus model. Genetical Research, 49(3), 245-247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300027142

[49]

Li, H., Jiang, S., Li, C., Liu, L., Lin, Z., He, H., Deng, X. W., Zhang, Z., & Wang, X. (2019). The hybrid protein interactome contributes to rice heterosis as epistatic effects. The Plant Journal, 102(1), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14616

[50]

Boeven, P. H. G., Zhao, Y., Thorwarth, P., Liu, F., Maurer, H. P., Gils, M., Schachschneider, R., Schacht, J., Ebmeyer, E., Kazman, E., Mirdita, V., Dörnte, J., Kontowski, S., Horbach, R., Cöster, H., Holzapfel, J., Jacobi, A., Ramgraber, L., Reinbrecht, C., … Würschum, T. (2020). Negative dominance and dominance-by-dominance epistatic effects reduce grain-yield heterosis in wide crosses in wheat. Science Advances, 6(24), eaay4897. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay4897

[51]

Sang, Z., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Li, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). Epistasis activation contributes substantially to heterosis in temperate by tropical maize hybrids. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 921608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.921608

[52]

Korte, A., & Farlow, A. (2013). The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: A review. Plant Methods, 9(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-29

[53]

Liu, X., Dong, X., & Luo, J. (2015). Progresses in plant metabolomics using linkage and association mapping strategies. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences, 27(8), 987-994. https://doi.org/10.13376/j.cbls/2015137

[54]

Jia, Z., Xu, J., Ma, Y., Wei, S., Sun, C., Chen, X., Kang, J., Chen, H., Zhang, C., Dong, Y., Tao, J., Guo, X., Lv, H., Tang, G., Jiang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2025). eQTL analysis: A bridge from genome to mechanism. Genes & Diseases, 101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101850

[55]

Huang, Y., Wuchty, S., & Przytycka, T. M. (2013). eQTL epistasis - Challenges and computational approaches. Frontiers in Genetics, 4, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00051

[56]

Swanson-Wagner, R. A., Jia, Y., DeCook, R., Borsuk, L. A., Nettleton, D., & Schnable, P. S. (2006). All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(18), 6805-6810. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510430103

[57]

Hochholdinger, F., & Hoecker, N. (2007). Towards the molecular basis of heterosis. Trends in Plant Science, 12(9), 427-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.08.005

[58]

He, G., Zhu, X., Elling, A. A., Chen, L., Wang, X., Guo, L., Liang, M., He, H., Zhang, H., Chen, F., Qi, Y., Chen, R., & Deng, X.-W. (2010). Global epigenetic and transcriptional trends among two rice subspecies and their reciprocal hybrids. The Plant Cell, 22(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.072041

[59]

Xie, J., Wang, W., Yang, T., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Z., Zhu, X., Li, N., Zhi, L., Ma, X., Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Li, F., Zhao, Y., Jia, X., Zhou, J., Jiang, N., Li, G., Liu, M., … Zhang, H. (2022). Large-scale genomic and transcriptomic profiles of rice hybrids reveal a core mechanism underlying heterosis. Genome Biology, 23(1), 264. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02822-8

[60]

Zhao, Y., Li, T., Liu, D., Yin, H., Wang, L., Lu, S., Yu, H., Sun, X., Zhang, T., & Zhao, Q. (2025). The origin and evolution of cultivated rice and genomic signatures of heterosis for yield traits in super-hybrid rice. BMC Biology, 23(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02255-2

[61]

Guo, M., Rupe, M. A., Yang, X., Crasta, O., Zinselmeier, C., Smith, O. S., & Bowen, B. (2006). Genome-wide transcript analysis of maize hybrids: Allelic additive gene expression and yield heterosis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 113(5), 831-845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0335-x

[62]

Stupar, R. M., & Springer, N. M. (2006). Cis-transcriptional variation in maize inbred lines B73 and Mo17 leads to additive expression patterns in the F1 hybrid. Genetics, 173(4), 2199-2210. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.060699

[63]

Wan, J., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Zhang, X., Guo, Z., Hu, D., Meng, S., Lin, Y., Qiu, X., Mu, L., Ding, D., & Tang, J. (2022). Gene expression variation explains maize seed germination heterosis. BMC Plant Biology, 22(1), 301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03690-x

[64]

Wang, Z., Ni, Z., Wu, H., Nie, X., & Sun, Q. (2006). Heterosis in root development and differential gene expression between hybrids and their parental inbreds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 113(7), 1283-1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0382-3

[65]

Gao, Q., Li, R., Li, C., Duan, F., & Huang, H. (2023). Comprehensive evaluation of rice blast resistance, high yield and good quality of 11 new japonica hybrid rice varieties. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 36(4), 665-672. https://doi.org/10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2023.4.001

[66]

Huang, S., Wang, L., Wang, Q., & Tang, S. (2008). Studies on sheath blight resistance and biological characters of rice variety ZH5 and its filial generations. Hybrid Rice, 23(4), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.16267/j.cnki.1005-3956.2008.04.004

[67]

Henderson, I. R., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2007). Epigenetic inheritance in plants. Nature, 447(7143), 418-424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05917

[68]

Xue, Y., Cao, X., Chen, X., Deng, X., Deng, X. W., Ding, Y., Dong, A., Duan, C. G., Fang, X., Gong, L., Gong, Z., Gu, X., He, C., He, H., He, S., He, X. J., He, Y., He, Y., Jia, G., … Liu, Q. (2025). Epigenetics in the modern era of crop improvements. SCIENTIA SINICA Vitae, 68(6), 1570-1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-024-2784-3

[69]

Nakamura, S., & Hosaka, K. (2010). DNA methylation in diploid inbred lines of potatoes and its possible role in the regulation of heterosis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 120(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1058-6

[70]

Greaves, I. K., Eichten, S. R., Groszmann, M., Wang, A., Ying, H., Peacock, W. J., & Dennis, E. S. (2016). Twenty-four-nucleotide siRNAs produce heritable trans-chromosomal methylation in F1 Arabidopsis hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(44), E6895-E6902. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613623113

[71]

Kawanabe, T., Ishikura, S., Miyaji, N., Sasaki, T., Wu, L. M., Itabashi, E., Takada, S., Shimizu, M., Takasaki-Yasuda, T., Osabe, K., Peacock, W. J., Dennis, E. S., & Fujimoto, R. (2016). Role of DNA methylation in hybrid vigor in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(43), E6704-E6711. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613372113

[72]

Zhang, Q., Wang, D., Lang, Z., He, L., Yang, L., Zeng, L., Li, Y., Zhao, C., Huang, H., Zhang, H., Zhang, H., & Zhu, J. K. (2016). Methylation interactions in Arabidopsis hybrids require RNA-directed DNA methylation and are influenced by genetic variation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(29), E4248-E4256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607851113

[73]

Zhu, W., Hu, B., Becker, C., Dogan, E. S., Berendzen, K. W., Weigel, D., & Liu, C. (2017). Altered chromatin compaction and histone methylation drive non-additive gene expression in an interspecific Arabidopsis hybrid. Genome Biology, 18(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1281-4

[74]

Kakoulidou, I., & Johannes, F. (2024). DNA methylation remodeling in F1 hybrids. The Plant Journal, 118(3), 671-681. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16137

[75]

Fu, C., Ma, C., Zhu, M., Liu, W., Ma, X., Li, J., Liao, Y., Liu, D., Gu, X., Wang, H., & Wang, F. (2023). Transcriptomic and methylomic analyses provide insights into the molecular mechanism and prediction of heterosis in rice. The Plant Journal, 115(1), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16217

[76]

Barber, W. T., Zhang, W., Win, H., Varala, K. K., Dorweiler, J. E., Hudson, M. E., & Moose, S. P. (2012). Repeat associated small RNAs vary among parents and following hybridization in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(26), 10444-10449. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202073109

[77]

He, G., Chen, B., Wang, X., Li, X., Li, J., He, H., Yang, M., Lu, L., Qi, Y., Wang, X., & Deng, X. W. (2013). Conservation and divergence of transcriptomic and epigenomic variation in maize hybrids. Genome Biology, 14(6), R57. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r57

[78]

Shivaprasad, P. V., Dunn, R. M., Santos, B. A., Bassett, A., & Baulcombe, D. C. (2012). Extraordinary transgressive phenotypes of hybrid tomato are influenced by epigenetics and small silencing RNAs. EMBO Journal, 31(2), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.458

[79]

Li, P., Su, T., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Xin, X., Yu, Y., Zhao, X., Yu, S., & Zhang, F. (2021). Genome-wide analysis of changes in miRNA and target gene expression reveals key roles in heterosis for Chinese cabbage biomass. Horticulture Research, 8(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00474-6

[80]

Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Ding, C. H., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, J., Ying, S., Wang, M., Zhang, R., Liu, J., Xie, Y., Tang, T., Diao, H., Ye, L., Zhuang, Y., Teng, W., Zhang, B., Huang, L., Tong, Y., … Zhang, Y. (2023). LHP1-mediated epigenetic buffering of subgenome diversity and defense responses confers genome plasticity and adaptability in allopolyploid wheat. Nature Communications, 14(1), 7538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43178-2

[81]

Groszmann, M., Gonzalez-Bayon, R., Lyons, R. L., Greaves, I. K., Kazan, K., Peacock, W. J., & Dennis, E. S. (2015). Hormone-regulated defense and stress response networks contribute to heterosis in Arabidopsis F1 hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(46), E6397-E6406. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519926112

[82]

Gonzalez-Bayon, R., Shen, Y., Groszmann, M., Zhu, A., Wang, A., Allu, A. D., Dennis, E. S., Peacock, W. J., & Greaves, I. K. (2019). Senescence and defense pathways contribute to heterosis. Plant Physiology, 180(1), 240-252. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.01205

[83]

Ndamukong, I., Abdallat, A. A., Thurow, C., Fode, B., Zander, M., Weigel, R., & Gatz, C. (2007). SA-inducible Arabidopsis glutaredoxin interacts with TGA factors and suppresses JA-responsive PDF1.2 transcription. The Plant Journal, 50(1), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03039.x

[84]

Liu, L., Sonbol, F.-M., Huot, B., Gu, Y., Withers, J., Mwimba, M., Yao, J., He, S. Y., & Dong, X. (2016). Salicylic acid receptors activate jasmonic acid signalling through a non-canonical pathway to promote effector-triggered immunity. Nature Communications, 7(1), 13099-13109. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13099

[85]

Yin, X., Chen, Z., Yu, J., Nie, Y., Yu, M., & Liu, Y. (2014). Identification of regional test for rice resistance to rice false smut and virulence differentiation of Ustilaginoidea virens in Jiangsu Province. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(4), 1459-1465. https://doi.org/10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2014.04.013

[86]

Zhu, Y., Cai, Q., Guan, H., Wei, Y., Chen, L., Xie, H., Chen, Z., & Zhang, J. (2023). Blast resistance improvement of hybrid rice restorer line Fuhui 676 by polygene polymerization. Chinese Science Bulletin, 68(21), 2812-2823. https://doi.org/10.1360/tb-2023-0080

[87]

Duvick, D. N. (2001). Biotechnology in the 1930s: The development of hybrid maize. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2(1), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1038/35047587

[88]

Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(4), 463-493. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9560463

[89]

Gardner, C. O., & Eberhart, S. A. (1966). Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics, 22(3), 439-452. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528181

[90]

Chen, Z. (2013). Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14(7), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3503

[91]

Papikian, A., Liu, W., Gallego-Bartolome, J., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2019). Site-specific manipulation of Arabidopsis loci using CRISPR-Cas9 SunTag systems. Nature Communications, 10(1), 729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08736-7

[92]

Gallego-Bartolome, J., Gardiner, J., Liu, W., Papikian, A., Ghoshal, B., Kuo, H. Y., Zhao, J. M., Segal, D. J., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2018). Targeted DNA demethylation of the Arabidopsis genome using the human TET1 catalytic domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(9), E2125-E2134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716945115

[93]

Dai, R., Zhang, J., Liu, F., Xu, H., Qian, J. M., Cheskis, S., Liu, W., Wang, B., Zhu, H., Pronk, L. J. U., Medema, M. H., de Jonge, R., Pieterse, C. M. J., Levy, A., Schlaeppi, K., & Bai, Y. (2025). Crop root bacterial and viral genomes reveal unexplored species and microbiome patterns. Cell, 188(9), 2521-2539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.02.013

[94]

Wagner, M. R., Tang, C., Salvato, F., Clouse, K. M., Bartlett, A., Vintila, S., Phillips, L., Sermons, S., Hoffmann, M., Balint-Kurti, P. J., & Kleiner, M. (2021). Microbe-dependent heterosis in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(30), e2021965118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021965118

[95]

Tan, X., Wang, D., Zhang, X., Zheng, S., Jia, X., Liu, H., Liu, Z., Yang, H., Dai, H., Chen, X., Qian, Z., Wang, R., Ma, M., Zhang, P., Yu, N., & Wang, E. (2025). A pair of LysM receptors mediates symbiosis and immunity discrimination in Marchantia. Cell, 188(5), 1330-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.12.024

[96]

Chen, Y., Ge, L., Li, Z., Wang, A., Zhou, X., & Li, F. (2024). Targeting of viral RNAs by nonsense-mediated decay is compromised by virus-plant interactions. New Plant Protection, 1, e8. https://doi.org/10.1002/npp2.8

[97]

Liu, J., Gong, P., Lu, R., Lozano-Durán, R., Zhou, X., & Li, F. (2024). Chloroplast immunity: A cornerstone of plant defense. Molecular Plant, 17(5), 686-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2024.03.012

[98]

Ge, L., Zhou, X., & Li, F. (2024). Plant-virus arms race beyond RNA interference. Trends in Plant Science, 29(1), 16-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2023.10.014

[99]

Tang, Z., Shi, S., Du, X., & Xu, G. (2025). Plant defense strategies: The dual armor of disease resistance and tolerance. New Plant Protection, e70022. https://doi.org/10.1002/npp2.70022

[100]

Wang, Y., Mei, Y., & Li, F. (2025). Engineering nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat immune receptors to achieve broad-spectrum disease resistance in plants. New Plant Protection, e70023. https://doi.org/10.1002/npp2.70023

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). New Plant Protection published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

PDF (1651KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/