Use of synthetic communities to study microbial ecology of the gut

Abstract

The application of in vitro synthetic microbial communities is an excellent approach to model the ecological interactions between microbes in the human gastrointestinal tract. Although DNA-based studies have provided a wealth of information, they do not consider the ecological properties of the human gut microbiota. Ecological interactions between gut microbes of interest can be studied by applying synthetic communities. This review describes the considerations that should be taken into account when constructing a synthetic community by discussing example research questions that can be answered by using a synthetic microbial community, the choice of microbial species, the growth conditions, possible reactor setups, and the parameters to analyze.

Keywords

Intestinal microbiome / synthetic microbial communities / in vitro fermentation / complex microbial ecosystem

References

[1] Falony G,Vieira-Silva S.Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation.Science2016;352:560-4

[2] Rothschild D,Barkan E.Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota.Nature2018;555:210-5

[3] Zoetendal EG,De Vos WM.Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria.Appl Environ Microbiol1998;64:3854-9 PMCID:PMC106569

[4] Lozupone CA,Gordon JI,Knight R.Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota.Nature2012;489:220-30 PMCID:PMC3577372

[5] Zhernakova A,Bonder MJ.LifeLines cohort studyPopulation-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity.Science2016;352:565-9 PMCID:PMC5240844

[6] Proctor L.Priorities for the next 10 years of human microbiome research.Nature2019;569:623-5

[7] Hermes GDA,Kootte RS.Individual and cohort-specific gut microbiota patterns associated with tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese males.Sci Rep2020;10:7523 PMCID:PMC7200728

[8] O'Keefe SJ,Lahti L.Fat, fibre and cancer risk in African Americans and rural Africans.Nat Commun2015;6:6342 PMCID:PMC4415091

[9] Salonen A.Impact of diet on human intestinal microbiota and health.Annu Rev Food Sci Technol2014;5:239-62

[10] Elzinga J,de Vos WM.The use of defined microbial communities to model host-microbe interactions in the human gut.Microbiol Mol Biol Rev2019;83:e00054-18 PMCID:PMC6684003

[11] Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome.Nature2012;486:207-14 PMCID:PMC3564958

[12] Auchtung JM,Britton RA.Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs).Microbiome2015;3:42 PMCID:PMC4588258

[13] Reichardt N,Holtrop G.Specific substrate-driven changes in human faecal microbiota composition contrast with functional redundancy in short-chain fatty acid production.ISME J2018;12:610-22 PMCID:PMC5776475

[14] Cheng L,Zhuang H,Zhang X.gutMDisorder: a comprehensive database for dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disorders and interventions.Nucleic Acids Res2020;48:D554-60 PMCID:PMC6943049

[15] Qin J,Raes J.MetaHIT ConsortiumA human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing.Nature2010;464:59-65 PMCID:PMC3779803

[16] Almeida A,Boland M.A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome.Nat Biotechnol2021;39:105-14 PMCID:PMC7801254

[17] Söhngen C,Bunk B.BacDive--the bacterial diversity metadatabase in 2016.Nucleic Acids Res2016;44:D581-5 PMCID:PMC4702946

[18] Clark RL,Stevenson DM.Design of synthetic human gut microbiome assembly and butyrate production.Nat Commun2021;12:3254 PMCID:PMC8166853

[19] Zimmermann J,Waschina S.gapseq: informed prediction of bacterial metabolic pathways and reconstruction of accurate metabolic models.Genome Biol2021;22:81 PMCID:PMC7949252

[20] Beumer R,Rombouts F.Campylobacter jejuni non-culturable coccoid cells.Int J Food Microbiol1992;15:153-63

[21] Müsken A,Greune L.Anaerobic conditions promote expression of Sfp fimbriae and adherence of sorbitol-fermenting enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:NM to human intestinal epithelial cells.Appl Environ Microbiol2008;74:1087-93 PMCID:PMC2258567

[22] Plugge CM.Anoxic media design, preparation, and considerations.Methods Enzymol2005;397:3-16

[23] Shetty SA,Geerlings S,de Vos WM,C . Minimalist approach for deciphering the ecophysiology of human gut microbes. In: Kostopoulos I, editor. Mucin and human milk oligosaccharides utilization: a strategy of Akkermansia muciniphila to ensure survival in the human gut. Wageningen; 2021. p. 131-76.

[24] Johnson AJ,Al-Ghalith GA.Personalized Microbiome Class StudentsDaily sampling reveals personalized diet-microbiome associations in humans.Cell Host Microbe2019;25:789-802.e5

[25] Bibbò S,Giorgio V.The role of diet on gut microbiota composition.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci2016;20:4742-9

[26] Belzer C,Aalvink S.Microbial metabolic networks at the mucus layer lead to diet-independent butyrate and vitamin B₁₂ production by intestinal symbionts.mBio2017;8:e00770-17 PMCID:PMC5605934

[27] Bunesova V,Schwab C.Mucin cross-feeding of infant bifidobacteria and eubacterium hallii.Microb Ecol2018;75:228-38

[28] Yen S,Schroeter K.Metabolomic analysis of human fecal microbiota: a comparison of feces-derived communities and defined mixed communities.J Proteome Res2015;14:1472-82

[29] Drake DR.Continuous-culture chemostat systems and flowcells as methods to investigate microbial interactions. In: Brogden KA, Guthmiller JM, editors. Polymicrobial diseases. Washington: ASM Press; 2002. p. 21-30.

[30] Newton DF,Macfarlane GT.Effects of antibiotics on bacterial species composition and metabolic activities in chemostats containing defined populations of human gut microorganisms.Antimicrob Agents Chemother2013;57:2016-25 PMCID:PMC3632929

[31] O’Donnell MM,Shanahan F.The use of a mini-bioreactor fermentation system as a reproducible, high-throughput ex vivo batch model of the distal colon.Front Microbiol2018;9:1844 PMCID:PMC6096000

[32] Venema K.The TNO in vitro model of the colon (TIM-2). In: Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-expósito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, Requena T, Swiatecka D, Wichers H, editors. The impact of food bioactives on health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 293-304.

[33] Stolaki M,Venema K.Microbial communities in a dynamic in vitro model for the human ileum resemble the human ileal microbiota.FEMS Microbiol Ecol2019;95:fiz096

[34] Barroso E,Peláez C,Requena T.The computer-controlled multicompartmental dynamic model of the gastrointestinal system SIMGI. In: Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-expósito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, Requena T, Swiatecka D, Wichers H, editors. The impact of food bioactives on health. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 319-27.

[35] Taguer M,Maurice CF.Translational activity is uncoupled from nucleic acid content in bacterial cells of the human gut microbiota.Gut Microbes2021;13:1-15 PMCID:PMC8009119

[36] Galazzo G,Benedikter BJ.How to count our microbes?.Front Cell Infect Microbiol2020;10:403 PMCID:PMC7426659

[37] Vrancken G,Huys GRB,Raes J.Synthetic ecology of the human gut microbiota.Nat Rev Microbiol2019;17:754-63

[38] D’hoe K,Faust K.Integrated culturing, modeling and transcriptomics uncovers complex interactions and emergent behavior in a three-species synthetic gut community.Elife2018;7:e37090 PMCID:PMC6237439

[39] McCarty NS.Synthetic biology tools to engineer microbial communities for biotechnology.Trends Biotechnol2019;37:181-97 PMCID:PMC6340809