Designing an assessment tool for integrated evaluation of sustainable fisheries in China
Qi Ding, Xiujuan Shan, Xianshi Jin, Harry Gorfine, Jiting Sun
Designing an assessment tool for integrated evaluation of sustainable fisheries in China
Fisheries are social-ecological systems. Evaluating the sustainability of fisheries requires methods to measure performance from ecological, economic, social, and governance aspects. Whereas a number of multi-dimensional evaluation tools such as fishery performance indicators (FPIs) have been used for assessing fishery management systems, fishery management practices and data availability are likely to differ substantially among fisheries in different countries. This makes it at least somewhat problematic to precisely adapt this methodology to fisheries within a given country. This study constructed a practical tool to evaluate and compare fishery systems in China. On the basis of an established indicator library and the FPIs tool, indicators in the newly developed tool for comprehensive fisheries evaluation were selected according to the management objectives, data availability, and the authority of relevant indicators. The sustainability assessment tool for Chinese fisheries (SAT-fish) provides a three-tier hierarchical framework covering 60 indicators, of which 48 indicators were extracted from the FPIs tool and 12 indicators were associated with policy statements. Applicability and comprehensiveness of this tool in comparison with six other well-established frameworks were investigated. This tool offers a promising new method to assess the sustainability of fishery systems in China, with great potential to guide Chinese fisheries towards a higher level of sustainability.
[1] |
|
[2] |
Anderson JL, Anderson CM, Chu J, Meredith J (2016) Fishery performance indicators manual (Version 1.3). http://isfs.institute.ifas.ufl.edu/projects/new-metrics/fpi-manual.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
Bucaram SJ (2016) Baseline assessment eastern Pacific Ocean tuna fisheries using the fisheries performance indicator methodology. Report prepared for the World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/common_oceans/docs/EPO_FPI%20_report.pdf
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
Chu J, Anderson JL, Anderson CM (2012) Evaluation of new fishery performance indicators (FPIs): a case study of the blue swimming crab fisheries in Indonesia and Philippines. ARD 52, The World Bank Group, Washington, D.C. (100 pp). https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1524330/evaluation-of-new-fishery-performance-indicators-fpis/2210282/
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
Fisheries Bureau of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs China Fisheries Statistical Yearbook 2023, 2023 Beijing China Agricultural Press
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
Gentner B, Arocha F, Anderson C, Flett K, Obregon P, van Anrooy R (2018) Fishery performance indicator studies for the commercial and recreational pelagic fleets of the Dominican Republic and Grenada. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No.1162, Rome.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
Hobday AJ, Hartog JR, Ogier E, Thomas L, Fleming A, Hornborg S (2019). Healthcheck Phase 2, FRDC Project 2016/060. Available at: FRDC. https://www.frdc.com.au/project/2016-060
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (2021) The 14th Five-year Plan for National Fishery Development. http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/YYJ/202201/t20220106_6386439.htm (accessed 1 March 2023).
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |