Condition-dependent resource allocation strategy governed by CodY regulator in Bacillus subtilis

Abstract

To thrive in nature, bacteria have to rapidly proliferate in favorable conditions while constantly adapt to the fluctuating nutrient environments. However, the molecular players that ensure rapid growth of bacteria in favorable conditions remain poorly understood. Here, we focus on the growth physiology of Bacillus subtilis and find that codY knockout strongly compromises cell growth in rich medium. Global proteome allocation analysis has shown that codY knockout causes a “waste” of cellular resources by stimulating unnecessary expression of many proteins, further reducing the cellular investment on translation machinery. Therefore, CodY-dependent repression is crucial in ensuring rapid growth of B. subtilis in rich medium. On the other hand, the relief of CodY-dependent repression could promote the bacterial adaption during transition from rich medium to minimal medium by shifting resource allocation from ribosome synthesis to amino acid biosynthesis. In addition, the relief of CodY-dependent repression in minimal medium also stimulates pathways of alternative functions such as motility and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Our study has thus revealed the pivotal role of CodY in bacterial growth control via governing the condition-dependent resource allocation of B. subtilis, further shedding light on the fundamental molecular strategy of bacteria to achieve fitness maximization.

Keywords

Bacillus subtilis / bacterial adaptation / CodY / growth control / resource allocation

References

[1] Basan M, Honda T, Christodoulou D, Hörl M, Chang YF, Leoncini E, et al. A universal trade-off between growth and lag in fluctuating environments. Nature. 2020; 584: 470–474.

[2] Biselli E, Schink SJ, Gerland U. Slower growth of Escherichia coli leads to longer survival In carbon starvation due to a decrease in the maintenance rate. Mol Syst Biol. 2020; 16:e9478.

[3] Abram F, Arcari T, Guerreiro D, O'Byrne CP. Evolutionary trade-offs between growth and survival: the delicate balance between reproductive success and longevity in bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol. 2021; 79: 133–162.

[4] Zhu M, Dai X. Stringent response ensures the timely adaptation of bacterial growth to nutrient downshift. Nat Commun. 2023; 14: 467.

[5] Zhu M, Wang Q, Mu H, Han F, Wang Y, Dai X. A fitness trade-off between growth and survival governed by Spo0A-mediated proteome allocation constraints in Bacillus subtilis. Sci Adv. 2023; 9:eadg9733.

[6] Battesti A, Majdalani N, Gottesman S. The RpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011; 65: 189–213.

[7] Hengge R. Stationary-Phase gene regulation in Escherichia coli. EcoSal Plus. 2011; 4:ecosalplus.5.6.3.

[8] Hecker M, Pané-Farré J, Uwe V. SigB-Dependent general stress response in Bacillus subtilis and related Gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2007; 61: 215–236.

[9] Jørgensen BB, Boetius A. Feast and famine–microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007; 5: 770–781.

[10] Holscher HD. The gut microbiome in feast and famine. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 18: 749–750.

[11] Conway T, Krogfelt KA, Cohen PS. The life of commensal Escherichia coli in the mammalian intestine. EcoSal Plus. 2004; 1:ecosalplus.8.3.1.2.

[12] Wu C, Mori M, Abele M, Banaei-Esfahani A, Zhang Z, Okano H, et al. Enzyme expression kinetics by Escherichia coli during transition from rich to minimal media depends on proteome reserves. Nat Microbiol. 2023; 8: 347–359.

[13] Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006; 57: 233–266.

[14] Levy A, Salas Gonzalez I, Mittelviefhaus M, Clingenpeel S, Herrera Paredes S, Miao J, et al. Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants. Nature Genet. 2017; 50: 138–150.

[15] Taheri-Araghi S, Bradde S, Sauls JT, Hill NS, Levin PA, Paulsson J, et al. Cell-size control and homeostasis in bacteria. Curr Biol. 2015; 25: 385–391.

[16] Dai X, Zhu M. Coupling of ribosome synthesis and translational capacity with cell growth. Trends Biochem Sci. 2020; 45: 681–692.

[17] Scott M, Klumpp S, Mateescu EM, Hwa T. Emergence of robust growth laws from optimal regulation of ribosome synthesis. Mol Syst Biol. 2014; 10: 747.

[18] Belliveau NM, Chure G, Hueschen CL, Garcia HG, Kondev J, Fisher DS, et al. Fundamental limits on the rate of bacterial growth and their influence on proteomic composition. Cell Syst. 2021; 12: 924–944.e2.

[19] Scott M, Hwa T. Shaping bacterial gene expression by physiological and proteome allocation constraints. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022; 21: 327–342.

[20] Wu C, Balakrishnan R, Braniff N, Mori M, Manzanarez G, Zhang Z, et al. Cellular perception of growth rate and the mechanistic origin of bacterial growth law. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022; 119:e2201585119.

[21] Kostinski S, Reuveni S. Ribosome composition maximizes cellular growth rates in E. coli. Phys Rev Lett. 2020; 125:028103.

[22] Hu XP, Dourado H, Schubert P, Lercher MJ. The protein translation machinery is expressed for maximal efficiency in Escherichia coli. Nat Commun. 2020; 11: 5260.

[23] Bosdriesz E, Molenaar D, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ. How fast-growing bacteria robustly tune their ribosome concentration to approximate growth-rate maximization. FEBS J. 2015; 282: 2029–2044.

[24] Liao C, Blanchard AE, Lu T. An integrative circuit-host modelling framework for predicting synthetic gene network behaviours. Nat Microbiol. 2017; 2: 1658–1666.

[25] Zhu J, Chu P, Fu X. Unbalanced response to growth variations reshapes the cell fate decision landscape. Nat Chem Biol. 2023; 19: 1097–1104.

[26] Sonenshein AL. CodY, a global regulator of stationary phase and virulence in Gram-positive bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005; 8: 203–207.

[27] Sonenshein AL. Control of key metabolic intersections in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007; 5: 917–927.

[28] Handke LD, Shivers RP, Sonenshein AL. Interaction of Bacillus subtilis CodY with GTP. J Bacteriol. 2008; 190: 798–806.

[29] Villapakkam AC, Handke LD, Belitsky BR, Levdikov VM, Wilkinson AJ, Sonenshein AL. Genetic and biochemical analysis of the interaction of Bacillus subtilis CodY with branched-chain amino acids. J Bacteriol. 2009; 191: 6865–6876.

[30] Belitsky BR, Sonenshein AL. Genome-wide identification of Bacillus subtilis CodY-binding sites at single-nucleotide resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 7026–7031.

[31] Brinsmade SR, Alexander EL, Livny J, Stettner AI, Segrè D, Rhee KY, et al. Hierarchical expression of genes controlled by the Bacillus subtilis global regulatory protein CodY. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111: 8227–8232.

[32] Scott M, Gunderson CW, Mateescu EM, Zhang Z, Hwa T. Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science. 2010; 330: 1099–1102.

[33] Sauls JT, Cox SE, Do Q, Castillo V, Ghulam-Jelani Z, Jun S. Control of Bacillus subtilis replication initiation during physiological transitions and perturbations. mBio. 2019; 10:e02205-19.

[34] Zheng H, Bai Y, Jiang M, Tokuyasu TA, Huang X, Zhong F, et al. General quantitative relations linking cell growth and the cell cycle in Escherichia coli. Nat Microbiol. 2020; 5: 995–1001.

[35] Liebermeister W, Noor E, Flamholz A, Davidi D, Bernhardt J, Milo R. Visual account of protein investment in cellular functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014; 111: 8488–8493.

[36] Brinsmade SR, Kleijn RJ, Sauer U, Sonenshein AL. Regulation of CodY activity through modulation of intracellular branched-chain amino acid pools. J Bacteriol. 2010; 192: 6357–6368.

[37] Brinsmade SR. CodY, a master integrator of metabolism and virulence in Gram-positive bacteria. Curr Genet. 2017; 63: 417–425.

[38] Krásný L, Gourse RL. An alternative strategy for bacterial ribosome synthesis: Bacillus subtilis rRNA transcription regulation. EMBO J. 2004; 23: 4473–4483.

[39] Basan M, Hui S, Okano H, Zhang Z, Shen Y, Williamson JR, et al. Overflow metabolism in Escherichia coli results from efficient proteome allocation. Nature. 2015; 528: 99–104.

[40] Wadhwa N, Berg HC. Bacterial motility: machinery and mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022; 20: 161–173.

[41] Colin R, Ni B, Laganenka L, Sourjik V. Multiple functions of flagellar motility and chemotaxis in bacterial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2021; 45:fuab038.

[42] Molle V, Nakaura Y, Shivers RP, Yamaguchi H, Losick R, Fujita Y, et al. Additional targets of the Bacillus subtilis global regulator CodY identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation and genome-wide transcript analysis. J Bacteriol. 2003; 185: 1911–1922.

[43] Bergara F, Ibarra C, Iwamasa J, Patarroyo JC, Aguilera R, Márquez-Magaña LM. CodY is a nutritional repressor of flagellar gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2003; 185: 3118–3126.

[44] Levdikov VM, Blagova E, Young VL, Belitsky BR, Lebedev A, Sonenshein AL, et al. Structure of the branched-chain amino acid and GTP-sensing global regulator, CodY, from Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 2017; 292: 2714–2728.

[45] Ni B, Colin R, Link H, Endres RG, Sourjik V. Growth-rate dependent resource investment in bacterial motile behavior quantitatively follows potential benefit of chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 595–601.

[46] Harwood CR, Mouillon JM, Pohl S, Arnau J. Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018; 42: 721–738.

[47] Balakrishnan R, Cremer J. Conditionally unutilized proteins and their profound effects on growth and adaptation across microbial species. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2023; 75:102366.

[48] Zhu M, Dai X. Shaping of microbial phenotypes by trade-offs. Nat Commun. 2024; 15: 4238.

[49] Belitsky BR, Sonenshein AL. Genetic and biochemical analysis of CodY-binding sites in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2008; 190: 1224–1236.

[50] Ratnayake-Lecamwasam M, Serror P, Wong KW, Sonenshein AL. Bacillus subtilis CodY represses early-stationary-phase genes by sensing GTP levels. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 1093–1103.

[51] Alvi S, Mondelo VD, Boyle J, Buck A, Gejo J, Mason M, et al. Flagellar point mutation causes social aggregation in laboratory-adapted Bacillus subtilis under conditions that promote swimming. J Bacteriol. 2024; 206:e0019924.

[52] Scott M, Hwa T. Bacterial growth laws and their applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011; 22: 559–565.

[53] Hui S, Silverman JM, Chen SS, Erickson DW, Basan M, Wang J, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals a simple strategy of global resource allocation in bacteria. Mol Syst Biol. 2015; 11: 784.

[54] Basan M, Zhu M, Dai X, Warren M, Sévin D, Wang YP, et al. Inflating bacterial cells by increased protein synthesis. Mol Syst Biol. 2015; 11: 836.

[55] Gourse RL, Chen AY, Gopalkrishnan S, Sanchez-Vazquez P, Myers A, Ross W. Transcriptional responses to ppGpp and DksA. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2018; 72: 163–184.

[56] Zhu M, Dai X. Growth suppression by altered (p)ppGpp levels results from non-optimal resource allocation in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: 4684–4693.

[57] Xia L, Wen J. Available strategies for improving the biosynthesis of surfactin: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2023; 43: 1111–1128.

[58] Slamti L, Lereclus D. The oligopeptide ABC-importers are essential communication channels in Gram-positive bacteria. Res Microbiol. 2019; 170: 338–344.

[59] Molle V, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Eichenberger P, González-Pastor JE, Liu JS, et al. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2003; 50: 1683–1701.

[60] Higgins D, Dworkin J. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012; 36: 131–148.

[61] Han A, Kang HR, Son J, Kwon DH, Kim S, Lee WC, et al. The structure of the pleiotropic transcription regulator CodY provides insight into its GTP-sensing mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: gkw775.

[62] Turnbough, Jr. CL. Regulation of bacterial gene expression by transcription attenuation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2019; 83:e00019-19.

[63] Burkholder PR, Giles NH. Induced biochemical mutations in Bacillus subtilis. Am J Bot. 1947; 34: 345–348.

[64] Johnson GE, Lalanne JB, Peters ML, Li GW. Functionally uncoupled transcription-translation in Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 2020; 585: 124–128.

[65] Guérout-Fleury AM, Frandsen N, Stragier P. Plasmids for ectopic integration in Bacillus subtilis. Gene. 1996; 180: 57–61.

[66] Zheng L. An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32: e115.

[67] Härtl B, Wehrl W, Wiegert T, Homuth G, Schumann W. Development of a new integration site within the Bacillus subtilis chromosome and construction of compatible expression cassettes. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183: 2696–2699.

[68] You C, Okano H, Hui S, Zhang Z, Kim M, Gunderson CW, et al. Coordination of bacterial proteome with metabolism by cyclic AMP signalling. Nature. 2013; 500: 301–306.

[69] Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc. 2016; 11: 2301–2319.

[70] Zavřel T, Faizi M, Loureiro C, Poschmann G, Stühler K, Sinetova M, et al. Quantitative insights into the cyanobacterial cell economy. eLife2019; 8:e42508.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). mLife published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.