Mesh-reinforced cruroplasty for type III-IV hiatus hernia repair: a single-center experience using the Patient-Tailored Algorithm

Sara De Bernardi , Alberto Aiolfi , Francesco Cammarata , Michele Manara , Giulia Bonavina , Marta Cavalli , Giampiero Campanelli , Luigi Bonavina , Davide Bona

Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 32

PDF
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :32 DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2025.78
Original Article

Mesh-reinforced cruroplasty for type III-IV hiatus hernia repair: a single-center experience using the Patient-Tailored Algorithm

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: Laparoscopic hiatus hernia (HH) repair with cruroplasty is an effective treatment for symptomatic patients with type III-IV HH. Various techniques have been described for posterior cruroplasty, ranging from simple suture (SS) repair to suture reinforced with mesh. Mesh-buttressed (MB) cruroplasty aims to reduce HH recurrence, but there is no consensus on indications for mesh placement, mesh type, fixation method, or materials. This study aimed to assess the medium-term effectiveness of MB cruroplasty guided by the Patient-Tailored Algorithm (PTA) in laparoscopic repair of type III-IV HH.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study from November 2019 to April 2023, including patients with type III-IV HH. The institutional PTA, based on intraoperative measurable parameters (HH type, hiatus diastasis, pillars trophism, and redo surgery), was utilized to guide the decision-making process. If the PTA score exceeded 5, MB cruroplasty using a 10 × 7 cm keyhole-shaped Phasix-ST mesh was performed. The primary outcome was HH recurrence, defined as a combination of symptoms and anatomical gastric migration > 2 cm above the diaphragm. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. Statistical significance was set at P-value < 0.05.

Results: Seventy-four patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. The median age was 66 years and 69% were female. The median follow-up was 38 months (range 12-98). MB cruroplasty was performed in 37 patients (50%). HH recurrence occurred in 7 patients (9.5%), with a clinical trend toward higher recurrence after SS compared with MB (10.8% vs. 8.1%). Postoperative quality of life, measured with the disease-specific GERD-HRQL, improved significantly compared to baseline (20 vs. 3, P = 0.004). In the MB group, both GERD-HRQL and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scores improved significantly compared to SS (GERD-HRQL: 2 vs. 7, P = 0.048; RSI: 3 vs. 10, P = 0.003). Trends toward improved SF-36 scores and reduced postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were also observed.

Conclusion: MB cruroplasty is associated with favorable medium-term outcomes, including reduced HH recurrence, improved quality of life, and decreased daily postoperative PPI use in patients with type III-IV HH. The PTA provides a simple, reproducible intraoperative strategy for guiding cruroplasty and standardizing surgical decision making in type III-IV HH repair.

Keywords

Minimally invasive hiatus hernia repair / hiatal hernia / mesh reinforcement / cruroplasty / hiatus hernia recurrence

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sara De Bernardi, Alberto Aiolfi, Francesco Cammarata, Michele Manara, Giulia Bonavina, Marta Cavalli, Giampiero Campanelli, Luigi Bonavina, Davide Bona. Mesh-reinforced cruroplasty for type III-IV hiatus hernia repair: a single-center experience using the Patient-Tailored Algorithm. Mini-invasive Surgery, 2025, 9(1): 32 DOI:10.20517/2574-1225.2025.78

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Braghetto I,Musleh M,Lasnibat JP.Thinking about hiatal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic repair: when should it be considered a true recurrence? A different point of view.Int Surg2018;103:105-15

[2]

Dallemagne B,Perretta S,Markiewicz S.Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate.Ann Surg2011;253:291-6

[3]

Oelschlager BK,Hunter JG.Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.J Am Coll Surg2011;213:461-8

[4]

Luketich JD,Christie NA.Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010;139:395-404.e1 PMCID:PMC2813424

[5]

Jones R,Lomelin D,Oleynikov D.Long-term outcomes of radiologic recurrence after paraesophageal hernia repair with mesh.Surg Endosc2015;29:425-30

[6]

Lubezky N,Keidar A.Prosthetic mesh repair of large and recurrent diaphragmatic hernias.Surg Endosc2007;21:737-41

[7]

Zaninotto G,Costantini M.Objective follow-up after laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia. Assessment of safety and durability.World J Surg2007;31:2177-83

[8]

Westcott LZ.Techniques for closing the hiatus: mesh, pledgets and suture techniques.Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg2020;5:16

[9]

Gerdes S, Schoppmann SF, Bonavina L, Boyle N, Müller-Stich BP, Gutschow CA; Hiatus Hernia Delphi Collaborative Group. Management of paraesophageal hiatus hernia: recommendations following a European expert Delphi consensus.Surg Endosc2023;37:4555-65 PMCID:PMC10234895

[10]

Aiolfi A,Sozzi A.Medium-term safety and efficacy profile of paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST® mesh: a single-institution experience.Hernia2022;26:279-86

[11]

Bona D,Asti E.Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia: proposal for standardization using the “critical view” concept.Updates Surg2020;72:555-8

[12]

Aiolfi A,Saino G.Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.Hernia2022;26:619-26

[13]

Daly S,Collings AT.SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias.Surg Endosc2024;38:4765-75

[14]

Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, et al; SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.Surg Endosc2013;27:4409-28

[15]

Lima DL,Pereira X.Hiatal hernia repair with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement: a qualitative systematic review.Surg Endosc2023;37:7425-36

[16]

Belafsky PC,Koufman JA.Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).J Voice2002;16:274-7

[17]

Balla A,Ribichini E.Gastroesophageal reflux disease - health-related quality of life questionnaire: prospective development and validation in Italian.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol2021;33:339-45

[18]

Velanovich V.The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument.Dis Esophagus2007;20:130-4

[19]

Velanovich V.Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.J Gastrointest Surg1998;2:141-5

[20]

Clavien PA,de Oliveira ML.The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.Ann Surg2009;250:187-96

[21]

Granderath FA,Pointner R.Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area.Surg Endosc2007;21:542-8

[22]

Barazanchi AWH,Bhimani N,Smith G.Impact of pre-existing mesh at the hiatus at revisional hiatal hernia surgery.Dis Esophagus2024;37:doae050

[23]

Paranyak M.A prospective randomized trial on laparoscopic total vs partial fundoplication in patients with atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Langenbecks Arch Surg2023;408:269

[24]

Aiolfi A,Saino G.Laparoscopic toupet fundoplication for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: results at medium-term follow-up.World J Surg2020;44:3821-8

[25]

Porta A,Musolino C,Zappa MA.Prospective comparison and quality of life for single-incision and conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a series of morbidly obese patients.Obes Surg2017;27:681-7

[26]

Clapp B,Nguyen-Lee PJ.Does bioabsorbable mesh reduce hiatal hernia recurrence rates? A meta-analysis.Surg Endosc2023;37:2295-303

[27]

Hanna NM,Collings AT.Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc2024;38:2917-38

[28]

Petric J,Liu DS,Watson DI.Sutured versus mesh-augmented hiatus hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Ann Surg2022;275:e45-51

[29]

Latorre-Rodríguez AR,Mittal SK.Cruroplasty with or without mesh? A systematic literature review with a novel time-organized proportion meta-analysis.Surg Endosc2024;38:1685-708

[30]

Aiolfi A,Bonitta G,Bonavina L.Comment on "Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: to mesh or not to mesh".Ann Surg Open2023;4:e304

[31]

Granderath FA,Champion JK.Prosthetic closure of the esophageal hiatus in large hiatal hernia repair and laparoscopic antireflux surgery.Surg Endosc2006;20:367-79

[32]

Aiolfi A, Bona D, Sozzi A, Bonavina L; PROMER Collaborative Group. PROsthetic MEsh Reinforcement in elective minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair (PROMER): an international survey.Updates Surg2024;76:2675-82

[33]

Rajkomar K,Gall L.Laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair with mesh reinforcement versus suture cruroplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia2023;27:849-60

[34]

Memon MA.Hiatal hernia surgery. 1st edition. Springer Cham; 2018.

[35]

Akmaz B,Boerma EG.Hiatal hernia recurrences after laparoscopic surgery: exploring the optimal technique.Surg Endosc2023;37:4431-42

[36]

Hyun JJ.Clinical significance of hiatal hernia.Gut Liver2011;5:267-77 PMCID:PMC3166665

[37]

Redd M,Gutta A.Impact of age on the prevalence of hiatal hernia: 2484.Am J Gastroenterol2015;110:S1028

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

132

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/