Addressing unanswered questions in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: lifetime management, leaflet modification, and cerebral protection
Matteo Sturla , Syed Rizvi , Jacopo Lin , Tadahisa Sugiura
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 24
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has rapidly evolved from a therapy reserved for high-risk surgical candidates to a preferred treatment option across a broad range of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Contemporary randomized trials have demonstrated comparable or superior early outcomes to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), leading to expanded indications in intermediate- and low-risk populations, as well as select patients with bicuspid anatomy. Recent guideline updates, including the 2025 European Society of Cardiology recommendations, unify the age threshold for TAVR to ≥ 70 years in appropriately selected patients and support consideration of early intervention in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis based on emerging evidence. As younger patients increasingly undergo TAVR, several key uncertainties have become central to clinical decision-making. Long-term valve durability beyond the first decade remains insufficiently defined, emphasizing the need for structured lifetime management strategies that account for anticipated reinterventions, prosthesis-patient mismatch, and coronary access preservation. The rise in valve-in-valve and redo-TAVR procedures introduces complex anatomical challenges, including coronary obstruction and sinus sequestration, which has driven the development of advanced leaflet-modification techniques. In parallel, the role of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) remains uncertain, as randomized trials have demonstrated neutral results, leading to ongoing investigation into which patients may benefit and which technologies may offer meaningful protection. This review synthesizes current evidence and unresolved questions in three domains essential to contemporary TAVR practice: lifetime management, leaflet modification strategies, and CEP.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement / lifetime management of aortic stenosis / leaflet modification / cerebral embolic protection
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al.; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.Eur Heart J2022;43:561-632 |
| [4] |
Praz F, Borger MA, Lanz J, et al.; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.Eur Heart J2025;46:4635-736 |
| [5] |
Généreux P, Schwartz A, Oldemeyer JB, et al.; EARLY TAVR Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.N Engl J Med2025;392:217-27 |
| [6] |
Loganath K, Craig NJ, Everett RJ, et al.; EVOLVED investigators. Early intervention in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and myocardial fibrosis: the EVOLVED randomized clinical trial.JAMA2025;333:213-21 PMCID:PMC11519785 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
Jørgensen TH, Thyregod HGH, Savontaus M, et al.; NOTION-2 investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in low-risk tricuspid or bicuspid aortic stenosis: the NOTION-2 trial.Eur Heart J2024;45:3804-14 |
| [10] |
Blankenberg S, Seiffert M, Vonthein R, et al.; DEDICATE-DZHK6 Trial Investigators. Transcatheter or surgical treatment of aortic-valve stenosis.N Engl J Med2024;390:1572-83 |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Makkar RR, Thourani VH, Mack MJ, et al.; PARTNER 2 Investigators. Five-year outcomes of transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement.N Engl J Med2020;382:799-809 |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Leon MB, Mack MJ, Pibarot P, et al.; PARTNER 3 Investigators. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at 7 years.N Engl J Med2026;394:773-83 |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
Watanabe Y, Yamamoto M, Hioki H, et al.; OCEAN-TAVI Investigators. Long-term impact of mild paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the OCEAN-TAVI registry.JACC Cardiovasc Interv2026;19:63-75 |
| [20] |
Badertscher P, Stortecky S, Serban T, et al.; SwissTAVI Investigators. Long-term outcomes of patients requiring pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the SwissTAVI registry.JACC Cardiovasc Interv2025;18:1163-71 |
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Rogers T, Khan JM, Laham R, et al.; TELLTALE Investigators. Electrosurgical leaflet modification to prevent coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failing native and bioprosthetic valves.JACC Cardiovasc Interv2025;18:2355-68 PMCID:PMC12914756 |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
TreSquare Technologies. Available from: https://tresquaretech.com/. [Last accessed on 30 Jun 2026] |
| [38] |
Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Jamal Z, et al.; BHF PROTECT-TAVI Investigators. Routine cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic-valve implantation.N Engl J Med2025;392:2403-12 |
| [39] |
Kapadia SR, Makkar R, Leon M, et al.; PROTECTED TAVR Investigators. Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter aortic-valve replacement.N Engl J Med2022;387:1253-63 |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |