A systematic review of renal mass biopsy: what evidence supports its use (or omission)?

Marissa A. Solorzano , Ibukunoluwa Omole , Sabrina L. Noyes , Mahin Mirza , Alice Semerjian , Craig G. Rogers , Khurshid R. Ghani , Brian R. Lane

Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 29

PDF
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) :29 DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2025.12
Systematic Review

A systematic review of renal mass biopsy: what evidence supports its use (or omission)?

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: Management of clinically localized renal masses ≤ 7 cm (cT1RM) is typically guided by imaging rather than renal mass biopsy (RMB), unlike most other malignancies, where tissue diagnosis precedes treatment decisions. Despite advancements, fewer than 25% of cT1RM patients undergo RMB before surgery or active surveillance (AS). While imaging modalities such as CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound can often identify benign lesions (e.g., Bosniak I-IIF cysts, angiomyolipoma), decisions regarding solid, enhancing masses and Bosniak III-IV cysts frequently proceed without histological confirmation of renal cell carcinoma. This practice may lead to potentially unnecessary or “needless” interventions. AS has emerged as a viable alternative to surgery for renal masses < 3-4 cm, showing low metastatic progression rates comparable to those seen with intervention.

Methods: We systematically reviewed observational studies (retrospective and prospective) due to the absence of randomized controlled trials on RMB for cT1RM.

Results: Reported sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RMB range from 93%-99%, 71%-100%, 97%-100%, and 38%-63%, respectively. Safety data affirm RMB as a low-risk procedure, with minor complications (e.g., bleeding, hematoma) occurring in < 5% of cases and hospital admissions/readmissions in < 3%.

Conclusion: While RMB is accurate, its role in treatment planning remains underexplored. Emerging evidence suggests increased adoption of non-interventional approaches (e.g., AS), with RMB influencing treatment decisions (e.g., avoidance of nephrectomy) in 10%-30% of cases. Future studies should investigate when RMB is warranted, its influence on treatment selection, and its effects on patient-centered outcomes such as decisional conflict and regret.

Keywords

Active surveillance / kidney cancer / renal cell carcinoma / renal mass biopsy / renal tumor biopsy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Marissa A. Solorzano, Ibukunoluwa Omole, Sabrina L. Noyes, Mahin Mirza, Alice Semerjian, Craig G. Rogers, Khurshid R. Ghani, Brian R. Lane. A systematic review of renal mass biopsy: what evidence supports its use (or omission)?. Mini-invasive Surgery, 2025, 9(1): 29 DOI:10.20517/2574-1225.2025.12

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bukavina L,Bray F.Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: 2022 update.Eur Urol2022;82:529-42

[2]

Lim A,Heilbrun ME,Lowrance WT.The contemporary role of renal mass biopsy in the management of small renal tumors.Front Oncol2012;2:106 PMCID:PMC3437570

[3]

Lane BR,Kattan MW.A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy.J Urol2007;178:429-34

[4]

Campbell SC,Chang SS,Souter L.Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA Guideline: part I.J Urol2021;206:199-208

[5]

Ljungberg B,Abu-Ghanem Y.European Association of Urology Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update.Eur Urol2022;82:399-410

[6]

Motzer RJ,Agarwal N.NCCN Guidelines® Insights: kidney cancer, Version 2.2024.J Natl Compr Canc Netw2024;22:4-16

[7]

Frank I,Cheville JC,Weaver AL.Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size.J Urol2003;170:2217-20

[8]

Thompson RH,Kaag M.Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases.J Urol2009;181:2033-6 PMCID:PMC2734327

[9]

Lane BR,Eggener S.Differential use of partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity tumors may explain variability in reported utilization rates.J Urol2013;189:2047-53

[10]

Lebentrau S,Baumunk D.Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm in the context of guideline development: a contribution of healthcare research.World J Urol2017;35:753-9

[11]

Thompson RH,Vickers A.Contemporary use of partial nephrectomy at a tertiary care center in the United States.J Urol2009;181:993-7 PMCID:PMC2724261

[12]

Campbell SC,Karam JA,Clark PE.Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA Guideline: part II.J Urol2021;206:209-18

[13]

Salka BR,Nwachukwu C.Concordance of surgical treatment selection with the AUA guidelines for localized renal masses.Urol Oncol2025;43:394.e23-9

[14]

Moch H,Humphrey PA,Ulbright TM.The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours.Eur Urol2016;70:93-105

[15]

Diaz de Leon A, Davenport MS, Silverman SG, Schieda N, Cadeddu JA, Pedrosa I. Role of virtual biopsy in the management of renal masses.AJR Am J Roentgenol2019;212:1234-43 PMCID:PMC6800762

[16]

Moch H,Berney DM.The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours.Eur Urol2022;82:458-68

[17]

Finelli A,Bro B.Management of small renal masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.J Clin Oncol2017;35:668-80

[18]

Wang Y,Wilder S,Rogers CG.The evolving management of small renal masses.Nat Rev Urol2024;21:406-21

[19]

Hussain S,Ullah N.Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the medical field: a review.Biomed Res Int2022;2022:5164970 PMCID:PMC9192206

[20]

Pedrosa I.How we do it: managing the indeterminate renal mass with the MRI clear cell likelihood score.Radiology2022;302:256-69 PMCID:PMC8805575

[21]

Salles-Silva E,Amorim VB,Parente DB.Clear cell likelihood score may improve diagnosis and management of renal masses.Abdom Radiol2024;49:4494-506

[22]

Wolf JS.Evolving role of renal mass biopsy: myths, facts, and misconceptions. In: Leveillee RJ, Jorda M, editors. Renal mass biopsy. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 1-12.

[23]

Ali SN,Landman J.The changing role of renal mass biopsy.Urol Clin North Am2023;50:217-25

[24]

Lane BR,Herts BR,Novick AC.Renal mass biopsy - a renaissance?.J Urol2008;179:20-7

[25]

Marconi L,Lam TB.Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy.Eur Urol2016;69:660-73

[26]

Patel HD,Pierorazio PM.Diagnostic accuracy and risks of biopsy in the diagnosis of a renal mass suspicious for localized renal cell carcinoma: systematic review of the literature.J Urol2016;195:1340-7 PMCID:PMC5609078

[27]

Iversen P.Aspiration biopsy of the kidney.Am J Med1951;11:324-30

[28]

Leveillee RJ,Nields MW.Renal mass biopsy: simple techniques and optimizing navigational/targeting tools. In: Leveillee RJ, Jorda M, editors. Renal mass biopsy. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 71-102.

[29]

Richard PO,Bhindi B.Canadian Urological Association guideline: management of small renal masses - full-text.Can Urol Assoc J2022;16:E61-75 PMCID:PMC8932428

[30]

Andersen MF.Tumor seeding with renal cell carcinoma after renal biopsy.Urol Case Rep2016;9:43-4 PMCID:PMC5037124

[31]

Volpe A,Geddie WR.Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy.J Urol2007;178:379-86

[32]

Herts BR.Imaging guided biopsies of renal masses.Curr Opin Urol2000;10:105-9

[33]

Mullins JK.Renal cell carcinoma seeding of a percutaneous biopsy tract.Can Urol Assoc J2013;7:E176-9 PMCID:PMC3612408

[34]

Smith EH.Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review.Radiology1991;178:253-8

[35]

Menhadji AD,Okhunov Z.Technique for office-based, ultrasonography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal cortical neoplasms using a novel transducer for facilitated ultrasound targeting.BJU Int2016;117:948-53

[36]

Dave CN,Chennamsetty A.Office-based ultrasound-guided renal core biopsy is safe and efficacious in the management of small renal masses.Urology2017;102:26-30

[37]

Rasmussen LR,Nielsen TK.Short-term complications for percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy of renal masses in adult outpatients.Acta Radiol2018;59:491-6

[38]

Jiang P,Okhunov Z.Multidisciplinary approach and outcomes of pretreatment small (cT1a) renal mass biopsy: single-center experience.J Endourol2022;36:703-11

[39]

Patel RM,Jiang P,Landman J.Office-based renal tumor biopsy: a paradigm change in the management of a small renal mass?.Curr Urol Rep2021;22:43

[40]

Faraj K,Patel K.A retrospective comparative outcomes and cost analysis of office based, ultrasound guided renal mass biopsy performed by urologists and standard hospital biopsies for small renal masses.Urol Pract2018;5:260-5

[41]

Patel RM,Okhunov Z.Pretreatment diagnosis of the small renal mass: status of renal biopsy in the United States of America.J Endourol2018;32:884-90

[42]

Khan AA,Quereshi S,Vandal MT.Percutaneous needle biopsy for indeterminate renal masses: a national survey of UK consultant urologists.BMC Urol2007;7:10 PMCID:PMC1929116

[43]

Jiang P,Peta A.A review of the recommendations and strength of evidence for clinical practice guidelines on the management of small renal masses.J Endourol2023;37:903-13

[44]

Patel HD,Rowe SP,Gorin MA.Surgical histopathology for suspected oncocytoma on renal mass biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJU Int2017;119:661-6

[45]

Abel EJ,Matin SF.Percutaneous biopsy of primary tumor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma to predict high risk pathological features: comparison with nephrectomy assessment.J Urol2010;184:1877-81 PMCID:PMC4809737

[46]

Al Nazer M, Mourad WA. Successful grading of renal-cell carcinoma in fine-needle aspirates.Diagn Cytopathol2000;22:223-6Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(200004)22:4%3C223::AID-DC4%3E3.0.CO;2-B. [Last accessed on 17 Sep 2025]

[47]

Ball MW,Gorin MA.Grade heterogeneity in small renal masses: potential implications for renal mass biopsy.J Urol2015;193:36-40

[48]

Nahouraii LM,Merrill SB,Kaag MG.Histologic heterogeneity of extirpated renal cell carcinoma specimens: implications for renal mass biopsy.J Kidney Cancer VHL2020;7:20-5 PMCID:PMC7478168

[49]

Millet I,Serre I,Thuret R.Can renal biopsy accurately predict histological subtype and Fuhrman grade of renal cell carcinoma?.J Urol2012;188:1690-4

[50]

Blumenfeld AJ,Fuchs GJ.Percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma underestimates nuclear grade.Urology2010;76:610-3

[51]

Johnson DC,Smith AB.Preoperatively misclassified, surgically removed benign renal masses: a systematic review of surgical series and United States population level burden estimate.J Urol2015;193:30-5

[52]

Kim JH,Khandwala Y,Park HK.Association of prevalence of benign pathologic findings after partial nephrectomy with preoperative imaging patterns in the United States from 2007 to 2014.JAMA Surg2019;154:225-31 PMCID:PMC6439638

[53]

Gao H,Zepeda JP.The success rate of small renal mass core needle biopsy and its impact on lowering benign resection rate.BMC Urol2023;23:189 PMCID:PMC10657570

[54]

Patel HD,Su ZT.Renal mass biopsy is associated with reduction in surgery for early-stage kidney cancer.Urology2020;135:76-81

[55]

Patel DN,Meagher MF.Utilization of renal mass biopsy in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study utilizing the National Cancer Database.Urol Oncol2021;39:79.e1-8

[56]

Boynton DN,Van Til M.Renal mass biopsy is associated with fewer radical nephrectomies for benign or indolent disease, particularly for T1b renal masses.Urol Pract2025;12:148-56

[57]

Volpe A,Gill IS.Rationale for percutaneous biopsy and histologic characterisation of renal tumours.Eur Urol2012;62:491-504

[58]

Tong W,Xu Y.The role of percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy in the management of small renal masses without chance of nephron-sparing surgery.Int Urol Nephrol2020;52:2223-8

[59]

Sinks A,Holck H.Renal mass biopsy mandate is associated with change in treatment decisions.J Urol2023;210:72-8

[60]

Srivastava A,Lee J.Renal mass biopsy: a strategy to reduce associated costs and morbidity when managing localized renal masses.Urol Oncol2021;39:790.e9-15

[61]

Chung R,Gillespie A.The utility of renal mass biopsy in shared decision-making for renal mass treatment.Urology2023;178:98-104

[62]

Branger N,Pignot G.Oncocytoma on renal mass biopsy: is it still the same histology when surgery is performed? Results from UroCCR-104 study.World J Urol2023;41:483-9

[63]

Couture F,Breau RH.The increasing use of renal tumor biopsy amongst Canadian urologists: when is biopsy most utilized?.Urol Oncol2021;39:499.e15-22

[64]

Richard PO,Bhatt JR.Renal tumor biopsy for small renal masses: a single-center 13-year experience.Eur Urol2015;68:1007-13

[65]

Wang X,Xu Z.Accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle core biopsy of renal masses: a single center experience in China.Medicine2018;97:e0178 PMCID:PMC5895438

[66]

Ma LX,Mosquera JM.Contemporary results and clinical utility of renal mass biopsies in the setting of ablative therapy: a single center experience.Cancer Treat Res Commun2020;25:100209

[67]

Chen S,Li J.Accuracy, safety, and diagnostic prediction of percutaneous renal mass biopsy and subsequent changes in treatment.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne2024;19:113-21 PMCID:PMC11223527

[68]

Tolouee SA,Berg KD,Fode M.Renal tumor biopsies are associated with a low complication rate.Scand J Urol2018;52:407-10

[69]

Lobo JM,Bitner DP.Does renal mass biopsy influence multidisciplinary treatment recommendations?.Scand J Urol2020;54:27-32

[70]

Kutikov A,Uzzo RG,Bratslavsky G.Renal mass biopsy: always, sometimes, or never?.Eur Urol2016;70:403-6

[71]

Menon AR,Attwood KM.Active surveillance for risk stratification of all small renal masses lacking predefined clinical criteria for intervention.J Urol2021;206:229-39 PMCID:PMC9036570

[72]

Gao B,Bhatt R.Avoiding “Needless” nephrectomy: what is the role of small renal mass biopsy in 2024?.Urol Oncol2024;42:236-44

[73]

Hussain B,Lane BR.Outcomes after initial non-interventional management of clinical state cT1b renal masses.Eur Urol Open Sci2025;In Press:

[74]

Ambani SN,Montgomery JS.Predictors of delayed intervention for patients on active surveillance for small renal masses: does renal mass biopsy influence our decision?.Urology2016;98:88-96

[75]

Jorgenson LC,Adamo D.Imaging and nonsurgical management of renal masses.Radiographics2025;45:e240093

[76]

Wells SA,Wittmann TA.Renal mass biopsy and thermal ablation: should biopsy be performed before or during the ablation procedure?.Abdom Radiol2017;42:1773-80

[77]

Takafuji M,Nakatsuka A.Computed tomography-guided biopsy for small renal masses before or immediately after tumor ablation: factors affecting diagnostic yield.Jpn J Radiol2021;39:283-92

[78]

Uhlig A,Wang X.Sequencing of renal mass biopsy and ablation: results from the National Cancer Database.Urol Pract2021;8:555-64

[79]

Doganca T.Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous biopsy for small renal masses and first report of post-biopsy adhesions: a prospective study.Urol J2019;16:357-60

[80]

Pasquier D,Fregeville A.Renal tumor biopsy does not increase the risk of surgical complications of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.Prog Urol2022;32:843-8

[81]

Kumar S,Vulasala SSR.Magnetic resonance imaging virtual biopsy of common solid renal masses - a pictorial review.J Comput Assist Tomogr2023;47:186-98

[82]

Johnson BA,Steinberg RL,Pedrosa I.Diagnostic performance of prospectively assigned clear cell Likelihood scores (ccLS) in small renal masses at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Urol Oncol2019;37:941-6 PMCID:PMC6934987

[83]

Steinberg RL,Johnson BA.Prospective performance of clear cell likelihood scores (ccLS) in renal masses evaluated with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Radiol2021;31:314-24 PMCID:PMC7755825

[84]

Chen KY,Qiu JX.Cost-effectiveness analysis of the clear cell likelihood score against renal mass biopsy for evaluating small renal masses.Urology2024;188:111-7 PMCID:PMC11193637

[85]

Shuch B,Bernhard JC.[89Zr]Zr-girentuximab for PET-CT imaging of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol2024;25:1277-87

[86]

Barwari K,Laguna MP.The penetration of renal mass biopsy in daily practice: a survey among urologists.J Endourol2012;26:737-47

[87]

Curci N.The current role of biopsy in the diagnosis of renal tumors.Semin Ultrasound CT MR2017;38:72-7

[88]

Londoño DC,Thomas AA.Accuracy and implications of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of renal masses.Perm J2013;17:4-7 PMCID:PMC3783072

[89]

Bernhard JC, Bigot P, Pignot G, et al; NEPHRON Study Group. The accuracy of renal tumor biopsy: analysis from a national prospective study. World J Urol. 2015;33:1205-11.

[90]

Garnon J,Buy X.Evaluation of percutaneous biopsies of renal masses under MRI-guidance: a retrospective study about 26 cases.Eur Radiol2015;25:617-23

[91]

Prince J,Hinshaw L.Patient and tumor characteristics can predict nondiagnostic renal mass biopsy findings.J Urol2015;193:1899-904 PMCID:PMC4573549

[92]

Jeon HG,Jeong BC.Percutaneous kidney biopsy for a small renal mass: a critical appraisal of results.J Urol2016;195:568-73

[93]

Alle N,Huss J,Pantuck A.Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.Abdom Radiol2018;43:1813-9

[94]

Tsang Mui Chung MS, Maxwell AW, Wang LJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE. Should renal mass biopsy be performed prior to or concomitantly with thermal ablation?.J Vasc Interv Radiol2018;29:1240-4

[95]

Posielski NM,Wells SA.Risk factors for complications and nondiagnostic results following 1,155 consecutive percutaneous core renal mass biopsies.J Urol2019;201:1080-7

[96]

Gillis CJ,MacDonald LP.Identification of tumor size as the only factor associated with nondiagnostic biopsies in patients with small renal masses.Can Urol Assoc J2020;14:E220-3 PMCID:PMC7197968

[97]

Santy A,Colleter L.Operative and oncological results and impact on treatment strategy of systematic renal tumor biopsy: comparison between patients < and >75 years old.Urol Oncol2020;38:74.e21-7

[98]

Shahait M,Landman J.Utilization and operative influence of renal mass biopsy in the small renal mass: analysis from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Small Renal Mass Registry.J Endourol2020;34:99-106

[99]

Bada M,Cicero C.The role of renal biopsy to improve small renal mass diagnosis and management: are there predictive factors for a higher detection rate?. The first Italian study of 100 cases.Minerva Urol Nephrol2021;73:78-83

[100]

Ferrari M,Barizzi J,D’Antonio E.Percutaneous biopsy of small renal mass: can diagnostic accuracy be affected by hospital volume?.Cent European J Urol2021;74:334-40 PMCID:PMC8552940

[101]

Masic S,Kidd LC.Feasibility and outcomes of renal mass biopsy for anatomically complex renal tumors.Urology2021;158:125-30 PMCID:PMC9039834

[102]

Jasinski M,Tworkiewicz M.Ultrasound-guided renal mass biopsy and its clinical utility: a single-centre experience.Urol Int2022;106:560-6

[103]

Kapur P,Araj E.Improving renal tumor biopsy prognostication with BAP1 analyses.Arch Pathol Lab Med2022;146:154-65 PMCID:PMC9812366

[104]

Nazzani S,Biasoni D.Renal tumor biopsy in patients with cT1b-T4-M0 disease susceptible to radical nephrectomy: analysis of safety, accuracy and clinical impact on definitive management.Scand J Urol2022;56:367-72

[105]

Valtersson J,Elgborn A,Graumann O.One hour observation of patients after image-guided percutaneous renal mass biopsy.Acta Radiol Open2022;11:20584601221138555 PMCID:PMC9703508

[106]

Serhal M,Seedial SM.Safety and diagnostic efficacy of image-guided biopsy of small renal masses.Cancers2024;16:835 PMCID:PMC10887197

[107]

Garbens A,Klaassen Z.Comprehensive assessment of the morbidity of renal mass biopsy: a population-based assessment of biopsy-related complications.Can Urol Assoc J2021;15:42-7 PMCID:PMC7864714

[108]

Ozambela M Jr., Wang Y, Leow JJ, Silverman SG, Chung BI, Chang SL. Contemporary trends in percutaneous renal mass biopsy utilization in the United States.Urol Oncol2020;38:835-43

[109]

Patel AK,Chintalapati P.Utilization of renal mass biopsy for T1 renal lesions across michigan: results from MUSIC-KIDNEY, a statewide quality improvement collaborative.Eur Urol Open Sci2021;30:37-43 PMCID:PMC8317904

[110]

Staehler M,Brinkmann I.Long-term follow-up in patients undergoing renal mass biopsy: seeding is not anecdotal.Clin Genitourin Cancer2024;22:189-92

[111]

Robert SC,Miao TL.Complications after renal mass biopsy: frequency, nature, timing, and associated characteristics.AJR Am J Roentgenol2023;221:344-53

[112]

Beisland C,Reisæter LAR.Real-life use of diagnostic biopsies before treatment of kidney cancer: results from a Norwegian population-based study.Scand J Urol2018;52:38-44

[113]

Michel J,Lec PM.Analysis of guideline recommended use of renal mass biopsy and association with treatment.Can J Urol2020;27:10285-93

[114]

Okhunov Z,Jefferson FA.Can preoperative renal mass biopsy change clinical practice and reduce surgical intervention for small renal masses?.Urol Oncol2021;39:735.e17-23

[115]

Neuzillet Y,Andre M,Coulange C.Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses.J Urol2004;171:1802-5

[116]

Buijs M,de Bruin DM.An in-vivo prospective study of the diagnostic yield and accuracy of optical biopsy compared with conventional renal mass biopsy for the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma: the interim analysis.Eur Urol Focus2018;4:978-85

[117]

Amaral BS,Arora A.Renal tumor biopsy: rationale to avoid surgery in small renal masses.Curr Urol Rep2021;22:46

[118]

Kajita S,Matsui Y.Time course of complications after small renal mass biopsy: evaluation of initial follow-up images.Jpn J Radiol2024;42:398-405 PMCID:PMC10980650

PDF

155

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/