Hiatal hernia repair in the era of robotic surgery: lessons learned from a single-center experience

Abstract

Aim: Robotic-assisted surgery has been successfully introduced in hiatal hernia repair; however, clear advantages over laparoscopy remain limited, with small series and contradictory results. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of robotic hiatal hernia repair in non-selected patients.

Methods: All patients presenting with symptomatic hiatal hernia were included. The DaVinci® robotic platform was used, and a strict standardized operative technique was performed. Preoperative and postoperative data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.

Results: A total of 103 consecutive, unselected patients underwent surgery. Median total operating time was 72 min [range 46-168 min]. The 30-day complication rate was 12% (12/103). After a median follow-up of 29 months [range 1-64 months], the late complication rate was 5% and the recurrence rate was 5%.

Conclusion: Robotic surgery is a valuable option for hiatal hernia repair, especially in difficult cases or emergency operations. Whether this translates to better long-term outcomes needs to be further investigated in series with longer follow-up.

Keywords

Robotic surgery / hiatal hernia repair / anti-reflux surgery / fundoplication / Da Vinci system

References

[1] Daly S,Kumar SS,Collings AT.et al. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias Surg Endosc. 2024 38 4765 75

[2] Leeder PC,Smith G,Dehn TC. Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia Surg Endosc. 2003 17 1372 5

[3] Okrainec A,Ferri LE,Feldman LS,Fried GM. Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis Surg Endosc. 2011 25 1083 7

[4] Fullum TM,Oyetunji TA,Ortega G.et al. Open versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair JSLS. 2013 17 23 9 3662742

[5] Zehetner J,Demeester SR,Ayazi S.et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of paraesophageal hernia: the second decade J Am Coll Surg. 2011 212 813 20

[6] Tolboom RC,Broeders IA,Draaisma WA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery J Surg Oncol. 2015 112 266 70

[7] Brenkman HJ,Parry K,van Hillegersberg R,Ruurda JP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: promising anatomical and functional results J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 26 465 9

[8] Ma L,Luo H,Kou S.et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis J Robot Surg. 2023 17 1879 90

[9] Karikis I,Pachos N,Mela E.et al. Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes Hernia. 2024 28 1559 69

[10] Elissavet S,Ioannis G,Panagiotis P,Konstantinos M,Apostolos K. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 26 134 45 PMC10505365

[11] Bhatt H,Wei B. Comparison of laparoscopic vs. robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review J Thorac Dis. 2023 15 1494 502 PMC10089873

[12] Giovannetti A,Craigg D,Castro M,Ross S,Sucandy I,Rosemurgy A. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) versus robotic “Redo” hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication: which approach is better? Am Surg. 2019;85:978-84

[13] Greene CL,DeMeester SR,Zehetner J,Worrell SG,Oh DS,Hagen JA. Diaphragmatic relaxing incisions during laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair Surg Endosc. 2013 27 4532 8

[14] Straatman J,Rahman SA,Carter NC.et al. Proctored adoption of robotic hiatus hernia surgery: outcomes and learning curves in a high-volume UK centre Surg Endosc. 2023 37 7608 15 10520141

[15] O’Connor SC,Mallard M,Desai SS.et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to hiatal hernia repair: results after 7 years of robotic experience Am Surg. 2020 86 1083 7

[16] Soliman BG,Nguyen DT,Chan EY.et al. Robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes compared to laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair Surg Endosc. 2020 34 2495 502

[17] Gerull WD,Cho D,Arefanian S,Kushner BS,Awad MM. Favorable peri-operative outcomes observed in paraesophageal hernia repair with robotic approach Surg Endosc. 2021 35 3085 9

[18] Klock JA,Walters RW,Nandipati KC. Robotic hiatal hernia repair associated with higher morbidity and readmission rates compared to laparoscopic repair: 10-year analysis from the national readmissions database (NRD) J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 27 489 97

[19] Anyomih TTK,Mehta A,Sackey D.et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review J Robot Surg. 2024 18 281

[20] Rodier S,Henning J,Kukreja J,Mohammedi T,Shah P,Damani T. Robotic primary and revisional hiatal hernia repair is safe and associated with favorable perioperative outcomes: a single institution experience J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 33 932 6

[21] Gonçalves-Costa D,Barbosa JP,Quesado R,Lopes V,Barbosa J. Robotic surgery versus Laparoscopic surgery for anti-reflux and hiatal hernia surgery: a short-term outcomes and cost systematic literature review and meta-analysis Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2024 409 175 11156741

[22] Lekarczyk A,Sinha H,Dvir D,Goyert J,Airhart A,Reddy RM. Similar hospital profits with robotic-assisted paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair, despite higher or supply costs Surg Endosc. 2023 37 3952 5

[23] Horn D,Sacarny A,Zhou A. Technology adoption and market allocation: the case of robotic surgery J Health Econ. 2022 86 102672