Comparison of conventional and robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Alyssa Murillo , Riley Brian , Daniel S. Oh
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 7
Comparison of conventional and robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robotic-assisted MIE (RAMIE) have increased in prevalence across the world for the management of esophageal cancer. Both minimally invasive modalities have demonstrated decreased morbidity, with preservation of oncologic outcomes, when compared to open esophagectomy. A limitation of conventional MIE is the use of rigid instruments with 2D visualization leading to a prolonged learning curve and extended operative times. RAMIE offers both improved visualization with 3D video capable of magnification and full dexterity with wristed instruments. To date, retrospective and randomized controlled trials demonstrate overall higher harvest during lymphadenectomy by RAMIE compared to MIE, though more studies are needed to determine definitive impact on oncologic outcomes and long-term survival. RAMIE showed superiority for lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant therapy and for bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymphadenectomy with decreased rates of RLN paralysis. Current data suggests no overall cost difference between the two modalities. Ongoing studies will further clarify the role for RAMIE in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) and the outcomes of robotic/MIE hybrid techniques.
Esophageal cancer / robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy / minimally invasive esophagectomy / esophageal cancer surgery
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer stat facts: esophageal cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html. (accessed 2025-02-14) |
| [3] |
van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074-84. |
| [4] |
Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al; CROSS study group. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090-8. |
| [5] |
Mertens AC, Kalff MC, Eshuis WJ, Van Gulik TM, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS; Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit group. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nationwide propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:175-83. PMCID:PMC7752871 |
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Kingma BF, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, et al; UGIRA Study Group. Worldwide techniques and outcomes in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): results from the multicenter international registry. Ann Surg. 2022;276:e386-92. |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
National Library of Medicine. RAE versus MIE in patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06012214?term=esophagectomy&limit=100&intr=Robotic&rank=3#publications. (accessed 2025-02-14) |
| [31] |
National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.Gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/. (accessed 2025-02-14) |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |