A comparative review of minimally invasive approaches to esophagectomy: technical considerations, variations, and outcomes

Abstract

Esophageal cancer continues to rise as a public health issue, and esophagectomy remains a mainstay therapy for the disease. Surgical approaches to esophagectomy have evolved over the past few decades with the advent of laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, and robotic technologies. The aim of this review is to identify original articles and perform a comprehensive literature search to provide updates on surgical approaches and technical considerations for esophagectomy. Articles describing the surgical technique specific to robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) were reviewed and included. Technical considerations reviewed were comprised of patient positioning, optimal trocar placement, dissection, indocyanine green use, kocherization, pyloric interventions, anastomotic techniques, jejunostomy tube placement, and gastric ischemic conditioning, discussing relevant outcomes for each consideration and approach. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated by comparing RAMIE to open esophagectomy and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcomes reviewed included lymph node harvest, intra-operative blood loss, operative times, 30-day readmission, mortality, length of stay, pulmonary complications, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, anastomotic leak, long-term survival, and disease-free survival.

Keywords

Esophagectomy / robotic esophagectomy / minimally invasive esophagectomy / open esophagectomy / clinical outcomes / technical variations / review

References

[1] Sung H,Siegel RL.Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J Clin2021;71:209-49

[2] Siegel RL,Fuchs HE.Cancer statistics, 2022.CA Cancer J Clin2022;72:7-33

[3] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=1&id=1433. [Last accessed on 13 Oct 2023]

[4] Cuschieri A,Banting S.Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach.J R Coll Surg Edinb1992;37:7-11

[5] Espinoza-Mercado F,Borgella JD.Does the approach matter? Comparing survival in robotic, minimally invasive, and open esophagectomies.Ann Thorac Surg2019;107:378-85

[6] Biere SSAY,van der Peet DL.Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Minerva Chir2009;64:121-33

[7] Nagpal K,Vats A.Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.Surg Endosc2010;24:1621-9

[8] Sgourakis G,Radtke A.Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.Dig Dis Sci2010;55:3031-40

[9] Dantoc M,Eslick GD.Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.Arch Surg2012;147:768-76

[10] Yibulayin W,Lv H.Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol2016;14:304 PMCID:PMC5143462

[11] Guo W,Yang S.Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.Surg Endosc2016;30:3873-81

[12] Lv L,Ren Y.Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.Onco Targets Ther2016;9:6751-62 PMCID:PMC5096744

[13] Xiong WL,Lei HK.Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.ANZ J Surg2017;87:165-70

[14] Biere SS,Maas KW.Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet2012;379:1887-92

[15] Biere SS,Bonavina L.Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial).BMC Surg2011;11:2 PMCID:PMC3031195

[16] van der Sluis PC, Schizas D, Liakakos T, van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive esophagectomy.Dig Surg2020;37:93-100

[17] Shen T,Cao Y,Li H.Robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (RAILE): a review of surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.Front Surg2022;9:998282 PMCID:PMC9672456

[18] Grimminger PP,Perez D.Multicenter experience in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - a comparison of hybrid and totally robot-assisted techniques.J Gastrointest Surg2021;25:2463-9 PMCID:PMC8523396

[19] Giulini L,Tank J,Stein HJ.Hybrid robotic versus hybrid laparoscopic Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: a case-matched analysis.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2021;59:1279-85

[20] Egberts JH,Perez DR.Robot-assisted oesophagectomy: recommendations towards a standardised Ivor Lewis procedure.J Gastrointest Surg2019;23:1485-92

[21] Gutierrez M,Behbehani S.Does closure of fascia, type, and location of trocar influence occurrence of port site hernias? A literature review.Surg Endosc2020;34:5250-8

[22] Chouliaras K,Kukar M.Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique.Updates Surg2021;73:831-8

[23] Zhang Y,Han Y.Initial experience of robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: 61 consecutive cases from a single Chinese institution. Dis Esophagus 2018;31:doy048.

[24] Ninomiya I,Yamaguchi T.Optimization of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the lateral decubitus position.Esophagus2021;18:482-8

[25] Pham TH,McLaren PJ.Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach increases neovascularization of the gastric conduit in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.J Surg Oncol2017;116:391-7 PMCID:PMC5533617

[26] Nakamura K,Akamatsu H.Impact of the Kocher maneuver on anastomotic leak after esophagogastrostomy in combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy.Fujita Med J2019;5:36-44 PMCID:PMC8766227

[27] Nguyen NT,Nguyen XM.Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy without pyloroplasty: analysis of 109 cases.Am Surg2010;76:1135-8

[28] Giugliano DN,Meidl H.Do intraoperative pyloric interventions predict the need for postoperative endoscopic interventions after minimally invasive esophagectomy?.Dis Esophagus2017;30:1-8

[29] Fuchs HF,Harnsberger CR.Intraoperative endoscopic botox injection during total esophagectomy prevents the need for pyloromyotomy or dilatation.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2016;26:433-8

[30] Bolger JC,Yeung JC.Omission of intraoperative pyloric procedures in minimally invasive esophagectomy: assessing the impact on patients.Dis Esophagus2023;36:doac061

[31] Heid CA,Kernstine K.How I do it: robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.Dis Esophagus2020;33:doaa070

[32] Meredith K,Andacoglu O.Safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2018;31:doy005.

[33] Irino T,Ericson J,Lundell L.Thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastrostomy by use of linear stapler-a simplified technique facilitating a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis operation.Langenbecks Arch Surg2016;401:315-22

[34] Egberts JH,Aselmann H,Becker T.Fully robotic da Vinci Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in four-arm technique-problems and solutions.Dis Esophagus2017;30:1-9

[35] Peri A,Viganò J.Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.Surg Endosc2022;36:1675-82 PMCID:PMC8428217

[36] Aiolfi A,Bonitta G.Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg2022;407:3297-309

[37] Deng XF,Zhou D,Dai JG.Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol2015;21:4757-64 PMCID:PMC4402326

[38] Kukar M,Peng JS.Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis associated with low leak and stricture rates.J Gastrointest Surg2020;24:1729-35 PMCID:PMC9022892

[39] Fabbi M,Fumagalli Romario U.End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.Langenbecks Arch Surg2022;407:2681-92

[40] Schlottmann F,Bras Harriott C,Herbella FAM.Transthoracic esophagectomy: hand-sewn versus side-to-side linear-stapled versus circular-stapled anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2022;32:380-92

[41] Harustiak T,Snajdauf M,Lischke R.Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg2016;49:1650-9

[42] Carroll PA,Darling GE.Elimination of routine feeding jejunostomy after esophagectomy.Ann Thorac Surg2020;110:1706-13

[43] Li HN,Dai L,Chen MW.A Meta-analysis of jejunostomy versus nasoenteral tube for enteral nutrition following esophagectomy.J Surg Res2021;264:553-61

[44] Akiyama S,Sekiguchi H.Preoperative embolization therapy for esophageal operation.J Surg Oncol1998;69:219-23

[45] Siegal SR,Haisley KR.Gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy is associated with decreased stricture rate and overall anastomotic complications.J Gastrointest Surg2018;22:1501-7

[46] Ladak F,Switzer N.Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.Surg Endosc2019;33:384-94

[47] Watson TJ.“Open” esophagectomy.J Gastrointest Surg2011;15:1500-2

[48] Zhang Y,Gan Q.Early Outcomes of robot-assisted versus thoracoscopic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.Ann Surg Oncol2019;26:1284-91

[49] Luketich JD,Buenaventura PO.Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.Ann Surg2003;238:486-94; discussion 494-5 PMCID:PMC1360107

[50] Meredith K,Maramara T,Huston J.Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy.Surg Endosc2020;34:814-20

[51] Deng HY,Li SX.Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.Dis Esophagus2019;32:doy110

[52] Khaitan PG,Thibault D.Robotic esophagectomy trends and early surgical outcomes: the US experience.Ann Thorac Surg2023;115:710-7

[53] Mederos MA,Shenoy R.Comparison of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted, video-assisted, and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open2021;4:e2129228 PMCID:PMC8561331

[54] van der Sluis PC,May AM.Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Ann Surg2019;269:621-30

[55] Chao YK,Liu YH.Lymph node evaluation in robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis.World J Surg2018;42:590-8

[56] He H,Wang Z.Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg2018;13:52 PMCID:PMC5967100

[57] Tagkalos E,Hoppe-Lotichius M.Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.Dis Esophagus2020;33:doz060

[58] Yang Y,Li B.Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.Dis Esophagus2020;33:doz080

[59] Angeramo CA,Casas MA.Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery2021;170:1692-701

[60] Washington K,Jay J.Oncologic resection in laparoscopic versus robotic transhiatal esophagectomy.JSLS2019;23:e2019.00017 PMCID:PMC6532833

[61] Naffouje SA,Khalaf Z.Outcomes of open versus minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity-score matched analysis of NSQIP database.Ann Surg Oncol2019;26:2001-10

[62] Manigrasso M,Marello A.Robotic esophagectomy. A systematic review with meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.J Pers Med2021;11:640 PMCID:PMC8306060

[63] Yun JK,Kim HJ.Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.Dis Esophagus2020;33:doz071

[64] Mariette C,Dabakuyo-Yonli TS.Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.N Engl J Med2019;380:152-62

[65] Chen J,Zhang X.Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with extended two-field lymph node dissection for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.J Thorac Dis2019;11:3874-80 PMCID:PMC6790445

[66] Na KJ,Park S,Kim YT.Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.J Robot Surg2022;16:841-8

[67] Straatman J,Cuesta MA.Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial.Ann Surg2017;266:232-6

[68] Nuytens F,Meunier B.Five-year survival outcomes of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer: results of the MIRO randomized clinical trial.JAMA Surg2021;156:323-32 PMCID:PMC7890455

[69] van der Sluis PC,van der Horst S.Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).Trials2012;13:230 PMCID:PMC3564860

[70] Goense L,van der Horst S.Cost analysis of robot-assisted versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer. Results of the ROBOT randomized clinical trial.Eur J Surg Oncol2023;49:106968

[71] Clark J,Purkayastha S.The role of robotic assisted laparoscopy for oesophagogastric oncological resection; an appraisal of the literature.Dis Esophagus2011;24:240-50

[72] Seto Y,Aikou S.Robotic surgery for esophageal cancer: merits and demerits.Ann Gastroenterol Surg2017;1:193-8 PMCID:PMC5881348

[73] Liu CY,Shih CS,Liu CC.Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World J Surg2018;42:2522-9

[74] Medbery RL.Quality and cost in thoracic surgery.Thorac Surg Clin2017;27:267-77