The evolution of anastomotic techniques in robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Abstract

Radical esophagectomy is the cornerstone in the treatment of esophageal cancer combined with perioperative therapies, whereas patients diagnosed at an early stage may be candidates for endoscopic resection. Minimally invasive procedures aim to improve the postoperative complications and reduce overall morbidity. The short and long-term results of the incorporation of robot-assisted esophagectomy in specialised centres worldwide have been encouraging. The Ivor Lewis technique has become the preferable approach, reaching up to 61% of the minimally invasive reconstructions in the Western World; however, the percentage of anastomotic leaks remains problematic. Throughout the last decade, a few modifications of the anastomotic technique have been proposed in an effort to improve the surgical results of the robot-assisted approach. This review presents the evolving robotic techniques of performing the esophagogastric anastomosis. An overview of the available approaches will be discussed with a focus on the intrathoracic anastomosis.

Keywords

Esophageal cancer / Ivor Lewis esophagectomy / minimally invasive esophagectomy / robot-assisted esophagectomy / anastomotic leak

References

[1] Kuppusamy MK, Low DE; International Esodata Study Group (IESG). Evaluation of international contemporary operative outcomes and management trends associated with esophagectomy: a 4-year study of >6000 patients using ECCG definitions and the online esodata database. Ann Surg 2022;275:515-25.

[2] Low DE,Alderson D.Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy.Ann Surg2019;269:291-8

[3] Reavis KM.The esophageal anastomosis: how improving blood supply affects leak rate.J Gastrointest Surg2009;13:1558-60 PMCID:PMC2719724

[4] Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: results of the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2022;164:674-84.e5

[5] Biere SSAY,Cuesta MA.Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Dig Surg2011;28:29-35

[6] Li B,Toker A.International consensus statement on robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).J Thorac Dis2020;12:7387-401 PMCID:PMC7797844

[7] Metcalfe C,Berrisford R.Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial.Health Technol Assess2016;20:1-68 PMCID:PMC4947875

[8] Mariette C,Dabakuyo-Yonli TS.Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.N Engl J Med2019;380:152-62

[9] Maas KW,van Berge Henegouwen MI.Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial.World J Surg2015;39:1986-93 PMCID:PMC4496501

[10] Biere SSAY,Maas KW.Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet2012;379:1887-92

[11] Orringer MB,Chang AC,Pickens A.Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned.Ann Surg2007;246:363-74

[12] Orringer MB.Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.Ann Surg1984;200:282-8 PMCID:PMC1250471

[13] DePaula AL,Ferreira EA,Grecco E.Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty.Surg Laparosc Endosc1995;5:1-5

[14] Melvin WS,Krause KR.Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery.Surg Endosc2002;16:1790-2

[15] Horgan S,Elli EF.Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy.Am Surg2003;69:624-6

[16] van der Sluis PC,May AM.Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Ann Surg2019;269:621-30

[17] Jin D,Yu J.Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Int J Med Robot2019;15:e1988

[18] Harbison GJ,Yim NH.Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an American college of surgeons NSQIP database analysis.Am J Surg2019;218:1223-8

[19] Tagkalos E,Hoppe-Lotichius M.Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.Dis Esophagus2020;33:doz060

[20] Chen H,Peng H,Wang K.Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Transl Cancer Res2021;10:4601-16 PMCID:PMC8798469

[21] Schröder W,Schmidt HM.Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidity in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy: results from the esobenchmark database.Ann Surg2019;270:820-6

[22] Bartella I,Gutschow CA.Technique of open and minimally invasive intrathoracic reconstruction following esophagectomy-an expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process.Dis Esophagus2021;34:doaa127

[23] Plat VD,Schoonmade LJ,van der Peet DL.Implementation of robot-assisted Ivor Lewis procedure: robotic hand-sewn, linear or circular technique?.Am J Surg2020;220:62-8

[24] Luketich JD,Awais O.Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.Ann Surg2012;256:95-103 PMCID:PMC4103614

[25] Cao C,Yu S.Esophagocolonic OrVil anastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2023;33:117-23

[26] Shishido Y,Makinoya M.Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.BMC Surg2022;22:152 PMCID:PMC9052471

[27] Honda M,Noma H,Furukawa TA.Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Surg2013;257:238-48

[28] Halliday LJ,Sgromo B.Variation in esophageal anastomosis technique-the role of collaborative learning.Dis Esophagus2020;33:doz072

[29] Okamura A,Mine S.Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.Surg Endosc2016;30:4279-85

[30] Deng XF,Zhou D,Dai JG.Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol2015;21:4757-64 PMCID:PMC4402326

[31] Yang Y,Yi J.Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial.Ann Surg2022;275:646-53

[32] Tagkalos E,Berlth F.Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).BMC Cancer2021;21:1060 PMCID:PMC8474742

[33] Chao YK,Wen YW.Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials2019;20:346 PMCID:PMC6558787

[34] Ladak F,Switzer N.Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.Surg Endosc2019;33:384-94

[35] Casas MA,Bras Harriott C,Schlottmann F.Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for prevention of anastomotic leak in totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Dis Esophagus2022;35:doab056

[36] LeBlanc G,Huston J,Meredith K.The use of indocyanine green (ICYG) angiography intraoperatively to evaluate gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy: does it impact surgical decision-making? Surg Endosc 2023.

[37] de Groot EM,van der Veen A.Indocyanine green fluorescence in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis: a prospective study.Updates Surg2023;75:409-18 PMCID:PMC9852174

[38] Low DE,De Manzoni G.Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS^®) society recommendations.World J Surg2019;43:299-330

[39] Froghi F,Berrisford R.A randomised trial of post-discharge enteral feeding following surgical resection of an upper gastrointestinal malignancy.Clin Nutr2017;36:1516-9