Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with multiple ipsilateral renal tumors: single-centre experience

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to report the perioperative outcomes of off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for multiple ipsilateral renal tumours at our Institution.

Methods: Data of consecutive patients affected by multiple ipsilateral renal tumours managed by RAPN between September 2018 and June 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Perioperative and post-operative data were collected. Eventual intra- and post-operative complications with or without readmissions (occurred within 30 days) were recorded and classified according to Clavien-Dindo system. Final pathology examination of excised tumours was performed.

Results: Twelve patients were included in the analysis. Median tumour size was 34 mm and median R.E.N.A.L. [(R)adius (tumour size as maximal diameter), (E)xophytic/endophytic properties of the tumour, (N)earness of tumour deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, (A)nterior (a)/posterior (p) descriptor and the (L)ocation relative to the polar line] score was 6. Median console time was 134 min. An off-clamp approach with pure enucleation was possible in 20 out of 28 lesions (71.4%). Median estimated blood loss was 200 mL. No differences were observed in renal function both at discharge and after 30 days, with respect to baseline. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Post-operative complications occurred in two patients, both classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 2. Positive surgical margins were reported in one case (4.5%). No local recurrence or metastasis were diagnosed within a median follow-up of six months.

Conclusion: Our case series showed the feasibility of off-clamp RAPN in patients with multiple ipsilateral renal tumours in experienced hands. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up are warranted to better define the optimal management strategy in such an uncommon scenario.

Keywords

Off-clamp / robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) / multiple ipsilateral renal tumours

References

[1] Antonelli A, Cindolo L, Sandri M, et al; AGILE Group (Italian Group for Advanced Laparo-Endoscopic Surgery). Safety of on- vs off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: per-protocol analysis from the data of the CLOCK randomized trial.World J Urol2020;38:1101-8

[2] Bertolo R,Garisto J.Off-clamp vs on-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes from a propensity-score matching between two high-volume centers.Eur J Surg Oncol2019;45:1232-7

[3] Brassetti A,Mari A.On-clamp vs. off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for cT2 renal tumors: retrospective propensity-score-matched multicenter outcome analysis.Cancers2022;14:4431 PMCID:PMC9496892

[4] Antonelli A,Francavilla S.On-clamp versus off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Urologia2019;86:52-62

[5] Shrivastava N, Sharma G, Ahluwalia P, et al; European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Study Group. Off-clamp versus on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis by the european association of urology young academic urologists renal cancer study group.Eur Urol Open Sci2023;58:10-8 PMCID:PMC10630115

[6] Bertolo R, Pecoraro A, Carbonara U, et al; European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Renal Cancer Working Group. Resection techniques during robotic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review.Eur Urol Open Sci2023;52:7-21 PMCID:PMC10172691

[7] Bertolo R,Carilli M,Bove P.Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: points of technique.Urol Video J2023;20:100257

[8] Kutikov A.The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.J Urol2009;182:844-53

[9] Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.Ann Intern Med2006;145:247-54

[10] Dindo D,Clavien PA.Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.Ann Surg2004;240:205-13 PMCID:PMC1360123

[11] Tsivian M,Caso JR.Predicting occult multifocality of renal cell carcinoma.Eur Urol2010;58:118-26

[12] Klatte T,Wunderlich H.Metachronous bilateral renal cell carcinoma: risk assessment, prognosis and relevance of the primary-free interval.J Urol2007;177:2081-7

[13] Blute M,Leibovich BC,Lohse CM.Multiple ipsilateral renal tumors discovered at planned nephron sparing surgery: importance of tumor histology and risk of metachronous recurrence.J Urol2003;170:760-3

[14] Rogers CG,Blatt AM,Pinto PA.Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique.Eur Urol2008;53:514-21 PMCID:PMC2644902

[15] Yang J,Xue JX.Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy with sequential clamping of segmental renal arteries for multiple ipsilateral renal tumors: initial outcomes.BMC Urol2019;19:31 PMCID:PMC6500028

[16] Buffi N,Paciotti M.Techniques and outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for the treatment of multiple ipsilateral renal masses.Minerva Urol Nephrol2023;75:223-30

[17] Biebel MG,Patel B.A multi-institutional matched-pair analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for single vs multiple ipsilateral renal masses.J Endourol2023;37:781-5

[18] Antonelli A, Mari A, Longo N, et al; Collaborators. Role of clinical and surgical factors for the prediction of immediate, early and late functional results, and its relationship with cardiovascular outcome after partial nephrectomy: results from the prospective multicenter RECORd 1 project.J Urol2018;199:927-32

[19] Gill IS,Aron M.“Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique.Eur Urol2011;59:128-34

[20] Anderson BG,Du K.Comparing off-clamp and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a prospective randomized trial.Urology2019;126:102-9

[21] Antonelli A, Cindolo L, Sandri M, et al; AGILE Group (Italian Group for Advanced Laparo-Endoscopic Surgery). Is off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy beneficial for renal function? Data from the CLOCK trial.BJU Int2022;129:217-24

[22] Campbell SC,Munoz-Lopez C,Yasuda Y.Every decade counts: a narrative review of functional recovery after partial nephrectomy.BJU Int2023;131:165-72 PMCID:PMC10087004

[23] Bove P,Sandri M.Deviation from the protocol of a randomized clinical trial comparing on-clamp versus off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CLOCK II laparoscopic study): a real-life analysis.J Urol2021;205:678-85

[24] Bertolo R, Bove P, Sandri M, et al; AGILE Group (Italian Group for Advanced Laparoendoscopic Surgery). Randomized clinical trial comparing on-clamp versus off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal masses (CLOCK II laparoscopic study): a intention-to-treat analysis of perioperative outcomes.Eur Urol Open Sci2022;46:75-81 PMCID:PMC9732468

[25] Autorino R,Laydner H.Repeat robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN): feasibility and early outcomes.BJU Int2013;111:767-72

[26] Bertolo R, Campi R, Mir MC, et al; Young Academic Urologists Kidney Cancer Working Group of the European Urological Association. Systematic review and pooled analysis of the impact of renorrhaphy techniques on renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy.Eur Urol Oncol2019;2:572-5

[27] Giulioni C,Marconi A.Clampless laparoscopic tumor enucleation for exophytic masses greater than 4 cm: is renorrhaphy necessary?.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2022;32:931-7

[28] Porpiglia F,Amparore D.Nephron-sparing suture of renal parenchyma after partial nephrectomy: which technique to go for? Some best practices.Eur Urol Focus2019;5:600-3