Minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: real-world data from the Italian National Registry of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (IGoMIPS)

Abstract

Aim: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy has become the standard of care for benign and low malignant lesions. Spleen preservation in this setting has been proposed to reduce surgical trauma and long-term sequelae. The aim of the current study is to present real-world data on indications, techniques, and outcomes of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP).

Methods: Patients who underwent SPDP and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPWS) were extracted from the 2019-2022 Italian National Registry for Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (IGoMIPS). Perioperative and pathological data were collected.

Results: One hundred and ten patients underwent SPDP and five hundred and seventy-eight underwent DPWS. Patients undergoing SPDP were significantly younger (56 vs. 63.5 years; P < 0.001). Seventy-six percent of SPDP cases were performed in six out of thirty-four IGoMIPS centers. SPDP was performed predominantly for Neuroendocrine Tumors (43.6% vs.23.5%; P < 0.001) and for smaller lesions (T1 57.6% vs. 29.8%; P < 0.001). The conversion rate was higher in the case of DPWS (7.6% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.006), even when pancreatic cancer was ruled out (5.0% vs. 0.9%; P = 0.045). The robotic approach was most commonly used for SPDP (50.9% vs. 29.7%; P < 0.001). No difference in postoperative outcomes and length of stay was observed between the two groups, as well as between robotic and laparoscopic approaches in the SPDP group. A trend toward a lower rate of postoperative sepsis was observed after SPDP (0.9% vs. 5.2%; P = 0.056). In 84.7% of SPDP, splenic vessels were preserved (Kimura procedure) without an impact on short-term postoperative outcomes.

Conclusion: In this registry analysis, SPDP was feasible and safe. The Kimura procedure was prevalent over the Warshaw procedure. The typical patient undergoing SPDP was young with a neuroendocrine tumor at an early stage. Robotic assistance was used more frequently for SPDP than for DPWS.

Keywords

Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy / minimally invasive pancreatic surgery / laparoscopic pancreatic surgery / robotic pancreatic surgery / splenic vessels preservation

References

[1] Asbun HJ,Vissers FL.The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection.Ann Surg2020;271:1-14

[2] van Hilst J,Klompmaker S.European consortium on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (E-MIPS). minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-european propensity score matched study.Ann Surg2019;269:10-7

[3] Nakata K,Ohtsuka T.Minimally invasive preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci2018;25:476-88

[4] Moekotte AL,White SA.Minimally invasive liver and pancreatic surgery study group-UK (MI-LAPS UK). splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.Surg Endosc2020;34:1301-9 PMCID:PMC7012970

[5] Lee W,Han HS.Comparison of infectious complications after spleen preservation versus splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci2023;30:252-62

[6] Choi SH,Hwang HK,Lee WJ.Is it worthwhile to preserve adult spleen in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? Perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis.Surg Endosc2012;26:3149-56

[7] Dai MH,Xing C.Splenic preservation in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.Br J Surg2017;104:452-62

[8] Shi N,Li YT,Dai MH.Splenic preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Surg Oncol2016;23:365-74

[9] Kimura W,Sugawara S.Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein: techniques and its significance.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci2010;17:813-23

[10] Warshaw AL.Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.Arch Surg1988;123:550-3

[11] Zerbi A,Napoli N.The italian national registry for minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an initiative of the italian group of minimally invasive pancreas surgery (IGoMIPS).Updates Surg2020;72:379-85

[12] Capretti G,Salvia R.Application of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an Italian survey.Updates Surg2019;71:97-103

[13] Bassi C,Dervenis C.International study group on pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). the 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after.Surgery2017;161:584-91

[14] Dindo D,Clavien PA.Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.Ann Surg2004;240:205-13.

[15] Holdsworth RJ,Cuschieri A.Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks.Br J Surg1991;78:1031-8

[16] Chong J,Spelman D,Cheng AC.Overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis in patients with asplenia and hyposplenia: a retrospective cohort study.Epidemiol Infect2017;145:397-400 PMCID:PMC9507625

[17] Long B,Gottlieb M.Complications in the adult asplenic patient: a review for the emergency clinician.Am J Emerg Med2021;44:452-7

[18] Buzelé R,Sauvanet A.Medical complications following splenectomy.J Visc Surg2016;153:277-86

[19] Hassenpflug M,Hinz U.Hypercoagulability after distal pancreatectomy: Just meaningless alterations?.Pancreatology2017;17:478-83

[20] Crary SE.Vascular complications after splenectomy for hematologic disorders.Blood2009;114:2861-8 PMCID:PMC2756197

[21] Turner VM.Influence of ageing on the microarchitecture of the spleen and lymph nodes.Biogerontology2017;18:723-38 PMCID:PMC5597693

[22] Panda N,Narsimhan M,Bronson JR.Spleen-preserving versus spleen-sacrificing distal pancreatectomy in laparoscopy and open method-perioperative outcome analysis-14 years experience.Indian J Surg2016;78:90-5 PMCID:PMC4875893

[23] Halfdanarson TR,Rubin J.Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival.Ann Oncol2008;19:1727-33 PMCID:PMC2735065

[24] Dababneh Y. Pancreatic serous cystadenoma. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557432/ [Last accessed on 22 Mar 2023]

[25] Babiker HM,Mukkamalla SKR. Mucinous cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448105/ [Last accessed on 22 Mar 2023]

[26] Pendola F,Ripat C.Distal pancreatectomy for benign and low grade malignant tumors: short-term postoperative outcomes of spleen preservation-a systematic review and update meta-analysis.J Surg Oncol2017;115:137-43

[27] Kwon W,Kim JH.An analysis of complications, quality of life, and nutritional index after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with regard to spleen preservation.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A2016;26:335-42

[28] Zhao YP,Dai MH.Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: spleen-preservation does not increase morbidity.Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int2012;11:536-41

[29] Lof S,van Hilst J.Outcomes of elective and emergency conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter propensity score-matched study.Ann Surg2021;274:e1001-7.

[30] Kawaguchi Y,Nomi T,Gayet B.Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy employing radical en bloc procedure for adenocarcinoma: technical details and outcomes.Surgery2015;157:1106-12

[31] Seo S,Sumiyoshi T.Optimal lymph-node dissection for pancreatic tail cancer.Surg Today2022;52:1307-12

[32] Ramia JM,Blanco-Fernández G.Pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms located in the distal pancreas: a multicenter study.Gland Surg2022;11:795-804 PMCID:PMC9177270

[33] Chen S,Chen JZ.Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.Surg Endosc2015;29:3507-18

[34] Chen P,Wang T,Ye Y.Comparative efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-center comparative study.J Healthc Eng2022;2022:7302222 PMCID:PMC8747902

[35] Kang CM,Lee WJ.Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?.Surg Endosc2011;25:2004-9

[36] Yang SJ,Kang CM.Revisiting the potential advantage of robotic surgical system in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy over conventional laparoscopic approach.Ann Transl Med2020;8:188 PMCID:PMC7154491

[37] Eckhardt S,Maurer E,Bartsch DK.Robotic-assisted approach improves vessel preservation in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy.Dig Surg2016;33:406-13

[38] Hang K,Liu H.Splenic vessels preserving versus Warshaw technique in spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg2022;103:106686.

[39] Lee LS,Kang CM.Minimally invasive approach for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a comparative analysis of postoperative complication between splenic vessel conserving and Warshaw's technique.J Gastrointest Surg2016;20:1464-70

[40] Lin X,Lu F.“Kimura-first” strategy for robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: experiences from 61 consecutive cases in a single institution.Gland Surg2021;10:186-200 PMCID:PMC7882308