Improving oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: what novel tools do we have?

Abstract

The recent application of novel technologies to the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedure has provided a new perspective and demonstrated potential usefulness in surgical planning, intraoperative navigation, and education of both patients and healthcare professionals, allowing for a patient-tailored prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. Integration of novel techniques into robotic surgery has improved the accuracy of surgery and has demonstrated a potential benefit in functional and oncological outcomes in patients with PCa. However, further randomized and prospective studies are needed to assess and validate the role of these technologies in clinical practice. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the new emerging techniques, such as three-dimensional (3D) imaging and printing, augmented reality (AR), and confocal microscopy (CM), and their impact on RARP and its oncological outcomes.

Keywords

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / augmented reality / three-dimensional (3D) imaging / 3D printed models / confocal microscopy

References

[1] Mottet N,van den Bergh RCN. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. 2022. Available from: https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full-guideline/EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP_SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-2022.pdf [Last accessed on 15 Sep 2022]

[2] Schiavina R,Borghesi M.MRI displays the prostatic cancer anatomy and improves the bundles management before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.J Endourol2018;32:315-21

[3] Zhang L,Zha Z.Surgical margin status and its impact on prostate cancer prognosis after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.World J Urol2018;36:1803-15 PMCID:PMC6208659

[4] Bianchi L,Angiolini A.The Use of augmented reality to guide the intraoperative frozen section during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol2021;80:480-8

[5] Samei G,Kesch C.A partial augmented reality system with live ultrasound and registered preoperative MRI for guiding robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Med Image Anal2020;60:101588

[6] Autorino R.Robotic surgery in urology: the way forward.World J Urol2020;38:809-11

[7] Knipper S.Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy-so successful because it is better or better because it is so successful?.Eur Urol Oncol2018;1:361-3

[8] Mazzone E,Knipper S.Contemporary national assessment of robot-assisted surgery rates and total hospital charges for major surgical Uro-oncological procedures in the United States.J Endourol2019;33:438-47

[9] Leow JJ,Meyer CP.Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database.Eur Urol2016;70:837-45

[10] Moreno-Sierra J,Senovilla-Perez JL.Oncologic outcomes in 408 consecutive patient cohort treated with da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed)2020;44:179-86

[11] Sierra JM.Robotic radical prostatectomy in the 21 st century: evolution of experience.MRAJ2021;9

[12] Martini A,Dell’Oglio P.Image guidance in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: how far do we stand?.Curr Opin Urol2019;29:10-3

[13] Rocco B,Assumma S.Digital frozen sections with fluorescence confocal microscopy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical technique.Eur Urol2021;80:724-9

[14] Makary J,Arianayagam R.The evolution of image guidance in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a glimpse into the future.J Robot Surg2022;16:765-74

[15] Schiavina R,Lodi S.Real-time augmented reality three-dimensional guided robotic radical prostatectomy: preliminary experience and evaluation of the impact on surgical planning.Eur Urol Focus2021;7:1260-7

[16] Porpiglia F,Checcucci E,Bertolo R.Augmented reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: preliminary experience.Urology2018;115:184

[17] Cacciamani GE,Meneses AD.Impact of three-dimensional printing in urology: state of the art and future perspectives. A systematic review by ESUT-YAUWP group.Eur Urol2019;76:209-21

[18] Wang S,Keepers Z.The use of three-dimensional visualization techniques for prostate procedures: a systematic review.Eur Urol Focus2021;7:1274-86

[19] Ukimura O,Nakamoto M.Three-dimensional surgical navigation model with TilePro display during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.J Endourol2014;28:625-30

[20] Shin T,Gill IS.Three-dimensional printed model of prostate anatomy and targeted biopsy-proven index tumor to facilitate nerve-sparing prostatectomy.Eur Urol2016;69:377-9 PMCID:PMC9084292

[21] Jomoto W,Doi H.Development of a three-dimensional surgical navigation system with magnetic resonance angiography and a three-dimensional printer for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Cureus2018;10:e2018 PMCID:PMC5837468

[22] Chandak P,Lynch H.Three-dimensional printing in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - an idea, development, exploration, assessment, long-term follow-up (IDEAL) phase 2a study.BJU Int2018;122:360-1

[23] Checcucci E,Amparore D.Uro-technology and SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists Working Party of the European Association of UrologyThe impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.World J Urol2022;40:2221-9

[24] Ebbing J,Collins JW.Comparison of 3D printed prostate models with standard radiological information to aid understanding of the precise location of prostate cancer: a construct validation study.PLoS One2018;13:e0199477 PMCID:PMC6016928

[25] Porpiglia F,Checcucci E.ESUT Research GroupDevelopment and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists’ and patients’ perception.World J Urol2018;36:201-7

[26] Wake N,Huang R.Patient-specific 3D printed and augmented reality kidney and prostate cancer models: impact on patient education.3D Print Med2019;5:4 PMCID:PMC6743040

[27] Saba P,Holler T.Comparison of multi-parametric MRI of the prostate to 3D prostate computer aided designs and 3D-printed prostate models for pre-operative planning of radical prostatectomies: a pilot study.Urology2021;158:150-5

[28] Cipollari S,Du L.Tissue clearing techniques for three-dimensional optical imaging of intact human prostate and correlations with multi-parametric MRI.Prostate2021;81:1450

[29] Roberts S,Checcucci E.“Augmented reality” applications in urology: a systematic review.Minerva Urol Nephrol2022;

[30] Ukimura O.Imaging-assisted endoscopic surgery: cleveland Clinic experience.J Endourol2008;22:803-10

[31] Simpfendörfer T,Müller M.Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Endourol2011;25:1841-5

[32] Porpiglia F,Amparore D.Augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyper-accuracy three-dimensional reconstruction (HA3D™) technology: a radiological and pathological study.BJU Int2019;123:834-45

[33] Porpiglia F,Amparore D.Three-dimensional elastic augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyperaccuracy three-dimensional reconstruction technology: a step further in the identification of capsular involvement.Eur Urol2019;76:505-14

[34] Kalia M,Navab N.Preclinical evaluation of a markerless, real-time, augmented reality guidance system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg2021;16:1181-8

[35] Borgmann H,Salem J.Feasibility and safety of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass.World J Urol2017;35:967-72

[36] Shee K,Wu X,Halter RJ.A novel ex vivo trainer for robotic vesicourethral anastomosis.J Robot Surg2020;14:21-7

[37] Harrison P,Abe T.The validation of a novel robot-assisted radical prostatectomy virtual reality module.J Surg Educ2018;75:758-66

[38] Anceschi U,Luciani L.Analysis of predictors of early trifecta achievement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for trainers and expert surgeons: the learning curve never ends.Minerva Urol Nephrol2022;74:133-6

[39] Checcucci E.The future of robotic radical prostatectomy driven by artificial intelligence.Mini-invasive Surg2021;5:49

[40] Eissa A,Sighinolfi MC.“Real-time” assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy: state-of-the-art.Clin Genitourin Cancer2020;18:95-104

[41] Jaulim A,Ebrahim F,Elhage O.Imaging modalities aiding nerve-sparing during radical prostatectomy.Turk J Urol2019;45:325-30 PMCID:PMC6739086

[42] Gillitzer R,Fandel T.Intraoperative peripheral frozen sections do not significantly affect prognosis after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.BJU Int2011;107:755-9 PMCID:PMC4881412

[43] Schlomm T,Huxhold C.Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.Eur Urol2012;62:333-40

[44] Oxley J,Rowe E.Could a Mohs technique make NeuroSAFE a viable option?.BJU Int2018;122:358-9

[45] Rocco B,Bertoni L.Real-time assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy: a novel approach that uses fluorescence confocal microscopy for the evaluation of peri-prostatic soft tissue.BJU Int2020;125:487-9

[46] Lopez A,Mach KE.Intraoperative optical biopsy during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy using confocal endomicroscopy.J Urol2016;195:1110-7 PMCID:PMC4882279

[47] Panarello D,Seyde O,Terrone C.Atlas of ex vivo prostate tissue and cancer images using confocal laser endomicroscopy: a project for intraoperative positive surgical margin detection during radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol Focus2020;6:941-58

[48] Puliatti S,Pirola GM.Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: the first application for real-time pathological examination of prostatic tissue.BJU Int2019;124:469-76

[49] Bertoni L,Reggiani Bonetti L.Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: prostatic and periprostatic tissues atlas and evaluation of the learning curve.Virchows Arch2020;476:511-20