Retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a step-by-step description of surgical technique

Abstract

In the last decades, minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN) has gained traction and, as of today, robot-assisted laparoscopic PN (RAPN) is increasingly being performed; this procedure might be performed with a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal (rRAPN) approach. However, rRAPN is less standardized in the literature. Therefore, we describe our rRAPN technique using a da Vinci Xi Surgical System and four robotic arms. First, with the patient placed in full flank position, the camera port is placed at the level of the Petit’s triangle apex. Retroperitoneal space is created by turning the index finger in a 180° movement through this port. After, the two first 8 mm robotic ports are blindly placed with the surgeon’s index finger guide, 8 cm far from the first port, respectively along the anterior and posterior axillary line; 3-5 cm caudally to the last one, a 12 mm AirSeal® assistant port is placed in the same manner. To create space for the last 8 mm robotic port, the peritoneum is reflected medially and downward off of the transversus abdominis muscle laparoscopically. Only then, the last port is placed under direct vision 8 cm ventral and about 2 cm cephalad from the port on the anterior axillary line. The robotic ports placement will result in a caudally convex arc. This technique, due to the extensive use of the surgeon index, implies fast access to the retroperitoneum, protects the underlying anatomical structures from damage, and, due to the trocar positioning along an arc, lowers the arm conflict risk.

Keywords

Renal cancer / robotic partial nephrectomy / nephron sparing surgery / retroperitoneal access

References

[1] Campbell S,Allaf ME.Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline.J Urol2017;198:520-9

[2] Cacciamani GE,Gill T.Impact of surgical factors on robotic partial nephrectomy outcomes: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.J Urol2018;200:258-74

[3] Ghani KR,Sammon JD,Trinh QD.Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.J Urol2014;191:907-12

[4] Benway BM,Cabello JM.Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes.Eur Urol2009;55:592-9

[5] Patel MN,Laungani R.Retroperitoneal robotic renal surgery: technique and early results.J Robot Surg2009;3:1

[6] Ghani KR,Menon M.Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a step-by-step guide.BJU Int2014;114:311-3

[7] Dell'Oglio P,Xiangjun L.ERUS Educational Working Group and the YAU working group on robot-assisted surgeryThe impact of surgical strategy in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it beneficial to treat anterior tumours with transperitoneal access and posterior tumours with retroperitoneal access?.Eur Urol Oncol2021;4:112-6

[8] Porpiglia F,Amparore D.RECORD 2 ProjectTransperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2 Project).Surg Endosc2020;

[9] Feliciano J.Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: a four-arm approach.J Soc Laparoendosc Surg2012;16:208-11 PMCID:PMC3481227

[10] Hu JC,Filson CP.Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study.Eur Urol2014;66:542-9

[11] Gettman M,Chow G,Bartsch G.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system.Urology2004;64:914-8

[12] Singh I.Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current review of the technique and literature.J Minim Access Surg2009;5:87-92 PMCID:PMC2843130

[13] Clayman RV,Soper NJ.Laparoscopic nephrectomy.N Engl J Med1991;324:1370-1

[14] Gaur DD,Purohit KC.Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report.J Urol1993;149:103-5

[15] Harke NN,Radtke JP.Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair analysis.Eur Urol Focus2020;S2405-4569(20)30254:

[16] Marconi L.Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumours: retro or transperitoneal approach?.Eur Urol Focus2018;4:632-5

[17] Stroup SP,Marshall MT.Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes.World J Urol2017;35:1721-8

[18] Choo SH,Sung HH.Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores.World J Urol2014;32:1523-9

[19] Hu JC,Filson CP.Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study.Eur Urol2014;66:542-9

[20] Kutikov A.The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth.J Urol2009;182:844-53

[21] Ficarra V,Secco S.Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery.Eur Urol2009;56:786-93

[22] Mittakanti HR,Li HF.Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis.World J Urol2020;38:1093-9

[23] Maurice MJ,Kaouk JH.Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitioneal renal surgery: initial investigation of a purpose-built single-port surgical system.Eur Urol2017;71:643-7