Retrospective study assessing the learning curve and the accuracy of minimally invasive robot-assisted pedicle screw placement during the first 41 robot-assisted spinal fusion surgeries

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the learning curve and the accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in the first 41 cases.

Methods: This retrospective study investigated the first 41 patients undergoing spinal fusion, whereby 250 pedicle screws were inserted with robotic assistance in a private hospital by a single surgeon. The pedicle screw accuracy was evaluated by computed tomography scan by an orthopedic surgeon according to the Gertzbein and Robbins classification. Planning time and screw placement time were noted. In addition, data about any screw malposition, a return to the operating theatre, and intraoperative repositioning were collected. The data were analyzed with Microsoft Excel.

Results: The results show a high degree of accuracy (98%) of pedicle screw placement with a minimally invasive robot-assisted spinal fusion with no screw malposition requiring a return to the operating theatre. The learning curve improved with time, reaching a plateau at around 25 cases.

Conclusion: This study shows a high degree of accuracy of pedicle screw placement with the robot and it shows a surgeon’s improved experience with the robot with time. Further comparative studies are needed to better assess the robot’s accuracy and its future in spine surgery.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgical procedures / bone screws / vertebrae / robotics

References

[1] Molliqaj G,Alaid A.Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.Neurosurg Focus2017;42:E14

[2] Benech CA,Benech F,Crawford N.Navigated robotic assistance results in improved screw accuracy and positive clinical outcomes: an evaluation of the first 54 cases.J Robot Surg2020;14:431-7 PMCID:PMC7237393

[3] Hyun SJ,Jahng TA.Minimally invasive robotic versus open fluoroscopic-guided spinal instrumented fusions: a randomized controlled trial.Spine2017;42:353-8

[4] Huntsman KT,Ahrendtsen LA.Navigated robot-guided pedicle screws placed successfully in single-position lateral lumbar interbody fusion.J Robot Surg2020;14:643-7 PMCID:PMC7347701

[5] Gertzbein SD.Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.Spine1990;15:11-4

[6] Mason A,Babuska JM.The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems: a systematic review.J Neurosurg Spine2014;20:196-203

[7] Gelalis ID,Pakos EE.Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.Eur Spine J2012;21:247-55 PMCID:PMC3265579

[8] Marcus HJ,Nandi D,Darzi A.Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review.Eur Spine J2014;23:291-7 PMCID:PMC3906467

[9] Gao S,Fang H.Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur Spine J2018;27:921-30

[10] Aoude AA,Figueiredo R,Ouellet J.Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review.Eur Spine J2015;24:990-1004

[11] Tarawneh AM.A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the accuracy and clinical outcome of pedicle screw placement using robot-assisted technology and conventional freehand technique.Global Spine J2021;11:575-86 PMCID:PMC8119930

[12] Fatima N,Hadzipasic M,Shin JH.Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J2021;21:181-92

[13] Theologou M,Zevgaridis D,Matejic S.Pedicle screw placement accuracy impact and comparison between grading systems.Surg Neurol Int2017;8:131 PMCID:PMC5502290

[14] Hu X.What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?.Clin Orthop Relat Res2014;472:1839-44 PMCID:PMC4016454

[15] Pechlivanis I,Engelhardt M.Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system: first experiences and accuracy of screw placement.Spine2009;34:392-8

[16] Keric N,Haj A.Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws.Neurosurg Focus2017;42:E11

[17] Wiesner L,Schulitz KP.Clinical evaluation and computed tomography scan analysis of screw tracts after percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine.Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2000;25:615-21

[18] Xu DS,Godzik J,Smith W.Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.Ann Transl Med2018;6:104 PMCID:PMC5900070

[19] Ziino C,Ajiboye RM,Koltsov JC.Single position versus lateral-then-prone positioning for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation.J Spine Surg2018;4:717-24 PMCID:PMC6330578

[20] Blizzard DJ.MIS single-position lateral and oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral pedicle screw fixation: feasibility and perioperative results.Spine2018;43:440-6

[21] Laratta JL,Lombardi JM.Accuracy of S2 alar-iliac screw placement under robotic guidance.Spine Deform2018;6:130-6

[22] Shillingford JN,Park PJ.Human versus Robot: a propensity-matched analysis of the accuracy of free hand: versus: robotic guidance for placement of S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws.Spine2018;43:E1297-304

[23] Urakov TM,Burks SS.Initial academic experience and learning curve with robotic spine instrumentation.Neurosurg Focus2017;42:E4

[24] Zhang Q,Xu YF.Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease.World Neurosurg2019;125:e429-34

[25] Pennington Z,Westbroek EM.Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion: systematic review of the literature.Spine J2019;19:1397-411

[26] Costa F,Ortolina A.Computed tomography-based image-guided system in spinal surgery: state of the art through 10 years of experience.Neurosurgery2015;11:59-67