Robotic radical prostatectomy in post HIFU salvage setting: tertiary center experience and review of the current literature

Stefano De Luca , Sabrina De Cillis , Federico Piramide , Paolo Alessio , Filippo Russo , Daniele Amparore , Gabriele Volpi , Stefano Granato , Matteo Manfredi , Cristian Fiori , Enrico Checcucci , Francesco Porpiglia

Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2022, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 13

PDF
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2022, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :13 DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.127
Original Article

Robotic radical prostatectomy in post HIFU salvage setting: tertiary center experience and review of the current literature

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the study was to describe our surgical technique of salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) in patients who underwent primary high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and to report the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes during the first year follow up. The secondary aim of the study was to review the current literature evidence on this topic.

Methods: We retrospectively extracted, from our prospective RARP database, all the patients who underwent sRARP for biochemical recurrence after primary HIFU. All the surgical interventions were performed by a single surgeon following our total anatomical reconstruction (TAR) technique. Demographics, perioperative, functional, and oncological results were collected up to one year follow-up.

Results: Eleven patients underwent post-HIFU sRARP with TAR technique at our institution. All the surgical procedures were uneventful. All the complication recorded were classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade I. Continence rate at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month post intervention was 36.3%, 45.5%, 63.6 %, and 81.1%, respectively. Medium PSA at 12 months follow-up was 0.2 ng/mL (SD 0.01), with no Biochemical Failure (BCF) recorded.

Conclusion: sRARP with TAR technique is a safe and feasible procedure in patients with BCF after primary HIFU. No major complications were recorded, with good oncological and functional results after one year follow up.

Keywords

Prostate cancer, focal therapy / HIFU, safety, salvage therapy, magnetic resonance imaging, PSMA-PET/CT

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Stefano De Luca, Sabrina De Cillis, Federico Piramide, Paolo Alessio, Filippo Russo, Daniele Amparore, Gabriele Volpi, Stefano Granato, Matteo Manfredi, Cristian Fiori, Enrico Checcucci, Francesco Porpiglia. Robotic radical prostatectomy in post HIFU salvage setting: tertiary center experience and review of the current literature. Mini-invasive Surgery, 2022, 6(1): 13 DOI:10.20517/2574-1225.2021.127

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ferlay J,Dikshit R.Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.Int J Cancer2015;136:E359-86

[2]

Cooperberg MR,Meng MV,Carroll PR.The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management.J Clin Oncol2004;22:2141-9 PMCID:PMC2997214

[3]

Mottet N,Briers E.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent.Eur Urol2021;79:243-62

[4]

Schröder FH,Roobol MJ.ERSPC InvestigatorsScreening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.N Engl J Med2009;360:1320-8

[5]

De Luca S,Bollito E.Risk of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy.Minerva Urol Nefrol2020;72:360-8

[6]

Bianchi L,Fossati N.Oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series with more than 10 years follow up.Minerva Urol Nefrol2019;71:38-46

[7]

Ahdoot M,Turkbey B,Pinto PA.Contemporary treatments in prostate cancer focal therapy.Curr Opin Oncol2019;31:200-6 PMCID:PMC6465079

[8]

Valerio M,Eggener SE.New and established technology in focal ablation of the prostate: a systematic review.Eur Urol2017;71:17-34

[9]

Elkhoury FF,Marks LS.MR-guided biopsy and focal therapy: new options for prostate cancer management.Curr Opin Urol2018;28:93-101 PMCID:PMC7314431

[10]

De Luca S,Tucci M.Prostate cancer management at an Italian tertiary referral center: does multidisciplinary team meeting influence diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process?.Minerva Urol Nefrol2019;71:576-82

[11]

Guillaumier S,Arya M.A multicentre study of 5-year outcomes following focal therapy in treating clinically significant nonmetastatic prostate cancer.Eur Urol2018;74:422-9 PMCID:PMC6156573

[12]

Stabile A,Hosking-Jervis F.Medium-term oncological outcomes in a large cohort of men treated with either focal or hemi-ablation using high-intensity focused ultrasonography for primary localized prostate cancer.BJU Int2019;124:431-40

[13]

Clery R,Seisen T.Outcomes after salvage radical prostatectomy and first-line radiation therapy or HIFU for recurrent localized prostate cancer: results from a multicenter study.World J Urol2019;37:1491-8

[14]

Thompson JE,Shaw G.Peri-operative, functional and early oncologic outcomes of salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after high-intensity focused ultrasound partial ablation.BMC Urol2020;20:81 PMCID:PMC7329479

[15]

Linares Espinós E,Sivaraman A.Minimally invasive salvage prostatectomy after primary radiation or ablation treatment.Urology2016;94:111-6

[16]

Panebianco V,Weinreb JC.Prostate magnetic resonance imaging for local recurrence reporting (PI-RR): international consensus-based guidelines on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol Oncol2021;4:868-76

[17]

Roach M 3rd,Thames H Jr.Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2006;65:965-74

[18]

Porpiglia F,Manfredi M.Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: implications on early recovery of urinary continence.Eur Urol2016;69:485-95

[19]

Manfredi M,Fiori C.Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures.BJU Int2019;124:477-86

[20]

Campobasso D,Amparore D.Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with previous prostate surgery.Minerva Urol Nefrol2019;71:605-11

[21]

Montorsi F,Rosen RC.Pasadena Consensus PanelBest practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.Eur Urol2012;62:368-81

[22]

Marconi L,Tourinho-Barbosa R.Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after focal therapy: oncological, functional outcomes and predictors of recurrence.Eur Urol2019;76:27-30

[23]

Nunes-Silva I,Srougi V.Effect of prior focal therapy on perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.J Urol2017;198:1069-76

[24]

Checcucci E,De Luca S,Fiori C.Precision prostate cancer surgery: an overview of new technologies and techniques.Minerva Urol Nefrol2019;71:487-501

PDF

55

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/