Has robotic prostatectomy determined the fall of the laparoscopic approach?

John Hayes , Nikhil Vasdev , Prokar Dasgupta

Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2021, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 56

PDF
Mini-invasive Surgery ›› 2021, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :56 DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.126
Perspective

Has robotic prostatectomy determined the fall of the laparoscopic approach?

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has revolutionised the surgical management of localised prostate cancer in the modern era. The surgeon is provided with greater precision, more versatile dexterity and an immersive three-dimensional visual field. The impressive hardware facilitates, for example, the dissection of the peri-prostatic fascia, whilst preserving the neurovascular bundle, or the suturing of the vesico-urethral anastomosis. Prior to RALP, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) represented the first venture into the minimally invasive world. Associated with more cumbersome ergonomics, LRP has a significant learning curve compared with the robotic approach. There has been a paucity, until recently, of high-quality literature comparing outcomes between the two operations, including the attainment of the Pentafecta of survivorship: biochemical recurrence-free, continence, potency, no postoperative complications and negative surgical margins.

Keywords

Prostate cancer / robotic / prostatectomy / laparoscopic

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
John Hayes, Nikhil Vasdev, Prokar Dasgupta. Has robotic prostatectomy determined the fall of the laparoscopic approach?. Mini-invasive Surgery, 2021, 5(1): 56 DOI:10.20517/2574-1225.2021.126

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Schuessler WW,Clayman RV.Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report.J Urol1992;147:246-8

[2]

Binder J.Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.BJU Int2001;87:408-10

[3]

Abboudi H,Guru KA.Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review.BJU Int2014;114:617-29

[4]

Plerhoples TA,Wren SM.The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.J Robot Surg2012;6:65-72

[5]

Patel VR,Coelho RF.Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol2011;59:702-7

[6]

Stolzenburg JU,Neuhaus P.Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from the first multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded controlled trial in radical prostatectomy (LAP-01).Eur Urol2021;79:750-9

[7]

Asimakopoulos AD,Annino F,Calado AA.Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.J Sex Med2011;8:1503-12

[8]

Porpiglia F,Lucci Chiarissi M.Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol2013;63:606-14

[9]

Wang T,Wang S.A Meta-analysis of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Open Med (Wars)2019;14:485-90 PMCID:PMC6572386

[10]

Porpiglia F,Bertolo R.Five-year outcomes for a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol Focus2018;4:80-6

[11]

Close A,Rushton S.Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.Eur Urol2013;64:361-9

PDF

125

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/