Robotic vs. traditional stapler use in robotic portal anatomic lung resection

Abstract

Aim: Currently, there is a paucity of data comparing robotic to traditional video-assisted thoracic surgery stapling devices and the effects on perioperative outcomes during robotic anatomic lung resection. We sought to investigate our institutional experience with patients undergoing robotic anatomic lung resection stratified by the type of stapler used over a contemporary period.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained thoracic surgery database and evaluated all patients who underwent robotic anatomic lung resection between January 2015 and December 2018. Patients were grouped based on the type of stapler used during surgery and preoperative characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.

Results: In total, 634 lung resections occurred during the study period. Of those, 236 met inclusion criteria, and 49 cases (20.8%) fully utilized the robotic stapler. We found no clinically significant difference in preoperative or intraoperative characteristics between groups, except operative time was longer in the robot stapler group. This was likely related to surgeon learning curve. There were no differences between groups in postoperative outcomes or complications.

Conclusion: We found equivalent rates of complications, prolonged air leak, and chest tube duration between the two groups. Based on our data, we recommend that surgeons use the stapling device with which they are most confident.

Keywords

Robotic stapler / robotic lung resection / lung cancer / EndoWrist®

References

[1] Zirafa C,Ricciardi S,Davini F.Nodal upstaging evaluation in NSCLC patients treated by robotic lobectomy..Surg Endosc2019;33:153-8

[2] Toker A,Demirhan O,Kaba E.Lymph node dissection in surgery for lung cancer: comparison of open vs. video-assisted vs. robotic-assisted approaches..Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2016;22:284-90 PMCID:PMC5088393

[3] Liang H,Zhao L,Zhang J.Robotic versus video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer: a meta-analysis..Ann Surg2018;268:254-9

[4] Cerfolio RJ,Dylewski M,Spaggiari L.The long-term survival of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional study..J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2018;155:778-86 PMCID:PMC5896345

[5] Zirafa CC,Ricciardi S,Davini F.Long-term oncologic results for robotic major lung resection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients..Surg Oncol2019;28:223-7

[6] Kneuertz PJ,Richardson M,Moffatt-Bruce SD.Long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approach..Clin Lung Cancer2019;Epub ahead of print [PMID: 31685354 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.10.004]

[7] Pearlstein DP.Robotic lobectomy utilizing the robotic stapler..Ann Thorac Surg2016;102:e591-3

[8] Galetta D,Pardolesi A,Spaggiari L.New stapling devices in robotic surgery..J Vis Surg2017;3:45 PMCID:PMC5637468

[9] Kim MP,Meisenbach LM,Chan EY.Da Vinci Xi robot decreases the number of thoracotomy cases in pulmonary resection..J Thorac Dis2019;11:145-53 PMCID:PMC6384383

[10] Dindo D,Clavien PA.Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey..Ann Surg2004;240:205-13 PMCID:PMC1360123

[11] Clavien PA,de Oliveira ML,Dindo D.The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience..Ann Surg2009;250:187-96

[12] STS National Database 2018. General thoracic surgery database training manual. Available from: https://www.sts.org/sites/default/files/content/GTSDTrainingManual_September24_2018.pdf [Last accessed on 11 Feb 2020]

[13] Phillips JD.Editorial on expanded indications for robotic surgery in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer..J Thorac Dis2019;11 (Suppl 9):S1172-4 PMCID:PMC6560600

[14] Veronesi G,Maisonneuve P,Schmid RA.Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer..J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2010;140:19-25

[15] Cerfolio RJ.Total port approach for robotic lobectomy..Thorac Surg Clin2014;24:151-6

[16] Kim MP.“Five on a dice” port placement for robot-assisted thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy using robotic stapler..J Thorac Dis2017;9:5355-62 PMCID:PMC5756971

[17] Khan N,Chan EY.“Five on a dice” port placement allows for successful robot-assisted left pneumonectomy..Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep2017;6:e42-4 PMCID:PMC5748245

[18] Guo F,Li S.Compare the prognosis of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis..Medicine (Baltimore)2019;98:e17089 PMCID:PMC6775418

[19] Attaar A,Nason KS.Risk factors for prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis..Ann Surg2019;Epub ahead of print [PMID: 31577547 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003560]

[20] Seder CW,Ramsay T,Blackmon S.A Prolonged air leak score for lung cancer resection: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database..Ann Thorac Surg2019;108:1478-83

[21] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health. A report of the surgeon general. preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: we can make the next generation tobacco-free. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2012/consumer_booklet/index.htm [Last accessed on 11 Feb 2020]

[22] Lampalo M,Jukić I,Barišić B.Health sequelae of tobacco exposure in childhood and adolescence..Psychiatr Danub2019;31 (Suppl 1):39-43

[23] Oh DS,Cesnik L,Cerfolio RJ.Port strategies for robot-assisted lobectomy by high-volume thoracic surgeons: a nationwide survey..Innovations (Phila)2019;14:545-52

[24] Song G,Miao S,Zhao Y.Learning curve for robot-assisted lobectomy of lung cancer..J Thorac Dis2019;11:2431-7 PMCID:PMC6626771

[25] Arnold BN,Bhatnagar V,Wang Z.Defining the learning curve in robot-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy..Surgery2019;165:450-4

[26] Meyer M,Tempesta B,Strother E.The learning curve of robotic lobectomy..Int J Med Robot2012;8:448-52