Hydrodynamic Performance and Wave Attenuation Mechanism of a Single-Ring Floating Breakwater with Internal Compartmentalization and Ballasted Water

Abstract

A three-dimensional, two-way coupled fluid–structure interaction (FSI) numerical model was established to investigate the hydrodynamic performance and wave-attenuation mechanism of a water-ballasted single-ring floating breakwater with internal compartmentalization. The model couples the CFD wave solver in OpenFOAM with its built-in six-degree-of-freedom rigid-body motion solver and the dynamic mooring solver MoorDyn. It was validated against two benchmark cases comprising physical wave-flume measurements and published numerical results. Four configurations-unballasted, single-compartment, dual-compartment, and four-compartment-were compared under extreme irregular waves, with different incident-wave headings considered for the compartmentalized configurations. The analysis focused on wave transmission, transient mooring tension, and the combined effects of annular wave scattering and ballast-water sloshing. The results demonstrate that the four-compartment configuration provides the strongest wave attenuation, whereas the dual-compartment configuration achieves a better balance between wave-attenuation performance and mooring-load distribution.

Keywords

Floating breakwater / Water ballast / Tuned liquid damper (TLD) / Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) / Compartmentalization / Mooring tension

References

[1] Kjeldstad T, Lindholm D, Marstein E, Selj J. Cooling of floating photovoltaics and the importance of water temperature. Sol. Energy 2021, 218, 544-551. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.03.022

[2] Li Z, Chen D, Feng X. Hydroelastic and expansibility analysis of a modular floating photovoltaic system with multi-directional hinge connections. Ocean Eng. 2023, 289, 116218. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116218

[3] Cazzaniga R, Cicu M, Rosa-Clot M, Rosa-Clot P, Tina GM, Ventura C. Floating photovoltaic plants: Performance analysis and design solutions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 1730-1741. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.269

[4] Garrod A, Neda Hussain S, Ghosh A, Nahata S, Wynne C, Paver S. An assessment of floating photovoltaic systems and energy storage methods: A comprehensive review. Results Eng. 2024, 21, 101940. DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101940

[5] El Hammoumi A, Chalh A, Allouhi A, Motahhir S, El Ghzizal A, Derouich A. Design and construction of a test bench to investigate the potential of floating PV systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123917. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123917

[6] Majumder A, Kumar A, Innamorati R, Mastino CC, Cappellini G, Baccoli R, et al. Cooling Methods for Standard and Floating PV Panels. Energies 2023, 16, 7939. DOI: 10.3390/en16247939

[7] Kim SM, Oh M, Park HD. Analysis and Prioritization of the Floating Photovoltaic System Potential for Reservoirs in Korea. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 395. DOI: 10.3390/app9030395

[8] Oliveira-Pinto S, Stokkermans J. Marine floating solar plants: An overview of potential, challenges and feasibility. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Marit. Eng. 2020, 173, 120-135. DOI: 10.1680/jmaen.2020.10

[9] Wang J, Lund PD. Review of Recent Offshore Photovoltaics Development. Energies 2022, 15, 7462. DOI: 10.3390/en15207462

[10] Fan Y, Li J, Liu S, Zhang H. A study of wave forces on a vertical truncated cylinder with different submergence depths. Ocean Eng. 2024, 313, 119489. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119489

[11] Zhai G, Zhou T, Ma Z, Ren N, Chen J, Teh HM. Comparison of impulsive wave forces on a semi-submerged platform deck, with and without columns and considering air compressibility effects, under regular wave actions. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2021, 15, 1932-1953. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2021.1999858

[12] Zhang N, Xiao L, Zou Q, Cummins C. Large-scale wave basin experimental study on the spatio-temporal distribution of wave impact loads on a semi-submersible platform. Ocean Eng. 2025, 327, 120991. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120991

[13] Dai J, Wang CM, Utsunomiya T, Duan W. Review of recent research and developments on floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng. 2018, 158, 132-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.083

[14] Fouladi MQ, Bahmanpouri F, Rezazadeh S, Kollolemad F, Mashayekhi M, Viccione G. Investigating the sidewall’s effects on π-shaped floating breakwaters interacting with water waves by the scaled boundary FEM. Ocean Eng. 2023, 284, 115200. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115200

[15] Ji CY, Chen X, Cui J, Gaidai O, Incecik A. Experimental study on configuration optimization of floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng. 2016, 117, 302-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.03.002

[16] Bayram A. Experimental study of a sloping float breakwater. Ocean Eng. 2000, 27, 445-453. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-8018(98)00080-8

[17] Williams AN, Lee HS, Huang Z. Floating pontoon breakwaters. Ocean Eng. 2000, 27, 221-240. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-8018(98)00056-0

[18] Yin Z, Ni Z, Luan Y, Zhang X, Li J, Li Y. Hydrodynamic characteristics of a box-type floating breakwater with restrained piles under regular waves. Ocean Eng. 2023, 280, 114408. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114408

[19] Ning DZ, Zhao XL, Zhao M, Hann M, Kang HG. Analytical investigation of hydrodynamic performance of a dual pontoon WEC-type breakwater. Appl. Ocean Res. 2017, 65, 102-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2017.03.012

[20] Christensen ED, Bingham HB, Skou Friis AP, Larsen AK, Jensen KL. An experimental and numerical study of floating breakwaters. Coast. Eng. 2018, 137, 43-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.03.002

[21] Liu Z, Wang Y, Wang W, Hua X. Numerical modeling and optimization of a winged box-type floating breakwater by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Ocean Eng. 2019, 188, 106246. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106246

[22] Cho IH. Transmission coefficients of a floating rectangular breakwater with porous side plates. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 2016, 8, 53-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2015.10.002

[23] Dou P, Xue MA, Zheng J, Zhang C, Qian L. Numerical and experimental study of tuned liquid damper effects on suppressing nonlinear vibration of elastic supporting structural platform. Nonlinear Dyn 2020, 99, 2675-2691. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-019-05447-y

[24] Xue MA, Dou P, Zheng J, Lin P, Yuan X. Pitch motion reduction of semisubmersible floating offshore wind turbine substructure using a tuned liquid multicolumn damper. Mar. Struct. 2022, 84, 103237. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103237

[25] Yang Z, Ji X, Xie M, Li J, Zhang H, Wang D. Experimental study on the dynamic response of a water ballast type floating breakwater. Ocean Eng. 2021, 233, 109012. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109012

[26] Sun B, Zhang H, Yang S, Li C. Experimental investigation on the wave-attenuating performance and shape optimization of water ballast type floating breakwater. Ocean Eng. 2022, 248, 110848. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110848

[27] Xue MA, He Y, Yuan X, Cao Z, Odoom JK. Numerical and experimental study on sloshing damping effects of the porous baffle. Ocean Eng. 2023, 285, 115363. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115363

[28] Zhao X, Du X, Li M, Göteman M. Semi-analytical study on the hydrodynamic performance of an interconnected floating breakwater-WEC system in presence of the seawall. Appl. Ocean Res. 2021, 109, 102555. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102555

[29] Masoudi E, Marshall A. Diffraction of waves by multi-pontoon rectangular floating breakwaters. Ocean Eng. 2024, 310, 118789. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118789

[30] Gao J, Mi C, Song Z, Liu Y. Transient gap resonance between two closely-spaced boxes triggered by nonlinear focused wave groups. Ocean Eng. 2024, 305, 117938. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117938

[31] Hu KZ, Xu TJ, Wang S. Hydrodynamic investigation of a new type of floating breakwaters integrated with porous baffles. Appl. Ocean Res. 2025, 154, 104380. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2024.104380

[32] Dunbar AJ, Craven BA, Paterson EG. Development and validation of a tightly coupled CFD/6-DOF solver for simulating floating offshore wind turbine platforms. Ocean Eng. 2015, 110, 98-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.066

[33] Palm J, Eskilsson C, Paredes GM, Bergdahl L. Coupled mooring analysis for floating wave energy converters using CFD: Formulation and validation. Int. J. Mar. Energy 2016, 16, 83-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijome.2016.05.003

[34] Eskilsson C, Palm J. High-fidelity modelling of moored marine structures: Multi-component simulations and fluid-mooring coupling. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 2022, 8, 513-526. DOI: 10.1007/s40722-022-00263-w

[35] Domínguez JM, Crespo AJC, Hall M, Altomare C, Wu M, Stratigaki V, et al. SPH simulation of floating structures with moorings. Coast. Eng. 2019, 153, 103560. DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103560

[36] Yang X, Jiang L, Yao Y, Gao X, Yan X, Shao N, et al. Energy Harness and Wake Structure of “Cir-Tri-Att” Oscillators for Flow-Induced Motion Tidal Energy Conversion System. Mar. Energy Res. 2025, 2, 10002. DOI: 10.70322/mer.2025.10002

[37] Lian J, Yang S, Yan L, Yang X, Yao Y, Liang C. Binocular Camera-Based Depth Recognition for Motion Monitoring and Response Analysis of Flexible Floating Structures for Offshore Photovoltaics. Mar. Energy Res. 2025, 2, 10019. DOI: 10.70322/mer.2025.10019

[38] Li X, Xiao Q, Zhou Y, Ning D, Incecik A, Nicoll R, et al. Coupled CFD-MBD numerical modeling of a mechanically coupled WEC array. Ocean Eng. 2022, 256, 111541. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111541

[39] Wei Y, Yu S, Jin P, Huang L, Elsherbiny K, Tezdogan T. Coupled analysis between catenary mooring and VLFS with structural hydroelasticity in waves. Mar. Struct. 2024, 93, 103516. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103516

[40] Chen H, Medina TA, Cercos-Pita JL. CFD simulation of multiple moored floating structures using OpenFOAM: An open-access mooring restraints library. Ocean Eng. 2024, 303, 117697. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117697

[41] Hall M, Goupee A. Validation of a lumped-mass mooring line model with DeepCwind semisubmersible model test data. Ocean Eng. 2015, 104, 590-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.035

[42] Lee SC, Song S, Park S. Platform Motions and Mooring System Coupled Solver for a Moored Floating Platform in a Wave. Processes 2021, 9, 1393. DOI: 10.3390/pr9081393

[43] Chen H, Hall M. CFD simulation of floating body motion with mooring dynamics: Coupling MoorDyn with OpenFOAM. Appl. Ocean Res. 2022, 124, 103210. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2022.103210

[44] Jeon W, Park S, Cho S. Moored motion prediction of a semi-submersible offshore platform in waves using an OpenFOAM and MoorDyn coupled solver. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 2023, 15, 100544. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2023.100544

[45] Yuan X, Cao Z, Xue MA, Li L, Zheng J. Experimental study on effects of floating breakwater filled with ballast water on wave attenuation. Ocean Eng. 2025, 341, 122720. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122720

[46] Jacobsen NG, Fuhrman DR, Fredsøe J. A Wave Generation Toolbox for the Open-Source CFD Library: OpenFOAM. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2012, 70, 1073-1088. DOI: 10.1002/fld.2726

[47] Hirt CW, Nichols BD. Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 1981, 39, 201-225. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5

[48] Mohapatra SC, da Silva Bispo IB, Guo Y, Guedes Soares C. Analysis of Wave-Induced Forces on a Floating Rectangular Box with Analytical and Numerical Approaches. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 2024, 23, 113-126. DOI: 10.1007/s11804-024-00385-7

[49] Lian J, Yan L, Yang S, Yao Y, Yang X, Liang C. Numerical and experimental analysis of wave-slamming characteristics of offshore floating photovoltaic structures. Ocean Eng. 2026, 356, 125242. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.125242