Drone-Assisted Vision for Offshore Wind Turbine Inspection and Maintenance: A Systematic Review

Owen Fiddy , Dena Bazazian , Asiya Khan , Lars Johanning , Deborah Greaves

Mar. Energy Res. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 10016

PDF (2006KB)
Mar. Energy Res. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) :10016 DOI: 10.70322/mer.2026.10016
Review
research-article
Drone-Assisted Vision for Offshore Wind Turbine Inspection and Maintenance: A Systematic Review
Author information +
History +
PDF (2006KB)

Abstract

Offshore wind turbines are exposed to harsh marine conditions that accelerate degradation and make inspection costly, hazardous, and weather-dependent. Early fault detection is needed to reduce downtime and prevent structural failure. This review investigates offshore wind turbine failure mechanisms, inspection technologies, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and robotic systems, computer-vision-based defect detection, infrared thermography, and drone-assisted maintenance. A structured literature review methodology was used to synthesise studies across offshore engineering, robotics, sensing, and machine learning. The findings show that autonomous offshore fault detection remains limited by a lack of real-world experimentation and data. UAV inspection systems offer strong remote inspection capability but often lack real-time perception and adaptive autonomy, while deep learning models remain highly dependent on controlled datasets and are vulnerable to offshore environmental noise. The literature is disconnected, with few studies integrating autonomous navigation, multimodal sensing, and onboard intelligence into a unified offshore inspection framework. These findings demonstrate the need for robust drone-based systems capable of reliable visual and thermal fault detection in real offshore environments.

Keywords

Offshore wind turbines / Unmanned aerial vehicles / Drone inspection / Computer vision / Infrared thermography / Multimodal sensing / Fault detection / Autonomous inspection

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Owen Fiddy, Dena Bazazian, Asiya Khan, Lars Johanning, Deborah Greaves. Drone-Assisted Vision for Offshore Wind Turbine Inspection and Maintenance: A Systematic Review. Mar. Energy Res., 2026, 3 (3) : 10016 DOI:10.70322/mer.2026.10016

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Shafiee M, Zhou Z, Mei L, Dinmohammadi F, Karama J, Flynn D. Unmanned Aerial Drones for Inspection of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Mission-Critical Failure Analysis. Robotics 2021, 10, 26. DOI: 10.3390/robotics10010026

[2]

Gao Z, Odgaard P. Real-time monitoring, fault prediction and health management for offshore wind turbine systems. Renew. Energy 2023, 218, 119258. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119258

[3]

Hameed Z, Hong YS, Cho YM, Ahn SH, Song CK. Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.008

[4]

Ma X, Li M, Li W, Liu Y. Overview of Offshore Wind Power Technologies. Sustainability 2025, 17, 596. DOI: 10.3390/su17020596

[5]

Jiang Z, Jovan F, Moradi P, Richardson T, Bernardini S, Watson S, et al. A multirobot system for autonomous deployment and recovery of a blade crawler for operations and maintenance of offshore wind turbine blades. J. Field Robot. 2023, 40, 73-93. DOI: 10.1002/rob.22117

[6]

Ma M, Liu H, Gao Y, Li S, Ma C, Hu D. Fully Autonomous Inspection of Wind Turbine Blades Based on Drones and Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Intelligent Sensing and Industrial Automation, Virtual, China, 9-10 December 2023; pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1145/3632314.3632348

[7]

Jia X, Chen X. AI-based optical-thermal video data fusion for near real-time blade segmentation in normal wind turbine operation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 127, 107325. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107325

[8]

Aird JA, Barthelmie RJ, Pryor SC. Automated Quantification of Wind Turbine Blade Leading Edge Erosion from Field Images. Energies 2023, 16, 2820. DOI: 10.3390/en16062820

[9]

Bounenni L, Castanedo CI, Maldague X. Defect Detection in Wind Turbine Blades Using Infrared Thermography, Image Processing, and U-Net. In Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Advanced Infrared Technology and Applications (AITA 2025), Kobe, Japan, 15-19 September 2025.DOI: 10.3390/proceedings2025129042

[10]

Corley B, Koukoura S, Carroll J, McDonald A. Combination of Thermal Modelling and Machine Learning Approaches for Fault Detection in Wind Turbine Gearboxes. Energies 2021, 14, 1375. DOI: 10.3390/en14051375

[11]

Kabra K, Xiong A, Li W, Luo M, Lu W, Yu T, et al. Deep object detection for waterbird monitoring using aerial imagery. In Proceedings of the 2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Nassau, Bahamas, 12-15 December 2022; pp. 455-460. DOI: 10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00073

[12]

Courbis S, Williams K, Stepanuk J, Etter H, McManus M, Campoblanco F, et al. Technology Gaps for Monitoring Birds and Marine Mammals at Offshore Wind Facilities. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 2024, 58, 5-22. DOI: 10.4031/MTSJ.58.3.1

[13]

Yang B, Sun D. Testing, inspecting and monitoring technologies for wind turbine blades: A survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 22, 515-526. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.056

[14]

García Márquez FP, Peco Chacón AM. A review of non-destructive testing on wind turbines blades. Renew. Energy 2020, 161, 998-1010. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.145

[15]

Heo SJ, Na WS. Review of Drone-Based Technologies for Wind Turbine Blade Inspection. Electronics 2025, 14, 227. DOI: 10.3390/electronics14020227

[16]

Zhang K, Pakrashi V, Murphy J, Hao G. Inspection of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines Using Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Literature Review and Trends. Sensors 2024, 24, 911. DOI: 10.3390/s24030911

[17]

Katkuri AVR, Madan H, Khatri N, Abdul-Qawy ASH, Patnaik KS. Autonomous UAV navigation using deep learning-based computer vision frameworks: A systematic literature review. Array 2024, 23, 100361. DOI: 10.1016/j.array.2024.100361

[18]

Sun C, Zhang C, Xiong N. Infrared and Visible Image Fusion Techniques Based on Deep Learning: A Review. Electronics 2020, 9, 2162. DOI: 10.3390/electronics9122162

[19]

Yang K, Xiang W, Chen Z, Zhang J, Liu Y. A review on infrared and visible image fusion algorithms based on neural networks. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 2024, 101, 104179. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2024.104179

[20]

Ayala A, Portela L, Buarque F, Fernandes BJT, Cruz F. UAV control in autonomous object-goal navigation: A systematic literature review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 57, 125. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-024-10758-7

[21]

Hwang S, An YK, Sohn H. Continuous Line Laser Thermography for Damage Imaging of Rotating Wind Turbine Blades. Procedia Eng. 2017, 188, 225-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.478

[22]

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71

[23]

Liu L, Li P, Wang D, Zhu S. A wind turbine damage detection algorithm designed based on YOLOv8. Appl. Soft Comput. 2024, 154, 111364. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111364

[24]

Svystun S, Scislo L, Pawlik M, Melnychenko O, Radiuk P, Savenko O, et al. DyTAM: Accelerating Wind Turbine Inspections with Dynamic UAV Trajectory Adaptation. Energies 2025, 18, 1823. DOI: 10.3390/en18071823

[25]

Zhang Z, Zhang H, Zhang X, Hu Q, Jiang X. A Review of Wind Turbine Icing and Anti/De-Icing Technologies. Energies 2024, 17, 2805. DOI: 10.3390/en17122805

[26]

Ikhazuangbe GI, Gomes C, Mohanna S, Dagogo B, Osarimwian ON, Jaja E, et al. A Review of Lightning Protection Methods for Wind Turbine Blades. IOSR J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2023, 18, 1-13. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Godson-Ikhazuangbe/publication/367299237_Review_of_Lightning_Protection_Methods_for_Wind_Turbine_Blades/links/63cb1ff3e922c50e99ad1442/Review-of-Lightning-Protection-Methods-for-Wind-Turbine-Blades.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2026).

[27]

Snyder B, Kaiser MJ. A comparison of offshore wind power development in Europe and the U.S.: Patterns and drivers of development. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 1845-1856. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.013

[28]

Qin X, Zhang M, Fu S, Li H, Hou J, Xu Y. Review on researches and main influencing factors on mechanical properties of offshore wind power cables. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2025, 10, 426-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.joes.2024.06.001

[29]

Zhang M, Li Q, Li H, Yu W, Guo Z, Siew WH. Damage mechanism of wind turbine blade under the impact of lightning induced arcs. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2019, 11, 053306. DOI: 10.1063/1.5118717

[30]

Soraghan C, Shenton S. Repairing Lightning Strike Damage: Executing Rope-Access Blade Repairs at a UK Offshore Wind Farm; O&M Case Study CS-0019; Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult: Blyth, UK, 2018.

[31]

Garolera CA, Madsen SF, Nissim M, Myers JD, Holboell J. Lightning Damage to wind turbine blades from wind farm in US. IEEE Trans. Power Del. 2014, 31, 1043-1049. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2370682

[32]

Ataya S, Ahmed MMZ. Damages of wind turbine blade trailing edge: Forms, location, and root causes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2013, 35, 480-488. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.05.011

[33]

Miao XY, Chen X. Structural transverse cracking mechanisms of trailing edge regions in composite wind turbine blades. Compos. Struct. 2023, 308, 116680. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116680

[34]

Mishnaevsky L, Hasager CB, Bak C, Tilg AM, Bech JI, Doagou Rad S, et al. Leading edge erosion of wind turbine blades: Understanding, prevention and protection. Renew. Energy 2021, 169, 953-969. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.044

[35]

Cai C, Guo J, Song X, Zhang Y, Wu J, Tang S, et al. Review of Data-Driven Approaches for Wind Turbine Blade Icing Detection. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1617. DOI:10.3390/su15021617

[36]

Olabi AG, Wilberforce T, Elsaid K, Sayed ET, Salameh T, Abdelkareem MA, et al. A Review on Failure Modes of Wind Turbine Components. Energies 2021, 14, 5241. DOI: 10.3390/en14175241

[37]

Mishnaevsky L. Repair of wind turbine blades: Review of methods and related computational mechanics problems. Renew. Energy 2019, 140, 828-839. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.113

[38]

Carroll J, McDonald A, McMillan D. Failure rate, repair time and unscheduled O&M cost analysis of offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy 2016, 19, 1107-1119. DOI: 10.1002/we.1887

[39]

Moros D, Berrabah N, Searle KD, Ashton IG. Maintenance & failure data analysis of an offshore wind farm. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2024, 2767, 062006. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/6/062006

[40]

Nisingizwe MP, Ndishimye P, Swaibu K, Nshimiyimana L, Karame P, Dushimiyimana V, et al. Effect of unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) delivery on blood product delivery time and wastage in Rwanda: a retrospective, cross-sectional study and time series analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2022, 10, e564-e569. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00048-1

[41]

Garg V, Niranjan S, Prybutok V, Pohlen T, Gligor D. Drones in last-mile delivery: A systematic review on Efficiency, Accessibility, and Sustainability. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2023, 123, 103831. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103831

[42]

Lyu M, Zhao Y, Huang C, Huang H. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Search and Rescue: A Survey. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3266. DOI: 10.3390/rs15133266

[43]

Kulsinskas A, Durdevic P, Ortiz-Arroyo D. Internal Wind Turbine Blade Inspections Using UAVs: Analysis and Design Issues. Energies 2021, 14, 294. DOI:10.3390/en14020294

[44]

Best O, Khan A, Sharma S, Collins K, Gianni M. Leading Edge Erosion Classification in Offshore Wind Turbines Using Feature Extraction and Classical Machine Learning. Energies 2024, 17, 5475. DOI: 10.3390/en17215475

[45]

Natili F, Castellani F, Astolfi D, Becchetti M. Video-Tachometer Methodology for Wind Turbine Rotor Speed Measurement. Sensors 2020, 20, 7314. DOI: 10.3390/s20247314

[46]

Liao YH, Wang L, Yan Y. Instantaneous Rotational Speed Measurement of Wind Turbine Blades using a Marker-Tracking Method. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 16-19 May 2022; pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1109/I2MTC48687.2022.9806658

[47]

Gao W, Liu J, Cui C, Liu X, Fang Y. An efficient image stitching method of wind-turbine blades for damage measurement in online repair robots. Measurement 2025, 256, 118125. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.118125

[48]

Gao W, Cui C, Liu X, Yang H, Zhang H, Fang Y. An improved image stitching method for blades of wind turbine based on online repair technology. Comput. Ind. 2026, 176, 104446. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2026.104446

[49]

Xiao B, Wu H, Xu W, Dai X, Hu H, Lu Y, et al. Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 17-21 June 2024; pp. 4818-4829. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.00461

[50]

Wu G, Yi T, Fang J, Xie L, Zhang X, Wei W, et al. 4D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Dynamic Scene Rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 17-21 June 2024; pp. 20310-20320. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01920

[51]

Chen T, Zhu L, Ding C, Cao R, Wang Y, Zhang S, et al. SAM-Adapter: Adapting Segment Anything in Underperformed Scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), Paris, France, 2-6 October 2023; pp. 3359-3367. DOI: 10.1109/ICCVW60793.2023.00361

[52]

He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27-30 June 2016; pp. 770-778. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

[53]

Lin TY, Dollar P, Girshick R, He K, Hariharan B, Belongie S. Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA, 21-26 July 2017; pp. 936-944. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.106

[54]

Carion N, Massa F, Synnaeve G, Usunier N, Kirillov A, Zagoruyko S. End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Glasgow, UK, 23-28 August 2020; pp. 213-229. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13

[55]

Kirillov A, Mintun E, Ravi N, Mao H, Rolland C, Gustafson L, et al. Segment Anything. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Paris, France, 1-6 October 2023; pp. 3992-4003. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00371

[56]

Sun Z, Qian J, Liu A, Yao S, Lv X, Shao L. Icing Detection of Wind Turbine Blades Based on an Improved PP-YOLOE Detection Network. Sensors 2025, 25, 6438. DOI: 10.3390/s25206438

[57]

Jiang W, Jin J. Intelligent icing detection model of wind turbine blades based on SCADA data. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.07914. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2101.07914

[58]

Tang Z, Jian X. Thermal fault diagnosis of complex electrical equipment based on infrared image recognition. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 5547. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56142-x

[59]

Attallah O, Ibrahim RA, Zakzouk NE. Fault diagnosis for induction generator-based wind turbine using ensemble deep learning techniques. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 12787-12798. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.139

[60]

Kiczek B, Batsch M. Exploration of Unsupervised Deep Learning-Based Gear Fault Detection for Wind Turbine Gearboxes. Energies 2025, 18, 3630. DOI: 10.3390/en18143630

[61]

Zhou J, Zhao Y. A distance-aware approach for reliable out-of-distribution detection of wind turbine gearbox fault diagnosis. Front. Energy Res. 2024, 12, 149630. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1496130

[62]

Lee C, Maceren EDC. Wind energy system fault classification and detection using deep convolutional neural network and particle swarm optimization-extreme gradient boosting. IET Energy Syst. Integr. 2024, 6, 479-497. DOI: 10.1049/esi2.12144

[63]

Zhao Z, Li T. Enhancing wind turbine blade damage detection with YOLO-Wind. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 18667. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-03639-8

[64]

Li W, Pan Z, Zhu Q, Du Y. Wind turbine blade defect detection and measurement technology based on improved SegFormer and pixel matching. Opt. Laser Technol. 2024, 179, 111381. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111381

[65]

Zhang L, Fan Q, Lin J, Zhang Z, Yan X, Li C. A nearly end-to-end deep learning approach to fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearboxes under nonstationary conditions. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 119, 105735. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105735

[66]

Sheiati S, Jia X, McGugan M, Branner K, Chen X. Artificial intelligence-based blade identification in operational wind turbines through similarity analysis aided drone inspection. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 137, 109234. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109234

[67]

Shihavuddin A, Chen X, Fedorov V, Nymark Christensen A, Andre Brogaard Riis N, Branner K, et al. Wind Turbine Surface Damage Detection by Deep Learning Aided Drone Inspection Analysis. Energies 2019, 12, 676. DOI: 10.3390/en12040676

[68]

Mansoor M, Tan X, Mirza AF, Gong T, Song Z, Irfan M. WindDefNet: A Multi-Scale Attention-Enhanced ViT-Inception-ResNet Model for Real-Time Wind Turbine Blade Defect Detection. Machines 2025, 13, 453. DOI: 10.3390/machines13060453

[69]

Tong Z, Cheng L, Xie S, Kersemans M. A flexible deep learning framework for thermographic inspection of composites. NDT E Int. 2023, 139, 102926. DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102926

[70]

Wilson AN, Gupta KA, Koduru BH, Kumar A, Jha A, Cenkeramaddi LR. Recent Advances in Thermal Imaging and its Applications Using Machine Learning: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 3395-3407. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3234335

[71]

Balakrishnan GK, Yaw CT, Koh SP, Abedin T, Raj AA, Tiong SK, et al. A Review of Infrared Thermography for Condition-Based Monitoring in Electrical Energy: Applications and Recommendations. Energies 2022, 15, 6000. DOI: 10.3390/en15166000

[72]

Khatri A, Khadka S, Lamichhane N, Shrestha R. A comprehensive review of infrared thermography and deep learning applications for solar photovoltaic systems. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2025, 148, 105878. DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2025.105878

[73]

Sheinin M, Sankaranarayanan AC, Narasimhan SG. Projecting Trackable Thermal Patterns for Dynamic Computer Vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 16-22 June 2024; pp. 25223-25232.DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.02383

[74]

Stadler D, Specker A. A Strong Baseline for Multi-Person Tracking in Thermal Infrared Imagery. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Nashville, TN, USA, 11-15 June 2025; pp. 4540-4550. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW67362.2025.00439

[75]

Shyam P, Yoo H. Lightweight Thermal Super-Resolution and Object Detection for Robust Perception in Adverse Weather Conditions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3-7 January 2024; pp. 7471-7482. DOI: 10.1109/WACV57701.2024.00730

[76]

Yun H, Lo S, Diepenbrock CH, Bailey BN, Earles JM. VisTA-SR: Improving the Accuracy and Resolution of Low-Cost Thermal Imaging Cameras for Agriculture. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Seattle, WA, USA, 17-21 June 2024; pp. 5470-5479. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW63382.2024.00556

[77]

Wang C, Gu Y. Research on infrared nondestructive detection of small wind turbine blades. Results Eng. 2022, 15, 100570. DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100570

[78]

Wang L, Fan Y, Wang Y, Luo G, Shen M, Zhu G. Research on the Online Monitoring and Fault Early Warning System of Infrared Thermography for Wind Power Equipment Based on Deep Learning Algorithm. Distrib. Gener. Altern. Energy J. 2025, 40, 771-792. DOI: 10.13052/dgaej2156-3306.4047

[79]

Lysyi A, Sachenko A, Radiuk P, Lysyi M, Melnychenko O, Zahorodnia D. Method of UAV-Based Inspection of Photovoltaic Modules Using Thermal and RGB Data Fusion. Radioelectron. Comput. Syst. 2025, 116, 186-205. DOI: 10.32620/reks.2025.4.13

[80]

Vasconcelos HM, Sousa PJ, Dias S, Viriato N, Domingues T, Tavares PJ, et al. UAV-Based Thermographic Inspection of Wind Turbine Blades for Structural Integrity Assessment: Preliminary Findings. Procedia Struct. Integr. 2025, 68, 795-801. DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2025.06.132

[81]

Bounenni L, Ibarra Castanedo C, Maldague XPV. Infrared Defect Detection in Wind Turbine Blades. eJNDT 2026, 31, 32481. DOI: 10.58286/32481

[82]

Fan Y, Mai J, Xue F, Lau SSY, Jiang S, Tao Y, et al. UAV and Deep Learning for Automated Detection and Visualization of Façade Defects in Existing Residential Buildings. Sensors 2025, 25, 7118. DOI: 10.3390/s25237118

[83]

Li XL, Chen DP, Zeng Z, Shen JL, Wang X, Zhao YJ. The Inspection of Wind Blades Using Thermography with Different Exciting Methods. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Advanced Material Engineering (AME 2016), Wuhan, China, 15-17 April 2016; pp. 946-955. DOI: 10.2991/ame-16.2016.154

[84]

Chaudhuri S, Stamm M, Lapšanská I, Lançon T, Osterbrink L, Driebe T, et al. Infrared Thermography of Turbulence Patterns of Operational Wind Turbine Rotor Blades Supported with High‐Resolution Photography: KI‐VISIR Dataset. Wind Energy 2025, 28, e2958. DOI: 10.1002/we.2958

[85]

Yang X, Guo R, Li H. Comparison of multimodal RGB-thermal fusion techniques for exterior wall multi-defect detection. J. Infrastruct. Intell. Resil. 2023, 2, 100029. DOI: 10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100029

[86]

Memari M, Shekaramiz M, Masoum MAS, Seibi AC. Data Fusion and Ensemble Learning for Advanced Anomaly Detection Using Multi-Spectral RGB and Thermal Imaging of Small Wind Turbine Blades. Energies 2024, 17, 673. DOI: 10.3390/en17030673

[87]

Svystun S, Melnychenko O, Radiuk P, Savenko O, Sachenko A, Lysyi A. Thermal and RGB Images Work Better Together in Wind Turbine Damage Detection. Int. J. Comput. 2024, 23, 526-535. DOI: 10.47839/ijc.23.4.3752

[88]

Worzewski T, Krankenhagen R, Doroshtnasir M. Thermographic inspection of wind turbine rotor blade segment utilizing natural conditions as excitation source, Part II: The effect of climatic conditions on thermographic inspections-A long term outdoor experiment. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2016, 76, 767-776. DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2016.04.012

[89]

Bu Y, Yan Y, Yang Y. Advancement Challenges in UAV Swarm Formation Control: A Comprehensive Review. Drones 2024, 8, 320. DOI: 10.3390/drones8070320

[90]

Jacobson A, Chen Z, Milford M. Autonomous Multisensor Calibration and Closed‐loop Fusion for SLAM. J. Field Robot. 2015, 32, 85-122. DOI: 10.1002/rob.21500

[91]

Sanchez-Cuevas PJ, Gonzalez-Morgado A, Cortes N, Gayango DB, Jimenez-Cano AE, Ollero A, et al. Fully-Actuated Aerial Manipulator for Infrastructure Contact Inspection: Design, Modeling, Localization, and Control. Sensors 2020, 20, 4708. DOI: 10.3390/s20174708

[92]

Ladig R, Paul H, Miyazaki R, Shimonomura K. Aerial Manipulation Using Multirotor UAV: A Review from the Aspect of Operating Space and Force. JRM 2021, 33, 196-204. DOI: 10.20965/jrm.2021.p0196

[93]

Chermprayong P, Zhang K, Xiao F, Kovac M. An Integrated Delta Manipulator for Aerial Repair: A New Aerial Robotic System. IEEE Robot. Automat. Mag. 2019, 26, 54-66. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2018.2888911

[94]

Zhang K, Chermprayong P, Xiao F, Tzoumanikas D, Dams B, Kay S, et al. Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots. Nature 2022, 609, 709-717. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04988-4

[95]

Orr L. Autonomous Aerial Additive Manufacturing and Infrastructure Repair. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK, August 2023.

[96]

Lyu C, Lin S, Lynch A, Zou Y, Liarokapis M. UAV-based deep learning applications for automated inspection of civil infrastructure. Autom. Constr. 2025, 177, 106285. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106285

[97]

Amouzadrad P, Mohapatra SC, Guedes Soares C. Review on Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Hydrodynamic and Hydroelastic Responses of Floating Offshore Structures. JMSE 2025, 13, 1015. DOI: 10.3390/jmse13061015

PDF (2006KB)

4

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉