A Study on Site Selection and Capacity Allocation of a Four-Energy Complementary Power Generation System in the Zhoushan Archipelago Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Abstract

Marine renewable energy (MRE) is a vital component of emerging energy systems, playing a key role in the low-carbon transition and enhancing energy self-sufficiency in coastal regions. The Zhoushan Archipelago possesses favorable conditions for wind, wave, tidal-current, and solar energy, providing a resource foundation for multi-energy complementary systems. However, due to resource intermittency, spatiotemporal heterogeneity, and marine-use constraints, single MRE sources cannot independently ensure the long-term stable power supply required for isolated island grids. This study develops a comprehensive decision-making framework for wind-wave-tidal-solar integration by combining logical veto screening, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and capacity allocation optimization. First, a multi-level evaluation system is established across resource, natural-engineering, socio-economic, and environmental dimensions, utilizing exclusionary factors-such as nature reserves, cultural heritage, and existing marine engineering-as preliminary veto criteria. Second, a “four-energy complementarity–synergy index” is introduced to characterize temporal availability, ensuring that site selection accounts for the contribution of multi-energy combinations to supply stability. Third, AHP is applied to determine weights and rank candidate sites, while a minimum-variance model optimizes capacity ratios for preferred locations. Furthermore, the TOPSIS method is introduced as an alternative multi-criteria decision-making approach for comparative analysis, to test the sensitivity of the ranking results to the choice of evaluation method. Based on the shortlisted priority candidate sites, a minimum variance capacity allocation model is established to analyse the synergy relationships between different energy types. Results indicate that multi-criteria evaluation effectively reveals suitability differences that single-resource metrics miss. Additionally, optimized capacity allocation significantly reduces combined-output fluctuations and enhances supply stability. The proposed framework is structured, verifiable, and adaptable, providing a methodological reference for the siting and preliminary capacity planning of multi-energy offshore power stations.

Keywords

Marine renewable energy / Multi-energy complementary power generation systems / Site selection evaluation / Analytic hierarchy process / Capacity allocation / Logical veto / Zhoushan Archipelago

References

[1] Lewis A, Estefen S, Huckerby J, Musial W, Pontes T, Torres-Martinez J. Ocean energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation ; Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 497-534. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139151153.010

[2] Shao M, Han Z, Sun J, Xiao C, Zhang S, Zhao Y. A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications for renewable energy site selection. Renew. Energy 2020, 157, 377-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.137

[3] Albadi MH, El-Saadany EF. Overview of wind power intermittency impacts on power systems. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2010, 80, 627-632. DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2009.10.035

[4] Denholm P, Margolis RM. Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in traditional electric power systems. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 2852-2861. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.014

[5] Reguero BG, Losada IJ, Méndez FJ. A global wave power resource and its seasonal, interannual and long-term variability. Appl. Energy 2015, 148, 366-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.114

[6] Lewis M, Neill SP, Robins PE, Hashemi MR. Resource assessment for future generations of tidal-stream energy arrays. Energy 2015, 83, 403-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.036

[7] Jurasz J, Canales FA, Kies A, Guegouz M, Beluco A. A review on the complementarity of renewable energy sources: Concept, metrics, application and future research directions. Sol. Energy 2020, 195, 703-724. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.087

[8] Fusco F, Nolan G, Ringwood JV. Variability reduction through optimal combination of wind/wave resources-An Irish case study. Energy 2010, 35, 314-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.09.023

[9] Neto PBL, Saavedra OR, Oliveira DQ. The effect of complementarity between solar, wind and tidal energy in isolated hybrid microgrids. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 339-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.134

[10] Zhu W, Guo J, Zhao G, Zeng B. Optimal sizing of an island hybrid microgrid based on an improved multi-objective grey wolf optimiser. Processes 2020, 8, 1581. DOI: 10.3390/pr8121581

[11] Vasileiou M, Loukogeorgaki E, Vagiona DG. GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 73, 745-757. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.161

[12] Tian F, Li X, Liu M, Xia C, Guo X, Fang X, et al. Application of a GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to the Siting of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Power Plants: A Case Study of the Xisha Sea Area, China. Energies 2024, 17, 5097. DOI: 10.3390/en17205097

[13] Yousefi H, Motlagh SG, Montazeri M. Multi-criteria decision-making system for wind farm site-selection using geographic information system (GIS): Case study of Semnan Province, Iran. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7640. DOI: 10.3390/su14137640

[14] Luna-Rubio R, Trejo-Perea M, Vargas-Vázquez D, Ríos-Moreno GJ. Optimal sizing of renewable hybrid energy systems: A review of methodologies. Sol. Energy 2012, 86, 1077-1088. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.10.016

[15] Alshammari N, Asumadu J. Optimum unit sizing of hybrid renewable energy system utilizing harmony search, Jaya and particle swarm optimization algorithms. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 60, 102255. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102255

[16] Elkadeem MR, Younes A, Sharshir SW, Campana PE, Wang S. Sustainable siting and design optimisation of hybrid renewable energy systems: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis. Appl. Energy 2021, 295, 117071. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117071

[17] Liu Z, Shi L, Guo J, Cai T, Wang X, Xia X. Spatiotemporal changes and utilisation intensity of the Zhoushan Archipelago coastline over four decades. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 2013. DOI: 10.3390/jmse12112013

[18] Cradden L, Kalogeri C, Barrios IM, Galanis G, Ingram D, Kallos G. Multi-criteria site selection for offshore renewable energy platforms. Renew. Energy 2016, 87, 791-806. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.035

[19] Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisfors P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2020, 146, 1999-2049. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3803

[20] Warren IR, Bach HK. MIKE 21: A modelling system for estuaries, coastal waters and seas. Environ. Softw. 1992, 7, 227-250. DOI: 10.1016/0266-9838(92)90006-P

[21] Amante C, Eakins BW. ETOPO1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis; National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA: Boulder, Colorado, 2009.

[22] Weatherall P, Marks KM, Jakobsson M, Schmitt T, Tani S, Arndt JK, et al. A new digital bathymetric model of the world’s oceans. Earth Space Sci. 2015, 2, 331-345. DOI: 10.1002/2015EA000107

[23] Pérez-Collazo C, Greaves D, Iglesias G. A review of combined wave and offshore wind energy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 141-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.032

[24] Wen Y, Kamranzad B, Lin P. Joint exploitation potential of offshore wind and wave energy along the south and southeast coasts of China. Energy 2022, 249, 123710. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123710

[25] Onea F, Rusu E. An Evaluation of Marine Renewable Energy Resources Complementarity in the Portuguese Nearshore. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1901. DOI: 10.3390/jmse10121901

[26] Hagerman G, Polagye B. Methodology for Estimating Tidal Current Energy Resources and Power Production by Tidal In-Stream Energy Conversion Devices; Electric Power Research Institute: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2006.

[27] Zuo Y, Chen S, Yang K, Guo B. On the correlation and complementarity assessment of ocean wind, solar and wave energy resources. In IET Conference Proceedings CP843; The Institution of Engineering and Technology: Stevenage, UK, 2023; pp. 1329-1336.

[28] Vafaei N, Ribeiro RA, Camarinha-Matos LM. Assessing normalization techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 199, 1229-1236. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.156

[29] Chen SJ, Hwang CL. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992; Volume 375, pp. 289-486. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5

[30] Saaty TL. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1990, 48, 9-26. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

[31] Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2004, 8, 365-381. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007

[32] Kamjoo A, Maheri A, Dizqah AM, Putrus GA. Multi-objective design under uncertainties of hybrid renewable energy systems using NSGA-II and chance-constrained programming. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2016, 74, 187-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.07.007

[33] Delgado MG, Sendra JB. Sensitivity analysis in multicriteria spatial decision-making: A review. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2004, 10, 1173-1187. DOI: 10.1080/10807030490887221

[34] Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25, 1582-1591. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.004

[35] Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1992. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

[36] Cavazzi S, Dutton AG. An offshore wind energy geographic information system (OWE-GIS) for assessment of the UK’s offshore wind energy potential. Renew. Energy 2016, 87, 212-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.021

[37] Vagiona DG, Kamilakis M. Sustainable site selection for offshore wind farms in the South Aegean-Greece. Sustainability 2018, 10, 749. DOI: 10.3390/su10030749

[38] Díaz H, Guedes Soares C. An integrated GIS approach for site selection of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic continental European coastline. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 134, 110328. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110328

[39] Malczewski J. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2006, 20, 703-726. DOI: 10.1080/13658810600661508

[40] Kolios A, Mytilinou V, Lozano-Minguez E, Salonitis K. A comparative study of multiple-criteria decision-making methods under stochastic inputs. Energies 2016, 9, 566. DOI: 10.3390/en9070566

[41] Chaouachi A, Covrig CF, Ardelean M. Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States. Energy Policy 2017, 103, 179-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.018

[42] Erdinc O, Uzunoglu M. Optimum design of hybrid renewable energy systems: Overview of different approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1412-1425. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.011

[43] Anoune K, Bouya M, Astito A, Ben Abdellah A. Sizing methods and optimization techniques for PV-wind based hybrid renewable energy system: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 652-673. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.032

[44] Sánchez-Lozano JM, García-Cascales MS, Lamata MT. Identification and selection of potential sites for onshore wind farm development in the Region of Murcia, Spain. Energy 2014, 73, 311-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.024

[45] Díaz H, Guedes Soares C. A novel multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate floating wind farm locations. Renew. Energy 2022, 185, 431-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.014

[46] Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Izadikhah M. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl. Math. Comput. 2006, 181, 1544-1551. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057