A Co-Benefits Analytical Framework: Overlap in Protection for People and Ecosystems from Power-Generating Tidal Range Infrastructure

Iris Gray , Sylvia Ascher , Iain Staffell , Catherine Matilda Collins

Mar. Energy Res. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 10011

PDF (901KB)
Mar. Energy Res. ›› 2026, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) :10011 DOI: 10.70322/mer.2026.10011
Article
research-article
A Co-Benefits Analytical Framework: Overlap in Protection for People and Ecosystems from Power-Generating Tidal Range Infrastructure
Author information +
History +
PDF (901KB)

Abstract

Tidal range power plants (TPPs) are reliable electricity generators with the la Rance TPP in France serving as an example of long-term (60+ years) success. Despite their potential for energy delivery, the challenges surrounding TPP development remain substantial. High initial investment and concerns about environmental impacts on marine ecosystems have made it difficult to progress major proposals. With rising sea levels and more frequent, intense storm surges expected to lead to greater inundation of key coastal zones, co-benefits to ecosystems and infrastructure that TPPs may offer are being reconsidered. Using the UK as a case study, we map appropriate tidal resource (>5 m tidal range), 2050 1:25 flood risk areas (1 m rise), coastal zones with conservation specification and areas of high human density. Overlap in these factors reveals specific locations in which further research would usefully estimate potential costs and benefits, socially, ecologically and financially. Viewed together, reduced flood risk to people and infrastructure, ecosystem conservation opportunity and stable energy generation may highlight the future opportunity of TPPs.

Keywords

Tidal power / Conservation benefit / Flood protection / Coastal habitat / Climate change / Sea-level rise / Integrated nature-climate actions

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Iris Gray, Sylvia Ascher, Iain Staffell, Catherine Matilda Collins. A Co-Benefits Analytical Framework: Overlap in Protection for People and Ecosystems from Power-Generating Tidal Range Infrastructure. Mar. Energy Res., 2026, 3 (2) : 10011 DOI:10.70322/mer.2026.10011

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.C., I.G., S.A. and I.S.; Methodology, I.G., S.A. and I.S.; Formal Analysis, I.G. and I.S.; Investigation, I.G. and S.A.; Data Curation, I.G., S.A. and I.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, I.G. and S.A.; Writing—Review & Editing, C.M.C., I.G., S.A. and I.S.; Visualization, I.G., S.A. and I.S.; Supervision, C.M.C.; Project Administration, C.M.C.; Funding Acquisition, C.M.C. and I.S.

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from public data sets as indicated in the methods section.

Funding

SEA & IMG were supported as research assistants by the Centre for Sectoral Economy Performance in the Dyson School of Design Engineering at Imperial College London.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Chowdhury MS, Rahman KS, Selvanathan V, Nuthammachot N, Suklueng M, Mostafaeipour A, et al. Current trends and prospects of tidal energy technology. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 8179-8194. DOI: 10.1007/s10668—020—01013—4

[2]

Staffell I, Pusey A, Xie J, Johnson N. The global potential and hourly capacity factors of tidal range and tidal stream technologies. R. Soc. Proc. A 2026, Submitted.

[3]

Waters S, Aggidis G. A World First: Swansea Bay Tidal lagoon in review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 916-921. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.011

[4]

Coles DS, Adcock TAA, Cornett A, Haas K, Jo CH, Liu H, et al. A review of global tidal stream energy resources. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2025, 481, 20240841. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2024.0841

[5]

Jo CH, Hwang SJ. Review on Tidal Energy Technologies and Research Subjects. China Ocean. Eng. 2020, 34, 137-150. DOI: 10.1007/s13344—020—0014—8

[6]

Neill SP, Angeloudis A, Robins PE, Walkington I, Ward SL, Masters I, et al. Tidal range energy resource and optimization—Past perspectives and future challenges. Renew. Energy 2018, 127, 763-778. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.007

[7]

Tethys. Sihwa Tidal Power Plant. 2019. Available online: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/project—sites/sihwa—tidal—power—plant (accessed on 10 November 2025).

[8]

Vandercruyssen D, Baker S, Howard D, Aggidis G. Tidal range electricity generation into the twenty—second century. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.—Energy 2024, 177, 205-213. DOI: 10.1680/jener.23.00031

[9]

Neill SP, Haas KA, Thiébot J, Yang Z. A review of tidal energy—Resource, feedbacks, and environmental interactions. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2021, 13, 062702. DOI: 10.1063/5.0069452

[10]

Vandercruyssen D, Baker S, Howard D, Aggidis G. Tidal range electricity generation: A comparison between estuarine barrages and coastal lagoons. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11381. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11381

[11]

Guo B, Ahmadian R, Falconer RA. Refined hydro—environmental modelling for tidal energy generation: West Somerset Lagoon case study. Renew. Energy 2021, 179, 2104-2123. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.034

[12]

Day JW, Crump BC, Kemp WM, Yáñez—Arancibia A. Estuarine Ecology ; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. DOI: 10.1002/9781118412787

[13]

Lowe JA, Gregory JM. The effects of climate change on storm surges around the United Kingdom. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2005, 363, 1313-1328. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2005.1570

[14]

Burden A, Smeaton C, Angus S, Garbutt A, Jones L, Lewis HD, et al. Impacts of climate change on coastal habitats, relevant to the coastal and marine environment around the UK. MCCIP Sci. Rev. 2020, 2020, 228-255. DOI: 10.14465/2020.arc11.chb

[15]

Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J, Nicholls RJ. Future Coastal Population Growth and Exposure to Sea—Level Rise and Coastal Flooding—A Global Assessment. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118571. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118571

[16]

Folkard—Tapp H, Boran I, Chan S, Dombrowsky I, Penney TL, Bazely D, et al. Beyond Nature—based Solutions: The case for Integrated Nature—Climate Action. J. Appl. Ecol. 2025, 62, 2478-2486. DOI: 10.1111/1365—2664.70130

[17]

Howarth C, Robinson EJZ. Effective climate action must integrate climate adaptation and mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 2024, 14, 300-301. DOI: 10.1038/s41558—024—01963—x

[18]

Seeger K, Minderhoud PSJ. Sea level much higher than assumed in most coastal hazard assessments. Nature 2026, 652, 667-674. DOI: 10.1038/s41586—026—10196—1

[19]

Palmer M, Howard T, Lowe J, Bricheno L, Calvert D, Edwards T, et al. UKCP18 Marine Report ; Met Office Hadley Centre: London, UK, 2018.

[20]

Met Office Hadley Centre. UKCP18 Factsheet: Sea—Level Rise and Storm Surge ; Met Office Hadley Centre : London, UK, 2023.

[21]

van Ginkel KCH, Rijken B, Hoogvliet M, van Veggel W, Botzen WJW, Filatova T. How an economic and financial perspective could guide transformational adaptation to sea level rise. Npj Clim. Action 2025, 4, 89. DOI: 10.1038/s44168—025—00297—4

[22]

Bachner G, Lincke D, Hinkel J. The macroeconomic effects of adapting to high—end sea—level rise via protection and migration. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5705. DOI: 10.1038/s41467—022—33043—z

[23]

Brook T, Millington—Drake M, Garbutt A, McGarrigle A, Rodriguez K, du Plessis N. The State of the Worlds Saltmarshes 2025: A Global Call to Action for Coastal Resilience and Adaptation ; The World Wildlife Fund: Gland, Switzerland, 2025.

[24]

Gibbs D, While A, Jonas AEG. Governing Nature Conservation: The European Union Habitats Directive and Conflict around Estuary Management. Environ. Plan A Econ. Space 2007, 39, 339-358. DOI: 10.1068/a37399

[25]

Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81, 169-193. DOI: 10.1890/10—1510.1

[26]

Xiang Z, Li Y, Zhang Z. Global conservation priorities of coastal habitats towards extreme sea level rise risks. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 473, 143455. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143455

[27]

Ascher SE, Gray IM, Collins T. Misplaced fears? What the evidence reveals of the ecological effects of tidal power generation. Environ. Solut. Evid. 2025, 6, e70124. DOI: 10.1002/2688—8319.70124

[28]

NESO, Arup. Strategic Case for Tidal Range ; NESO: Warwick, UK; Arup: London, UK, 2025.

[29]

Watson N, Bolton P. Contracts for Difference. House of Commons Library. London, UK 2024. Available online: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research—briefings/cbp—9871/ (accessed on 10 November 2025).

[30]

Tethys. La Rance Tidal Barrage. 2019. Available online: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/project—sites/la—rance—tidal—barrage (accessed on 10 November 2025).

[31]

Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST). Marine Renewables ; POST: London, UK, 2020.

[32]

Sathiamoorthy M, Probert SD. The integrated Severn barrage complex: Harnessing tidal, wave and wind power. Appl. Energy 1994, 49, 17-46. DOI: 10.1016/0306—2619(94)90055—8

[33]

Kennish MJ, Paerl HW, Crosswell JR. Climate Change and Estuaries ; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023. DOI: 10.1201/9781003126096

[34]

Ma Q, Moreira TM, Adcock TAA. The impact of a tidal barrage on coastal flooding due to storm surge in the Severn Estuary. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 2019, 5, 217-226. DOI: 10.1007/s40722—019—00143—w

[35]

Chen Z, Orton P, Wahl T. Storm Surge Barrier Protection in an Era of Accelerating Sea—Level Rise: Quantifying Closure Frequency, Duration and Trapped River Flooding. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 725. DOI: 10.3390/jmse8090725

[36]

Hall JW, Harvey H, Manning LJ. Adaptation thresholds and pathways for tidal flood risk management in London. Clim. Risk Manag. 2019, 24, 42-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2019.04.001

[37]

Egbert GD, Erofeeva SY. Efficient Inverse Modeling of Barotropic Ocean Tides. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2002, 19, 183-204. DOI: 10.1175/1520—0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2

[38]

Shetty C, Priyam A. A review on tidal energy technologies. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 56, 2774-2779. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.020

[39]

NOAA Office for Coastal Management. METHOD DESCRIPTION. Detailed Method for Mapping Sea Level Rise Inundation ; NOAA Office for Coastal Management: North Charleston, SC, USA, 2017.

[40]

NOAA. Sea Level Rise Viewer. 2024. Available online: https://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/tools/slr.html (accessed on 10 May 2026).

[41]

Climate Central. Coastal Risk Screening Tool. 2025. Available online: https://coastal.climatecentral.org/ (accessed on 10 May 2026).

[42]

Copernicus. Copernicus DEM ; Copernicus: Göttingen, Germany, 2024. DOI: 10.5270/ESA—c5d3d65

[43]

Mouselimis L. Digital Elevation Models. In R Package Version 1.0.5. 2024. Available online: https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/copernicus—data—space—ecosystem—dashboard (accessed on 10 May 2026).

[44]

GDAL/OGR Contributors. GDAL/OGR Geospatial Data Abstraction Software Library. 2025. Available online: https://gdal.org/en/stable/ (accessed on 10 May 2026).

[45]

Hijmans RJ. Terra: Spatial Data Analysis. CRAN: Contributed Packages. 2023. Available online: https://cran.r—project.org/web/packages/terra/index.html (accessed on 10 May 2026).

[46]

Perkins MS, Bakker JD, Arkema KK. Exploring the disaster risk reduction and energy resilience benefits of coastal ecosystems and protected areas in Puerto Rico. Ecosyst. Serv. 2026, 79, 101847. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101847

[47]

Pétillon J, McKinley E, Alexander M, Adams JB, Angelini C, Balke T, et al. Top ten priorities for global saltmarsh restoration, conservation and ecosystem service research. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 898, 165544. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165544

[48]

Burrows R, Yates NC, Hedges TS, Li M, Zhou JG, Chen DY, et al. Tidal energy potential in UK waters. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.—Marit. Eng. 2009, 162, 155-164. DOI: 10.1680/maen.2009.162.4.155

[49]

Pörtner H—O, Scholes RJ, Arneth A, Barnes DKA, Burrows MT, Diamond SE, et al. Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science 2023, 380, eabl4881. DOI: 10.1126/science.abl4881

[50]

Palmer L, Gillespie D, MacAulay JDJ, Sparling CE, Russell DJF, Hastie GD. Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) presence is reduced during tidal turbine operation . Aquat. Conserv. 2021, 31, 3543-3553. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3737

[51]

Manuel L, Meselhe E, Kleiss BA, Lewis KA, Madill H, Allison M, et al. A roadmap to the Co—production of a decision support tool for coastal ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Policy 2023, 144, 31-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.001

[52]

Burnett N, Bolton P. Flood Risk Management and Funding ; House of Commons: London, UK, 2024.

[53]

House of Commons. Marine Renewables Industry ; Hansard HC Deb; House of Commons : London, UK, 2025; Volume 760.

[54]

Muhl E—K, Armitage D, Anderson K, Boyko C, Busilacchi S, Butler J, et al. Transitioning toward “deep” knowledge co—production in coastal and marine systems: examining the interplay among governance, power, and knowledge. Ecol. Soc. 2023, 28, 17. DOI: 10.5751/ES—14443—280417

[55]

Environmental Audit Committee. Technological Innovations and Climate Change: Tidal Power ; House of Commons: London, UK. 2021. Available online: https://committees.parliament.uk/work/780/technological—innovations—and—climate—change—tidal—power/publications/ (accessed on 10 May 2026).

PDF (901KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/