Influence of Soil Damping and Aerodynamic Damping on the Dynamic Response of Monopile Wind Turbines under Earthquake and Wind Loads

Piguang Wang , Yang Bai , Renqiang Xi , Yang Qu , Xiuli Du

Mar. Energy Res. ›› 2025, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 10003

PDF (817KB)
Mar. Energy Res. ›› 2025, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) :10003 DOI: 10.70322/mer.2025.10003
Article
research-article
Influence of Soil Damping and Aerodynamic Damping on the Dynamic Response of Monopile Wind Turbines under Earthquake and Wind Loads
Author information +
History +
PDF (817KB)

Abstract

Vibration damping is essential for predicting the responses of wind turbines, and contributions mainly come from structural, soil, and aerodynamic damping. In engineering design, it is difficult to precisely account for the individual contributions of each damping source. As a result, a simplified approach is commonly used, where a total damping factor is applied that combines the effects of structural, soil, aerodynamic, and other damping sources. However, the accuracy of this simplified approach in predicting the dynamic response of turbines has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study primarily focuses on the applicability of vibration-damping simplification methods, particularly in analyzing the dynamic response of turbines under earthquake and wind loads.

Keywords

Wind turbine / Soil damping / Aerodynamic damping / Dynamic response

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Piguang Wang, Yang Bai, Renqiang Xi, Yang Qu, Xiuli Du. Influence of Soil Damping and Aerodynamic Damping on the Dynamic Response of Monopile Wind Turbines under Earthquake and Wind Loads. Mar. Energy Res., 2025, 2(1): 10003 DOI:10.70322/mer.2025.10003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278480). The support is gratefully acknowledged. The results and conclusions presented are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the sponsors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W. and R.X.; Methodology, P.W. and R.X.; Software, P.W. and Y.B.; Validation, P.W., R.X. and Y.B.; Formal Analysis, Y.B.; Investigation, Y.Q.; Resources, Y.Q.; Data Curation, P.W. and R.X.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, P.W. and R.X.; Writing—Review & Editing, Y.B., P.W. and R.X.; Visualization, Y.Q.; Supervision, X.D.; Project Administration, X.D.; Funding Acquisition, P.W.

Ethics Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278480), and Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX1108).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Herzig G. Global Offshore Wind Report 2020; World Forum Offshore Wind: Singapore, 2021.

[2]

Yang J, Liu Q, Li X, Cui X. Overview of wind power in China: Status and future. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1454.

[3]

Chen C, Duffour P. Modelling damping sources in monopile-supported offshore wind turbines. Wind. Energy 2018, 21, 1121-1140.

[4]

Shirzadeh R, Devriendt C, Bidakhvidi MA, Guillaume P. Experimental and computational damping estimation of an offshore wind turbine on a monopole foundation. J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerod. 2013, 120, 96-106.

[5]

Cheng Y, Luo Y, Wang J, Dai K, Wang W, Damatty A. Fragility and vulnerability development of offshore wind turbines under aero-hydro loadings. Eng. Struct. 2023, 293, 116625.

[6]

Wang P, Bai Y, Wang M, Zhao M, Du X. Seismic Vulnerability and Performance-based Assessment of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbine Considering Turbine Blades. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2024, 186, 108918.

[7]

Ali A, De Risi R, Sextos A, Goda K, Chang Z. Seismic vulnerability of offshore wind turbines to pulse and non‐pulse records. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2019, 49, 24-50.

[8]

Valamanesh V, Myers A. Aerodynamic damping and seismic response of horizontal axis wind turbine towers. J. Struct. Eng. 2014, 140, 11.

[9]

Feyzollahzadeh M, Mahmoodi MJ, Yadavar-Nikravesh SM, Jamali J. Wind load response of offshore wind turbine towers with fixed monopile platform. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod. 2016, 158, 122-138.

[10]

Rendon EA, Manuel L. Long-term loads for a monopile-supported offshore wind turbine. Wind Energy 2014, 17, 209-223.

[11]

Garrad AD. Forces and dynamics of horizontal axes wind turbines. In Wind Energy Conversion Systems; Prentice Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 119-142.

[12]

Chen C, Duffour P, Dai K, Wang Y, Fromme P. Identification of aerodynamic damping matrix for operating wind turbines. Mech. Syst. Signal. Process. 2021, 154, 107568.

[13]

Carswell W, Johansson J, Løvholt F, Arwade SR. Foundation damping and the dynamics of offshore wind turbine monopiles. Renew. Energy 2015, 80, 724-736.

[14]

Van Buren E, Muskulus M. Improving pile foundation models for use in bottom-fixed offshore wind turbine applications. Energy Procedia 2012, 24, 363-370.

[15]

Wang P, Zhang W, Xu H, Zhao M, Du X. A high-accuracy substructure method in the time domain for simulating pile-soil dynamic interaction in horizontal vibration. Comput. Geotech. 2021, 140, 104479.

[16]

Wang P, Zhao M, Zhang B, Xu H, Du X. Effects of rocking impedance and soil shear stress of the free-field on the dynamic response of an end-bearing pile during horizontal earthquakes. Comput. Geotech. 2022, 150, 104919.

[17]

Versteijlen W, Metrikine A, Hoving J, Smid E, de Vries W. Estimation of the vibration decrement of an offshore wind turbine support structure caused by its interaction with soil. In Proceedings of the EWEA Offshore 2011 conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 29 November-1 December 2011.

[18]

Tarp-Johansen NJ, Andersen L, Christensen E, Mørch C, Kallesøe B, Frandsen S. Comparing sources of damping of cross-wind motion. In Proceedings of the European Offshore Wind 2009, Stockholm, Sweden, 14-16 September 2009.

[19]

Damgaard M, Andersen J, LB I, Andersen L. Time-varying dynamic properties of offshore wind turbines evaluated by modal testing. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, France, 2-6 September 2013; pp. 2343-2346.

[20]

Jiang J, Lian J, Dong X, Wang H, Zhou H. Soil damping calculation of the offshore wind turbine supported by wide-shallow bucket foundation. Appl. Ocean Res. 2021, 111, 102682.

[21]

Huang Y, Wang P, Zhao M, Zhang C, Du X. Dynamic responses of an end-bearing pile subjected to horizontal earthquakes considering water-pile-soil interactions. Ocean Eng. 2021, 238, 109726.

[22]

Applied Technology Council. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors: Component Equivalency Methodology (FEMA P695); FEMA: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.

[23]

Wang P, Zhao M, Du X, Liu J, Xu C. Wind, wave and earthquake responses of offshore wind turbine on monopile foundation in clay. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2018, 113, 47-57.

[24]

Lee S, Kim H, Lee S. Analysis of aerodynamic characteristics on a counter-rotating wind turbine. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2010, 10, 339-342.

[25]

DNV. Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads (DNV-RP-C205); Det Norske Veritas: Oslo, Norway, 2010.

[26]

Simiu E. Wind spectra and dynamic along wind response. J. Struct. Div. 1974, 100, 1897-1910.

[27]

Xi R, Wang P, Du X, Xu K, Xu C, Jia J. A semi-analytical model of aerodynamic damping for horizontal axis wind turbines and its applications. Ocean Eng. 2020, 214, 107861.

[28]

Wang M, Bai Y, Wang P, Zhao M, Du X. Cloud-based seismic fragility analysis of operating offshore wind turbine with stochastic coupling of wind-wave-earthquake excitations. Thin-Wall. Struct. 2025, 208, 112858.

PDF (817KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/