Nanomedicine for Cranial Repair: Insights From Recent Advance in Nanomaterial-Based Cranioplasty

Tingting Zhang , Tong Sun , Xiaoshuang Dai , Dingkun Zhang , Junwen Guan

MEDCOMM - Biomaterials and Applications ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : e70026

PDF
MEDCOMM - Biomaterials and Applications ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : e70026 DOI: 10.1002/mba2.70026
REVIEW ARTICLE

Nanomedicine for Cranial Repair: Insights From Recent Advance in Nanomaterial-Based Cranioplasty

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Cranial defect repair remains a major challenge in orthopedics and regenerative medicine. Traditional approaches like autologous bone grafts face some limitations, including donor site morbidity and infection risks. Recent advances in nanotechnology have enabled innovative nanomedicine-based strategies for cranial repair. This review highlights current progress, applications, and challenges of nanomedicines, focusing on 10 bioactive categories: Ca-, C-, Ti-, Mg-, Ag-, Mn-, Si-, Se-, bio-based, and carrier-based nanomaterials. Among these, Ca-based nanomedicines, particularly nano-hydroxyapatite, dominate due to their structural similarity to natural bone. C-, Mg-, and Ti-based nanomaterials also show promise, offering excellent mechanical strength, biodegradability, and osteogenic activity. Bio-based and carrier-based systems further enhance biocompatibility and enable controlled drug delivery for improved bone regeneration. Despite their potential, critical challenges remain, including nanotoxicity, degradation control, and long-term clinical safety. Future research should focus on optimizing material properties, enhancing bioactivity, and ensuring translational feasibility. By addressing these hurdles, nanomedicine-based therapies could revolutionize cranial defect repair, providing safer, more efficient alternatives to conventional treatments. This review discusses these advancements while outlining future directions to maximize clinical impact.

Keywords

cranial repair / insights / nanomedicine / recent advance / therapeutics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tingting Zhang, Tong Sun, Xiaoshuang Dai, Dingkun Zhang, Junwen Guan. Nanomedicine for Cranial Repair: Insights From Recent Advance in Nanomaterial-Based Cranioplasty. MEDCOMM - Biomaterials and Applications, 2025, 4(3): e70026 DOI:10.1002/mba2.70026

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

K. Sehlikoğlu, “Investigation of Fatal Traumatic Head Injuries,” Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 30, no. 3 (2024): 160–166.

[2]

W. Liang, Y. Xiaofeng, L. Weiguo, et al., “Cranioplasty of Large Cranial Defect at an Early Stage After Decompressive Craniectomy Performed for Severe Head Trauma,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 18, no. 3 (2007): 526–532.

[3]

M. T. Graham, J. Huang, F. X. Creighton, and M. A. Lediju Bell, “Simulations and Human Cadaver Head Studies to Identify Optimal Acoustic Receiver Locations for Minimally Invasive Photoacoustic-Guided Neurosurgery,” Photoacoustics 19 (2020): 100183–100196.

[4]

B. I. Ştefănescu, T. I. Mihalache, G. B. Constantin, G. Ţocu, M. M. Ştefănescu, and R. E. Bogdan Goroftei, “Fetal Acrania Diagnosed at 17 Weeks of Gestation by 2D/3D Ultrasound: A Case Report and Literature Review,” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 65, no. 1 (2024): 125–129.

[5]

C. M. Pasick, K. Margetis, G. F. Santiago, C. Gordon, and P. J. Taub, “Adult Cranioplasty,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 30, no. 7 (2019): 2138–2143.

[6]

D. R. Aprianto, M. A. Parenrengi, B. Utomo, A. Al Fauzi, E. A. Subagio, and A. Suryawan, “Comparison of Autograft and Implant Cranioplasty in Pediatrics: A Meta-Analysis,” Surgical Neurology International 13 (2022): 406–414.

[7]

S. Yao, Q. Zhang, Y. Mai, et al., “Outcome and Risk Factors of Complications After Cranioplasty With Polyetheretherketone and Titanium Mesh: A Single-Center Retrospective Study,” Frontiers in Neurology 13 (2022): 926436.

[8]

L. He, “Biomaterials for Regenerative Cranioplasty: Current State of Clinical Application and Future Challenges,” Journal of Functional Biomaterials 15, no. 4 (2024): 84–118.

[9]

S. Bai, X. Lu, X. Yan, et al., “A Novel Cranial Bone Transport Technique Repairs Skull Defect and Minimizes Brain Injury Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury Rats,” Advanced Science 04467 (2025): e04467.

[10]

H. Samadian, H. Khastar, A. Ehterami, and M. Salehi, “Bioengineered 3D Nanocomposite Based on Gold Nanoparticles and Gelatin Nanofibers for Bone Regeneration: In Vitro and In Vivo Study,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 13877.

[11]

S. Anjum, F. Rahman, P. Pandey, et al., “Electrospun Biomimetic Nanofibrous Scaffolds: A Promising Prospect for Bone Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16 (2022): 9206.

[12]

K. Gulati, C. Ding, T. Guo, H. Guo, H. Yu, and Y. Liu, “Craniofacial Therapy: Advanced Local Therapies From Nano-Engineered Titanium Implants to Treat Craniofacial Conditions,” International Journal of Oral Science 15, no. 1 (2023): 15.

[13]

Z. Zou, L. Wang, Z. Zhou, et al., “Simultaneous Incorporation of PTH(1-34) and Nano-Hydroxyapatite Into Chitosan/Alginate Hydrogels for Efficient Bone Regeneration,” Bioactive Materials 6, no. 6 (2021): 1839–1851.

[14]

Y. Wang, J. Wang, R. Gao, et al., “Biomimetic Glycopeptide Hydrogel Coated PCL/nHA Scaffold for Enhanced Cranial Bone Regeneration via Macrophage M2 Polarization-Induced Osteo-Immunomodulation,” Biomaterials 285 (2022): 121538.

[15]

L. Guo, H. Chen, Y. Li, J. Zhou, and J. Chen, “Biocompatible Scaffolds Constructed by Chondroitin Sulfate Microspheres Conjugated 3D-Printed Frameworks for Bone Repair,” Carbohydrate Polymers 299 (2023): 120188.

[16]

W. Lu, M. Zeng, W. Liu, et al., “Human Urine-Derived Stem Cell Exosomes Delivered via Injectable GelMA Templated Hydrogel Accelerate Bone Regeneration,” Materials Today Bio 19 (2023): 100569.

[17]

A. K. Teotia, D. B. Raina, C. Singh, et al., “Nano-Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute Functionalized With Bone Active Molecules for Enhanced Cranial Bone Regeneration,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9, no. 8 (2017): 6816–6828.

[18]

T. Feng, B. Liang, H. Bi, and Y. Han, “A Sandwich-Like Structure Composite Electrospun Membrane of Polylactic Acid/Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Polyvinyl Alcohol/Sodium Alginate/Nano-Hydroxyapatite for Skull Defect Repair,” Materials & Design 209 (2021): 109957.

[19]

M. Fu, J. Li, M. Liu, et al., “Sericin/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Hydrogels Based on Graphene Oxide for Effective Bone Regeneration via Immunomodulation and Osteoinduction,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 18 (2023): 1875–1895.

[20]

S. Jiang, X. Wang, Y. Ma, et al., “Synergistic Effect of Micro-Nano-Hybrid Surfaces and Sr Doping on the Osteogenic and Angiogenic Capacity of Hydroxyapatite Bioceramics Scaffolds,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 17 (2022): 783–797.

[21]

I. da Silva Brum, L. Frigo, P. Goncalo Pinto dos Santos, C. Nelson Elias, G. A. M. D. Fonseca, and J. Jose de Carvalho, “Performance of Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate and Xenogenic Hydroxyapatite on Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvarial Defects: Histomorphometric, Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Analysis,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 16 (2021): 3473–3485.

[22]

Y. Zhao, T. Fan, J. Chen, et al., “Magnetic Bioinspired Micro/Nanostructured Composite Scaffold for Bone Regeneration,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 174 (2019): 70–79.

[23]

S. Cao, Q. Li, S. Zhang, K. Liu, Y. Yang, and J. Chen, “Oxidized Bacterial Cellulose Reinforced Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Bone Repair,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 211 (2022): 112316.

[24]

Y. Zuo, Q. Li, Q. Xiong, et al., “Naringin Release From a Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Collagen Scaffold Promotes Osteogenesis and Bone Tissue Reconstruction,” Polymers 14, no. 16 (2022): 3260–3272.

[25]

X. Du, X. Yuan, S. Lin, X. Tan, and Y. Han, “An Injectable Bone Paste of Poly (Lactic Acid)/Zinc-Doped Nano Hydroxyapatite Composite Microspheres for Skull Repair,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 239 (2024): 113969.

[26]

D. Wähnert, J. Koettnitz, M. Merten, et al., “Spongostan™ Leads to Increased Regeneration of a Rat Calvarial Critical Size Defect Compared to Nanobone® and Actifuse,” Materials 14, no. 8 (2021): 1961.

[27]

W. Hatakeyama, M. Taira, T. Sawada, et al., “Bone Regeneration of Critical-Size Calvarial Defects in Rats Using Highly Pressed Nano-Apatite/Collagen Composites,” Materials 15, no. 9 (2022): 3376.

[28]

E. Chatzipetros, Z. Yfanti, P. Christopoulos, et al., “Imaging of Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Chitosan Scaffolds Using A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Device on Rat Calvarial Defects With Histological Verification,” Clinical Oral Investigations 24, no. 1 (2019): 437–446.

[29]

M. Bahraminasab, N. Doostmohammadi, A. Talebi, et al., “3D Printed Polylactic Acid/Gelatin-Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Platelet-Rich Plasma Scaffold for Critical-Sized Skull Defect Regeneration,” Biomedical Engineering Online 21, no. 1 (2022): 86.

[30]

Q. Xue and Y. Wang, “Impact of Hyperbaric Oxygen on Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Zoledronic Acid Biocomposite for Bone Tissue Engineering,” Journal of Cluster Science 33, no. 3 (2021): 999–1005.

[31]

X. Wang, G. Li, J. Guo, et al., “Hybrid Composites of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Sheets, Hydroxyapatite, and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Granules for Bone Regeneration in a Rabbit Calvarial Critical-Size Defect Model,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 13, no. 5 (2017): 1891–1899.

[32]

X. Gui, B. Zhang, Z. Su, et al., “3D-Printed Degradable Hydroxyapatite Bioactive Ceramics For Skull Regeneration,” MedComm: Biomater. Appl. 2, no. 2 (2023): e41.

[33]

Y. Huang, Y. Ji, Z. Kang, et al., “Integrating Eggshell-Derived CaCO3/MgO Nanocomposites and Chitosan Into A Biomimetic Scaffold for Bone Regeneration,” Chemical Engineering Journal 395 (2020): 125098.

[34]

N. Su, C. Villicana, C. Zhang, et al., “Aspirin Synergizes With Mineral Particle-Coated Macroporous Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration Through Immunomodulation,” Theranostics 13, no. 13 (2023): 4512–4525.

[35]

H. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. Xiong, L. Dong, and X. Li, “Development of Hierarchical Porous Bioceramic Scaffolds With Controlled Micro/Nano Surface Topography for Accelerating Bone Regeneration,” Materials Science and Engineering: C 130 (2021): 112437.

[36]

Z. Liu, X. Yuan, G. Fernandes, et al., “The Combination of Nano-Calcium Sulfate/Platelet Rich Plasma Gel Scaffold With BMP2 Gene-Modified Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promotes Bone Regeneration in Rat Critical-Sized Calvarial Defects,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy 8, no. 1 (2017): 122.

[37]

X. He, R. Dziak, X. Yuan, et al., “BMP2 Genetically Engineered MSCs and EPCs Promote Vascularized Bone Regeneration in Rat Critical-Sized Calvarial Bone Defects,” PLoS One 8, no. 4 (2013): e60473.

[38]

M. Mabrouk, S. M. Mousa, M. B. Shalaby, et al., “Egyptian Corals-Based Calcium Silicate (CaS) Nanopowders Doped With Zinc/Copper for Improved Chemical Stability and Treatment of Calvarial Defects,” Colloids and Surfaces, A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 660 (2023): 130875.

[39]

Q. Liu, S. Zhang, L. Shi, et al., “Osteogenic Induction and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Calcium-Chlorogenic Acid Nanoparticles Remodel the Osteoimmunology Microenvironment for Accelerating Bone Repair,” Advanced Healthcare Materials 13, no. 29 (2024): e2401114.

[40]

S. Liu, S. Mou, C. Zhou, et al., “Off-The-Shelf Biomimetic Graphene Oxide-Collagen Hybrid Scaffolds Wrapped With Osteoinductive Extracellular Matrix for the Repair of Cranial Defects in Rats,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10, no. 49 (2018): 42948–42958.

[41]

F. Liu, L. Xue, L. Xu, et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Bovine Serum Albumin Nanoparticles Modified by Poly-L-Lysine Functionalized Graphene Oxide for BMP-2 Delivery,” Materials & Design 215 (2022): 110479.

[42]

H. J. Jang, M. S. Kang, W. H. Kim, et al., “3D Printed Membranes of Polylactic Acid and Graphene Oxide for Guided Bone Regeneration,” Nanoscale Advances 5, no. 14 (2023): 3619–3628.

[43]

J. H. Lee, Y. C. Shin, S. M. Lee, et al., “Enhanced Osteogenesis by Reduced Graphene Oxide/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites,” Scientific Reports 5 (2015): 18833.

[44]

B. Geng, F. Fang, P. Li, et al., “Surface Charge-Dependent Osteogenic Behaviors of Edge-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots,” Chemical Engineering Journal 417 (2021): 128125.

[45]

B. Wang, M. Yang, L. Liu, et al., “Osteogenic Potential of Zn(2+)-Passivated Carbon Dots for Bone Regeneration In Vivo,” Biomaterials Science 7, no. 12 (2019): 5414–5423.

[46]

C. Wang, J. Liu, Y. Liu, B. Qin, and D. He, “Study on Osteogenesis of Zinc-Loaded Carbon Nanotubes/Chitosan Composite Biomaterials in Rat Skull Defects,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 31, no. 2 (2020): 15.

[47]

T. Kasai, S. Matsumura, T. Iizuka, et al., “Carbon Nanohorns Accelerate Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvarial Bone Defect,” Nanotechnology 22, no. 6 (2011): 065102.

[48]

Y. Xue, W. Niu, M. Wang, M. Chen, Y. Guo, and B. Lei, “Engineering a Biodegradable Multifunctional Antibacterial Bioactive Nanosystem for Enhancing Tumor Photothermo-Chemotherapy and Bone Regeneration,” ACS Nano 14, no. 1 (2020): 442–453.

[49]

A. E. S. Oprea, A. C. Bîrcă, O. Gherasim, et al., “Electrospun Fibrous Silica for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications,” Pharmaceutics 15, no. 6 (2023): 1728.

[50]

M. Toledano, C. Vallecillo, A. Gutierrez-Corrales, D. Torres-Lagares, M. Toledano-Osorio, and M. A. Serrera-Figallo, “Histomorphometric Analysis of Differential Regional Bone Regeneration Induced by Distinct Doped Membranes,” Polymers 14, no. 10 (2022): 2078.

[51]

C. Xu, Y. Chang, Y. Xu, et al., “Silicon-Phosphorus-Nanosheets-Integrated 3D-Printable Hydrogel as a Bioactive and Biodegradable Scaffold for Vascularized Bone Regeneration,” Advanced Healthcare Materials 11, no. 6 (2022): e2101911.

[52]

X. Xu, Z. Chen, L. Xiao, et al., “Nanosilicate-Functionalized Nanofibrous Membrane Facilitated Periodontal Regeneration Potential by Harnessing Periodontal Ligament Cell-Mediated Osteogenesis and Immunomodulation,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 21, no. 1 (2023): 223.

[53]

J. Hu, J. M. Miszuk, K. M. Stein, and H. Sun, “Nanoclay Promotes Mouse Cranial Bone Regeneration Mainly Through Modulating Drug Binding and Sustained Release,” Applied Materials Today 21 (2020): 100860.

[54]

H. Kanniyappan, M. K. Sundaram, A. Ravikumar, et al., “Enhancing Bone Repair Through Improved Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis Using Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticle-Loaded Konjac Glucomannan-Based Interpenetrating Network Scaffolds,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 279 (2024): 135182–135197.

[55]

C. Li, W. Zhang, R. Wang, et al., “Nanocomposite Multifunctional Hydrogel for Suppressing Osteosarcoma Recurrence and Enhancing Bone Regeneration,” Chemical Engineering Journal 435 (2022): 134896.

[56]

C. Li, J. Sun, K. Shi, et al., “Preparation and Evaluation of Osteogenic Nano-MgO/PMMA Bone Cement for Bone Healing in A Rat Critical Size Calvarial Defect,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B 8, no. 21 (2020): 4575–4586.

[57]

H. Li, H. Wang, J. Pan, et al., “Nanoscaled Bionic Periosteum Orchestrating the Osteogenic Microenvironment for Sequential Bone Regeneration,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12, no. 33 (2020): 36823–36836.

[58]

X. Yang, J. Huang, C. Chen, L. Zhou, H. Ren, and D. Sun, “Biomimetic Design of Double-Sided Functionalized Silver Nanoparticle/Bacterial Cellulose/Hydroxyapatite Hydrogel Mesh for Temporary Cranioplasty,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15, no. 8 (2023): 10506–10519.

[59]

X. Mi, Z. Su, Y. Fu, S. Li, and A. Mo, “3D Printing of Ti(3)C(2)-MXene-Incorporated Composite Scaffolds for Accelerated Bone Regeneration,” Biomedical Materials 17, no. 3 (2022): 035002.

[60]

S. Cavalu, I. V. Antoniac, L. Fritea, et al., “Surface Modifications of The Titanium Mesh for Cranioplasty Using Selenium Nanoparticles Coating,” Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 32, no. 22 (2018): 2509–2522.

[61]

R. Zhao, Y. Shen, X. Deng, et al., “From Brain to Bone: Harnessing Extracellular Vesicles Released From TBI to Enhance Osteogenesis by 3D-Printed Hydrogel Scaffold,” Composites, Part B: Engineering 264 (2023): 110909.

[62]

G. Chen, S. Deng, M. Zuo, et al., “Non-Viral CRISPR Activation System Targeting VEGF-A and TGF-beta1 for Enhanced Osteogenesis of Pre-Osteoblasts Implanted With Dual-Crosslinked Hydrogel,” Mater Today Bio 16 (2022): 100356.

[63]

N. K. Zarrin, F. Mottaghitalab, R. L. Reis, S. C. Kundu, and M. Farokhi, “Thermosensitive Chitosan/Poly(N-Isopropyl Acrylamide) Nanoparticles Embedded in Aniline Pentamer/Silk Fibroin/Polyacrylamide as an Electroactive Injectable Hydrogel for Healing Critical-Sized Calvarial Bone Defect in Aging Rat Model,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 213 (2022): 352–368.

[64]

Z. Shi, F. Yang, Q. Pang, et al., “The Osteogenesis and the Biologic Mechanism of Thermo-Responsive Injectable Hydrogel Containing Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Sodium Alginate Nanoparticles Towards Promoting Osteal Wound Healing,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 224 (2023): 533–543.

[65]

B. Tian, N. Wang, Q. Jiang, L. Tian, L. Hu, and Z. Zhang, “The Immunogenic Reaction and Bone Defect Repair Function of ε-poly-L-lysine (EPL)-Coated Nanoscale PCL/HA Scaffold in Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 32, no. 6 (2021): 63.

[66]

M. Hara, Y. Sumita, Y. Kodama, et al., “Gene-Activated Matrix With Self-Assembly Anionic Nano-Device Containing Plasmid DNAs for Rat Cranial Bone Augmentation,” Materials 14, no. 22 (2021): 7097.

[67]

Y. Li, J. Zhang, L. Chen, H. Li, and J. Wang, “Repair of Critical-Sized Rat Cranial Defects With Rada16-W9 Self-Assembled Peptide Hydrogel,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 652 (2023): 68–75.

[68]

Y. Ai, W. She, S. Wu, et al., “AM1241-Loaded Poly(Ethylene Glycol)–Dithiothreitol Hydrogel Repairs Cranial Bone Defects by Promoting Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and COL-1 Expression,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10 (2022): 888598.

[69]

C. Li, J. Wang, Y. Niu, et al., “Baicalin Nanocomplexes With an In Situ-Forming Biomimetic Gel Implant for Repair of Calvarial Bone Defects via Localized Sclerostin Inhibition,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15 (2023): 9044–9057.

[70]

X. Ren, D. Dejam, M. K. Oberoi, et al., “Osteoprotegerin-Eluting Nanoparticulate Mineralized Collagen Scaffolds Improve Skull Regeneration,” Biomaterials Advances 145 (2023): 213262.

[71]

L. Sun, M. Lu, L. Chen, et al., “Silk-Inorganic Nanoparticle Hybrid Hydrogel as an Injectable Bone Repairing Biomaterial,” Journal of Functional Biomaterials 14, no. 2 (2023): 86.

[72]

W. Zheng, Z. Bai, S. Huang, K. Jiang, L. Liu, and X. Wang, “The Effect of Angiogenesis-Based Scaffold of Mesoporousbioactive Glass Nanofiber on Osteogenesis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20 (2022): 12670.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). MedComm – Biomaterials and Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA).

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

30

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/