The osteogenic effect of mesenchymal stem cells regulated by photo-crosslinked hydrogels with tunable elastic modulus

Haifu Sun , Chen Qian , Kai Chen , Yu Wang , Yuqing Yang , Yonggang Li , Fan Xu , Liang Chen , Kun Li , Youzhi Hong , Yusen Qiao , Dechun Geng

MEDCOMM - Biomaterials and Applications ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : e105

PDF
MEDCOMM - Biomaterials and Applications ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (4) : e105 DOI: 10.1002/mba2.105
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The osteogenic effect of mesenchymal stem cells regulated by photo-crosslinked hydrogels with tunable elastic modulus

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Biomimicry is the enduring pursuit in the field of bone implants, wherein bio-materials with adjustable elastic modulus and porosity, the same as natural bone, offer a novel strategy for developing and applying new bone repair materials. Conventional biomaterials are often used to repair bone defects without complete consideration of structural and functional osseointegration, leading to interface repair failure. In this study, organic-inorganic interpenetrating network technology was employed using varying amounts of nano-hydroxyapatite (nHAP) and methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) and osteogenic growth peptide (OGP) to construct biomimetic bones with low, medium, and high nano-hydroxyapatite content (GelMA-c-OGP/nHAP). As the concentration of nano-hydroxyapatite increases, comprehensive evaluations of the biomimetic materials were conducted using osteogenic ability tests, Micro-CT scans, nanoindentation tests, and mechanical tests. The developed biomimetic structural material exhibits well-controlled mechanical properties. Compared to natural bone trabeculae, this biomimetic material not only maintains the organic and inorganic ratio of natural bone but also demonstrates exceptional mechanical load-bearing capabilities. Additionaly,this scaffold exhibits good porosity and mechanical properties. It enhances cell adhesion, integrates perfectly with bone tissue, and demonstrates excellent osteogenic ability both in vitro and in vivo. This study lays the foundation for constructing biomimetic scaffolds with adjustable mechanical properties, presenting high prospects for applications in the field of tissue engineering.

Keywords

biomimetic / bone tissue engineering / GelMA-c-OGP / nHAP / osteogenesis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Haifu Sun, Chen Qian, Kai Chen, Yu Wang, Yuqing Yang, Yonggang Li, Fan Xu, Liang Chen, Kun Li, Youzhi Hong, Yusen Qiao, Dechun Geng. The osteogenic effect of mesenchymal stem cells regulated by photo-crosslinked hydrogels with tunable elastic modulus. MEDCOMM - Biomaterials and Applications, 2024, 3(4): e105 DOI:10.1002/mba2.105

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

HoMSH, Medcalf RL, LiveseySA, TraianedesK. The dynamics of adult haematopoiesis in the bone and bone marrow environment. Br J Haematol. 2015;170(4):472-486.

[2]

MorrisonSJ, Scadden DT. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2014;505(7483):327-334.

[3]

JingX, XuC, SuW, et al. Photosensitive and conductive hydrogel induced innerved bone regeneration for infected bone defect repair. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(3):e2201349.

[4]

de Melo PereiraD, Habibovic P. Biomineralization-inspired material design for bone regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2018;7(22):e1800700.

[5]

PapeHC, EvansA, KobbeP. Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(suppl 1):S36-S40.

[6]

GreshamRCH, BahneyCS, LeachJK. Growth factor delivery using extracellular matrix-mimicking substrates for musculoskeletal tissue engineering and repair. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(7):1945-1956.

[7]

HolzwarthJM, MaPX. Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32(36):9622-9629.

[8]

MacCH, ChanHY, LinYH, et al. Engineering a biomimetic bone scaffold that can regulate redox homeostasis and promote osteogenesis to repair large bone defects. Biomaterials. 2022;286:121574.

[9]

WangSJ, JiangD, ZhangZZ, et al. Biomimetic nanosilica-collagen scaffolds for in situ bone regeneration: toward a cell-free, one-step surgery. Adv Mater. 2019;31(49):e1904341.

[10]

ZhaoR, ShangT, YuanB, Zhu X, ZhangX, YangX. Osteoporotic bone recovery by a bamboo-structured bioceramic with controlled release of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Bioact Mater. 2022;17:379-393.

[11]

LuY, LiM, LiL, et al. High-activity chitosan/nano hydroxyapatite/zoledronic acid scaffolds for simultaneous tumor inhibition, bone repair and infection eradication. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;82:225-233.

[12]

DepalleB, McGilvery CM, NobakhtiS, AldegaitherN, Shefelbine SJ, PorterAE. Osteopontin regulates type I collagen fibril formation in bone tissue. Acta Biomater. 2021;120:194-202.

[13]

XieX, CaiJ, LiD, et al. Multiphasic bone-ligament-bone integrated scaffold enhances ligamentization and graft-bone integration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Bioact Mater. 2024;31:178-191.

[14]

BaiL, ChenP, ZhaoY, et al. A micro/nano-biomimetic coating on titanium orchestrates osteo/angio-genesis and osteoimmunomodulation for advanced osseointegration. Biomaterials. 2021;278:121162.

[15]

ChoiS, LeeJS, ShinJ, et al. Osteoconductive hybrid hyaluronic acid hydrogel patch for effective bone formation. J Controlled Release. 2020;327:571-583.

[16]

MinardiS, Corradetti B, TaraballiF, et al. Evaluation of the osteoinductive potential of a bio-inspired scaffold mimicking the osteogenic niche for bone augmentation. Biomaterials. 2015;62:128-137.

[17]

LiuX, SmithLA, HuJ, MaPX. Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30(12):2252-2258.

[18]

NicholJW, KoshyST, BaeH, HwangCM, YamanlarS, Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5536-5544.

[19]

MaL, WangX, ZhouY, et al. Biomimetic Ti-6Al-4V alloy/gelatin methacrylate hybrid scaffold with enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic capabilities for large bone defect restoration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(10):3437-3448.

[20]

ZhouX, SunJ, WoK, et al. nHA-loaded gelatin/alginate hydrogel with combined physical and bioactive features for maxillofacial bone repair. Carbohydr Polymers. 2022;298:120127.

[21]

JiaW, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, ZhangYS, et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials. 2016;106:58-68.

[22]

YueK, Trujillo-de Santiago G, AlvarezMM, TamayolA, AnnabiN, KhademhosseiniA. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2015;73:254-271.

[23]

QiaoY, LiuX, ZhouX, et al. Gelatin templated polypeptide co-cross-linked hydrogel for bone regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2020;9(1):e1901239.

[24]

RobertsTT, Rosenbaum AJ. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis. 2012;8(4):114-124.

[25]

FangZ, FengQ. Improved mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite whisker-reinforced poly(L-lactic acid) scaffold by surface modification of hydroxyapatite. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;35:190-194.

[26]

QuinlanE, López-Noriega A, ThompsonE, KellyHM, CryanSA, O’BrienFJ. Development of collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds incorporating PLGA and alginate microparticles for the controlled delivery of rhBMP-2 for bone tissue engineering. J Controlled Release. 2015;198:71-79.

[27]

WangH, WuG, ZhangJ, et al. Osteogenic effect of controlled released rhBMP-2 in 3D printed porous hydroxyapatite scaffold. Colloids Surfaces B. 2016;141:491-498.

[28]

SunT, LiuR, LiuX, FengX, ZhangY, Lai R. The biocompatibility of dental graded nano-glass-zirconia material after aging. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018;13(1):61.

[29]

LiJ, LiL, WuT, et al. An injectable thermosensitive hydrogel containing resveratrol and dexamethasone-loaded carbonated hydroxyapatite microspheres for the regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects. Small Methods. 2024;8(1):e2300843.

[30]

ShitoleAA, RautPW, SharmaN, Giram P, KhandwekarAP, GarnaikB. Electrospun polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite/ZnO nanofibers as potential biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2019;30(5):51.

[31]

LiaoJ, ShiK, JiaY, WuY, QianZ. Gold nanorods and nanohydroxyapatite hybrid hydrogel for preventing bone tumor recurrence via postoperative photothermal therapy and bone regeneration promotion. Bioact Mat. 2021;6(8):2221-2230.

[32]

LiuF, LiuY, LiX, et al. Osteogenesis of 3D printed macro-pore size biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold in rabbit calvaria. J Biomater Appl. 2019;33(9):1168-1177.

[33]

ZouZ, WangL, ZhouZ, et al. Simultaneous incorporation of PTH(1-34) and nano-hydroxyapatite into chitosan/alginate hydrogels for efficient bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(6):1839-1851.

[34]

ZhangM, ChenX, PuX, LiaoX, HuangZ, Yin G. Dissolution behavior of CaO-MgO-SiO(2) -based multiphase bioceramic powders and effects of the released ions on osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(11):3159-3168.

[35]

XieC, YeJ, LiangR, et al. Advanced strategies of biomimetic tissue-engineered grafts for bone regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2021;10(14):e2100408.

[36]

JuX, LiuX, ZhangY, et al. A photo-crosslinked proteinogenic hydrogel enabling self-recruitment of endogenous TGF-β1 for cartilage regeneration. Smart Mater Med. 2022;3:85-93.

[37]

ZhuY, MaZ, KongL, He Y, ChanHF, LiH. Modulation of macrophages by bioactive glass/sodium alginate hydrogel is crucial in skin regeneration enhancement. Biomaterials. 2020;256:120216.

[38]

ZhongZ, WuX, WangY, et al. Zn/Sr dual ions-collagen co-assembly hydroxyapatite enhances bone regeneration through procedural osteo-immunomodulation and osteogenesis. Bioact Mater. 2022;10:195-206.

[39]

CampiG, Cristofaro F, PaniG, et al. Heterogeneous and self-organizing mineralization of bone matrix promoted by hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2017;9(44):17274-17283.

[40]

WangZ, WangJ, LiuJ, et al. Platinum nanoparticles enhance osteogenic differentiation of human dental follicle stem cells via scavenging ROS. Smart Mater Med. 2023;4:621-638.

[41]

WuZ, FanL, ChenC, et al. Promotion of osteoporotic bone healing by a tannic acid modified strontium-doped biomimetic bone lamella with ROS scavenging capacity and pro-osteogenic effect. Smart Mater Med. 2023;4:590-602.

[42]

ArevaloSE, Ebenstein DM, PruittLA. A methodological framework for nanomechanical characterization of soft biomaterials and polymers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;134:105384.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). MedComm - Biomaterials and Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA).

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

180

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/