Targeting the NAT1-ENO1-Lactate Axis Destabilizes PD-L1 to Reinvigorate Antitumor Immunity in Colorectal Cancer

Yi-Xuan Liu , Wen-Xin Wu , Yang Zang , Guang Hu , Xin Guo , Yi Wang , Yun Yang , Zhi Jiang , Xiu-Ming Li , Feng Liu , Yue-Yue Wu , Zu-Da Pan , Yuan-Meng Hu , Ruo-Yang Zhang , Hai-Yi Zhang , Ping-An Chang , Xiao-Shun He , Wen-Juan Gan , Hua Wu

MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (8) : e70867

PDF (8126KB)
MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (8) :e70867 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70867
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Targeting the NAT1-ENO1-Lactate Axis Destabilizes PD-L1 to Reinvigorate Antitumor Immunity in Colorectal Cancer
Author information +
History +
PDF (8126KB)

Abstract

Metabolic dysregulation is a hallmark of tumorigenesis and profoundly impacts immune surveillance; however, the underlying mechanisms and targeted treatments remain limited in colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we utilize public databases, mouse models, and multi-omics analyses to identify N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) as a critical prognostic-associated gene that emerges as a significant modulator of tumor immunity in CRC. We demonstrate that NAT1 suppresses glycolysis and lactate production, thereby promoting an immune-activated tumor microenvironment (TME). Mechanistically, NAT1 interacts with enolase 1 (ENO1), a key glycolytic enzyme, acetylating it at lysine 343 (K343) and thereby inhibiting its activity. However, loss of NAT1 in tumor cells leads to enhanced ENO1 activation, which in turn drives glycolysis and lactate production. Lactate then binds to TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), promoting its oligomerization and activation, leading to K63-linked ubiquitination of PD-L1, which enhances PD-L1 stability and facilitates immune evasion. Importantly, low NAT1-expressing tumors from CRC patients show increased sensitivity to anti-PD-1 therapy, and NAT1 deficiency significantly improves the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment in preclinical mouse models. Collectively, our findings highlight the critical role of NAT1 in reshaping the TME and suggest that targeting the NAT1-ENO1-lactate axis represents a promising therapeutic strategy to enhance immunotherapy in CRC.

Keywords

acetylation / colorectal cancer / glycolysis / immunotherapy / N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) / TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yi-Xuan Liu, Wen-Xin Wu, Yang Zang, Guang Hu, Xin Guo, Yi Wang, Yun Yang, Zhi Jiang, Xiu-Ming Li, Feng Liu, Yue-Yue Wu, Zu-Da Pan, Yuan-Meng Hu, Ruo-Yang Zhang, Hai-Yi Zhang, Ping-An Chang, Xiao-Shun He, Wen-Juan Gan, Hua Wu. Targeting the NAT1-ENO1-Lactate Axis Destabilizes PD-L1 to Reinvigorate Antitumor Immunity in Colorectal Cancer. MedComm, 2026, 7 (8) : e70867 DOI:10.1002/mco2.70867

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

F. Bray, M. Laversanne, H. Sung, et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 74, no. 3 (2024): 229–263.

[2]

M. Wang, C. Zheng, Z. Wang, et al., “Colorectal Cancer: Highlight the Clinical Research Current Progress,” Holistic Integrative Oncology 4, no. 1 (2025): 17.

[3]

D. M. Muzny, M. N. Bainbridge, K. Chang, et al., “Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Human Colon and Rectal Cancer,” Nature 487, no. 7407 (2012): 330–337.

[4]

B. Vogelstein, N. Papadopoulos, V. E. Velculescu, et al., “Cancer Genome Landscapes,” Science 339, no. 6127 (2013): 1546–1558.

[5]

K. Ganesh, Z. K. Stadler, A. Cercek, et al., “Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: Rationale, Challenges and Potential,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 16, no. 6 (2019): 361–375.

[6]

P. Sharma, S. Goswami, D. Raychaudhuri, et al., “Immune Checkpoint Therapy—Current Perspectives and Future Directions,” Cell 186, no. 8 (2023): 1652–1669.

[7]

K. Aliazis, A. Christofides, R. Shah, et al., “The Tumor Microenvironment's Role in the Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade,” Nature Cancer 6, no. 6 (2025): 924–937.

[8]

H. D. Dong, S. E. Strome, D. R. Salomao, et al., “Tumor-Associated B7-H1 Promotes T-Cell Apoptosis: A Potential Mechanism of Immune Evasion,” Nature Medicine 8, no. 8 (2002): 793–800.

[9]

R. Zappasodi, T. Merghoub, and J. D. Wolchok, “Emerging Concepts for Immune Checkpoint Blockade-Based Combination Therapies,” Cancer Cell 33, no. 4 (2018): 581–598.

[10]

C. Galassi, T. A. Chan, I. Vitale, and L. Galluzzi, “The Hallmarks of Cancer Immune Evasion,” Cancer Cell 42, no. 11 (2024): 1825–1863.

[11]

Y. N. Li, Z. X. Wang, P. Gao, et al., “CircRHBDD1 Promotes Immune Escape via IGF2BP2/PD-L1 Signaling and Acts as a Nanotherapeutic Target in Gastric Cancer,” Journal of Translational Medicine 22, no. 1 (2024): 704.

[12]

P. Fan, Z. Qi, Z. Liu, et al., “High Baseline Levels of PD-L1 Reduce the Heterogeneity of Immune Checkpoint Signature and Sensitize Anti-PD1 Therapy in Lung and Colorectal Cancers,” Cell Death & Disease 16, no. 1 (2025): 152.

[13]

D. Hanahan, “Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions,” Cancer Discovery 12, no. 1 (2022): 31–46.

[14]

K. Fischer, P. Hoffmann, S. Voelkl, et al., “Inhibitory Effect of Tumor Cell-Derived Lactic Acid on Human T Cells,” Blood 109, no. 9 (2007): 3812–3819.

[15]

N. Xu, Y. Zhu, Y. Han, et al., “Targeting MondoA-TXNIP Restores Antitumour Immunity in Lactic-Acid-Induced Immunosuppressive Microenvironment,” Nature Metabolism 7, no. 9 (2025): 1889–1904.

[16]

I. Elia, J. H. Rowe, S. Johnson, et al., “Tumor Cells Dictate Anti-Tumor Immune Responses by Altering Pyruvate Utilization and Succinate Signaling in CD8(+) T Cells,” Cell Metabolism 34, no. 8 (2022): 1137–1150.e6.

[17]

Y. Liu, F. Wang, D. Peng, et al., “Activation and Antitumor Immunity of CD8(+) T Cells Are Supported by the Glucose Transporter GLUT10 and Disrupted by Lactic Acid,” Science Translational Medicine 16, no. 762 (2024): eadk7399.

[18]

Z. W. Huang, X. N. Zhang, L. Zhang, et al., “STAT5 Promotes PD-L1 Expression by Facilitating Histone Lactylation to Drive Immunosuppression in Acute Myeloid Leukemia,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 8, no. 1 (2023): 391.

[19]

Y. Yang, Y. Wu, X. Guo, et al., “Extracellular CD44 Lactylation Impairs CD8 T Cell Function in KRAS-Mutant Colorectal Cancer,” Nature Metabolism 8, no. 4 (2026): 902–923.

[20]

H. O. Lee, Y. Hong, H. E. Etlioglu, et al., “Lineage-Dependent Gene Expression Programs Influence the Immune Landscape of Colorectal Cancer,” Nature Genetics 52, no. 6 (2020): 594–603.

[21]

E. Sim, K. Walters, and S. Boukouvala, “Arylamine N-Acetyltransferases: From Structure to Function,” Drug Metabolism Reviews 40, no. 3 (2008): 479–510.

[22]

H. Huang, S. Tang, M. Ji, et al., “p300-Mediated Lysine 2-Hydroxyisobutyrylation Regulates Glycolysis,” Molecular Cell 70, no. 5 (2018): 984.

[23]

C. K. Huang, Y. Sun, L. Lv, and Y. Ping, “ENO1 and Cancer,” Molecular Therapy-Oncolytics 24 (2022): 288–298.

[24]

J. H. Cha, L. C. Chan, C. W. Li, J. L. Hsu, and M. C. Hung, “Mechanisms Controlling PD-L1 Expression in Cancer,” Molecular Cell 76, no. 3 (2019): 359–370.

[25]

C. Wang, L. Deng, M. Hong, et al., “TAK1 Is a Ubiquitin-Dependent Kinase of MKK and IKK,” Nature 412, no. 6844 (2001): 346–351.

[26]

M. Funakoshi-Tago, K. Tago, M. Hayakawa, et al., “TRAF6 Is a Critical Signal Transducer in IL-33 Signaling Pathway,” Cellular Signalling 20, no. 9 (2008): 1679–1686.

[27]

W. Xiong, X. Gao, T. Zhang, et al., “USP8 Inhibition Reshapes an Inflamed Tumor Microenvironment That Potentiates the Immunotherapy,” Nature Communications 13, no. 1 (2022): 1700.

[28]

M. A. Lomaga, W. C. Yeh, I. Sarosi, et al., “TRAF6 Deficiency Results in Osteopetrosis and Defective Interleukin-1, CD40, and LPS Signaling,” Genes & Development 13, no. 8 (1999): 1015–1024.

[29]

A. D. Waldman, J. M. Fritz, and M. J. Lenardo, “A Guide to Cancer Immunotherapy: From T Cell Basic Science to Clinical Practice,” Nature Reviews Immunology 20, no. 11 (2020): 651–668.

[30]

M. Philip and A. Schietinger, “CD8(+) T Cell Differentiation and Dysfunction in Cancer,” Nature Reviews Immunology 22, no. 4 (2022): 209–223.

[31]

L. Liu, A. Von Vett, and N. Zhang, “Arylamine N-Acetyltransferases: Characterization of the Substrate Specificities and Molecular Interactions of Environmental Arylamines With Human NAT1 and NAT2,” Chemical Research in Toxicology 20, no. 9 (2007): 1300–1308.

[32]

N. J. Butcher and R. F. Minchin, “Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase 1: A Novel Drug Target in Cancer Development,” Pharmacological Reviews 64, no. 1 (2012): 147–165.

[33]

J. M. Tiang, N. J. Butcher, C. Cullinane, P. O. Humbert, and R. F. Minchin, “RNAi-Mediated Knock-Down of Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase-1 Expression Induces E-Cadherin Up-Regulation and Cell-Cell Contact Growth Inhibition,” PLoS One 6, no. 2 (2011): e17031.

[34]

Y. Endo, H. Yamashita, S. Takahashi, et al., “Immunohistochemical Determination of the miR-1290 Target Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) as a Prognostic Biomarker in Breast Cancer,” BMC Cancer 14 (2014): 990.

[35]

L. Z. Cao, X. F. Liu, B. W. Zheng, C. Z. Xing, and J. W. Liu, “Role of K63-Linked Ubiquitination in Cancer,” Cell Death Discovery 8, no. 1 (2022): 410.

[36]

M. L. Zhu, Z. X. Wang, Y. R. He, et al., “Acidic Tumor Microenvironment-Modulated Nanoparticle Potentiates Gastric Cancer Photoimmunotherapy,” Journal of Advanced Research 81 (2026): 731–744.

[37]

C. Zhang, L. J. Zhou, M. Y. Zhang, et al., “H3K18 Lactylation Potentiates Immune Escape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer,” Cancer Research 84, no. 21 (2024): 3589–3601.

[38]

W. L. Ye, L. Huang, X. Q. Yang, et al., “TRIM21 Induces Selective Autophagic Degradation of c-Myc and Sensitizes Regorafenib Therapy in Colorectal Cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 121, no. 42 (2024): e2406936121.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (8126KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉