Intracranial Efficacy of Crizotinib and Postprogression Therapeutic Strategies in Advanced c-ros Oncogene 1 (ROS1)-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), a Multicenter Real-World Study
Zihua Zou , Xiaobin Zheng , Panwen Tian , Zhe Liu , Jie Hu , Yong Fang , Yang Xia , Feng Ye , Tangfeng Lv , Li Li , Diansheng Zhong , Jin Zhou , Qian Chu , Meiqi Shi , Chengbo Han , Baoshan Cao , Dingzhi Huang , Hui Guo , Gen Lin
MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (7) : e70854
Intracranial efficacy of crizotinib and optimal postprogression therapies in c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1)-positive non–small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) remain under-explored. We performed a multicenter real-world study across 17 Chinese hospitals (2015–2024) in 325 ROS1-positive NSCLC patients to evaluate the intracranial efficacy of crizotinib and postprogression treatment strategies. Crizotinib achieved an overall response rate(ORR) of 78.5% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 22.4 months. Patients with baseline brain metastases had a 66.7% intracranial response rate and a median central nervous system (CNS)-PFS of 22.2 months, demonstrating intracranial benefit. After progression, next-generation ROS1 inhibitors (active against the G2032R resistance mutation, for example, taletrectinib and repotrectinib) significantly prolonged PFS compared to older-generation targeted agents (median 13.9 vs. 4.4 months), especially among patients with secondary ROS1 resistance mutations (ORR 66.7% vs. 14.3%). However, due to greater availability in China, earlier agents like lorlatinib and entrectinib were commonly used after crizotinib failure. In our cohort, lorlatinib demonstrated superior efficacy to entrectinib, with a trend toward longer PFS and higher overall (34% vs. 7%) and intracranial (50% vs. 0%) response rates. This large real-world study confirms crizotinib's intracranial benefit and underscores the importance of next-generation ROS1 inhibitors and older-generation agents like lorlatinib—for improved patient outcomes after crizotinib resistance.
c-ros oncogene 1 / central nervous system efficacy / Crizotinib / non–small cell lung cancer / subsequent treatments
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
2026 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |