Non-Viral Cytokine-Inducible SH2 Containing Protein Locus-Specific Integrated Fibroblast Activation Protein Alpha-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Achieve Potent Antitumor Efficacy in Glioblastoma

Xin Dong , Yao Sun , Yuetong Guo , Jiao Wang , Fei Wang , Ziming Wang , Ruizhen Li , Fei Xie , Tingting Tan , Baijie Cheng , Ronghan Huang , Shu Zhang , Xiaotong Lin , Zhaoze Guo , Hubing Wu , Hao Wu , Xubiao Zhang , Guozhu Xie

MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : e70702

PDF (15022KB)
MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) :e70702 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70702
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Non-Viral Cytokine-Inducible SH2 Containing Protein Locus-Specific Integrated Fibroblast Activation Protein Alpha-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Achieve Potent Antitumor Efficacy in Glioblastoma
Author information +
History +
PDF (15022KB)

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have been used to treat patients with glioblastoma (GBM) in clinical trial settings by targeting GBM-associated antigens. However, the efficacy of these CAR-T cells remains limited mainly due to the heterogeneous expression of tumor antigen and their anergy in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein (CIS, encoded by the gene CISH) is a potent intracellular checkpoint inducing T-cell anergy. Here, we identified fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAPα) as a highly attractive target for CAR-T cell therapy against GBM based on its dual expression pattern (on tumor cells and perivascular cells) in GBM. A panel of nanobodies specific for FAPα was isolated, and FAPα-targeting CAR-T cells were developed using the isolated nanobody to verify their specific cytotoxicity to GBM cells. Furthermore, a non-viral circular single-stranded DNA (cssDNA)-based CRISPR/Cas9-targeted genome-editing (cssDNA/CRISPR/Cas9) technology was used to integrate CAR cassettes at the CISH locus to generate CISH-knockout (CISH-KO) CAR-T cells. The resulting CISH-KO-CAR-T cells exhibited robust proliferation and potent anti-GBM activity in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our results provide novel engineered CAR-T cells with enhanced efficacy against GBM.

Keywords

chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy / clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/Cas9 / cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein / fibroblast activation protein alpha / glioblastoma

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xin Dong, Yao Sun, Yuetong Guo, Jiao Wang, Fei Wang, Ziming Wang, Ruizhen Li, Fei Xie, Tingting Tan, Baijie Cheng, Ronghan Huang, Shu Zhang, Xiaotong Lin, Zhaoze Guo, Hubing Wu, Hao Wu, Xubiao Zhang, Guozhu Xie. Non-Viral Cytokine-Inducible SH2 Containing Protein Locus-Specific Integrated Fibroblast Activation Protein Alpha-Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Achieve Potent Antitumor Efficacy in Glioblastoma. MedComm, 2026, 7 (4) : e70702 DOI:10.1002/mco2.70702

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

W. Wu, J. L. Klockow, M. Zhang, et al., “Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM): An Overview of Current Therapies and Mechanisms of Resistance,” Pharmacological Research 171 (2021): 105780.

[2]

K. M. Cappell and J. N. Kochenderfer, “Long-Term Outcomes Following CAR T Cell Therapy: What We Know so Far,” Nature Reviews Clinical oncology 20, no. 6 (2023): 359–371.

[3]

D. M. O'Rourke, M. P. Nasrallah, A. Desai, et al., “A Single Dose of Peripherally Infused EGFRvIII-Directed CAR T Cells Mediates Antigen Loss and Induces Adaptive Resistance in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma,” Science Translational Medicine 9, no. 399 (2017): eaaa0984.

[4]

N. Ahmed, V. Brawley, M. Hegde, et al., “HER2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified Virus-Specific T Cells for Progressive Glioblastoma: A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Trial,” JAMA Oncology 3, no. 8 (2017): 1094–1101.

[5]

Q. Lin, T. Ba, J. Ho, et al., “First-in-Human Trial of EphA2-Redirected CAR T-Cells in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Preliminary Report of Three Cases at the Starting Dose,” Frontiers in Oncology 11 (2021): 694941.

[6]

Z. Liu, J. Zhou, X. Yang, et al., “Safety and Antitumor Activity of GD2-Specific 4SCAR-T Cells in Patients With Glioblastoma,” Molecular Cancer 22, no. 1 (2023): 3.

[7]

I. Andreu-Saumell, A. Rodriguez-Garcia, V. Mühlgrabner, et al., “CAR Affinity Modulates the Sensitivity of CAR-T Cells to PD-1/PD-L1-mediated Inhibition,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 3552.

[8]

Z. Wang, N. Li, K. Feng, et al., “Phase I Study of CAR-T Cells With PD-1 and TCR Disruption in Mesothelin-Positive Solid Tumors,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology 18, no. 9 (2021): 2188–2198.

[9]

D. C. Palmer, B. R. Webber, Y. Patel, et al., “Internal Checkpoint Regulates T Cell Neoantigen Reactivity and Susceptibility to PD1 Blockade,” Med 3, no. 10 (2022): 682–704.e8.

[10]

C. N. Duncan, J. R. Bledsoe, B. Grzywacz, et al., “Hematologic Cancer After Gene Therapy for Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy,” New England Journal of Medicine 391, no. 14 (2024): 1287–1301.

[11]

E. M. Russo-Carbolante, V. Picanço-Castro, D. C. Alves, et al., “Integration Pattern of HIV-1 Based Lentiviral Vector Carrying Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII in Sk-Hep and 293T Cells,” Biotechnology Letters 33, no. 1 (2011): 23–31.

[12]

K. Perica, N. Jain, M. Scordo, et al., “CD4+ T-Cell Lymphoma Harboring a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Integration in TP53,” New England Journal of Medicine 392, no. 6 (2025): 577–583.

[13]

C. Gándara, V. Affleck, and E. A. Stoll, “Manufacture of Third-Generation Lentivirus for Preclinical Use, With Process Development Considerations for Translation to Good Manufacturing Practice,” Human Gene Therapy Methods 29, no. 1 (2018): 1–15.

[14]

M. K. Atianand and K. A. Fitzgerald, “Molecular Basis of DNA Recognition in the Immune System,” Journal of Immunology 190, no. 5 (2013): 1911–1918.

[15]

J. Tao, X. Zhou, and Z. Jiang, “cGAS-cGAMP-STING: The Three Musketeers of Cytosolic DNA Sensing and Signaling,” IUBMB Life 68, no. 11 (2016): 858–870.

[16]

J. Eyquem, J. Mansilla-Soto, T. Giavridis, et al., “Targeting a CAR to the TRAC Locus With CRISPR/Cas9 Enhances Tumour Rejection,” Nature 543, no. 7643 (2017): 113–117.

[17]

J. Zhang, Y. Hu, J. Yang, et al., “Non-Viral, Specifically Targeted CAR-T Cells Achieve High Safety and Efficacy in B-NHL,” Nature 609, no. 7926 (2022): 369–374.

[18]

J. Salsman and G. Dellaire, “Precision Genome Editing in the CRISPR Era,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology 95, no. 2 (2017): 187–201.

[19]

S. J. Hersch, S. Chandrasekaran, J. Lam, N. Nafissi, and R. A. Slavcev, “Manufacturing DNA in E. coli Yields Higher-fidelity DNA Than in Vitro Enzymatic Synthesis,” Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development 32, no. 2 (2024): 101227.

[20]

K. Xie, J. Starzyk, I. Majumdar, et al., “Efficient Non-Viral Immune Cell Engineering Using Circular Single-Stranded DNA-Mediated Genomic Integration,” Nature Biotechnology 43, no. 11 (2024): 1821–1832.

[21]

S. Muyldermans, “Nanobodies: Natural Single-Domain Antibodies,” Annual Review of Biochemistry 82 (2013): 775–797.

[22]

A. A. Fitzgerald and L. M. Weiner, “The Role of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Health and Malignancy,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 39, no. 3 (2020): 783–803.

[23]

L. M. Ebert, W. Yu, T. Gargett, et al., “Endothelial, Pericyte and Tumor Cell Expression in Glioblastoma Identifies Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) as an Excellent Target for Immunotherapy,” Clinical & Translational Immunology 9, no. 10 (2020): e1191.

[24]

M. Röhrich, A. Loktev, A. K. Wefers, et al., “IDH-Wildtype Glioblastomas and Grade III/IV IDH-Mutant Gliomas Show Elevated Tracer Uptake in Fibroblast Activation Protein-Specific PET/CT,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 46, no. 12 (2019): 2569–2580.

[25]

P. J. Galbo, A. T. Madsen, Y. Liu, et al., “Functional Contribution and Clinical Implication of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Glioblastoma,” Clinical Cancer Research 30, no. 4 (2024): 865–876.

[26]

M. Weller, J. Felsberg, C. Hartmann, et al., “Molecular Predictors of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Prospective Translational Study of the German Glioma Network,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 27, no. 34 (2009): 5743–5750.

[27]

M. Chen, X. Lei, C. Shi, et al., “Pericyte-targeting Prodrug Overcomes Tumor Resistance to Vascular Disrupting Agents,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 127, no. 10 (2017): 3689–3701.

[28]

M. Zarodniuk, A. Steele, X. Lu, J. Li, and M. Datta, “CNS Tumor Stroma Transcriptomics Identify Perivascular Fibroblasts as Predictors of Immunotherapy Resistance in Glioblastoma Patients,” NPJ Genomic Medicine 8, no. 1 (2023): 35.

[29]

M. J. Scanlan, B. K. Raj, B. Calvo, et al., “Molecular Cloning of Fibroblast Activation Protein Alpha, a Member of the Serine Protease Family Selectively Expressed in Stromal Fibroblasts of Epithelial Cancers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91, no. 12 (1994): 5657–5661.

[30]

G. Xie, N. A. Ivica, B. Jia, et al., “CAR-T Cells Targeting a Nucleophosmin Neoepitope Exhibit Potent Specific Activity in Mouse Models of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia,” Nature Biomedical Engineering 5, no. 5 (2021): 399–413.

[31]

D. C. Palmer, G. C. Guittard, Z. Franco, et al., “Cish Actively Silences TCR Signaling in CD8+ T Cells to Maintain Tumor Tolerance,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 212, no. 12 (2015): 2095–2113.

[32]

J. Lv, L. Qin, R. Zhao, et al., “Disruption of CISH Promotes the Antitumor Activity of human T Cells and Decreases PD-1 Expression Levels,” Molecular Therapy Oncolytics 28 (2023): 46–58.

[33]

A. Matsumoto, M. Masuhara, K. Mitsui, et al., “CIS, a Cytokine Inducible SH2 Protein, Is a Target of the JAK-STAT5 Pathway and Modulates STAT5 Activation,” Blood 89, no. 9 (1997): 3148–3154.

[34]

N. N. Shah and T. J. Fry, “Mechanisms of Resistance to CAR T Cell Therapy,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 16, no. 6 (2019): 372–385.

[35]

A. H. Long, W. M. Haso, J. F. Shern, et al., “4-1BB Costimulation Ameliorates T Cell Exhaustion Induced by Tonic Signaling of Chimeric Antigen Receptors,” Nature Medicine 21, no. 6 (2015): 581–590.

[36]

K. P. Safarzadeh, A. Naseri, S. Mirarefin, et al., “Nanobody-Based CAR-T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy,” Biomarker Research 10, no. 1 (2022): 24.

[37]

N. A. Vitanza, A. J. Johnson, A. L. Wilson, et al., “Locoregional Infusion of HER2-specific CAR T Cells in Children and Young Adults With Recurrent or Refractory CNS Tumors: An Interim Analysis,” Nature Medicine 27, no. 9 (2021): 1544–1552.

[38]

B. D. Choi, E. R. Gerstner, M. J. Frigault, et al., “Intraventricular CARv3-TEAM-E T Cells in Recurrent Glioblastoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 390, no. 14 (2024): 1290–1298.

[39]

L. K. Donovan, A. Delaidelli, S. K. Joseph, et al., “Locoregional Delivery of CAR T Cells to the Cerebrospinal Fluid for Treatment of Metastatic Medulloblastoma and Ependymoma,” Nature Medicine 26, no. 5 (2020): 720–731.

[40]

C. McMahon, A. S. Baier, R. Pascolutti, et al., “Yeast Surface Display Platform for Rapid Discovery of Conformationally Selective Nanobodies,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 25, no. 3 (2018): 289–296.

[41]

B. J. Vom, M. Vrohlings, S. Haller, et al., “Intratumoral IL-12 Combined With CTLA-4 Blockade Elicits T Cell-Mediated Glioma Rejection,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 210, no. 13 (2013): 2803–2811.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (15022KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/