Sulforaphane Synergizes With PD-1 Blockade Through Activating CD8+ T Cells in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Preclinical and Clinical Investigations

Jieyao Li , Jinyan Liu , Zheng Wang , Ming Zhao , Mingming You , Ziyi Fu , Caijuan Guo , Tengyue Zhang , Shasha Liu , Dongli Yue , Shuangning Yang , Yixin Li , Qun Gao , Yanfen Liu , Jianmin Huang , Liping Wang , Yi Zhang

MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : e70688

PDF (13530KB)
MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) :e70688 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70688
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Sulforaphane Synergizes With PD-1 Blockade Through Activating CD8+ T Cells in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Preclinical and Clinical Investigations
Author information +
History +
PDF (13530KB)

Abstract

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy has achieved promising success across several tumor types; however, its efficacy is still far from satisfactory in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining therapies have been attempted to synergize anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy through activating antitumor response. Previously, we convinced the role of sulforaphane (SFN) in regulating tumor immune microenvironment (TME) to enhance antitumor response. Consistently, here we observed combining SFN with chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy achieved the best tumor suppression versus other treatments in mouse models bearing Lewis lung carcinoma cells. Further, a clinical trial (KY-2021-0266) was performed, and the disease control and objective response rates were higher in the experimental group (SFN combined anti-PD-1 antibody and chemotherapy group, n = 30) compared with the control group (anti-PD-1 antibody combined chemotherapy group, n = 30) (100% vs. 93.3% and 86.7% vs. 60.0%, respectively). Moreover, the median progression-free survival was longer (19 vs. 9.5 months, respectively) in the experimental group. After treatment, antitumor response was enriched, while CD8-related function markers were elevated and myeloid-derived suppressor cell/M2-related markers were reduced in the experimental group. Two spurious progressions were observed in the experimental group. In conclusion, this synergistic effect suggests that SFN may be a promising immunosensitizer and a treatment option in NSCLC.

Keywords

anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy / CD8+ T cells / non–small cell lung cancer / spurious progressions / sulforaphane

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jieyao Li, Jinyan Liu, Zheng Wang, Ming Zhao, Mingming You, Ziyi Fu, Caijuan Guo, Tengyue Zhang, Shasha Liu, Dongli Yue, Shuangning Yang, Yixin Li, Qun Gao, Yanfen Liu, Jianmin Huang, Liping Wang, Yi Zhang. Sulforaphane Synergizes With PD-1 Blockade Through Activating CD8+ T Cells in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Preclinical and Clinical Investigations. MedComm, 2026, 7 (4) : e70688 DOI:10.1002/mco2.70688

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

J. C. Soria, Y. Ohe, J. Vansteenkiste, et al., “Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 378 (2018): 113–125.

[2]

G. V. Scagliotti, P. Parikh, J. von Pawel, et al., “Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine With Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 26 (2008): 3543–3551.

[3]

L. Gandhi, D. Rodríguez-Abreu, S. Gadgeel, et al., “Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 378 (2018): 2078–2092.

[4]

M. A. Socinski, M. Nishio, R. M. Jotte, et al., “IMpower150 Final Overall Survival Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology 16 (2021): 1909–1924.

[5]

M. A. Socinski, R. M. Jotte, F. Cappuzzo, et al., “Atezolizumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC,” New England Journal of Medicine 378 (2018): 2288–2301.

[6]

H. West, M. McCleod, M. Hussein, et al., “Atezolizumab in Combination With Carboplatin Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (IMpower130): A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial,” Lancet Oncology 20 (2019): 924–937.

[7]

C. Zhou, G. Chen, Y. Huang, et al., “Camrelizumab Plus Carboplatin and Pemetrexed Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (CameL): A Randomised, Open-Label, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial,” Lancet Respiratory Medicine 9 (2021): 305–314.

[8]

M. J. Grant, R. S. Herbst, and S. B. Goldberg, “Selecting the Optimal Immunotherapy Regimen in Driver-Negative Metastatic NSCLC,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 18 (2021): 625–644.

[9]

E. L. Leung, R. Z. Li, X. X. Fan, et al., “Longitudinal High-Dimensional Analysis Identifies Immune Features Associating With Response to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy,” Nature Communications 14 (2023): 5115.

[10]

Y. Liu, Y. Ping, L. Zhang, et al., “Changes in L-Phenylalanine Concentration Reflect and Predict Response to Anti-PD-1 Treatment Combined With Chemotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer,” MedComm 6 (2025): e70100.

[11]

J. Huang, D. Liu, Y. Wang, et al., “Ginseng Polysaccharides Alter the Gut Microbiota and Kynurenine/Tryptophan Ratio, Potentiating the Antitumour Effect of Antiprogrammed Cell Death 1/Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (Anti-PD-1/PD-L1) Immunotherapy,” Gut 71 (2022): 734–745.

[12]

P. Yu, H. Wei, K. Li, et al., “The Traditional Chinese Medicine Monomer Ailanthone Improves the Therapeutic Efficacy of Anti-PD-L1 in Melanoma Cells by Targeting c-Jun,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 41 (2022): 346.

[13]

S. Zwirner, A. A. Abu Rmilah, S. Klotz, et al., “First-in-Class MKK4 Inhibitors Enhance Liver Regeneration and Prevent Liver Failure,” Cell 187 (2024): 1666–1684.e1626.

[14]

Y. Xu, X. Han, Y. Li, et al., “Sulforaphane Mediates Glutathione Depletion via Polymeric Nanoparticles to Restore Cisplatin Chemosensitivity,” ACS Nano 13 (2019): 13445–13455.

[15]

Y. Ge, Z. Ge, F. Tian, et al., “Sulforaphane Potentiates the Efficacy of Chemoradiotherapy in Glioblastoma by Selectively Targeting Thioredoxin Reductase 1,” Cancer Letters 611 (2024): 217429.

[16]

Z. Lu, Y. Ren, L. Yang, et al., “Inhibiting Autophagy Enhances Sulforaphane-Induced Apoptosis via Targeting NRF2 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 11 (2021): 1246–1260.

[17]

Q. Zou, X. Zhou, J. Lai, et al., “Targeting p62 by Sulforaphane Promotes Autolysosomal Degradation of SLC7A11, Inducing Ferroptosis for Osteosarcoma Treatment,” Redox Biology 79 (2025): 103460.

[18]

Q. Shi, Y. Liu, W. Yang, Y. Li, C. Wang, and K. Gao, “The Covalent Modification of STAT1 Cysteines by Sulforaphane Promotes Antitumor Immunity via Blocking IFN-γ-Induced PD-L1 Expression,” Redox Biology 81 (2025): 103543.

[19]

I. Xagoraris, Y. Yang, E. Bougka, et al., “Sulforaphane Promotes Natural Killer Cell-Mediated Anti-Tumor Immune Responses Partially via cGAS-STING Pathway in Classical Hodgkin lymphoma,” Leukemia 39 (2025): 1787–1790.

[20]

C. Shen, Z. Zhang, Y. Tian, et al., “Sulforaphane Enhances the Antitumor Response of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells by Regulating PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway,” BMC Medicine 19 (2021): 283.

[21]

J. Liu, H. Chen, C. Guo, et al., “Sulforaphane Activates CD8(+) T Cells Antitumor Response Through IL-12RB2/MMP3/FasL-Induced MDSCs Apoptosis,” Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 12 (2024): e007983.

[22]

A. T. Krishnamurty, J. A. Shyer, M. Thai, et al., “LRRC15(+) Myofibroblasts Dictate the Stromal Setpoint to Suppress Tumour Immunity,” Nature 611 (2022): 148–154.

[23]

L. Sun, Y. Wang, X. Wang, et al., “PD-L1 Promotes Myofibroblastic Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells by Distinct Mechanisms Selective for TGF-β Receptor I Versus II,” Cell Reports 38 (2022): 110349.

[24]

Y. Chen, J. Kim, S. Yang, et al., “Type I Collagen Deletion in αSMA(+) Myofibroblasts Augments Immune Suppression and Accelerates Progression of Pancreatic Cancer,” Cancer Cell 39 (2021): 548–565.e546.

[25]

T. Fu, D. P. Sullivan, A. M. Gonzalez, et al., “Mechanotransduction via Endothelial Adhesion Molecule CD31 Initiates Transmigration and Reveals a Role for VEGFR2 in Diapedesis,” Immunity 56 (2023): 2311–2324.e2316.

[26]

H. Zhang, C. K. Tsui, G. Garcia, et al., “The Extracellular Matrix Integrates Mitochondrial Homeostasis,” Cell 187 (2024): 4289–4304.e4226.

[27]

T. E. Sutherland, D. P. Dyer, and J. E. Allen, “The Extracellular Matrix and the Immune System: A Mutually Dependent Relationship,” Science 379 (2023): eabp8964.

[28]

Q. Wang, J. Gao, and X. Wu, “Pseudoprogression and Hyperprogression After Checkpoint Blockade,” International Immunopharmacology 58 (2018): 125–135.

[29]

N. Liu, L. Chen, M. Yan, et al., “Eubacterium rectale Improves the Efficacy of Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy in Melanoma via L-Serine-Mediated NK Cell Activation,” Research 6 (2023): 0127.

[30]

Y. Ping, J. Shan, H. Qin, et al., “PD-1 Signaling Limits Expression of Phospholipid Phosphatase 1 and Promotes Intratumoral CD8(+) T Cell Ferroptosis,” Immunity 57 (2024): 2122–2139.e2129.

[31]

M. Russo, C. Spagnuolo, G. L. Russo, et al., “Nrf2 Targeting by Sulforaphane: A Potential Therapy for Cancer Treatment,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 58 (2018): 1391–1405.

[32]

X. Haristoy, K. Angioi-Duprez, A. Duprez, and A. Lozniewski, “Efficacy of Sulforaphane in Eradicating Helicobacter pylori in Human Gastric Xenografts Implanted in Nude Mice,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47 (2003): 3982–3984.

[33]

X. Liu and K. Lv, “Cruciferous Vegetables Intake Is Inversely Associated With Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis,” Breast 22 (2013): 309–313.

[34]

Y. Li, T. Zhang, H. Korkaya, et al., “Sulforaphane, a Dietary Component of Broccoli/Broccoli Sprouts, Inhibits Breast Cancer Stem Cells,” Clinical Cancer Research 16 (2010): 2580–2590.

[35]

S. V. Singh, R. Warin, D. Xiao, et al., “Sulforaphane Inhibits Prostate Carcinogenesis and Pulmonary Metastasis in TRAMP Mice in Association With Increased Cytotoxicity of Natural Killer Cells,” Cancer Research 69 (2009): 2117–2125.

[36]

P. Thejass and G. Kuttan, “Modulation of Cell-Mediated Immune Response in B16F-10 Melanoma-Induced Metastatic Tumor-Bearing C57BL/6 Mice by Sulforaphane,” Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology 29 (2007): 173–186.

[37]

F. Wang, W. Wang, J. Li, J. Zhang, X. Wang, and M. Wang, “Sulforaphane Reverses Gefitinib Tolerance in Human Lung Cancer Cells via Modulation of Sonic Hedgehog Signaling,” Oncology Letters 15 (2018): 109–114.

[38]

F. Wang, Y. Sun, X. Huang, et al., “Sulforaphane Inhibits Self-Renewal of Lung Cancer Stem Cells Through the Modulation of Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Pathway and Polyhomeotic Homolog 3,” AMB Express 11 (2021): 121.

[39]

D. Dyikanov, A. Zaitsev, T. Vasileva, et al., “Comprehensive Peripheral Blood Immunoprofiling Reveals Five Immunotypes With Immunotherapy Response Characteristics in Patients With Cancer,” Cancer Cell 42 (2024): 759–779.e712.

[40]

R. B. Delconte, M. Owyong, E. K. Santosa, et al., “Fasting Reshapes Tissue-Specific Niches to Improve NK Cell-Mediated Anti-Tumor Immunity,” Immunity 57 (2024): 1923–1938.e1927.

[41]

J. D. Klement, P. S. Redd, C. Lu, et al., “Tumor PD-L1 Engages Myeloid PD-1 to Suppress Type I Interferon to Impair Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Recruitment,” Cancer Cell 41 (2023): 620–636.e629.

[42]

Y. Zhou, G. Yang, H. Tian, et al., “Sulforaphane Metabolites Cause Apoptosis via Microtubule Disruption in Cancer,” Endocrine-Related Cancer 25 (2018): 255–268.

[43]

Y. Han, C. Zou, T. Liu, W. Cheng, P. Cheng, and A. Wu, “Inhibiting Interferon-γ Induced Cancer Intrinsic TNFRSF14 Elevation Restrains the Malignant Progression of Glioblastoma,” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 43 (2024): 212.

[44]

S. Jhunjhunwala, C. Hammer, and L. Delamarre, “Antigen Presentation in Cancer: Insights Into Tumour Immunogenicity and Immune Evasion,” Nature Reviews Cancer 21 (2021): 298–312.

[45]

H. Zhao, D. Teng, L. Yang, et al., “Myeloid-Derived Itaconate Suppresses Cytotoxic CD8(+) T Cells and Promotes Tumour Growth,” Nature Metabolism 4 (2022): 1660–1673.

[46]

Y. Liu, C. C. Wong, Y. Ding, et al., “Peptostreptococcus Anaerobius Mediates Anti-PD1 Therapy Resistance and Exacerbates Colorectal Cancer via Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Mice,” Nature Microbiology 9 (2024): 1467–1482.

[47]

A. U. Kabir, C. Zeng, M. Subramanian, et al., “ZBTB46 Coordinates Angiogenesis and Immunity to Control Tumor Outcome,” Nature Immunology 25 (2024): 1546–1554.

[48]

E. E. Crouch, A. Bhaduri, M. G. Andrews, et al., “Ensembles of Endothelial and Mural Cells Promote Angiogenesis in Prenatal Human Brain,” Cell 185 (2022): 3753–3769.e3718.

[49]

W. Jia, Q. Gao, A. Han, H. Zhu, and J. Yu, “The Potential Mechanism, Recognition and Clinical Significance of Tumor Pseudoprogression After Immunotherapy,” Cancer Biology & Medicine 16 (2019): 655–670.

[50]

D. Fujimoto, H. Yoshioka, Y. Kataoka, et al., “Pseudoprogression in Previously Treated Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Nivolumab Monotherapy,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology 14 (2019): 468–474.

[51]

J. H. Lee, G. V. Long, A. M. Menzies, et al., “Association Between Circulating Tumor DNA and Pseudoprogression in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Anti-Programmed Cell Death 1 Antibodies,” JAMA Oncology 4 (2018): 717–721.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (13530KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/