NR3C1, LAX1, and RCAN3 as Circulating Epigenetic Biomarkers for Prognosis and Chemotherapy Response Prediction in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Pablo Cano-Ramírez , Marta Toledano-Fonseca , María Teresa Cano-Osuna , Nerea Herrera-Casanova , Emilio Carrillo-Pecero , Antonio Rodríguez-Ariza , Enrique Aranda , María Victoria García-Ortiz

MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : e70682

PDF (2770KB)
MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) :e70682 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70682
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
NR3C1, LAX1, and RCAN3 as Circulating Epigenetic Biomarkers for Prognosis and Chemotherapy Response Prediction in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Author information +
History +
PDF (2770KB)

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal, largely due to late diagnosis and limited efficacy of treatments. Improving first-line treatment selection and patient monitoring requires novel, non-invasive biomarkers beyond carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and imaging. This study investigates epigenetic biomarkers from liquid biopsy with prognostic and predictive potential in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC; mPDAC). Genome-wide methylation profiling of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from healthy individuals and stage IV mPDAC patients identified 13 gene-associated CpG sites with significantly altered methylation patterns. ddPCR validation confirmed consistent methylation differences in lymphocyte transmembrane adaptor 1 (LAX1), nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1 (NR3C1), and RCAN3 between healthy and patient groups. Elevated LAX1 and RCAN3 methylation and reduced NR3C1 methylation at diagnosis were associated with poor prognosis and correlated with high-risk circulating biomarker profiles, including CA19-9 levels, RAS MAF (mutant allele fraction), cfDNA concentration, and cfDNA fragmentation. Notably, baseline NR3C1 methylation levels predicted response to first-line FOLFIRINOX-based treatment with an acceptable 75% sensitivity and a high specificity of 92.86%. These findings highlight the clinical significance of cfDNA methylation as a minimally invasive biomarker source, emphasizing LAX1, NR3C1, and RCAN3 as prognostic biomarkers in mPDAC. Specifically, baseline NR3C1 methylation emerges as a promising predictor of treatment response, supporting personalized therapeutic strategies in mPDAC.

Keywords

DNA methylation and response prediction / liquid biopsy / pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Pablo Cano-Ramírez, Marta Toledano-Fonseca, María Teresa Cano-Osuna, Nerea Herrera-Casanova, Emilio Carrillo-Pecero, Antonio Rodríguez-Ariza, Enrique Aranda, María Victoria García-Ortiz. NR3C1, LAX1, and RCAN3 as Circulating Epigenetic Biomarkers for Prognosis and Chemotherapy Response Prediction in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. MedComm, 2026, 7 (4) : e70682 DOI:10.1002/mco2.70682

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

H. Wei and H. Ren, “Precision Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma,” Cancer Letters 585 (2024): 216636.

[2]

C. Bosetti, V. Rosato, D. Li, et al., “Diabetes, Antidiabetic Medications, and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: An Analysis From the International Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium,” Annals of Oncology 25, no. 10 (2014): 2065–2072.

[3]

J. D. Mizrahi, R. Surana, J. W. Valle, and R. T. Shroff, “Pancreatic Cancer,” Lancet 395, no. 10242 (2020): 2008–2020.

[4]

W. Park, A. Chawla, and E. M. O'Reilly, “Pancreatic Cancer: A Review,” Jama 326, no. 9 (2021): 851–862.

[5]

J. X. Hu, C. F. Zhao, W. B. Chen, et al., “Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Epidemiology, Trend, and Risk Factors,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 27, no. 27 (2021): 4298–4321.

[6]

I. Garajová, M. Peroni, F. Gelsomino, and F. Leonardi, “A Simple Overview of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment for Clinical Oncologists,” Current Oncology 30, no. 11 (2023): 9587–9601.

[7]

X. Y. He and Y. Z. Yuan, “Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research: Moving Towards Early Detection,” World Journal of Gastroenterology 20, no. 32 (2014): 11241–11248.

[8]

A. Carrato, A. Falcone, M. Ducreux, et al., “A Systematic Review of the Burden of Pancreatic Cancer in Europe: Real-World Impact on Survival, Quality of Life and Costs,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 46, no. 3 (2015): 201–211.

[9]

M. F. Lansbergen, M. P. G. Dings, P. Manoukian, et al., “Transcriptome-Based Classification to Predict FOLFIRINOX Response in a Real-World Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Cohort,” Translational Research 273 (2024): 137–147.

[10]

T. Conroy, F. Desseigne, M. Ychou, et al., “FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 364, no. 19 (2011): 1817–1825.

[11]

E. N. Pijnappel, W. P. M. Dijksterhuis, and G. L. G. der, “First- and Second-Line Palliative Systemic Treatment Outcomes in a Real-World Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Cohort,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 20, no. 5 (2021): 443–450.

[12]

M. Taherian, H. Wang, and H. Wang, “Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Molecular Pathology and Predictive Biomarkers,” Cells 11, no. 19 (2022): 3068.

[13]

R. A. Moffitt, R. Marayati, E. L. Flate, et al., “Virtual Microdissection Identifies Distinct Tumor- and Stroma-Specific Subtypes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma,” Nature Genetics 47, no. 10 (2015): 1168–1178.

[14]

E. A. Collisson, P. Bailey, and D. K. Chang, “Biankin AV. Molecular Subtypes of Pancreatic Cancer,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 16, no. 4 (2019): 207–220.

[15]

B. Zhao, B. Zhao, and F. Chen, “Diagnostic Value of Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 34, no. 9 (2022): 891.

[16]

E. D. Saad, M. C. Machado, D. Wajsbrot, et al., “Pretreatment CA 19-9 Level as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated With Gemcitabine,” International Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer 32, no. 1 (2002): 35–41.

[17]

T. M. Bauer, B. F. El-Rayes, X. Li, et al., “Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Is a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Who Receive Gemcitabine-Containing Chemotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of 6 Prospective Trials,” Cancer 119, no. 2 (2013): 285–292.

[18]

A. J. Bronkhorst, V. Ungerer, and S. Holdenrieder, “The Emerging Role of Cell-Free DNA as a Molecular Marker for Cancer Management,” Biomolecular Detection and Quantification 17 (2019): 100087.

[19]

M. Ilié and P. Hofman, “Pros: Can Tissue Biopsy be Replaced by Liquid Biopsy?” Translational Lung Cancer Research 5, no. 4 (2016): 420–423.

[20]

M. Toledano-Fonseca, M. T. Cano, E. Inga, et al., “Circulating Cell-Free DNA-Based Liquid Biopsy Markers for the Non-Invasive Prognosis and Monitoring of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer,” Cancers 12, no. 7 (2020): E1754.

[21]

M. V. García-Ortiz, P. Cano-Ramírez, M. Toledano-Fonseca, et al., “Diagnosing and Monitoring Pancreatic Cancer Through Cell-Free DNA Methylation: Progress and Prospects,” Biomarker Research 11, no. 1 (2023): 88.

[22]

M. V. García-Ortiz, P. Cano-Ramírez, M. Toledano-Fonseca, et al., “Circulating NPTX2 Methylation as a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Prognosis and Monitoring of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer,” Clinical Epigenetics 15 (2023): 118.

[23]

Q. Guo and W. Qin, “DKK3 Blocked Translocation of β-Catenin/EMT Induced by Hypoxia and Improved Gemcitabine Therapeutic Effect in Pancreatic Cancer Bxpc-3 Cell,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 19, no. 12 (2015): 2832–2841.

[24]

P. C. Mahon, P. Baril, V. Bhakta, et al., “S100A4 Contributes to the Suppression of BNIP3 Expression, Chemoresistance, and Inhibition of Apoptosis in Pancreatic Cancer,” Cancer Research 67, no. 14 (2007): 6786–6795.

[25]

C. Zhang, S. Ou, Y. Zhou, et al., “m6A Methyltransferase METTL14-Mediated Upregulation of Cytidine Deaminase Promoting Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer,” Frontiers in Oncology 11 (2021): 696371.

[26]

M. E. Gómez García, F. Carbonell Castelló, A. Alberola Soler, et al., “‘Second-look’ en Adenocarcinoma de Páncreas Inicialmente Irresecable tras Quimioterapia Neoadyuvante,” Cirugía Española 91, no. 10 (2013): 683–685.

[27]

J. Roessler, O. Ammerpohl, J. Gutwein, et al., “Quantitative Cross-Validation and Content Analysis of the 450k DNA Methylation Array From Illumina, Inc,” BMC Research Res Notes 5, no. 1 (2012): 210.

[28]

L. Van Wesenbeeck, L. Janssens, H. Meeuws, et al., “Droplet Digital PCR Is an Accurate Method to Assess Methylation Status on FFPE Samples,” Epigenetics 13, no. 3 (2018): 207–213.

[29]

B. Győrffy, G. Bottai, T. Fleischer, et al., “Aberrant DNA Methylation Impacts Gene Expression and Prognosis in Breast Cancer Subtypes,” International Journal of Cancer 138, no. 1 (2016): 87–97.

[30]

J. Liu, J. Chen, S. Ehrlich, et al., “Methylation Patterns in Whole Blood Correlate With Symptoms in Schizophrenia Patients,” Schizophrenia Bulletin 40, no. 4 (2014): 769–776.

[31]

H. Luo, H. Zhu, D. Bao, et al., “Genome-Wide DNA Methylation and mRNA Transcription Analysis Revealed Aberrant Gene Regulation Pathways in Patients With Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis,” Chinese Medical Journal 138, no. 1 (2025): 120.

[32]

Broad Institute TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center. Correlation Between mRNA Expression and DNA Methylation. (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 2016).

[33]

F. Yin, S. Yi, L. Wei, et al., “Microarray-Based Identification of Genes Associated With Prognosis and Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 120, no. 4 (2019): 6057–6070.

[34]

H. Huang, C. Wu, A. Colaprico, et al., “Discovery of Oncogenic Mediator Genes in Rectal Cancer Chemotherapy Response Using Gene Expression Data From Matched Tumor and Patient-Derived Organoid,” preprint, medRxiv, January 30, 2024.

[35]

M. Lapin, S. Oltedal, K. Tjensvoll, et al., “Fragment Size and Level of Cell-Free DNA Provide Prognostic Information in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer,” Journal of translational medicine 16 (2018): 300.

[36]

Y. Liang, W. Diao, X. Yang, et al., “Regulator of Calcineurin 3 as a Novel Predictor of Diagnosis and Prognosis in Pan-Cancer,” Croatian Medical Journal 65, no. 4 (2024): 356–372.

[37]

E. Serrano-Candelas, D. Farré, Á. Aranguren-Ibáñez, et al., “The Vertebrate RCAN Gene Family: Novel Insights Into Evolution, Structure and Regulation,” PLoS ONE 9, no. 1 (2014): e85539.

[38]

S. Martínez-Høyer, S. Solé-Sánchez, F. Aguado, et al., “A Novel Role for an RCAN3-derived Peptide as a Tumor Suppressor in Breast Cancer,” Carcinogenesis 36, no. 7 (2015): 792–799.

[39]

Z. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Zhong, Y. Wang, and M. Peng, “Comprehensive Analysis of Aberrantly Expressed Competitive Endogenous RNA Network and Identification of Prognostic Biomarkers in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma,” OncoTargets and Therapy 13 (2020): 11377–11395.

[40]

L. Li, W. Xing, L. Jiang, D. Chen, and G. Zhang, “NR3C1 Overexpression Regulates the Expression and Alternative Splicing of Inflammation-associated Genes Involved in PTSD,” Gene 859 (2023): 147199.

[41]

G. E. Lind, K. Kleivi, G. I. Meling, et al., “ADAMTS1, CRABP1, and NR3C1 Identified as Epigenetically Deregulated Genes in Colorectal Tumorigenesis,” Cellular Oncology 28, no. 5-6 (2006): 259–272.

[42]

L. M. Noureddine, O. Trédan, N. Hussein, et al., “Glucocorticoid Receptor: A Multifaceted Actor in Breast Cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 9 (2021): 4446.

[43]

S. Khadka, S. R. Druffner, B. C. Duncan, and J. T. Busada, “Glucocorticoid Regulation of Cancer Development and Progression,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 14 (2023): 1161768.

[44]

T. Wu and Y. Shao, “NR3C1/Glucocorticoid Receptor Activation Promotes Pancreatic β-Cell Autophagy Overload in Response to Glucolipotoxicity,” Autophagy 19, no. 9 (2023): 2538–2557.

[45]

N. Bakour, F. Moriarty, G. Moore, et al., “Prognostic Significance of Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Cancers 13, no. 7 (2021): 1649.

[46]

L. C. Matthews, A. A. Berry, D. J. Morgan, et al., “Glucocorticoid Receptor Regulates Accurate Chromosome Segregation and Is Associated With Malignancy,” PNAS 112, no. 17 (2015): 5479–5484.

[47]

S. Prekovic, K. Schuurman, I. Mayayo-Peralta, et al., “Glucocorticoid Receptor Triggers a Reversible Drug-tolerant Dormancy State With Acquired Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Lung Cancer,” Nature Communications 12 (2021): 4360.

[48]

E. Ayroldi, L. Cannarile, D. V. Delfino, and C. Riccardi, “A Dual Role for Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper in Glucocorticoid Function: Tumor Growth Promotion or Suppression?,” Cell Death & Disease 9, no. 5 (2018): 1–12.

[49]

H. Snider, B. Villavarajan, Y. Peng, et al., “Region-Specific Glucocorticoid Receptor Promoter Methylation Has Both Positive and Negative Prognostic Value in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer,” Clinical Epigenetics 11, no. 1 (2019): 155.

[50]

Y. Deng, X. Xia, Y. Zhao, et al., “Glucocorticoid Receptor Regulates PD-L1 and MHC-I in Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Promote Immune Evasion and Immunotherapy Resistance,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 7041.

[51]

J. Yu, M. Chen, Q. Sang, et al., “Super-Enhancer Activates Master Transcription Factor NR3C1 Expression and Promotes 5-FU Resistance in Gastric Cancer,” Advanced Science 12, no. 7 (2024): 2409050.

[52]

Q. Jia, Y. Zhu, H. Yao, et al., “Oncogenic GALNT5 Confers FOLFIRINOX Resistance via Activating the MYH9/NOTCH/ DDR Axis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma,” Cell Death & Disease 15, no. 10 (2024): 1–14.

[53]

K. M. Hanssen, M. Haber, and J. I. Fletcher, “Targeting Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 1 (MRP1)-Expressing Cancers: Beyond Pharmacological Inhibition,” Drug Resistance Updates 59 (2021): 100795.

[54]

K. L. Aung, S. E. Fischer, R. E. Denroche, et al., “Genomics-Driven Precision Medicine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Early Results From the COMPASS Trial,” Clinical Cancer Research 24, no. 6 (2018): 1344–1354.

[55]

Z. Ni, P. Zhu, L. Liu, et al., “Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Key Gene AGRN as a Universal Programme in Gastrointestinal Tumours by an Artificial Intelligence-Derived Prognostic Index,” Med Research (2025).

[56]

Y. Zhao, Y. Zheng, Y. Zhu, et al., “M1 Macrophage-Derived Exosomes Loaded With Gemcitabine and Deferasirox Against Chemoresistant Pancreatic Cancer,” Pharmaceutics 13, no. 9 (2021): 1493.

[57]

A. Vivancos, E. Aranda, M. Benavides, et al., “Comparison of the Clinical Sensitivity of the Idylla Platform and the OncoBEAM RAS CRC Assay for KRAS Mutation Detection in Liquid Biopsy Samples,” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 8976.

[58]

K. Kataoka, T. Yamada, M. Shiozawa, et al., “Monitoring ctDNA RAS Mutational Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Trial Protocol of RAS-Trace and RAS-Trace-2 Studies,” Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon 8, no. 2 (2024): 132.

[59]

T. J. Morris, L. M. Butcher, A. Feber, et al., “ChAMP: 450k Chip Analysis Methylation Pipeline,” Bioinformatics 30, no. 3 (2014): 428–430.

[60]

A. E. Teschendorff, F. Marabita, M. Lechner, et al., “A Beta-mixture Quantile Normalization Method for Correcting Probe Design Bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA Methylation Data,” Bioinformatics 29, no. 2 (2013): 189–196.

[61]

Y. Li, D. Ge, and C. Lu, “The SMART App: An Interactive Web Application for Comprehensive DNA Methylation Analysis and Visualization,” Epigenetics & Chromatin 12, no. 1 (2019): 71.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (2770KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/