Differential Mortality Risk by Age in Males and Females With Steatotic Liver Disease
Taotao Yan , Nicholas Chien , Vy H. Nguyen , Isaac Le , Surya Teja Gudapati , Angela Chau , Xinrong Zhang , Scott Barnett , Sovann Linden , Linda Henry , Ramsey Cheung , Mindie H. Nguyen
MedComm ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : e70677
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a major cause of premature mortality, but data on sex differences in mortality remain limited. We compared the overall, nonliver-related, and liver-related mortality rates per 1000 person-years in MASLD patients by sex. Propensity score matching (PSM) yielded 3579 pairs of females and males with balanced characteristics from a cohort of 8517 MASLD patients (53.1% female, 46.6% male) seen at Stanford University Medical Center (1995–2023). In the total PSM cohort, the overall (12.68 vs. 12.92), nonliver-related (11.43 vs. 11.60), and liver-related (1.25 vs. 1.32) mortality rates were similar between males and females. However, in age-stratified analyses, females had higher overall (7.99 vs. 4.95, p = 0.02) and nonliver-related (7.20 vs. 4.71, p = 0.05) mortality rates among younger (≤50 years) patients, with opposite direction among the older group with higher overall (21.40 vs. 16.51, p = 0.02) and nonliver-related (19.02 vs. 14.80, p = 0.04) mortality rates in males. In Cox regression analyses, male sex was associated with lower risks of overall and nonliver-related mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59 and 0.61) among patients ≤50 years, but with higher risks among those >50 years (aHR 1.32 and 1.30). Sex and age should be considered in the management strategies for people with MASLD.
age / liver-related mortality / MASLD / nonliver-related mortality / overall mortality / sex differences
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
National Library of Medicine: Creatinine blood test, https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/003475.htm. |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic Address eee, Clinical Practice Guideline P, Chair, Representative EGB, Panel M. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis - 2021 update. Journal of Hepatology 2021; 75(3): 659–689. |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
2026 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |