Frequency- and Layer-Specific Modulation of Cortical Neuronal Activity by Pulsed Electrical Stimulation

Abstract

Electrical stimulation is a common technique in neuroscience and clinical therapies, with stimulation frequency being a critical factor in its efficacy. However, the cellular mechanisms by which different frequencies of pulsed electrical stimulation modulate neuronal activity remain poorly understood. In this study, we explore the effects of 60 Hz (low frequency [LF]) and 160 Hz (high frequency [HF]) pulsed electrical stimulation on excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of mice using two-photon Ca²⁺ imaging. Our results show that HF stimulation significantly increased Ca²⁺ activity in excitatory neurons in layer 2/3, both during and after stimulation, while LF stimulation enhanced neuronal activity only post-stimulation. In layer 5 excitatory neurons, HF stimulation increased neuronal activity only after stimulation cessation, whereas LF stimulation transiently suppressed activity during stimulation. Both LF and HF stimulation enhanced activity in inhibitory neurons in layer 2/3 during stimulation. In summary, our study reveals that electrical stimulation activates both excitatory and inhibitory neurons, with its primary mechanism of action being the modulation of neuronal rhythm rather than the amplitude of their activity. These findings shed light on stimulation mechanisms, supporting its therapeutic potential for neuropsychiatric disorders targeting neuronal rhythmicity.

Keywords

electrical stimulation / frequency-specific modulation / neuronal synchrony / primary somatosensory cortex / two-photon Ca²⁺ imaging

References

[1] Z. Wang, C. Jiang, L. Guan, et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation of Habenula Reduces Depressive Symptoms and Modulates Brain Activities in Treatment-Resistant Depression,” Nature Mental Health 2, no. 9 (2024): 1045–1052.

[2] S. Smeets, A. Boogers, T. Van Bogaert, et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation With Short Versus Conventional Pulse Width in Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Brain Stimulation 17, no. 1 (2024): 71–82.

[3] G. Koch, D. Altomare, A. Benussi, et al., “The Emerging Field of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease,” Brain 147, no. 12 (2024): 4003–4016.

[4] P. Ryvlin, S. Rheims, L. J. Hirsch, A. Sokolov, and L. Jehi, “Neuromodulation in Epilepsy: State-of-the-Art Approved Therapies,” Lancet Neurology 20, no. 12 (2021): 1038–1047.

[5] M. Wischnewski, I. Alekseichuk, and A. Opitz, “Neurocognitive, Physiological, and Biophysical Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 27, no. 2 (2023): 189–205.

[6] Y. Tang, Y. Xing, L. Sun, et al., “TRanscranial AlterNating Current Stimulation for Patients With Mild Alzheimer's Disease (TRANSFORM-AD): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial,” Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 16, no. 1 (2024): 203.

[7] S. H. Siddiqi, F. Schaper, A. Horn, et al., “Brain Stimulation and Brain Lesions Converge on Common Causal Circuits in Neuropsychiatric Disease,” Nature Human Behaviour 5, no. 12 (2021): 1707–1716.

[8] W. J. Neumann, L. A. Steiner, and L. Milosevic, “Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Deep Brain Stimulation Across Spatiotemporal Resolutions,” Brain 146, no. 11 (2023): 4456–4468.

[9] L. Shen, C. Jiang, C. S. Hubbard, et al., “Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Modulates 2 Distinct Neurocircuits,” Annals of Neurology 88, no. 6 (2020): 1178–1193.

[10] N. Kamble and P. K. Pal, “Frequency of Stimulation: The Most Important DBS Parameter in Improvement of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease,” Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology 27, no. 2 (2024): 120–121.

[11] C. Moreau, O. Pennel-Ployart, S. Pinto, et al., “Modulation of Dysarthropneumophonia by Low-Frequency STN DBS in Advanced Parkinson's Disease,” Movement Disorders 26, no. 4 (2011): 659–663.

[12] R. Dharnipragada, L. S. Denduluri, A. Naik, et al., “Frequency Settings of Subthalamic Nucleus DBS for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis,” Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 116 (2023): 105809.

[13] G. K. Wu, Y. Ardeshirpour, C. Mastracchio, J. Kent, M. Caiola, and M. Ye, “Amplitude- and Frequency-Dependent Activation of Layer II/III Neurons by Intracortical Microstimulation,” Iscience 26, no. 11 (2023): 108140.

[14] N. J. Michelson, J. R. Eles, A. L. Vazquez, K. A. Ludwig, and T. D. Y. Kozai, “Calcium Activation of Cortical Neurons by Continuous Electrical Stimulation: Frequency Dependence, Temporal Fidelity, and Activation Density,” Journal of Neuroscience Research 97, no. 5 (2019): 620–638.

[15] J. R. Eles and T. D. Y. Kozai, “In Vivo Imaging of Calcium and Glutamate Responses to Intracortical Microstimulation Reveals Distinct Temporal Responses of the Neuropil and Somatic Compartments in Layer II/III Neurons,” Biomaterials 234 (2020): 119767.

[16] M. C. Dadarlat, Y. J. Sun, and M. P. Stryker, “Activity-Dependent Recruitment of Inhibition and Excitation in the Awake Mammalian Cortex During Electrical Stimulation,” Neuron 112, no. 5 (2024): 821–834.

[17] C. Chen, L. Sun, A. Adler, et al., “Synchronized Activity of Sensory Neurons Initiates Cortical Synchrony in a Model of Neuropathic Pain,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 689.

[18] T. Okada, D. Kato, Y. Nomura, et al., “Pain Induces Stable, Active Microcircuits in the Somatosensory Cortex That Provide a Therapeutic Target,” Science Advances 7, no. 12 (2021): eabd8261.

[19] P. J. Uhlhaas and W. Singer, “Neural Synchrony in Brain Disorders: Relevance for Cognitive Dysfunctions and Pathophysiology,” Neuron 52, no. 1 (2006): 155–168.

[20] H. K. Min, S. C. Hwang, M. P. Marsh, et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation Induces BOLD Activation in Motor and Non-Motor Networks: An fMRI Comparison Study of STN and EN/GPi DBS in Large Animals,” Neuroimage 63, no. 3 (2012): 1408–1420.

[21] S. Zhao, G. Li, C. Tong, et al., “Full Activation Pattern Mapping by Simultaneous Deep Brain Stimulation and fMRI With Graphene Fiber Electrodes,” Nature Communications 11, no. 1 (2020): 1788.

[22] T. Hromádka, M. R. Deweese, and A. M. Zador, “Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex,” PLOS Biology 6, no. 1 (2008): e16.

[23] S. Sakata and K. D. Harris, “Laminar Structure of Spontaneous and Sensory-Evoked Population Activity in Auditory Cortex,” Neuron 64, no. 3 (2009): 404–418.

[24] D. H. O'Connor, S. P. Peron, D. Huber, and K. Svoboda, “Neural Activity in Barrel Cortex Underlying Vibrissa-Based Object Localization in Mice,” Neuron 67, no. 6 (2010): 1048–1061.

[25] Y. Tanaka, T. Nomoto, T. Shiki, et al., “Focal Activation of Neuronal Circuits Induced by Microstimulation in the Visual Cortex,” Journal of Neural Engineering 16, no. 3 (2019): 036007.

[26] A. T. Hussin, J. A. Boychuk, A. R. Brown, Q. J. Pittman, and G. C. Teskey, “Intracortical Microstimulation (ICMS) Activates Motor Cortex Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons Mainly Transsynaptically,” Brain Stimulation 8, no. 4 (2015): 742–750.

[27] L. Milosevic, S. K. Kalia, M. Hodaie, et al., “A Theoretical Framework for the Site-Specific and Frequency-Dependent Neuronal Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation,” Brain Stimulation 14, no. 4 (2021): 807–821.

[28] M. D. Johnson and C. C. McIntyre, “Quantifying the Neural Elements Activated and Inhibited by Globus Pallidus Deep Brain Stimulation,” Journal of Neurophysiology 100, no. 5 (2008): 2549–2563.

[29] A. M. Lozano and N. Lipsman, “Probing and Regulating Dysfunctional Circuits Using Deep Brain Stimulation,” Neuron 77, no. 3 (2013): 406–424.

[30] J. S. Isaacson and M. Scanziani, “How Inhibition Shapes Cortical Activity,” Neuron 72, no. 2 (2011): 231–243.

[31] O. K. Swanson and A. Maffei, “From Hiring to Firing: Activation of Inhibitory Neurons and Their Recruitment in Behavior,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 12 (2019): 168.

[32] H. W. Shin, M. S. Kim, S. R. Kim, S. R. Jeon, and S. J. Chung, “Long-Term Effects of Bilateral Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty in Patients With Parkinson's Disease,” Journal of Movement Disorders 13, no. 2 (2020): 127–132.

[33] T. Xie, J. Vigil, E. MacCracken, et al., “Low-Frequency Stimulation of STN-DBS Reduces Aspiration and Freezing of Gait in Patients With PD,” Neurology 84, no. 4 (2015): 415–420.

[34] V. Vedam-Mai, E. Y. van Battum, W. Kamphuis, et al., “Deep Brain Stimulation and the Role of Astrocytes,” Molecular Psychiatry 17, no. 2 (2012): 124–131, 115.

[35] G. Perea, M. Navarrete, and A. Araque, “Tripartite Synapses: Astrocytes Process and Control Synaptic Information,” Trends in Neuroscience (Tins) 32, no. 8 (2009): 421–431.

[36] L. Bekar, W. Libionka, G. F. Tian, et al., “Adenosine Is Crucial for Deep Brain Stimulation-Mediated Attenuation of Tremor,” Nature Medicine 14, no. 1 (2008): 75–80.

[37] Y. M. Shon, S. Y. Chang, S. J. Tye, et al., “Comonitoring of Adenosine and Dopamine Using the Wireless Instantaneous Neurotransmitter Concentration System: Proof of Principle,” Journal of Neurosurgery 112, no. 3 (2010): 539–548.

[38] S. Y. Chang, Y. M. Shon, F. Agnesi, and K. H. Lee, “Microthalamotomy Effect During Deep Brain Stimulation: Potential Involvement of Adenosine and Glutamate Efflux,” in 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Minneapolis, MN, USA (IEEE, 2009), 3294–3297.

[39] J. S. Schor, I. Gonzalez Montalvo, P. W. E. Spratt, et al., “Therapeutic Deep Brain Stimulation Disrupts Movement-related Subthalamic Nucleus Activity in Parkinsonian Mice,” Elife 11 (2022): e75253.

[40] J. Friedrich and L. Paninski, “Fast Active Set Methods for Online Spike Inference From Calcium Imaging,” in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain (Curran Associates Inc., 2016), 1992–2000.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2026 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.