Immunotherapy With Programmed Cell Death 1 Versus Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancers: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Jiadi Gan , Kaixin Lei , Tao Chang , Juan Wang , Ruiyuan Yang , Quanling Kong , Jingyi Yuan , Wenjun Meng , Yalun Li , Lina He , Jiaoming Li , Zeng Yan , Bojiang Chen , Weimin Li
MedComm ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (12) : e70476
This multicenter retrospective study analyzed data from 1266 patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across five leading hospitals in China. The aim was to evaluate survival outcomes and safety profiles of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. The main outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoint was adverse events. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox regression modeling, and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were performed to compare the real-world efficacies of PD-1 and PD-L1. Patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors had significantly longer median OS compared with those treated with PD-L1 inhibitors (28.2 versus [vs.] 24.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59–0.93]; p = 0.0099), with consistent effects after PSM analysis (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.12–0.91]; p = 0.005) and multivariable, adjusted Cox regression model with HR of 0.74 ([95% CI 0.59–0.93]; p = 0.01). Further analysis indicated that body mass index ≥ 24 kg/m2 (HR 0.72 [95% CI 0.75–0.93]; p = 0.014) and history of hypertension (HR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01–1.79]; p = 0.037) may interfere with the therapeutic effects of PD-1 with comparable safety profiles, which renewed personalized immunotherapy options for NSCLC patients in clinical settings.
immunotherapy / lung cancer / programmed cell death 1 / programmed cell death ligand 1
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
World Medical Association, World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA 310, no. 20 (2013): 2191–2194. |
| [44] |
|
2025 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |