Applying Genetic Risk Score to Improve Risk Assessment of New-Onset Lupus Nephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study
Yufang Ding , Mucong Li , Wei Bai , Junyan Qian , Mengzhuo Cao , Jian Xu , Xinwang Duan , Hui Luo , Cheng Zhao , Feng Zhan , Min Yang , Rui Wu , Lijun Wu , Zhen Chen , Wei Wei , Yang Xu , Shangzhu Zhang , Xiaomei Leng , Qian Wang , Xinping Tian , Pei Gao , Xiaofeng Zeng , Xinzhuang Yang , Mengtao Li , Jiuliang Zhao
MedComm ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (12) : e70453
Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, reliable tools for predicting LN risk remain limited. In this multicenter prospective cohort study, we developed, validated, and refined a risk stratification model for new-onset LN. A total of 2441 SLE patients without baseline renal involvement were consecutively enrolled from the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research (CSTAR) registry, with 215 (8.8%) developed LN in a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. A combination of clinical predictors, age < 30 years, absence of arthritis, serositis, hypocomplementemia, and positive anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies identified a clinical high-risk group (n = 537, 22.0%) with a 3-year LN incidence of 18.1%. The model was externally validated in 451 patients, with 50 developed LN in a median follow-up time of 3.4 years. In these patients, a genetic risk score (GRS) derived from 112 SLE-associated loci was found to be independently associated with LN (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 1.83–5.55, p = 4.36 × 10−5). Among clinically low-risk individuals, those in the highest GRS quartiles (81/451, 18.0%) showed elevated 3-year LN incidence (15.5% vs. 1.4%). New-onset LN may be predicted using a combination of clinical risk factors, and integrating GRS further improves risk stratification, enabling early identification of high-risk patients.
genetic risk score / lupus nephritis / risk factors / systemic lupus erythematosus
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
2025 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |