Prognostic Significance of the Density and Spatial Distribution of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Their Association With Denosumab Treatment Responsiveness

Yi-Fan Yang , Jing-Ru Liu , Ying-Song Han , Guo-Qiang Zhu , Hua-Qing Niu , Bo-Yu Zheng , Xin Tang , Jian Li , Yi-Jun Kang , Jin-Ming Yu , Bo-Wen Zheng , Bin Zhou

MedComm ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (11) : e70419

PDF
MedComm ›› 2025, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (11) : e70419 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70419
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Prognostic Significance of the Density and Spatial Distribution of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Their Association With Denosumab Treatment Responsiveness

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Given the lack of reliable indicators for predicting prognosis and treatment response in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) patients, this study aimed to identify new prognostic factors by analyzing the effect of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) on prognosis and denosumab treatment responsiveness. The expression of CD68⁺TAMs, CD163⁺TAMs, and IRF8⁺TAMs was detected using polychromatic fluorescence immunohistochemistry in 162 GCTB samples. TAM density was quantified through computer-aided image analysis, and spatial parameters, including nearest neighbor distance (NND) and effective percentage (EP), were measured using HALO software. Results showed that higher densities of CD68⁺ and CD163⁺ TAMs were significantly associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS). A smaller NND was linked to shorter PFS. Additionally, higher CD68⁺ EP was associated with poorer PFS, whereas higher CD163⁺ EP correlated with better PFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that TAM parameters' predictive performance was comparable to Campanacci and surgical approach in three subgroups. The ineffective denosumab-treated group had significantly higher TAMs EP compared to the effective group. In conclusion, TAMs significantly influence the prognosis of GCTB patients and are correlated with certain invasive tumor phenotypes. Elevated TAMs levels may be associated with reduced efficacy of denosumab treatment.

Keywords

denosumab / giant cell tumor of bone / polychromatic fluorescence immunohistochemistry / tumor associated macrophages

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yi-Fan Yang, Jing-Ru Liu, Ying-Song Han, Guo-Qiang Zhu, Hua-Qing Niu, Bo-Yu Zheng, Xin Tang, Jian Li, Yi-Jun Kang, Jin-Ming Yu, Bo-Wen Zheng, Bin Zhou. Prognostic Significance of the Density and Spatial Distribution of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone and Their Association With Denosumab Treatment Responsiveness. MedComm, 2025, 6(11): e70419 DOI:10.1002/mco2.70419

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

H. L. Wu, C. Xia, F. S. Liu, et al., “Lymphocyte Infiltration Score and Spatial Characteristics Refined the Prognosis and Denosumab Treatment Responsiveness Indicators for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone,” JCO Precision Oncology 8 (2024): e2400135.

[2]

B. W. Zheng, B. Y. Zheng, Z. Yang, et al., “Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Characteristics of Tumor Budding-Like in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone,” Cancer 130, no. 23 (2024): 4085-4095.

[3]

H. L. Wu, X. B. Wang, J. Li, and B. W. Zheng, “The Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Associations With the Immune Microenvironment and Responsiveness to Denosumab Treatment,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 19, no. 1 (2024): 405.

[4]

B. W. Zheng, B. Y. Zheng, H. Q. Niu, et al., “Tumor Growth Rate in Spinal Giant Cell Tumors of Bone and Association With the Immune Microenvironment and Denosumab Treatment Responsiveness: A Multicenter Study,” Neurosurgery 92, no. 3 (2023): 524-537.

[5]

S. V. Bukata, J. Y. Blay, P. Rutkowski, et al., “Denosumab Treatment for Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine Including the Sacrum,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46, no. 5 (2021): 277-284.

[6]

Q. Z. Wang, E. L. Zhang, X. Y. Xing, M. Y. Su, and N. Lang, “Clinical Significance of Preoperative CT and MR Imaging Findings in the Prediction of Postoperative Recurrence of Spinal Giant Cell Tumor of Bone,” Orthopaedic Surgery 13, no. 8 (2021): 2405-2416.

[7]

H. Li, J. Gao, Y. Gao, N. Lin, M. Zheng, and Z. Ye, “Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Current Status and Pitfalls,” Frontiers in Oncology 10 (2020): 580605.

[8]

N. Asano, M. Saito, E. Kobayashi, et al., “Preoperative Denosumab Therapy against Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Local Recurrence After Curettage Surgery,” Annals of Surgical Oncology 29, no. 6 (2022): 3992-4000.

[9]

M. Xu, Z. G. Song, C. X. Xu, et al., “IL-17A Stimulates the Progression of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone,” Clinical Cancer Research 19, no. 17 (2013): 4697-4705.

[10]

H. Q. Niu, B. Y. Zheng, M. X. Zou, and B. W. Zheng, “Complex Immune Microenvironment of Chordoma: A Road Map for Future Treatment,” Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 12, no. 6 (2024): e009313.

[11]

M. Rakaee, L. R. Busund, S. Jamaly, et al., “Prognostic Value of Macrophage Phenotypes in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Assessed by Multiplex Immunohistochemistry,” Neoplasia 21, no. 3 (2019): 282-293.

[12]

H. Nakanishi, Y. Miyata, Y. Mochizuki, et al., “Pathological Significance and Prognostic Roles of Densities of CD57+ Cells, CD68+ Cells, and Mast Cells, and Their Ratios in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma,” Human Pathology 79 (2018): 102-108.

[13]

A. Salmaninejad, S. F. Valilou, A. Soltani, et al., “Tumor-Associated Macrophages: Role in Cancer Development and Therapeutic Implications,” Cellular Oncology (Dordr) 42, no. 5 (2019): 591-608.

[14]

Q. Yang, N. Guo, Y. Zhou, J. Chen, Q. Wei, and M. Han, “The Role of Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) in Tumor Progression and Relevant Advance in Targeted Therapy,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 10, no. 11 (2020): 2156-2170.

[15]

X. Huang, Y. Pan, J. Ma, et al., “Prognostic Significance of the Infiltration of CD163(+) Macrophages Combined With CD66b(+) Neutrophils in Gastric Cancer,” Cancer Medicine 7, no. 5 (2018): 1731-1741.

[16]

H. Jeong, I. Hwang, S. H. Kang, H. C. Shin, and S. Y. Kwon, “Tumor-Associated Macrophages as Potential Prognostic Biomarkers of Invasive Breast Cancer,” Journal of Breast Cancer 22, no. 1 (2019): 38-51.

[17]

W. M. Hu, Y. Z. Yang, T. Z. Zhang, C. F. Qin, and X. N. Li, “LGALS3 Is a Poor Prognostic Factor in Diffusely Infiltrating Gliomas and Is Closely Correlated With CD163+ Tumor-Associated Macrophages,” Frontiers in Medicine 7 (2020): 182.

[18]

B. G. Nixon, F. Kuo, L. Ji, et al., “Tumor-Associated Macrophages Expressing the Transcription Factor IRF8 Promote T Cell Exhaustion in Cancer,” Immunity 55, no. 11 (2022): 2044-2058.e2045.

[19]

J. Lei, M. H. Zhou, F. C. Zhang, K. Wu, S. W. Liu, and H. Q. Niu, “Interferon Regulatory Factor Transcript Levels Correlate With Clinical Outcomes in Human Glioma,” Aging 13, no. 8 (2021): 12086-12098.

[20]

S. A. Vayrynen, J. Zhang, C. Yuan, et al., “Composition, Spatial Characteristics, and Prognostic Significance of Myeloid Cell Infiltration in Pancreatic Cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research 27, no. 4 (2021): 1069-1081.

[21]

B. A. Maisel, M. Yi, A. R. Peck, et al., “Spatial Metrics of Interaction Between CD163-Positive Macrophages and Cancer Cells and Progression-Free Survival in Chemo-Treated Breast Cancer,” Cancers (Basel) 14, no. 2 (2022): 308.

[22]

L. van der Heijden, P. D. S. Dijkstra, J. Y. Blay, and H. Gelderblom, “Giant Cell Tumour of Bone in the Denosumab Era,” European Journal of Cancer 77 (2017): 75-83.

[23]

C. E. Lewis and J. W. Pollard, “Distinct Role of Macrophages in Different Tumor Microenvironments,” Cancer Research 66, no. 2 (2006): 605-612.

[24]

X. Chen, J. Chen, W. Zhang, et al., “Prognostic Value of Diametrically Polarized Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Multiple Myeloma,” Oncotarget 8, no. 68 (2017): 112685-112696.

[25]

L. F. Tremble, M. McCabe, S. P. Walker, et al., “Differential Association of CD68(+) and CD163(+) Macrophages With Macrophage Enzymes, Whole Tumour Gene Expression and Overall Survival in Advanced Melanoma,” British Journal of Cancer 123, no. 10 (2020): 1553-1561.

[26]

B. W. Zheng, M. L. Yang, W. Huang, et al., “Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Chondroblastoma and Their Association With Response to Adjuvant Radiotherapy,” Journal of Inflammation Research 14 (2021): 1991-2005.

[27]

G. Troiano, V. C. A. Caponio, I. Adipietro, et al., “Prognostic Significance of CD68(+) and CD163(+) Tumor Associated Macrophages in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Oral Oncology 93 (2019): 66-75.

[28]

C. Wang, T. Hong, Y. Wang, et al., “Combining UBR5 and CD163(+) Tumor-Associated Macrophages Better Predicts Prognosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 70, no. 10 (2021): 2925-2935.

[29]

G. Yang, L. Zhang, M. Liu, Q. Liu, X. Duan, and J. Bo, “CD163+ Macrophages Predict a Poor Prognosis in Patients With Primary T1 High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder,” World Journal of Urology 37, no. 12 (2019): 2721-2726.

[30]

T. Jamiyan, H. Kuroda, R. Yamaguchi, A. Abe, and M. Hayashi, “CD68- and CD163-Positive Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Triple Negative Cancer of the Breast,” Virchows Archiv 477, no. 6 (2020): 767-775.

[31]

S. Kayal, S. Mathur, A. K. Karak, et al., “CD68 Tumor-Associated Macrophage Marker Is Not Prognostic of Clinical Outcome in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma,” Leukemia & Lymphoma 55, no. 5 (2014): 1031-1037.

[32]

C. Wei, C. Yang, S. Wang, et al., “Crosstalk Between Cancer Cells and Tumor Associated Macrophages Is Required for Mesenchymal Circulating Tumor Cell-Mediated Colorectal Cancer Metastasis,” Molecular Cancer 18, no. 1 (2019): 64.

[33]

Y. H. Joo, S. H. Hwang, D. I. Sun, K. J. Cho, J. O. Park, and M. S. Kim, “Relationships Between Tumor Volume and Lymphatic Metastasis and Prognosis in Early Oral Tongue Cancer,” Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 6, no. 4 (2013): 243-248.

[34]

J. R. Sierra, S. Corso, L. Caione, et al., “Tumor Angiogenesis and Progression Are Enhanced by Sema4D Produced by Tumor-Associated Macrophages,” Journal of Experimental Medicine 205, no. 7 (2008): 1673-1685.

[35]

D. Chen, X. Zhang, Z. Li, and B. Zhu, “Metabolic Regulatory Crosstalk Between Tumor Microenvironment and Tumor-Associated Macrophages,” Theranostics 11, no. 3 (2021): 1016-1030.

[36]

C. Yan, S. C. Chen, G. D. Ayers, et al., “Proximity of Immune and Tumor Cells Underlies Response to BRAF/MEK-Targeted Therapies in Metastatic Melanoma Patients,” npj Precision Oncology 6, no. 1 (2022): 6.

[37]

X. Ma, Z. Guo, X. Wei, et al., “Spatial Distribution and Predictive Significance of Dendritic Cells and Macrophages in Esophageal Cancer Treated With Combined Chemoradiotherapy and PD-1 Blockade,” Frontiers in Immunology 12 (2021): 786429.

[38]

S. Rashid, D. Song, J. Yuan, B. H. Mullin, and J. Xu, “Molecular Structure, Expression, and the Emerging Role of Siglec-15 in Skeletal Biology and Cancer,” Journal of Cellular Physiology 237, no. 3 (2022): 1711-1719.

[39]

N. Raje, E. Terpos, W. Willenbacher, et al., “Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in Bone Disease Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: An International, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomised, Controlled, Phase 3 Study,” Lancet Oncology 19, no. 3 (2018): 370-381.

[40]

S. Khazaei, N. De Jay, S. Deshmukh, et al., “H3.3 G34W Promotes Growth and Impedes Differentiation of Osteoblast-Like Mesenchymal Progenitors in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone,” Cancer Discovery 10, no. 12 (2020): 1968-1987.

[41]

M. Campanacci, N. Baldini, S. Boriani, and A. Sudanese, “Giant-Cell Tumor of Bone,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume 69, no. 1 (1987): 106-114.

[42]

C. G. Fisher, D. D. Saravanja, M. F. Dvorak, et al., “Surgical Management of Primary Bone Tumors of the Spine: Validation of an Approach to Enhance Cure and Reduce Local Recurrence,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36, no. 10 (2011): 830-836.

[43]

P. Rutkowski, L. Gaston, A. Borkowska, et al., “Denosumab Treatment of Inoperable or Locally Advanced Giant Cell Tumor of Bone—Multicenter Analysis outside Clinical Trial,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology 44, no. 9 (2018): 1384-1390.

[44]

E. A. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, J. Bogaerts, et al., “New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: Revised RECIST Guideline (version 1.1),” European Journal of Cancer 45, no. 2 (2009): 228-247.

[45]

H. Q. Niu, B. Y. Zheng, M. X. Zou, T. L. Zhang, and B. W. Zheng, “Skull Base Chordoma and Spinal Chordoma Exhibit Consistency in Terms of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Aspects,” Neuro-oncology 26, no. 6 (2024): 1171-1173.

[46]

T. L. Zhang, C. Xia, B. W. Zheng, et al., “Integrating Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Reveals Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Related CAF Subpopulations Associated With Chordoma Progression,” Neuro-oncology 26, no. 2 (2024): 295-308.

[47]

I. P. Nearchou, K. Lillard, C. G. Gavriel, H. Ueno, D. J. Harrison, and P. D. Caie, “Automated Analysis of Lymphocytic Infiltration, Tumor Budding, and Their Spatial Relationship Improves Prognostic Accuracy in Colorectal Cancer,” Cancer Immunology Research 7, no. 4 (2019): 609-620.

[48]

Y. K. Huang, M. Wang, Y. Sun, et al., “Macrophage Spatial Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer Defined by Multiplex Immunohistochemistry,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 3928.

[49]

B. W. Zheng, B. Y. Zheng, H. Q. Niu, et al., “Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Factors in Axial Chondroblastomas: A Retrospective Analysis of 61 Cases and Comparison With Extra-Axial Chondroblastomas,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology 21, no. 1 (2023): 188.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

15

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/