Recryopreservation impairs blastocyst implantation potential via activated endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway and induced apoptosis

Abstract

Recryopreservation (recryo) is occasionally applied in clinical, while the underlying mechanism of impaired clinical outcomes after recryo remains unclear. In this study, frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles of single blastocyst transfer in an academic reproductive medicine center were enrolled. According to the number of times blastocysts experienced cryopreservation, they were divided into the cryopreservation (Cryo) group and the Recryo group. Donated human blastocysts were collected and detected for mechanism exploration. It was found that recryo procedure resulted in impaired blastocyst developmental potential, including decreased implantation rate, reduced biochemical pregnancy rate, declined clinical pregnancy rate, higher early miscarriage rate, and lower live birth rate. Moreover, recryo led to impaired trophectoderm (TE) function, exhibiting lower human chorionic gonadotropin levels 12 days after FET. In addition, single-cell RNA sequencing showed that the expression of genes involved in cell adhesion and embryo development were altered. More specifically, activated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) pathway and induced apoptosis were further verified by immunofluorescence and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay involving in the recryo procedure. In conclusion, recryo could interfere with the process of blastocyst implantation by impairing TE function, affecting blastocyst adhesion, activating ER stress pathway and inducing apoptosis. It provides caution to embryologists about the potential risk of recryopreservation.

Keywords

blastocyst / endoplasmic reticulum stress / frozen embryo transfer / implantation / recryopreservation

References

[1] Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25(1): 2-14.

[2] Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, et al. Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(2): 126-136.

[3] Blockeel C, Drakopoulos P, Santos-Ribeiro S, Polyzos NP, Tournaye H. A fresh look at the freeze-all protocol: a SWOT analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(3): 491-497.

[4] Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; 393(10178): 1310-1318.

[5] Johnson KM, Hacker MR, Resetkova N, O’Brien B, Modest AM. Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111(4): 714-721.

[6] Zhang J, Du M, Li Z, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2018; 11(1): 59.

[7] Nagy ZP, Shapiro D, Chang CC. Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(2): 241-247.

[8] Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, et al. The effect of repeated cryopreservation and thawing using cryotip on the clinical outcomes of embryos. Reprod Med Biol. 2021; 20(2): 176-181.

[9] Koch J, Costello MF, Chapman MG, Kilani S. Twice-frozen embryos are no detriment to pregnancy success: a retrospective comparative study. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(1): 58-62.

[10] Murakami M, Egashira A, Murakami K, Araki Y, Kuramoto T. Perinatal outcome of twice-frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a clinical follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95(8): 2648-2650.

[11] Wang M, Jiang J, Xi Q, et al. Repeated cryopreservation process impairs embryo implantation potential but does not affect neonatal outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 42(1): 75-82.

[12] Shen X, Ding M, Yan Y, et al. Perinatal outcomes of singletons following double vitrification-warming procedures: a retrospective study using propensity score analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 30.

[13] Wang X, Mao R, Wang M, Long R, Jin L, Zhu L. The effect of recryopreservation on embryo viability and outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2023; 120(2): 321-332.

[14] Ojosnegros S, Seriola A, Godeau AL, Veiga A. Embryo implantation in the laboratory: an update on current techniques. Hum Reprod Update. 2021; 27(3): 501-530.

[15] Hill MJ, Richter KS, Heitmann RJ, et al. Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(5): 1283-1289.

[16] De Neubourg D, Gerris J, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M, Elseviers M. Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(6): 1476-1479.

[17] Girard JM, Simorre M, Leperlier F, et al. Association between early βhCG kinetics, blastocyst morphology and pregnancy outcome in a single-blastocyst transfer program. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 225: 189-193.

[18] Hernandez-Nieto C, Lee J, Alkon-Meadows T, et al. Biological relevance of trophectoderm morphology: initial β-hCG measurements correlate with trophectoderm grading on euploid frozen embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(9): 2051-2059.

[19] Sites CK, St Marie P, Rahil T. Implantation of fresh and thawed-warmed embryos in single embryo transfer cycles: interpreting the initial beta-HCG. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 30(3): 319-321.

[20] Zhou G, Zeng Y, Guo J, et al. Vitrification transiently alters Oct-4, Bcl2 and P53 expression in mouse morulae but does not affect embryo development in vitro. Cryobiology. 2016; 73(2): 120-155.

[21] Shaw L, Sneddon SF, Brison DR, Kimber SJ. Comparison of gene expression in fresh and frozen-thawed human preimplantation embryos. Reproduction. 2012; 144(5): 569-582.

[22] Mamo S, Bodo S, Kobolak J, Polgar Z, Tolgyesi G, Dinnyes A. Gene expression profiles of vitrified in vivo derived 8-cell stage mouse embryos detected by high density oligonucleotide microarrays. Mol Reprod Dev. 2006; 73(11): 1380-1392.

[23] Kopeika J, Thornhill A, Khalaf Y. The effect of cryopreservation on the genome of gametes and embryos: principles of cryobiology and critical appraisal of the evidence. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21(2): 209-227.

[24] Aksu DA, Agca C, Aksu S, et al. Gene expression profiles of vitrified in vitro-and in vivo-derived bovine blastocysts. Mol Reprod Dev. 2012; 79(9): 613-625.

[25] Li J, Xiong S, Zhao Y, Li C, Han W, Huang G. Effect of the re-vitrification of embryos at different stages on embryonic developmental potential. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 653310.

[26] Kader A, Agarwal A, Abdelrazik H, Sharma RK, Ahmady A, Falcone T. Evaluation of post-thaw DNA integrity of mouse blastocysts after ultrarapid and slow freezing. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(suppl 5): 2087-2094.

[27] Han B, Lv Y, Moser D, et al. ACE2-independent SARS-CoV-2 virus entry through cell surface GRP78 on monocytes—evidence from a translational clinical and experimental approach. EBioMedicine. 2023; 98: 104869.

[28] Lin T, Lee JE, Kang JW, Shin HY, Lee JB, Jin DI. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and unfolded protein response (UPR) in mammalian oocyte maturation and preimplantation embryo development. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(2): 409.

[29] Zheng X, Chen Y, Yan J, et al. Effect of repeated cryopreservation on human embryo developmental potential. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35(6): 627-632.

[30] Davidson LM, Liu Y, Griffiths T, Jones C, Coward K. Laser technology in the ART laboratory: a narrative review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38(5): 725-739.

[31] Aljahdali A, Airina R, Velazquez MA, et al. The duration of embryo culture after mouse IVF differentially affects cardiovascular and metabolic health in male offspring. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England). 2020; 35(11): 2497-2514.

[32] Wang M, Xi Q, Yang Q, et al. The relationship between a novel evaluation parameter of premature luteinization and IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 42(2): 323-331.

[33] Zhu L, Xi Q, Zhang H, Li Y, Ai J, Jin L. Blastocyst culture and cryopreservation to optimize clinical outcomes of warming cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 27(2): 154-160.

[34] Wang M, Yang Q, Ren X, et al. Investigating the impact of asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection on female fertility and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 38: 101013.

[35] Chen T, Chen X, Zhang S, et al. The genome sequence archive family: toward explosive data growth and diverse data types. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2021; 19(4): 578-583.

[36] CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(D1): D18-D32.

[37] Li Y, Liu C, Guo N, et al. Extracellular vesicles from human fallopian tubal fluid benefit embryo development in vitro. Hum Reprod Open. 2023; 2023(2): hoad006.

[38] Li W, Liao X, Lin K, et al. Earlier second polar body transfer and further mitochondrial carryover removal for potential mitochondrial replacement therapy. MedComm. 2023; 4(3): e217.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). MedComm published by Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association (SCIMEA) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.