Role of durotomy on function outcome, tissue sparing, inflammation, and tissue stiffness after spinal cord injury in rats

Chen Jin1,2, Kaiwei Wang1, Yilong Ren1,3, Yi Li1, Zhanwei Wang1, Liming Cheng1(), Ning Xie1()

PDF
MedComm ›› 2024, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : e530. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.530
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Role of durotomy on function outcome, tissue sparing, inflammation, and tissue stiffness after spinal cord injury in rats

  • Chen Jin1,2, Kaiwei Wang1, Yilong Ren1,3, Yi Li1, Zhanwei Wang1, Liming Cheng1(), Ning Xie1()
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Currently, there is a lack of effective treatments for spinal cord injury (SCI), a debilitating medical condition associated with enduring paralysis and irreversible neuronal damage. Extradural decompression of osseous as well as soft tissue components has historically been the principal objective of surgical procedures. Nevertheless, this particular surgical procedure fails to tackle the intradural compressive alterations that contribute to secondary SCI. Here, we propose an early intrathecal decompression strategy and evaluate its role on function outcome, tissue sparing, inflammation, and tissue stiffness after SCI. Durotomy surgery significantly promoted recovery of hindlimb locomotor function in an open-field test. Radiological analysis suggested that lesion size and tissue edema were significantly reduced in animals that received durotomy. Relative to the group with laminectomy alone, the animals treated with a durotomy had decreased cavitation, scar formation, and inflammatory responses at 4 weeks after SCI. An examination of the mechanical properties revealed that durotomy facilitated an expeditious restoration of the injured tissue's elastic rigidity. In general, early decompressive durotomy could serve as a significant strategy to mitigate the impairments caused by secondary injury and establish a more conducive microenvironment for prospective cellular or biomaterial transplantation.

Keywords

decompression / durotomy / functional recovery / secondary injuries / Spinal cord injury

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chen Jin, Kaiwei Wang, Yilong Ren, Yi Li, Zhanwei Wang, Liming Cheng, Ning Xie. Role of durotomy on function outcome, tissue sparing, inflammation, and tissue stiffness after spinal cord injury in rats. MedComm, 2024, 5(4): e530 https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.530

References

1 M Khorasanizadeh, M Yousefifard, M Eskian, et al. Neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(5):1-17.
2 X Hu, W Xu, Y Ren, et al. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):245.
3 R Zheng, Y Fan, B Guan, et al. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal cord injury. Spine J. 2023;23(12):1739-1749.
4 N Hejrati, MG Fehlings. A review of emerging neuroprotective and neuroregenerative therapies in traumatic spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2021;60:331-340.
5 A Anjum, MD Yazid, M Fauzi Daud, et al. Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, multimolecular interactions, and underlying recovery mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7533.
6 A Alizadeh, SM Dyck, S Karimi-Abdolrezaee. Traumatic spinal cord injury: an overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms. Front Neurol. 2019;10:282.
7 TH Lin, P Sun, M Hallman, et al. Noninvasive quantification of axonal loss in the presence of tissue swelling in traumatic spinal cord injury mice. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(15):2308-2315.
8 C Yang, T He, Q Wang, et al. Elevated intraspinal pressure drives edema progression after acute compression spinal cord injury in rabbits. Exp Neurol. 2022;357:114206.
9 F Streijger, K So, N Manouchehri, et al. Changes in pressure, hemodynamics, and metabolism within the spinal cord during the first 7 days after injury using a porcine model. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(24):3336-3350.
10 MC Werndle, S Saadoun, I Phang, et al. Monitoring of spinal cord perfusion pressure in acute spinal cord injury: initial findings of the injured spinal cord pressure evaluation study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(3):646-655.
11 ZZ Khaing, LN Cates, AE Fischedick, AM McClintic, PD Mourad, CP Hofstetter. Temporal and spatial evolution of raised intraspinal pressure after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(3):645-651.
12 XJ Cao, SQ Feng, CF Fu, et al. Repair, protection and regeneration of spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10(12):1953-1975.
13 GV Varsos, MC Werndle, ZH Czosnyka, et al. Intraspinal pressure and spinal cord perfusion pressure after spinal cord injury: an observational study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(6):763-771.
14 I Phang, MC Papadopoulos. Intraspinal pressure monitoring in a patient with spinal cord injury reveals different intradural compartments: injured spinal cord pressure evaluation (ISCoPE) study. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(3):414-418.
15 FRA Hogg, MJ Gallagher, S Chen, A Zoumprouli, MC Papadopoulos, S Saadoun. Predictors of intraspinal pressure and optimal cord perfusion pressure after traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(2):421-428.
16 CH Yang, ZX Quan, GJ Wang, et al. Elevated intraspinal pressure in traumatic spinal cord injury is a promising therapeutic target. Neural Regen Res. 2022;17(8):1703-1710.
17 F Zhu, S Yao, Z Ren, et al. Early durotomy with duroplasty for severe adult spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality: a novel concept and method of surgical decompression. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(10):2275-2282.
18 FRA Hogg, S Kearney, A Zoumprouli, et al. Acute spinal cord injury: correlations and causal relations between intraspinal pressure, spinal cord perfusion pressure, lactate-to-pyruvate ratio, and limb power. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(1):121-129.
19 CS Ahuja, JH Badhiwala, MG Fehlings. Time is spine‘’: the importance of early intervention for traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2020;58(9):1037-1039.
20 JR Wilson, LA Tetreault, BK Kwon, et al. Timing of decompression in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Global Spine J. 2017;7:95-115.
21 MG Fehlings, A Vaccaro, JR Wilson, et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the surgical timing in acute spinal cord injury study (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037.
22 JH Badhiwala, JR Wilson, CD Witiw, et al. The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(2):117-126.
23 M Yousefifard, B Hashemi, MM Forouzanfar, R Khatamian Oskooi, A Madani Neishaboori, R Jalili Khoshnoud. Ultraearly spinal decompression surgery can improve neurological outcome of complete cervical spinal cord injury; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022;10(1):e11.
24 JS Smith, R Anderson, T Pham, N Bhatia, O Steward, R Gupta. Role of early surgical decompression of the intradural space after cervical spinal cord injury in an animal model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(5):1206-1214.
25 J Zhang, H Wang, C Zhang, W Li. Intrathecal decompression versus epidural decompression in the treatment of severe spinal cord injury in rat model: a randomized, controlled preclinical research. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:34.
26 D Jalan, N Saini, M Zaidi, A Pallottie, S Elkabes, RF Heary. Effects of early surgical decompression on functional and histological outcomes after severe experimental thoracic spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26(1):62-75.
27 BK Kwon, W Tetzlaff, JN Grauer, J Beiner, AR Vaccaro. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J. 2004;4(4):451-464.
28 JW McDonald, C Sadowsky. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 2002;359(9304):417-425.
29 F Miyanji, JC Furlan, B Aarabi, PM Arnold, MG Fehlings. Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: mR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome–prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243(3):820-827.
30 S Saadoun, BA Bell, AS Verkman, MC Papadopoulos. Greatly improved neurological outcome after spinal cord compression injury in AQP4-deficient mice. Brain. 2008;131(4):1087-1098. Pt.
31 IR Griffiths, R Miller. Vascular permeability to protein and vasogenic oedema in experimental concussive injuries to the canine spinal cord. J Neurol Sci. 1974;22(3):291-304.
32 MT Fitch, C Doller, CK Combs, GE Landreth, J Silver. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of glial scarring and progressive cavitation: in vivo and in vitro analysis of inflammation-induced secondary injury after CNS trauma. J Neurosci. 1999;19(19):8182-8198.
33 E Moeendarbary, IP Weber, GK Sheridan, et al. The soft mechanical signature of glial scars in the central nervous system. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14787.
34 S Rammensee, MS Kang, K Georgiou, S Kumar, DV Schaffer. Dynamics of mechanosensitive neural stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells. 2017;35(2):497-506.
35 ND Leipzig, MS Shoichet. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials. 2009;30(36):6867-6878.
36 AJ Engler, S Sen, HL Sweeney, DE Discher. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126(4):677-689.
37 MG Haugh, TJ Vaughan, CM Madl, et al. Investigating the interplay between substrate stiffness and ligand chemistry in directing mesenchymal stem cell differentiation within 3D macro-porous substrates. Biomaterials. 2018;171:23-33.
38 WJ Hadden, JL Young, AW Holle, et al. Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(22):5647-5652.
39 AP Balgude, X Yu, A Szymanski, RV Bellamkonda. Agarose gel stiffness determines rate of DRG neurite extension in 3D cultures. Biomaterials. 2001;22(10):1077-1084.
40 LA Flanagan, YE Ju, B Marg, M Osterfield, PA Janmey. Neurite branching on deformable substrates. Neuroreport. 2002;13(18):2411-2415.
41 D Koch, WJ Rosoff, J Jiang, HM Geller, JS Urbach. Strength in the periphery: growth cone biomechanics and substrate rigidity response in peripheral and central nervous system neurons. Biophys J. 2012;102(3):452-460.
42 CA Grant, PC Twigg, DJ Tobin. Static and dynamic nanomechanical properties of human skin tissue using atomic force microscopy: effect of scarring in the upper dermis. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(11):4123-4129.
43 M Camlar, ? Turk, A Buhur, et al. Does decompressive duroplasty have a neuroprotective effect on spinal trauma?: an experimental study. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:288-294.
44 LE Bilston, LE Thibault. The mechanical properties of the human cervical spinal cord in vitro. Ann Biomed Eng. 1996;24(1):67-74.
45 RJ Oakland, RM Hall, RK Wilcox, DC Barton. The biomechanical response of spinal cord tissue to uniaxial loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006;220(4):489-492.
46 EC Clarke, S Cheng, LE Bilston. The mechanical properties of neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro, and comparisons with adult. J Biomech. 2009;42(10):1397-1402.
47 K Ichihara, T Taguchi, Y Shimada, I Sakuramoto, S Kawano, S Kawai. Gray matter of the bovine cervical spinal cord is mechanically more rigid and fragile than the white matter. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18(3):361-367.
48 H Metz, J McElhaney, AK Ommaya. A comparison of the elasticity of live, dead, and fixed brain tissue. J Biomech. 1970;3(4):453-458.
49 CD Etz, G Di Luozzo, S Zoli, et al. Direct spinal cord perfusion pressure monitoring in extensive distal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(6):1764-1773.
50 DM Basso, MS Beattie, JC Bresnahan. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12(1):1-21.
51 JF Talbott, WD Whetstone, WJ Readdy, et al. The brain and spinal injury center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(4):495-504.
52 C Zhang, VKH Lee, JML Yu, JPY Cheung, PA Koljonen, GKH Shea. Length of cervical stenosis, admission ASIA motor scores, and BASIC scores are predictors of recovery rate following central cord syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(3):212-219.
53 C Jin, R Zhu, ML Xu, et al. Effect of velocity and contact stress area on the dynamic behavior of the spinal cord under different testing conditions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:762555.
54 TP Prevost, G Jin, MA de Moya, HB Alam, S Suresh, S Socrate. Dynamic mechanical response of brain tissue in indentation in vivo, in situ and in vitro. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(12):4090-4101.
55 WC Hayes, LM Keer, G Herrmann, LF Mockros. A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. J Biomech. 1972;5(5):541-551.
56 JG Cooper, D Sicard, S Sharma, et al. Spinal cord injury results in chronic mechanical stiffening. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(3):494-506.
57 HJ Baumann, G Mahajan, TR Ham, et al. Softening of the chronic hemi-section spinal cord injury scar parallels dysregulation of cellular and extracellular matrix content. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103953.
58 T Saxena, J Gilbert, D Stelzner, J Hasenwinkel. Mechanical characterization of the injured spinal cord after lateral spinal hemisection injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(9):1747-1757.
59 CJ Sparrey, GT Manley, TM Keaveny. Effects of white, grey, and pia mater properties on tissue level stresses and strains in the compressed spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(4):585-595.
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/