Transcriptomic analysis of rat brain response to alternating current electrical stimulation: unveiling insights via single-nucleus RNA sequencing

Abstract

Electrical brain stimulation (EBS) has gained popularity for laboratory and clinical applications. However, comprehensive characterization of cellular diversity and gene expression changes induced by EBS remains limited, particularly with respect to specific brain regions and stimulation sites. Here, we presented the initial single-nucleus RNA sequencing profiles of rat cortex, hippocampus, and thalamus subjected to intracranial alternating current stimulation (iACS) at 40 Hz. The results demonstrated an increased number of neurons in all three regions in response to iACS. Interestingly, less than 0.1% of host gene expression in neurons was significantly altered by iACS. In addition, we identified Rgs9, a known negative regulator of dopaminergic signaling, as a unique downregulated gene in neurons. Unilateral iACS produced a more focused local effect in attenuating the proportion of Rgs9+ neurons in the ipsilateral compared to bilateral iACS treatment. The results suggested that unilateral iACS at 40 Hz was an efficient approach to increase the number of neurons and downregulate Rgs9 gene expression without affecting other cell types or genes in the brain. Our study presented the direct evidence that EBS could boost cerebral neurogenesis and enhance neuronal sensitization to dopaminergic drugs and agonists, through its downregulatory effect on Rgs9 in neurons.

Keywords

cell-type-specific response / gene expression change / intracranial alternating current stimulation / neuron / single-nucleus RNA sequencing

References

1	M Wischnewski, I Alekseichuk, A Opitz. Neurocognitive, physiological, and biophysical effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2023;27(2):189-205.
2	N Grossman, D Bono, N Dedic, et al. Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields. Cell. 2017;169(6):1029-1041.e1016.
3	AC Paulk, R Zelmann, B Crocker, et al. Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters. Brain Stimul. 2022;15(2):491-508.
4	EA Mosilhy, EE Alshial, MM Eltaras, et al. Non-invasive transcranial brain modulation for neurological disorders treatment: a narrative review. Life Sci. 2022;307:120869.
5	A Antal, B Luber, AK Brem, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2022;7:146-165.
6	A Menardi, S Rossi, G Koch, et al. Toward noninvasive brain stimulation 2.0 in Alzheimer's disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;75:101555.
7	J Peeters, A Boogers, T Van Bogaert, et al. Electrophysiologic evidence that directional deep brain stimulation activates distinct neural circuits in patients with Parkinson disease. Neuromodulation. 2023;26(2):403-413.
8	Y Liu, C Tang, K Wei, et al. Transcranial alternating current stimulation combined with sound stimulation improves the cognitive function of patients with Alzheimer's disease: a case report and literature review. Front Neurol. 2022;13:962684.
9	L Pini, FB Pizzini, I Boscolo-Galazzo, et al. Brain network modulation in Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia with transcranial electrical stimulation. Neurobiol Aging. 2022;111:24-34.
10	M Dhaynaut, G Sprugnoli, D Cappon, et al. Impact of 40 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation on cerebral Tau burden in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a case series. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85(4):1667-1676.
11	LC Wang, WY Wei, PC Ho. Short-term cortical electrical stimulation during the acute stage of traumatic brain injury improves functional recovery. Biomedicines. 2022;10(8):1965.
12	K Yuan, CE Ti, X Wang, et al. Individual electric field predicts functional connectivity changes after anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation in chronic stroke. Neurosci Res. 2023;186:21-32.
13	G Hsu, AD Shereen, LG Cohen, LC Parra. Robust enhancement of motor sequence learning with 4 mA transcranial electric stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2022;16(1):56-67.
14	F Hyldahl, E Hem-Jensen, UL Rahbek, K Tritsaris, S Dissing. Pulsed electric fields stimulate microglial transmitter release of VEGF, IL-8 and GLP-1 and activate endothelial cells through paracrine signaling. Neurochem Int. 2023;163:105469.
15	AJ Martorell, AL Paulson, HJ Suk, et al. Multi-sensory gamma stimulation ameliorates Alzheimer's-associated pathology and improves cognition. Cell. 2019;177(2):256-271.e222.
16	HF Iaccarino, AC Singer, AJ Martorell, et al. Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature. 2016;540(7632):230-235.
17	C Adaikkan, SJ Middleton, A Marco, et al. Gamma entrainment binds higher-order brain regions and offers neuroprotection. Neuron. 2019;102(5):929-943.e928.
18	M Soula, A Martin-Avila, Y Zhang, et al. Forty-hertz light stimulation does not entrain native gamma oscillations in Alzheimer's disease model mice. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26(4):570-578.
19	NR Nissim, DVH Pham, T Poddar, E Blutt, RH Hamilton. The impact of gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cognitive and memory processes in patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease: a literature review. Brain Stimul. 2023;16(3):748-755.
20	M Voroslakos, Y Takeuchi, K Brinyiczki, et al. Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):483.
21	Q Liu, Y Jiao, W Yang, et al. Intracranial alternating current stimulation facilitates neurogenesis in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12(1):89.
22	Q Liu, A Contreras, MS Afaq, et al. Intensity-dependent gamma electrical stimulation regulates microglial activation, reduces beta-amyloid load, and facilitates memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):138.
23	H Mathys, J Davila-Velderrain, Z Peng, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2019;570(7761):332-337.
24	EJ Armand, J Li, F Xie, C Luo, EA Mukamel. Single-cell sequencing of brain cell transcriptomes and epigenomes. Neuron. 2021;109(1):11-26.
25	GR Anderson, R Lujan, A Semenov, et al. Expression and localization of RGS9-2/G 5/R7BP complex in vivo is set by dynamic control of its constitutive degradation by cellular cysteine proteases. J Neurosci. 2007;27(51):14117-14127.
26	V Mitsi, D Terzi, I Purushothaman, et al. RGS9-2–controlled adaptations in the striatum determine the onset of action and efficacy of antidepressants in neuropathic pain states. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(36):E5088-E5097.
27	ME Feigin, CC Malbon. RGS19 regulates Wnt-beta-catenin signaling through inactivation of Galpha(o). J Cell Sci. 2007;120(pt 19):3404-3414.
28	Q Liu, V Telezhkin, W Jiang, et al. Electric field stimulation boosts neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells for spinal cord injury treatment via PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta/beta-catenin activation. Cell Biosci. 2023;13(1):4.
29	FDA. FDA Approves Brain Implant to Help Reduce Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor Symptoms. Retrieved May 23, 2016.
30	D Ukueberuwa, EM Wassermann. Direct current brain polarization: a simple, noninvasive technique for human neuromodulation. Neuromodulation. 2010;13(3):168-173.
31	MR Krause, PG Vieira, JP Thivierge, CC Pack. Brain stimulation competes with ongoing oscillations for control of spike timing in the primate brain. PLoS Biol. 2022;20(5):e3001650.
32	B Asamoah, A Khatoun, M Mc Laughlin. tACS motor system effects can be caused by transcutaneous stimulation of peripheral nerves. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):266.
33	F Sakloth, C Polizu, F Bertherat, V Zachariou. Regulators of G protein signaling in analgesia and addiction. Mol Pharmacol. 2020;98(6):739-750.
34	P Bonsi, G Ponterio, V Vanni, et al. RGS9-2 rescues dopamine D2 receptor levels and signaling in DYT1 dystonia mouse models. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(1):e9283.
35	MJ Clark, C Harrison, H Zhong, RR Neubig, JR Traynor. Endogenous RGS protein action modulates mu-opioid signaling through Galphao. Effects on adenylyl cyclase, extracellular signal-regulated kinases, and intracellular calcium pathways. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(11):9418-9425.
36	TM Cabrera-Vera, S Hernandez, LR Earls, et al. RGS9-2 modulates D2 dopamine receptor-mediated Ca2+ channel inhibition in rat striatal cholinergic interneurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(46):16339-16344.
37	JF Feng, J Liu, L Zhang, et al. Electrical guidance of human stem cells in the rat brain. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9(1):177-189.
38	JF Feng, J Liu, XZ Zhang, et al. Guided migration of neural stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells by an electric field. Stem Cells. 2012;30(2):349-355.
39	G Paxinos, C Watson, The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates: hard cover edition. Online via Elsevier. 2006.
40	FA Wolf, P Angerer, FJ Theis. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):15.