Lightweight ultra-high performance concrete prepared with the waste fraction of sintered shale pottery sand: preparation, mechanical properties, and material selection method
Jian Yang , Xiaolong Li , Xilun Ma , Xiangguo Wu , Junwei Luo , Kai Luo
Low-carbon Materials and Green Construction ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 32
Lightweight ultra-high performance concrete prepared with the waste fraction of sintered shale pottery sand: preparation, mechanical properties, and material selection method
To address the high construction difficulty and cost resulting from the heavy self-weight of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) skeletons in the construction of long-span arch bridges, as well as the ineffective utilization of 0–3 mm waste fraction of sintered shale pottery sand —which leads to resource waste and environmental pollution when stockpiled—this study employed an experimental approach combining the close packing and over slurry theories to determine the optimal mix proportion for lightweight ultra-high performance concrete (LUHPC) incorporating 0–3 mm waste fraction of 800/700-grade sintered shale pottery sand. LUHPC exhibited excellent properties. With a volume fraction of 3% straight-round steel fibers, the compressive strength was 147.7 MPa, the tensile strength was 17.4 MPa, and the elastic modulus was 49.9 GPa. All groups achieved a slump flow of at least 220 mm, meeting the requirements for self-compacting. The apparent density ranged from 1.943 to 2.178 g/cm3, 22.2%–30.6% lower than that of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis showed that the waste fraction of 800-grade sintered shale pottery sand provided better internal curing than that of 700-grade sand, thereby improving its mechanical performance. The addition of irregular steel fibers (end-hooked and wavy) enhanced tensile strength, but reduced flow properties and other mechanical properties. Analyses of carbon emissions and economics indicated that LUHPC with the waste fraction of 700- and 800-grade sintered shale pottery sand reduced emissions by 21.0% and 24.1%, and raw material costs by 42.9% and 45.0%, respectively, compared with conventional UHPC. Finally, a method integrating combined weighting and grey relational analysis was proposed to evaluate multiple performance criteria and select the optimal mix proportion, providing decision support for various engineering applications.
Lightweight ultra-high performance concrete (LUHPC) / Sintered shale lightweight aggregate / Evolution of microstructure and hydration / Carbon emissions / Grey relational analysis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Savor, Z., Jelena, B. (2008). From Melan patent to arch bridges of 400 m spans, Chinese-Croatian Joint Colloquium on Long Arch Bridges, 349–356. |
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
Guo, K. Z., Ge, J. C., Ding, Q. J., et al. (2021). Preparation and formation mechanism of lightweight ultra-high performance concrete, J. Chin. Ceram. Soc, 49(02) 381–390. https://doi.org/10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20200369 |
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
Feng, N. Q., Ma, Z. X., Lin, Z. L., (2022). Multi-functional concrete technology. China Architecture & Building Press. |
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
T/CECS 864–2021. Standard for Test Methods of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, (2021). |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Zhou, X. W. (2020). Effects and mechanisms of manufactured sand on rheological propeties of cement mortar. Southeast University of China. https://doi.org/10.27014/d.cnki.gdnau.2020.001248 |
| [34] |
GB/T 2419–2005. Standard for Test Method of Cement Mortar Flowability. China National Standard. Beijing: Standards Press of China, (2005). |
| [35] |
DB13/T 2946–2019. Technical Specification for Preparation and Engineering Application of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Hebei Provincial Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Science and Technology Publishing House, (2019). |
| [36] |
Yang, J., Li, Y., Chen, B. C., Xu, G., Huang, Q. W. (2024). Study on uniaxial tensile test method and constitutive. Materials Reports, 38, 22110263. https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.22110263 |
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
Tharun, M., & Senthil Kumar, G. (2017). Compressive and flexural behaviour of ultra high performance concrete with hybrid steel fiber, J. Ind. Pollut. Control, 33(S3), 1364–1369. |
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
Xue, G. J., Wang, C. L., Zhang, J. M., et al. (2021). Influence of steel fiber shape on the performance of high-performance concrete. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin., 38(12), 4313–4324. https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210210.003 |
| [46] |
Yang, J., Chen, B. C., Su, J. Z., et al. (2022). Effects of fibers on the mechanical properties of UHPC: a review. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (Engl. Ed.), 9(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2022.05.001 |
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
Wang, J. Y., Yu, X. Q., Zhou, T. (2024) Axial tensile properties of ultra-high performance concrete mixed with lightweight sand, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 56 (2), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.11918/202211080 |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
Zhang, X. H. (2025). Preparation and performance of lightweight ultra-high performance concrete based on response surface method. Qingdao University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.27263/d.cnki.gqudc.2025.000550 |
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
Huang, X. X., Huang, Z. C., Zhou, Y. W., et al. (2025). Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of LC3 concrete considering sustainability and uncertainty. J. Build. Eng, 102, 111960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.111960 |
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Zhou, X. X., Zhang, X. R., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Life cycle assessment of asphalt and cement pavements: Comparative cases in Shanxi Province. Constr. Build. Mater, 315, 125738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125738 |
| [60] |
Cao, Y. Y., Qu, S., Zheng, H. R., et al. (2023). Allocating China's CO2 emissions based on economic welfare gains from environmental externalities. Environmental Science and Technology,57(20), 7709–7720. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00044 |
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
Yang, S. Y., Shu, Y., Xu, P. P., et al. (2024). Evaluation of repair concrete mix proportion based on maximum deviation grey correlation. Materials Guide, 38(06), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.22040151 |
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
Yang, S. Y., Xu, P. P., Song, J. J., et al. (2024). Evaluation on proportion of repair concrete based on maximum deviation and grey relational analysis. Materials Reports, 38(6), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.11896/cldb.22040151 |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |