Embodied carbon costs of prefabricated substation buildings

Abstract

Exploring the economic impacts of embodied carbon emissions is significant for achieving sustainable development in construction projects. However, the quantitative assessment of carbon costs in prefabricated buildings remains lacking. Therefore, this study proposes a method to assess the embodied carbon costs of prefabricated building projects. First, this method clarifies the boundary scope of embodied carbon. After obtaining the PCXML bill of quantities through building information modeling (BIM), it quantifies embodied carbon emissions. Then, the corresponding damage carbon costs are calculated through a monetary valuation model (ReCiPe). Finally, interpretation and optimizations are carried out. In the case study of a prefabricated substation, its embodied carbon costs are concentrated in the raw material production stage (74.4%), while using renewable concrete and renewable steel bars can reduce carbon costs by 21.6%. The case results also show that embodied carbon emissions exacerbate human malnutrition, and its carbon cost ranks first among various damages (42.7%). By evaluating the embodied carbon costs of prefabricated substations, this study helps project stakeholders comprehensively understand the external diseconomy of carbon emissions.

Keywords

Prefabricated buildings / Electrical substations / Embodied carbon / Carbon cost / Life cycle assessment / Sustainable development

References

[1] Clarke J, Searle J. Active building demonstrators for a low-carbon future. Nature Energy, 2021, 6(12): 1087-1089

[2] Nordhaus WD. Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(7): 1518-1523

[3] Ricke K, Drouet L, Caldeira K, Tavoni M. Country-level social cost of carbon. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8(10): 895-900

[4] Huang Z, Zhou H, Tang H, Zhao Y, Lin B. Carbon emissions of prefabricated steel structure components: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 406 137047

[5] Kechidi S, Banks N. Minimising upfront carbon emissions of steel-framed modular housing: A case study. Journal Of Building Engineering, 2023, 72 106707

[6] Li CZ, Tam VW, Lai X, Zhou Y, Guo S. Carbon footprint accounting of prefabricated buildings: A circular economy perspective. Building And Environment, 2024, 258 111602

[7] Xiang Y, Mahamadu AM, Florez-Perez L, Wu Y. Design optimisation towards lower embodied carbon of prefabricated buildings: Balancing standardisation and customisation. Developments in the Built Environment, 2024, 18 100413

[8] Tavares V, Soares N, Raposo N, Marques P, Freire F. Prefabricated versus conventional construction: Comparing life-cycle impacts of alternative structural materials. Journal Of Building Engineering, 2021, 41 102705

[9] Han Q, Chang J, Liu G, Zhang H. The carbon emission assessment of a building with different prefabrication rates in the construction stage. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(4): 2366

[10] Teng Y, Li K, Pan W, Ng T. Reducing building life cycle carbon emissions through prefabrication: Evidence from and gaps in empirical studies. Building and Environment, 2018, 132: 125-136

[11] Mao C, Shen Q, Shen L, Tang L. Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects. Energy and Buildings, 2013, 66: 165-176

[12] Dong YH, Jaillon L, Chu P, Poon CS. Comparing carbon emissions of precast and cast-in-situ construction methods - A case study of high-rise private building. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 99: 39-53

[13] Ji Y, Li K, Liu G, Shrestha A, Jing J. Comparing greenhouse gas emissions of precast in-situ and conventional construction methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 173: 124-134

[14] Pervez H, Ali Y, Petrillo A. A quantitative assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from conventional and modular construction: A case of developing country. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 294 126210

[15] Aye L, Ngo T, Crawford RH, Gammampila R, Mendis P. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules. Energy and Buildings, 2012, 47: 159-168

[16] Jang H, Ahn Y, Roh S. Comparison of the embodied carbon emissions and direct construction costs for modular and conventional residential buildings in South Korea. Buildings, 2022, 12(151

[17] Zhang X, Zhang X. Comparison and sensitivity analysis of embodied carbon emissions and costs associated with rural house construction in China to identify sustainable structural forms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 293 126190

[18] Alshamrani OS. Integrated LCA-LCC assessment model of offsite, onsite, and conventional construction systems. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2022, 21(52058-2080

[19] Jiang X, Bai X, Zhang Y, Lyu S, Xu E, Skitmore M. Analysis of carbon emissions reduction strategies for prefabricated buildings under cost constraints: A case study. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2025

[20] Lu K, Deng X. OpenBIM driven marginal abatement cost of low-carbon measures in building design. Applied Energy, 2025, 377 124477

[21] Lu K, Deng X. OpenBIM-based assessment for social cost of carbon through building life cycle. Sustainable Cities And Society, 2023, 99 104871

[22] Chen Y, Zhou Y, Feng W, Fang Y, Feng A. Factors that influence the quantification of the embodied carbon emission of prefabricated buildings: A systematic review, meta-analysis and the way forward. Buildings, 2022, 12(8): 1265

[23] Ahmad F, Qureshi MI, Rawat S, Alkharisi MK, Alturki M. E-waste in concrete construction: Recycling, applications, and impact on mechanical, durability, and thermal properties—a review. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2025, 10(6246

[24] Ahmad F, Rawat S, Yang RC, Zhang L, Zhang YX. Fire resistance and thermal performance of hybrid fibre-reinforced magnesium oxychloride cement-based composites. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 472 140867

[25] Rawat S, Saliba P, Estephan PC, Ahmad F, Zhang Y. Mechanical performance of hybrid fibre reinforced magnesium oxychloride cement-based composites at ambient and elevated temperature. Buildings, 2024, 14(1270

[26] Pizzol M, Weidema B, Brandão M, Osset P. Monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 86: 170-179

[27] Isacs L, Finnveden G, Dahllöf L, Håkansson C, Petersson L, Steen B, Swanström L, Wikström A. Choosing a monetary value of greenhouse gases in assessment tools: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 127: 37-48

[28] Lu K, Deng X. Comprehensive carbon cost of building projects: Optimization and relationship. Building and Environment, 2025, 280 113157

[29] Trinks A, Mulder M, Scholtens B. External carbon costs and internal carbon pricing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 168 112780

[30] Tol RSJ. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(162064-2074

[31] Dong Y, Hauschild M, Sørup H, Rousselet R, Fantke P. Evaluating the monetary values of greenhouse gases emissions in life cycle impact assessment. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 2019, 209: 538-549

[32] Gerilla GP, Teknomo K, Hokao K. An environmental assessment of wood and steel reinforced concrete housing construction. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(7): 2778-2784

[33] Sathre R, Gustavsson L. Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change. Applied Energy, 2009, 86(2): 251-257

[34] Wen R, Qi S, Jrade A. Simulation and assessment of whole life-cycle carbon emission flows from different residential structures. Sustainability, 2016, 8(8): 807

[35] Zhang Y. Taking the time characteristic into account of life cycle assessment: Method and application for buildings. Sustainability, 2017, 9(6922

[36] Nydahl H, Andersson S, Åstrand AP, Olofsson T. Including future climate induced cost when assessing building refurbishment performance. Energy and Buildings, 2019, 203 109428

[37] Trovato MR, Nocera F, Giuffrida S. Life-cycle assessment and monetary measurements for the carbon footprint reduction of public buildings. Sustainability, 2020, 12(8 1597

[38] Schneider-Marin P, Lang W. Environmental costs of buildings: Monetary valuation of ecological indicators for the building industry. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25(91637-1659

[39] Kania G, Kwiecień K, Malinowski M, Gliniak M. Analyses of the life cycles and social costs of CO2 emissions of single-family residential buildings: A case study in Poland. Sustainability, 2021, 13(11): 6164

[40] Luo W, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Liu Y, Shi C, Wang Y. Life cycle carbon cost of buildings under carbon trading and carbon tax system in China. Sustainable Cities And Society, 2021, 66 102509

[41] Nydahl H, Andersson S, Åstrand AP, Olofsson T. Extended building life cycle cost assessment with the inclusion of monetary evaluation of climate risk and opportunities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 76 103451

[42] Schneider-Marin P, Lang W. A temporal perspective in Eco2 building design. Sustainability, 2022, 14(106025

[43] Nasab TJ, Monavari SM, Jozi SA, Majedi H. Development of an environmental life cycle cost model for high-rise construction in Tehran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2022, 19(109873-9882

[44] Nematchoua MK, Sendrahasina RM, Malmedy C, Orosa JA, Simo E, Reiter S. Analysis of environmental impacts and costs of a residential building over its entire life cycle to achieve nearly zero energy and low emission objectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 373 133834

[45] Scherz M, Kreiner H, Alaux N, Passer A. Transition of the procurement process to Paris-compatible buildings: Consideration of environmental life cycle costing in tendering and awarding. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28(7): 843-861

[46] Ramon D, Allacker K. Optimizing building solutions in a changing climate: Parameter-based analysis of embodied and operational environmental impacts. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 2023, 3(4 045010

[47] Tanthanawiwat K, Gheewala SH, Nilsalab P, Schoch M, Silalertruksa T. Environmental sustainability and cost performances of construction and demolition waste management scenarios: A case study of timber and concrete houses in Thailand. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 2024, 436 140652

[48] Sedghi Moghadam A, Mashayekhi M, Sarcheshmehpour M. Environmental life cycle costs of steel moment frames utilizing endurance time method. Structures, 2024, 62 106207

[49] Labar B, Bektaş N, Kegyes-Brassai O. Enhancing seismic performance: A comprehensive study on masonry and reinforced concrete structures considering soil properties and environmental impact assessment. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2024, 2024: 4505901

[50] ISO. (2006). Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework (ISO 14040). International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html

[51] Ding Z, Liu S, Luo L, Liao L. A building information modeling-based carbon emission measurement system for prefabricated residential buildings during the materialization phase. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 264 121728

[52] Hao JL, Cheng B, Lu W, Xu J, Wang J, Bu W, Guo Z. Carbon emission reduction in prefabrication construction during materialization stage: A BIM-based life-cycle assessment approach. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 723 137870

[53] Gao Y, Wang J, Yiu TW. Multi-information integration-based life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions for prefabricated construction: A case study of Shenzhen. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2024, 104 107330

[54] Xu J, Zhang Q, Teng Y, Pan W. Integrating IoT and BIM for tracking and visualising embodied carbon of prefabricated buildings. Building and Environment, 2023, 242 110492

[55] Li X, Jiang M, Lin C, Chen R, Weng M, Jim CY. Integrated BIM-IoT platform for carbon emission assessment and tracking in prefabricated building materialization. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2025, 215 108122

[56] Wang H, Zhang Y, Gao W, Kuroki S. Life cycle environmental and cost performance of prefabricated buildings. Sustainability, 2020, 12(7): 2609

[57] Zhang C, Hu M, Yang X, Amati A, Tukker A. Life cycle greenhouse gas emission and cost analysis of prefabricated concrete building façade elements. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2020, 24(51016-1030

[58] Gan VJL. BIM-based building geometric modeling and automatic generative design for sustainable offsite construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2022, 148(1004022111

[59] Guo F, Zhang Y, Chang C, Yu Y. Carbon Emissions of Assembly Buildings Constrained by Flexible Resource: A Study on Cost Optimization. Buildings, 2023, 13(190

[60] Haie H, Mingrong L, Juncen Z. Research on cost and carbon reduction using the optimization of composite slabs modules based on BIM technology. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(131982

[61] Su S, Li L, Sun A, Cao X, Yuan J. How to combine different types of prefabricated components in a building to reduce construction costs and carbon emissions?. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 98 111114

[62] Xie F, Wu Y, Zhou X, Zhang S. Analysis of standard unit carbon emission and cost assessment of the changing building envelope over material production phase. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 928 172382

[63] ISO. (2022). Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works — Framework for methods of assessment of the environmental, social and economic performance of construction works as a basis for sustainability assessment — Part 1: Buildings (ISO 21931–1). International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/71183.html

[64] YJK. (2024). YJK building structural design software. YJK Building Software. https://www.yjk.cn/jgrj/

[65] Autodesk. (2024). Autodesk Revit. Autodesk. https://www.autodesk.com.cn/products/revit/overview

[66] BUZZ. (2024). BeePC. BUZZ Technology. http://www.wengwengkeji.com/

[67] Shanghai Construction Project Quality Management Association. (2023). Intelligent construction prefabricated components - Standards for production and design data exchange (T/SCQA 426-2024). China Association Standards. http://www.gczlsh.com/DesktopModules/HT/chinese/xinwen/xiehuidt.aspx

[68] Lu K, Deng X, Zhang Y, Jiang X, Cheng B, Tam VWY. Extensible carbon emission factor database: Empirical study for the Chinese construction industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023

[69] PRé Sustainability. (2022). ReCiPe. Retrieved 2011–06–06 from https://pre-sustainability.com/articles/recipe/

[70] ISO. (2019). Monetary valuation of environmental impacts and related environmental aspects (ISO 14008). International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/43243.html

[71] Gao X, Chen X, Lu K, Deng X. Monetizing environmental impacts into environmental costs during prefabricated building construction: A 5D BIM-enabled analysis. CivilEng, 2025, 6(3 36

[72] Guo Z, Wang Q, Zhao N, Dai R. Carbon emissions from buildings based on a life cycle analysis: Carbon reduction measures and effects of green building standards in China. Low-Carbon Materials and Green Construction, 2023, 1(19

[73] Lu K, Deng X, Jiang X, Cheng B, Tam VWY. A review on life cycle cost analysis of buildings based on building information modeling. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2023, 29(3268-288

[74] Elmousalami HH. Artificial intelligence and parametric construction cost estimate modeling: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2020, 146(1): 03119008-3119011

[75] Lu K, Deng X, Cheng B, Tam VWY. Commodity futures pricing of carbon policy costs in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management., 2025

[76] Guan, X., Xiao, J., Xia, B., Xiao, X., & Noguchi, T. (2025). Benchmarks for permanent carbon in low-carbon probabilistic design of concrete structures: A case study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 489, 144700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144700

[77] Xiao, J., Guan, X., Xia, B., Ding, T., Wang, Y., & Xiao, X. (2024). Exploration of low-carbon approximate probability design method for concrete structures. Chinese Science Bulletin, 69(27), 4137-4150. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-0549

[78] Nasir A, Butt F, Ahmad F. Enhanced mechanical and axial resilience of recycled plastic aggregate concrete reinforced with silica fume and fibers. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2025, 10(14

Funding

State Grid Fujian Economic Research Institute(SGFJJY00BDJS2400085)

Science and Technology Project of State Grid(5200-202456098A-1-1-ZN)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)